On 02-06-2019 18:26, Martin Blais wrote:
> Another strange thing: when I press ENTER at the end of a line, the
> amount automatically indents itself...
> Personally I find that annoying (especially if there are cases it will
> get it wrong), I think it should be optional.
This behavior is defined
I just updated the pull request with the fix, unless I messed up fix
mercurial again, I rewrote the history to contain the fix.
On 02/06/2019 19:25, Martin Blais wrote:
> Just add it on top and I'll reimport from scratch
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:17 PM Daniele Nicolodi
I just noticed that my beancount repository on bitbucket also has two
heads... I need to fix that as well. Apparently `hg push --force` does
not do the same thing as `git push --force`...
On 02/06/2019 19:25, Martin Blais wrote:
> Just add it on top and I'll reimport from scratch
>
>
> On Sun,
Just add it on top and I'll reimport from scratch
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:17 PM Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 02/06/2019 18:32, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> > On 02/06/2019 18:24, Martin Blais wrote:
> >> Another issue: The account completion seems broken ; the list of account
> >> is in
On 02/06/2019 18:32, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 02/06/2019 18:24, Martin Blais wrote:
>> Another issue: The account completion seems broken ; the list of account
>> is in beancount-accounts is empty and I can't insert an account name.
>
> That must have broken in the refactoring. I'm on it.
I
On 02/06/2019 18:24, Martin Blais wrote:
> Another issue: The account completion seems broken ; the list of account
> is in beancount-accounts is empty and I can't insert an account name.
That must have broken in the refactoring. I'm on it
Cheers,
Dan
--
You received this message because you
Another strange thing: when I press ENTER at the end of a line, the amount
automatically indents itself...
Personally I find that annoying (especially if there are cases it will get
it wrong), I think it should be optional.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:24 PM Martin Blais wrote:
> Another issue:
Another issue: The account completion seems broken ; the list of account is
in beancount-accounts is empty and I can't insert an account name.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:10 PM Martin Blais wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 7:05 PM Daniele Nicolodi
> wrote:
>
>> On 02/06/2019 16:16, Martin Blais
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 7:05 PM Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 02/06/2019 16:16, Martin Blais wrote:
> > Thanks Dan,
> > I fixed most of the issues I had with these changes:
>
> Nice! Which issues do remain?
>
Give me a few days to run this myself and see if I encounter anything, then
I'll merge.
On 02/06/2019 16:16, Martin Blais wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
> I fixed most of the issues I had with these changes:
Nice! Which issues do remain?
> (require 'beancount)
> (setq beancount-outline-regexp "\\*+ ")
Yeah, I forgot to escape the * in the regexp...
> (define-key* beancount-mode-map
Thanks Dan,
I fixed most of the issues I had with these changes:
(require 'beancount)
(setq beancount-outline-regexp "\\*+ ")
(define-key* beancount-mode-map [(control c)(control n)]
'outline-next-visible-heading)
(define-key* beancount-mode-map [(control c)(control p)]
On 02/06/2019 15:39, Martin Blais wrote:
> Also, TAB seems not to work as previously; with org-mode I used to be
> able to toggle this way.
> Now TAB invokes completion.
>
> Do you have a config setup I could try that keeps the bindings close to
> what they used to be, at least for tab and moving
Just spent a half-hour trying to get outline-minor-mode with it, I can't
get the basics to work.
I keep getting this error:
outline-back-to-heading: Before first heading
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:20 PM Martin Blais wrote:
> Yes, just need a bit of time to review and test out the CL.
> Maybe
Yes, just need a bit of time to review and test out the CL.
Maybe Tomorrow.
(Limited cycles.)
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 8:20 PM Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 19/05/2019 17:45, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> > On 31/03/2019 06:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 05:41:16PM -0600,
On 19/05/2019 17:45, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 31/03/2019 06:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 05:41:16PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> I would like to upstream my changes, however, now that I know how I
>>> would like the code to look like at the end, I would need
On 22-05-2019 06:31, micah anderson wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 31/03/2019 06:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 05:41:16PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
I would like to upstream my changes, however, now that I know how I
would like the code to
Daniele Nicolodi writes:
> On 31/03/2019 06:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 05:41:16PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> I would like to upstream my changes, however, now that I know how I
>>> would like the code to look like at the end, I would need to break up
>>> my
On 31/03/2019 06:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 05:41:16PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> I would like to upstream my changes, however, now that I know how I
>> would like the code to look like at the end, I would need to break up
>> my changes in a patchset and submit
Just wanted to chime in that I’ve been using ledger-mode with outline mode for
folding on top of beancount files and it works well enough for me, with some of
the caveats in this thread. Would welcome a beancount major mode!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 05:41:16PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I would like to upstream my changes, however, now that I know how I
> would like the code to look like at the end, I would need to break up
> my changes in a patchset and submit if for inclusion. This would
> require some time
> I would like to upstream my changes, however, now that I know how I
> would like the code to look like at the end, I would need to break up my
> changes in a patchset and submit if for inclusion. This would require
> some time investment. I haven't seen any interested from Martin about
> those
On 17/03/2019 14:17, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 07:36:13PM -0700, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Please test and let me know.
>
> I understand it's embarrassingly late to get back to you with feedback,
> but I only got around playing with the changes you described now. The
>
On 23/01/2019 11:40, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> problem you were seeing. What I would like to do now is to get rid of
>> the need for beancount-init-accounts
>
> Yes, please.
>
>> but I am afraid completion would slow down considerably in very
>> large buffers.
>
> If needed, judicious use of
> problem you were seeing. What I would like to do now is to get rid of
> the need for beancount-init-accounts
Yes, please.
