how as "164x"?
I just tried getpeerinfo locally and all my peers show as: ""services" :
"0001" as expected.
Wladimir
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantag
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Dustin D. Trammell <
dtramm...@dustintrammell.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 07:43 +0100, Wladimir wrote:
> > The most straightforward way would be to run the blockchain daemon as
> > a system service (with its own uid/gid and se
n
any way. Are you just arguing for the sake of arguing?
Wladimir
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Wh
be able to do for a long time.
Wladimir
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gamp
om the coinbase transaction can be spent as any other output.
Wladimir
--
Android apps run on BlackBerry 10
Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.
Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> Consensus running through the comments in the pull is that it needs
> (auto)tests.
>
> Are you going to do this Luke? Or is anyone else working on this?
>
*crickets*
Anyone willing to give pull #1647 its final push by addressi
is anyone else working on this?
Wladimir
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Ev
> Hope I made you laugh a bit
>
So it's more like a jester's hat then :)
How did I end up on the dogecoin-development list?!?
Wladimir
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why M
nable-frontends=).
The others appear to be more controversial as they affect mining/consensus.
I'd really like to see ACKs from more reviewers and testers there before
merging.
Wladimir
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader
#x27;s non-trivial to translate to a local term.
Wladimir
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environmen
efore
release
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues?milestone=12&state=open
If there is something else that you're working on and needs to end up in
0.9, or know of some nasty bug in master that should absolutely be solved
first, please t
n of
the 'coins' so it may be considered realistic to allocate one or two ports
for it. Or not, in which case the altcoins can forget it too.
Regards,
Wladimir
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they a
it.
>
Deterministic builds are one part of the equation. Matt Corallo actually
did implement auto-updating using gitian updater:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1453
It ran into lots of bike shedding and was eventually abandoned, but there
is no question whether it is possible wit
ns to the options dialog (and improve the dialog in general),
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3347
It doesn't add the RPC settings though. As Mark says, it's dangerous to
make it too easy to shoot yourself in
27;t support importing private keys. Replace the importing of private
keys by a "sweep" function.
Wladimir
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't ha
f
> the sending amount. "the fee seems unusually high, are you really sure you
> want to pay X in fees?"
>
Bitcoin-qt (in master) always shows the fee and total amount that is going
to be paid in the confirmation dialog, so it is very hard t
-development),
this can be done in a later separate change.
See pull request here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1
Regards,
Wladimir
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organiz
ryptocurrency for
spending. Or just maybe fiat already works well enough there...
Wladimir
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
h
bitcoin-announce list that I missed? If
> not, maybe there should be)
>
Yes could have been announced here too.
We announced the rc1 here but not the final release.
...maybe we should add a list of places to announce to the rel
.0. Was that an official
> announcement?
>
Yes, it is.
Wladimir
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doublecl
re unnecessary coordination.
Don't make problems where they don't exist, we have enough actual issues.
Wladimir
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code
ing taken seriously.
Wladimir
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631
Yes, i'm updating BIP 0001 right now, will send a pull when ready.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> RE: replace BIPs on the wiki with links to github documents: agreed.
>
> Wladimir or Gregory: can one of you update BIP 0001 to describe the Proper
> Pro
g this number out of thin air)
>
This was considered (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3305) but
deemed to risky for 0.8.6 at the last moment, see the linked pull request
for details.
It will go into 0.9, at least if the full floating fee implementation isn&#
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:37:10 PM Wladimir wrote:
>
> I think this would stifle active BIP draft editing. We're already having a
> hard time getting some developers to write BIPs for their proposals - I
> don&#x
wiki with links to the github documents, with a notice that changes
should be proposed on github or mailed to the BIP editor (gmaxwell).
Agreed?
Regards,
Wladimir
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display
I think the problem is with this loop:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/qt/sendcoinsdialog.cpp#L261
This deletes widgets, but Qt may still be referring to them internally, and
"Deleting a QObject while pending events are waiting to be delivered can
cause a crash."
ork is not assigned a number until it is
> complete.
>
Talking about complete, BIP 40 and 41 don't even have an associated
document:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
I agree that was over-eager number assigning.
