On 11/2/2011 5:07 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
For instance subversion really goes with programming
more than networking; TCP Wrappers goes more with either System
Utilities or Security; etc.
I'd just like to mention that I mildly disagree on both counts,
especially Subversion. For instance, we use
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Randy McMurchy
ra...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
I'd just like to mention that I mildly disagree on both counts,
especially Subversion. For instance, we use Subversion to track
the changes of our own books, which has nothing to do with
programming. I could name
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/2/2011 5:07 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
For instance subversion really goes with programming
more than networking; TCP Wrappers goes more with either System
Utilities or Security; etc.
I'd just like to mention that I mildly disagree on both counts,
especially
Jonathan Oksman wrote:
While we're on the subject, I noticed recently that cmake is in the
system utilities section. It's intended use is as a build system for
programming, so it could be argued that it does belong in the
programming section. It's a language for describing the build process
On 11/4/2011 1:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Besides, building LFS/BLFS *is* programming. You still go through an
edit, build, check process. The output of a programming process is not
always executable code.
Not at all trying to argue, but for the sake of discussion I think it is
a stretch to
Ken Moffat wrote:
I agree that version-control packages are used for a lot more than
programming, and that tcp wrappers can be in either place. But for
cmake, I have to mildly disagree (mildly, because I no-longer build
it, and would need extremely strong reasons to build it again) -
in
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/4/2011 1:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Besides, building LFS/BLFS *is* programming. You still go through an
edit, build, check process. The output of a programming process is not
always executable code.
Not at all trying to argue, but for the sake of discussion I
On 11/4/2011 1:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
{,un}zip: System Utilities - General Libraries
pkg-config - Programming
?
I'm lost with these changes. I'd bet for every time the zip
library is used, the (un)zip utils are used 20 times.
And how does pkg-config fit with
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:44:33PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/4/2011 1:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Besides, building LFS/BLFS *is* programming. You still go through an
edit, build, check process. The output of a programming process is not
always executable code.
Not at all trying
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/4/2011 1:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
{,un}zip: System Utilities - General Libraries
pkg-config - Programming
?
I'm lost with these changes. I'd bet for every time the zip
library is used, the (un)zip utils are used 20 times.
Yes, I
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:44:33PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/4/2011 1:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Besides, building LFS/BLFS *is* programming. You still go through an
edit, build, check process. The output of a programming process is not
always executable code.
Not
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:03:42PM -0600, bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: bdubbs
Date: 2011-11-04 15:03:36 -0600 (Fri, 04 Nov 2011)
New Revision: 8935
Log:
Update to glib-2.31.0.
Update to pkg-config-0.26.
Remove gcc3.
More package reorganization.
Bruce, you do realise that
On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I see no use at all of pkg-config outside of programming.
It's definitely connected to programming, but then so is glibc,
binutils and gcc. But I don't think I'd classify them under a
programming label. Pkg-config is a
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:03:42PM -0600, bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: bdubbs
Date: 2011-11-04 15:03:36 -0600 (Fri, 04 Nov 2011)
New Revision: 8935
Log:
Update to glib-2.31.0.
Update to pkg-config-0.26.
Remove gcc3.
More package reorganization.
Bruce,
Is there anything significant left that uses glib1 or gtk1?. Looking at
the book, the following reference glib1:
general/sysutils/mc.xml: Can use glib2
kde/devel/kdebindings.xml:KDE3 - Optional
networking/netutils/wireshark.xml:Can use glib2
x/lib/gtk+.xml:
The
On 05/11/11 10:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:03:42PM -0600, bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: bdubbs
Date: 2011-11-04 15:03:36 -0600 (Fri, 04 Nov 2011)
New Revision: 8935
Log:
Update to glib-2.31.0.
Update to pkg-config-0.26.
Remove gcc3.
On 11/4/2011 6:27 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Still, both sides of the argument have valid points. Perhaps
programming is too broad a term.
Agreed. There should be a programming languages section, and then
perhaps a programming tools section. Combining them is simply
confusing.
I've been around
On 11/4/2011 6:57 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
The latest stable is 2.30.1.
And can easily be identified visiting the GTK site:
http://www.gtk.org/download/linux.php
--
Randy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything significant left that uses glib1 or gtk1?. Looking at
the book, the following reference glib1:
*snip*
If so, we would need to remove xmms and gsview also.
I've never used gsview so I can't really
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/4/2011 6:27 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Still, both sides of the argument have valid points. Perhaps
programming is too broad a term.
Agreed. There should be a programming languages section, and then
perhaps a programming tools section. Combining them is simply
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 11/4/2011 6:57 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
The latest stable is 2.30.1.
And can easily be identified visiting the GTK site:
http://www.gtk.org/download/linux.php
I believe you and Wayne, but it's not very obvious to me from the page
you reference. The page says
Gsview old but useful viewer of ps and pdf files. Its unical feature -
possibillty to display postscript coordinates for point under mouse
cursor - very useful for manual writing and editing postscript files.
I don't know other viewers with such functionality.
2011/11/5, Jonathan Oksman
22 matches
Mail list logo