> but I am afraid completion would slow down considerably in very
> large buffers.
If needed, judicious use of caching should do the trick.
Stefan
--
You
On 20/01/2019 19:36, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I changed the customization variable names to
>
> beancount-transaction-indent
> beancount-number-alignment-column
>
> which seem more descriptive (and a bit shorter).
I forgot to mention that to obtain automatic alignment column
determination now
Hi Stefano,
I just commit another round of updated.
On 20/01/2019 09:26, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 10:59:36PM -0700, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I was initially surprised that the function doesn't also align each line
> of the transaction before aligning the amounts
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 09:32:24AM -0700, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> (setq beancount-posting-alignment-column 4)
Nice :-)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . z...@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o
Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project
On 20/01/2019 09:26, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Since we're talking about customizability, it would be nice to have a
> local variable to set the desired amount of indentation. I know
> beancount goes for 2 spaces by default, but I currently use 4, for
> consistency with ledger. YMMV.
It is
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 10:59:36PM -0700, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I have now re-implemented number alignment. It is automatically
> triggered on newline and on tab. I also implemented
> beancount-align-transaction that you can bind to C-C C-q to obtain the
> ledger-mode functionality.
I've
Ciao Stefano,
On 04/01/2019 06:25, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Which functionalities do you miss the most in beancount-mode?
>
> - number alignment: I'm missing ledger-mode's equivalent of C-c C-q.
> beancount-align-numbers is supposed to do that (well, I guess), but:
>
> - it doesn't work
On Friday, 18 January 2019 21:10:44 UTC-2, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> orgstruct-mode has been deprecated and removed from org 9.2. I tried
> outshine https://github.com/alphapapa/outshine ...
Indeed, the org 9.2 relnotes (https://orgmode.org/Changes.html) tells
"OrgStruct minor mode and radio
Ciao Stefano,
On 19/01/2019 09:09, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Account completion works perfectly for me now. Ditto for indentation.
>
> The only glitch I've noticed is in the interaction between the two.
> Consider the case of a badly indented line: you hit TAB on it and it
> gets properly
Ciao Daniele,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:19:14PM -0700, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I found some time to hack on beancount-mode. You can find the progress
> here
> https://bitbucket.org/daniele/beancount/src/default/editors/emacs/beancount.el
great work! thanks a lot for this, more detailed
Hello,
orgstruct-mode has been deprecated and removed from org 9.2. I tried
outshine https://github.com/alphapapa/outshine and it works fine on a
fundamental-mode + beancount-mode buffer, it just requires headlines to
be written prefixed by four semicolons, as
* Foo
** Bar
I think
Hi Stefano,
I found some time to hack on beancount-mode. You can find the progress
here
https://bitbucket.org/daniele/beancount/src/default/editors/emacs/beancount.el
(unfortunately I botched the split of my changes in independent patches,
I'll probably rewrite history at some point)
I
On Friday, 11 January 2019 07:22:51 UTC-2, Martin Blais wrote:
>
> That seems like a useful thing to investigate.
> I personally would welcome making Beancount a major mode if that interacts
> well with it and it serves most people.
> It seems to be the most intuitive way for most people.
> I
I use it the same way you do (org-mode major + bean count minor). As long
as the same/similar folding of headlines is available then I wouldn't mind
(not that I matter, just giving you a data point.) For me, org-mode +
beancount works perfectly.
Thanks for the awesome tool.
On Friday,
That seems like a useful thing to investigate.
I personally would welcome making Beancount a major mode if that interacts
well with it and it serves most people.
It seems to be the most intuitive way for most people.
I only ever use org-mode major + beancount minor myself.
If I recall, Stefan once
On Sunday, 6 January 2019 18:43:46 UTC-2, Martin Blais wrote:
>
> Is there a way to have basic org functionality (folding) with it as a
> major mode? If so happy to convert
>
Yes. It's called orgstruct-mode or orgstruct++-mode
(https://orgmode.org/manual/Orgstruct-mode.html). I use it because
> Is there a way to have basic org functionality (folding) with it as a major
> mode? If so happy to convert
You can try and call org-mode's folding command from some other
major mode. I haven't tried it, so I don't know how well that
would work. But that puts you right back to the original
Is there a way to have basic org functionality (folding) with it as a major
mode? If so happy to convert
On Jan 7, 2019 06:24, "Stefano Zacchiroli" wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 12:37:14PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> AFAIK, this is because your major mode is org-mode which
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 12:37:14PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> AFAIK, this is because your major mode is org-mode which does its own
> thing with TAB.
Right.
Do you have any advice (and/or related work examples) on how to make
beancount-mode works both as a major and minor mode?
> - completion: I'm not sure how that is supposed to work. beancount-tab
> as a function works well for accounts and tags (but not metadata
> key/values, apparently), but if I bind it to TAB I lose indentation,
> whereas in ledger-mode the two seems to work well together. Maybe I'm
> not
Hi Stefano,
On 04/01/2019 14:25, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Which functionalities do you miss the most in beancount-mode?
>
> - completion: I'm not sure how that is supposed to work. beancount-tab
> as a function works well for accounts and tags (but not metadata
> key/values, apparently),
Ciao Daniele, first of all thanks a lot for your feedback.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 10:30:43AM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I agree that ledger-mode provides some functionality that would be
> nice to have in beancount-mode and I started to work on some, however
> I'm far from fluent in Elisp
Ciao Stefano,
On 02/01/2019 13:42, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Is any of the Emacs & Beancount users on this list using ledger-mode to
> edit Beancount ledgers?
>
> I've never found my way around beancount-mode and I really wanted a
> major mode dedicated to accounting, so I've started playing
46 matches
Mail list logo