Wladimir
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:55PM +0100, Wladimir wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > BIP drafts are stored in git://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git/drafts/ and
> > > are
P can be
implemented, even if still in draft status; it gives something to refer to
when mentioning a certain improvement proposal (in commit messages and such
it could be called BIP xxx Draft).
I don't think we are at risk of running out of numbers to assign
ng the dropdown box in the
amount widget), but I'm going to make the verification dialog show the
totals in all three units. This will make people learn about other units
without having to choose them consciously.
Wladimir
--
mentions of monetary value are accompanied with a unit).
Maybe we should stealthily collect people's settings and switch over once a
majority switched *ducks*.
Or, more seriously, maybe add a popup when upgrading the first time to 0.9
with an explanation where people can reconsider their unit s
ere for donations,
consider it an anonymous (wel, pseudonymous) gift jar.
Regards,
Wladimir
--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explo
alves
as the results is 64 bytes.
Regards,
Wladimir
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Mike Caldwell wrote:
> Gregory,
>
> No problem, thanks for providing the IRC recap, and glad I've finally made
> "radio contact" with the list. Perhaps there can be some lo
e number of users) and reviewing and testing takes
time so pull requests, proposals and such can linger for a while. Which can
indeed be frustrating.
Wladimir
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars
longer
need to burden the core code
(see also the discussion here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2917).
Wladimir
--
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance C
gitian-build with.
>
Fully agreed about payment protocol, autotools and Qt5 build.
I'm still not very excited about coin control (and last time I looked at
the code, it has an issue that it introduced statefulness into the wallet
model - a bane for concurrency. But th
oded" thus are not fully opaque. But
it's a long shot, as a hashed value is still very opaque.
> I also here that there is a LIKELY change from the base58 encoding ...
> when was this established?
>
No, there have been no changes to base58. The encoding is still exactly the
same
Chris,
Using zmq is a great fit for high-speed notifications such as this. Have
you seen the pull request to integrate zmq directly into bitcoind, so that
you don't even need -blocknotify?
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2415
If not: we could use some testing there!
Wladimir
O
.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hardfork_Wishlist.
Wladimir
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
that delivers powerful full stack analyt
oes not help in implementation
:-)
Wladimir
Multiple recipients/amounts. Any syntax you like. Thanks!
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance
ments are censored in the console screen and command line history. At
least `importprivkey`, `walletpassphrase`, `walletpassphrasechange` should
likely be in that list.
Wladimir
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'
Maybe now that bitcoin is growing out of the toy phase it's an idea to
start gpg signing commits, like the Linux kernel (
https://lwn.net/Articles/466468/).
But I suppose then we can't use github anymore to merge as-is and need
manual steps?
Wladimir
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:
e was a straightforward solution for that, yeah pooling together
our development on one or two clients instead of a zillion different ones
could help, but everyone has more fun working on their own client that's
just how things go :)
Wladimir
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Jim Nguyen wrot
BTC
units? And it's gone after 21 blocks.
I wonder if there is a way for the whole process to be transparent to the
user. The wallet is 'defragmented' but without losing the swept up coins to
the miner.
Wladimir
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Michael Gronager w
ultraprune + bloom filtering is the two major scalability improvements we
> have right now.
>
I'm not sure about a full feature freeze. I agree it could be wise not do
any more changes of the scale of ultraprune before 0.9, to give some
stability to fix the kinks in the current version
s at some point, or change their
interpretation, and bitcoin will automatically change with it. As
bitcoin happily links against any OpenSSL version you provide it, in
worst case, this can result in forks and unexpected behavior
completely out of our
n, Sourceforge
> would block certain downloads (but not the project site). That said it
> was trivial to bypass the restrictions then.
I don't think it's related to these sanctions but to the Great
Firewall of China, but sourceforge downloads are also blocked i
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Proposal: following 0.7.1 release, freeze the tree. Do not pull
>> anything, until ultraprune is pulled (or rejected, but I think the
>> latter is unlikely).
>
ty.
I've just pulled all the small stuff that was already ACKed for
post-0.7.1, so IMO the freeze can start.
Wladimir
--
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Re
ould go
> into a 0.7.1 release?
