CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agrisynthesis...)
Jane,
I was figuring on the void being the universal source,
but am not really sure of what terminology to use at
this point. I know that it fells like the heavy
energy sin
Dear Gil--Please tell us who Frank Moody is.
Gil Robertson wrote:
> Is the Tree's "doorway" (as promoted by Frank Moody) involved?
>
> Gil
Jane,
I was figuring on the void being the universal source,
but am not really sure of what terminology to use at
this point. I know that it fells like the heavy
energy sinks (feminine) and the light energy rises
(masculine) and in the middle something new is
generated (son/product) so I guess i
Nature, nor the void?
Jane
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Shade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agrisynthesis...)
Jane,
A few months back there was a discussion about using
ch 15, 2002 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agrisynthesis...)
> I am familiar with research identifying some trees working as receiving
antenna
> and used a digital multimeter to see that this seems to be the case, but
have
> not come across any on them acting as a transmitt
as a nourishment
> for the tree at the same
> time that it is 'doing' what it always does? Isn't a
> tree always
> broadcasting in a sense?
>
> Jane
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anthony Nelson-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
ways does? Isn't a tree always
> broadcasting in a sense?
>
> Jane
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anthony Nelson-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:36 AM
> Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agr
ing in a sense?
Jane
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Nelson-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agrisynthesis...)
Chris - Yes, I get your point about taking over a tree to act as
Chris - Yes, I get your point about taking over a tree to act as a
broadcaster. My main thought, as a rather junior practictioner of T'ai
Chi - Chi Gung, was that the Chi has to come from somewhere and I'm not
really harming the natural environment as a whole in my practice by drawing
it in, esp
Tony,
>surely the whole point about Chi is that you
>cannot retain it; you may 'gather' it but it's only
>passing through.
I am hesitant to completely agree with that. It
certainly seems like there is a part of the energy
that you keep, and in fact the GrandMaster above me
(teacher's teacher a
Chris - surely the whole point about Chi is that you cannot retain it: you
may 'gather' it, but it's only passing through. Thus it can scarcely be
'parasitic' to obtain it from natural surroundings - it returns to them soon
enough ! Tony N-S.
11 matches
Mail list logo
