correlate the request and
reply without a special nonce administration.
Wladimir
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution
be
eliminated of the 14?
Wladimir
BTW: we also still need a BIP to define URL signing / authentication
itself.
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one
for every change, or
we could
do a cleanup to 10 first, and start incrementing from there.
It would be nice to have 10 as the baseline, frozen protocol.
Yes, I think increasing with one is enough for now. Let's not get ahead of
ourselves :)
Wladimir
code will require extensive
testing. Who has access to IPv6 and can help testing?
Wladimir
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.comwrote:
Advantage of (2) is it should mean more testing of multisig, and fewer
bug reports of I added a multisig address via RPC but I can't send to
it using
much discussion.
Wladimir
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Gary Rowe g.r...@froot.co.uk wrote:
I think that the send to private address field will require more effort
to implement than the simpler expires and message fields and should be
deferred to a later BIP. There is a pressing need
restriction) should increase the version number. A client rejects URLs with
a version number higher than what it knows about.
That's the simplest way to handle it, and enough IMO.
Wladimir
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current
the mustimplement: idea, though I'd recommend a shorter
(abbreviated) prefix, to keep URL sizes small for QR codes and such,
Wladimir
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online
obviously needs to be
extended. But not with a zillion ways to write send XXX coins to YYY.
Anyway, that's my last word about it.
Wladimir
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:12 AM, bitcoin-l...@bluematt.me wrote:
Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-l
meaningless.
Also: being too small to matter is never a good argument to not do
something. It is fear paralysis.
Wladimir
2012/1/17 Jorge Timón timon.elvi...@gmail.com
It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
political organization for being against censorship
involve typing or
even seeing the addresses.
Copy/paste of HTML content is currently not possible. You *can* already
dragdrop the bitcoin: link to the client. Bluematt has a pull request to
automatically handle bitcoin: URLs when clicked in the browser.
Wladimir
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM
I think it would be ideal if someone wanted to take up wxBitcoin. Maybe
after
backporting to wx 2.8...
Indeed, someone could do this if they're interested in it, in their own
fork. That's what I said too. But it's no longer our issue.
I don't think that has very high priority, and
201 - 212 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