I think we should also pull #1859 "add LOCK() for proxy related
data-structures" Missing synchronization primitives are a sure way to
get reports about random crashes.
The rest can wait.
Wladimir
--
gin etc...). But I'm probably
misunderstanding what you're trying to do.
Wladimir
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has c
some deeply nested wiki page. Ie, something
like
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contribute/
http://www.ogre3d.org/developers
...
I'm willing to write this. But I know these kinds of proposals always
end in a big discussion about what should be and what should not be on
bitcoin.org, however we sho
the custom format for the wallets is
introduces, various new configurations will be possible: Multiple wallets,
wallet in block chain in separate dirs, etc.
Wladimir
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their productio
Fully agree with the changes, but I think there should be a small BIP, for
consistency, and to make it documented for other client developers.
Wladimir
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cove
for those messages will be broken again. There should be no more message
changes before the release unless there is a very good reason.
Wladimir
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the w
status with
certainty, so quite a large safety margin is used. To be precise the
warning is shown when the last received block was generated more than 90
minutes ago.
Wladimir
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive li
But is he the only one using the broken URLs? It was my impression that
they were widespread already.
Wladimir
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Gary Rowe wrote:
> Is it worth having a few more people email Ben to ask him politely to fall
> into line with the BIP? No point encouraging
albox don't play along well.
Wladimir
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> I had some difficulty setting up and maintaining my own gitian build
> system. So in the time-honored tradition of scratching my own itch, I
> recorded the necessary steps into a makef
sition in the alt
clients list is less important. That said, I'm not a big fan of randomized
order because it's confusing. Come back to the page and it's different.
Some other neutral ordering is probably possible.
Wladimir
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
d the only difference.
>
>
To prevent surprises in the future, in case OpenSSL decides to add more,
can we disable all other key formats in advance?
Wladimir
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event w
n the granularity should
be large, not command-level. The interaction between protocol versions and
capabilities needs to be defined as well. Does offering "getdata" at
protocol version 10 mean the same as offering it at protocol version 11"?
Probably not guarantee
ritical data structures. Sure, there might
be some cases in which the locks are not necessary, or read/write locks
could be used instead to improve concurrency, but this has to be approached
really carefully.
Wladimir
--
Live
e is no need to make it this fine-grained.
Wladimir
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Amir Taaki wrote:
> Introspection/command discovery is nice, but I would prefer it to be
> immediately done in the first version exchange so no assumptions as to how
> a network is operating need to be m
core, and I'd think it is
pretty important to keep it a first-class citizen.
Wladimir
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has
destination address, message is a freeform message
describing the transaction.
I don't think the message is currently stored in the Satoshi client. That
feature is somewhere on our way-too-long issue and todo list.
But I un
k still occur.
>
If you're behind such a slow internet connection, and concerned about every
bit of bandwidth, it is better to run a lightweight node. For example,
Electrum.
Even if you could reduce the wasted bandwidth a bit by puzzling around with
partial blocks, the download w
f the requested block header. If
this is passed in the reply, and the caller can correlate the request and
reply without a special nonce administration.
Wladimir
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary
ich this makes P2SH easier and less involved. How many steps can be
eliminated of the 14?
Wladimir
BTW: we also still need a BIP to define URL signing / authentication
itself.
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec
like this is sign message stuff is dragging the kitchen sink
into Bitcoin. It's fine for logging into a website, what you use it for,
but anything that approaches signing email (such as S/MIME implementations
and handling different cha
r
> we could
> > do a "cleanup" to 10 first, and start incrementing from there.
>
>
> It would be nice to have 10 as the baseline, "frozen" protocol.
>
Yes, I think increasing with one is
w all I see submitted for this is support for
> multiple local IPs (#829) though.
>
>
IPv6 support would be nice, but I don't think a milestone of 0.7 is
realistic. Such a change to the network code will require extensive
testing. Who has access to IPv6 and can help testing?
Wladimi
t;
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=4018239
Wladimir
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on a
y needed anymore -- anyway, it used to be
much more strict and you'll have no problems getting whitelisted.
