Dear gil, There is a very interesting anecdote of Frank Moody which may indicate that trees can not only act as transmitters , but also may have some extra form of consciousness than most people would attribute to them. The story goes like this: Frank was called in to see what was the problem in the 19 story Price Waterhouse building in Auckland. Staff absenteeism and illness was way above what you would reasonably expect. Initial indications led Frank to believe that the building had been built on a geopathic stress point, however this did not prove to be the case. He drew a diagram of the area and dowsed that the problem was emanating from a large tree that had been left in front of the building with a staghorn fern tied to it. Also the electricity main conduit ran through the roots of the tree. The deva of the tree was feeling pretty malevolent towards these people who were parasites in it's energy field. A short discussion with the deva indicated that if Frank removed the staghorn fern, tied some of the right coloured embroidery cottons, cut to the right lengths around the electrical conduit out of the transformer, the deva would be happy. The result was that after that everyone agreed that the building was a very pleasant environment to work in, and absenteeism was reduced to virtually nil. Just a few pieces of cotton in the most judicious place was enough to stop the radiation problems of the electromagnetic fields from the computers and to counteract the effects on the deva. Had you heard that story. Maybe you have some other of Frank Moody's exploits that you could share. Look forward to seeingyou again soon. James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gil Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:40 PM Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agrisynthesis...) > I am familiar with research identifying some trees working as receiving antenna > and used a digital multimeter to see that this seems to be the case, but have > not come across any on them acting as a transmitter, but do not question it > could be the case. Has anyone got some actual experiments to share or are we in > conjecture? > > Has anyone looked at the relationship between the particular tree and earth > energy occurrences? > > Is it speculated to be specie specific or location specific? > > How and where are the Preps placed? > > Is the Tree's "doorway" (as promoted by Frank Moody) involved? > > Gil > > jsherry wrote: > > > Hi Tony & Chris et al, > > I do not "get" how using a tree as a broadcaster would be "taking over a > > tree". Why wouldn't the preps act as a nourishment for the tree at the same > > time that it is 'doing' what it always does? Isn't a tree always > > broadcasting in a sense? > > > > Jane > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Anthony Nelson-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:36 AM > > Subject: Re: Gathering Chi (was re: agrisynthesis...) > > > > Chris - Yes, I get your point about taking over a tree to act as a > > broadcaster. My main thought, as a rather junior practictioner of T'ai > > Chi - Chi Gung, was that the Chi has to come from somewhere and I'm not > > really harming the natural environment as a whole in my practice by drawing > > it in, especially as at least a large proportion of it is quickly released. > > There must be a limit to the amount that can be stored - and can one be said > > to destroy it by using it ? Tony N-S. > >