Wladimir
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of vi
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:09 AM, slush wrote:
> Hello Gavin,
>
> excuse me, but do you think it's good idea to have IRC meeting on
> Valentine's evening? Some of us have girlfriends :-).
>
I have a girlfriend but she hates valentines day so it is ok with me:-)
Wladimir
ter has to crunch
for days anyway
BTW: On such an old computer you should probably use one of the thin
clients.
Wladimir
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning li
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
>
>>
>> Advantage of (2) is it should mean more testing of multisig, and fewer
>> bug reports of "I added a multisig address via RPC but I can't send to
>
racters is still the same, so BitcoinAddressValidator
doesn't have to be changed.
Advanced dialogs for constructing the addresses / adding them to the
address book could wait for 0.7.0.
Wladimir
--
Try before you buy
Sounds very nice. Congratulations with the release!
Any plans for porting over bitcoin-qt?
Wladimir
Op 1 feb. 2012 15:19 schreef "Michael Grønager" het
volgende:
> Dear Bitcoiners,
>
> libcoin is now in a state ready for its first release, which I would like
e mustimplement: idea, though I'd recommend a shorter
(abbreviated) prefix, to keep URL sizes small for QR codes and such,
Wladimir
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online
t breaks backwards
compatibility (for example, adds a multiple-send type or specific
restriction) should increase the version number. A client rejects URLs with
a version number higher than what it knows about.
That's the simplest way to handle it, and enough IMO.
Wladimir
-
they're easy to
implement and don't need much discussion.
Wladimir
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Gary Rowe wrote:
> I think that the "send to private address" field will require more effort
> to implement than the simpler "expires" and "message&q
posed to handle
this? Refuse to handle the request if their URL scheme parser version is
older than in the URL? This should be in the BIP.
Wladimir
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Andreas Schildbach
wrote:
> Generally I prefer BIP 21 over BIP 20.
>
> I'm neutral on the 'send
I agree with BIP 0021
Wladimir
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Amir Taaki wrote:
> Matt Corallo posted a modification of BIP 20 in an earlier email and I
> asked him if he wanted to become the champion of that BIP he submitted.
>
> It is a modification of BIP 20 sans the alt
spec obviously needs to be
extended. But not with a zillion ways to write "send XXX coins to YYY".
Anyway, that's my last word about it.
Wladimir
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
>
>
> Luke-Jr wrote:
>
> >On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitco
, that does not make the issue "political and thus meaningless".
Also: "being too small to matter" is never a good argument to not do
something. It is fear paralysis.
Wladimir
2012/1/17 Jorge Timón
> It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
&
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> > Internet censorship *is* a threat to bitcoin, if we don't stand up for
> our
> > rights now we deserve anything that is coming. There will be no "long
Internet censorship *is* a threat to bitcoin, if we don't stand up for our
rights now we deserve anything that is coming. There will be no "long run".
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Sunday, January 15, 2012 5:37:05 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > There are always issues that rais
Woohoo, 0.6.0 merging time!
I'll merge some GUI pull requests for 0.6.x this/next week.
Wladimir
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> FYI for anybody who doesn't hang out in IRC:
>
> I've been busy pulling patches into git HEAD for a Bitcoin version
th it, as downloading that
over Tor takes ages and causes unnecessary load on the network...
Wladimir
--
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port exi
I don't see reason why not. It could just be another, longer, address type.
The advantage being that it allows for shorter transactions in the block
chain (right?).
Wladimir
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> IMO, we should standardize and support public key addresses. W
ood idea! This could be integrated with the QR-code generation (
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/629) which adds "create a payment
link" functionality (but currently only "exports" this link as a QR code).
Wladimir
ways that don't involve typing or
even seeing the addresses.
Copy/paste of HTML content is currently not possible. You *can* already
drag&drop the bitcoin: link to the client. Bluematt has a pull request to
automatically handle bitcoin: URLs when clicked in the browser.
Wladimir
On Tue,
>
>
> I think it would be ideal if someone wanted to take up wxBitcoin. Maybe
> after
> backporting to wx 2.8...
>
Indeed, someone could do this if they're interested in it, in their own
fork. That's what I said too. But it's no longer our issue.
> > I don't think that has very high priority, an
201 - 294 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
