On 4/15/21 1:38 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 01:24:13AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When trying to push my changes to git, I got following error:
timtas@dalglish:~/src/blfs-git$ git commit -a
[trunk 8355679be] Upgrade to curl-7.76.1.
4
Hi all
When trying to push my changes to git, I got following error:
timtas@dalglish:~/src/blfs-git$ git commit -a
[trunk 8355679be] Upgrade to curl-7.76.1.
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
timtas@dalglish:~/src/blfs-git$ git push
fatal: remote error: access denied or
On 4/12/21 11:53 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/12/21 11:16 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 09:46 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just tried to upgrade my qemu virtual machine to glib 2.68.0, which
lead to lxdm/X not starting
On 4/12/21 11:16 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 09:46 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just tried to upgrade my qemu virtual machine to glib 2.68.0, which
lead to lxdm/X not starting anymore. /var/log/lxdm.log reports:
MESA-LOADER: failed
On 4/12/21 11:35 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/12/21 11:16 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 09:46 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just tried to upgrade my qemu virtual machine to glib 2.68.0, which
lead to lxdm/X not starting
On 4/12/21 11:16 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 09:46 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just tried to upgrade my qemu virtual machine to glib 2.68.0, which
lead to lxdm/X not starting anymore. /var/log/lxdm.log reports:
MESA-LOADER: failed
to investigate further,
but for the moment, I would advise people to stay away from glib 2.68.0,
at least on qemu vm's running X.
Bye
Tim
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Hohlstrasse 400
c/o Baubüro Insitu
8048 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org
On 4/1/21 11:47 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2021-04-01 10:52 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice, or at least as supported as cmake.
As I personally don't see the benefits of cmake over autotools from a
builders
On 3/17/21 2:55 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 14:44 +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi,
I inadvertently removed dconf-editor from my system (when recompiling dconf,
because dconf-editor and dconf are on the same page, and so are in the same
package
Hi all
I just saw that openssh has a new version and as I wondered about the
changes, I visited their page.
While the corresponding ticket
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/14725
was already assigned but had no changes comment, I added one, I hope
that's ok. Wasn't meant to
On 2/2/21 1:11 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2/1/21 5:46 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just installed gparted for the first time as in the SVN book
(version 1.2.0) and it seems that the part about root privileges seems
to be outdated.
I installed gparted without
Hi all
I just installed gparted for the first time as in the SVN book (version
1.2.0) and it seems that the part about root privileges seems to be
outdated.
I installed gparted without any helper stuff and it seems that the
provided org.gnome.gparted.policy already does the trick: when I
On 1/23/21 10:16 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, 2021-01-23 at 21:20 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/23/21 6:43 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, 2021-01-23 at 11:10 -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 1/23/21 11:06 AM, Tim Tassonis
On 1/23/21 6:43 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, 2021-01-23 at 11:10 -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/23/21 11:06 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Hi Tim,
When setting up my new xfce4 based system, I stumbled across
webp-pixbuf-loader.
It easily
as a suggestion to the libwebp or the
gdk-pixbuf page?
Bye
Tim
--
decentral.ch - IT Stuff
Tim Tassonis
Hohlstrasse 400
c/o Baubüro Insitu
8048 Zürich
st...@decentral.ch
+41 79 229 36 17
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
On 1/22/21 4:55 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/22/21 5:50 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
After building and running gegl and gimp from the book, gimp failed to
Gimp to launch, displaying a gegl:introspect error.
This is also reported here:
https
Hi all
After building and running gegl and gimp from the book, gimp failed to
Gimp to launch, displaying a gegl:introspect error.
This is also reported here:
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27994
Maybe we should revert to gegl-0.46 (that's what I did), or can anyone
run gimp with
Hi all
SANE-1.0.29 seems to link against elogind when present and not
specifically told to not do so by specifying
--with-systemd=no
Since I don't know what the consequences of elogind support for sane
are, I did set that. Maybe one then needs some polkit/dbus magic and the
whole group
Hi all
Since a couple of days, I'm experiencing connect issues to
wiki.linuxfromscratch.org. Is this a known issue, or is the problem on
my side?
Bye
Tim
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On 1/6/21 5:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 10:27 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 5:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 9:58 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Compile works for me with:
-DCONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB
On 1/6/21 5:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/6/21 9:58 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Compile works for me with:
-DCONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB=ON \
-DCONFIG_IMLIB2=OFF \
CONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB does not turn off CONFIG_IMLIB2 by itself and
will still give
Compile works for me with:
-DCONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB=ON \
-DCONFIG_IMLIB2=OFF \
CONFIG_GDK_PIXBUF_XLIB does not turn off CONFIG_IMLIB2 by itself and
will still give an error.
Is it ok if I update the page accordingly? I'm on 10.0 up until here, now!
Bye
Tim
--
On 1/5/21 11:34 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 09:58 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I am stuck at building libxslt-1.1.34, getting the following error:
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2
Hi all
I am stuck at building libxslt-1.1.34, getting the following error:
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd
doc/xsltproc.xml:8: warning: failed to load external entity
On 12/30/20 4:06 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 15:29 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I now seen to have everything in place for elogind and rootless X,
however, just calling startx still does not seem to work.
I get the following error on startx
On 12/30/20 4:06 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 15:29 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I now seen to have everything in place for elogind and rootless X,
however, just calling startx still does not seem to work.
I get the following error on startx
Hi all
I now seen to have everything in place for elogind and rootless X,
however, just calling startx still does not seem to work.
I get the following error on startx on the console:
[ 382.428] (EE) parse_vt_settings: Cannot open /dev/tty0 (Permission
denied)
If I just call
X vt7
I
On 12/29/20 4:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/29/20 6:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just went through building xorg with elogind/dbus support until
xinit, as in the book.
I then still had to
chmod u+s $XORG_PREFIX/libexec/Xorg
in order to get X running
Hi all
I just went through building xorg with elogind/dbus support until xinit,
as in the book.
I then still had to
chmod u+s $XORG_PREFIX/libexec/Xorg
in order to get X running. So just to make sure I did not fuck up
anywhere: is this still expected behaviour with elogind?
I assume the
On 12/25/20 4:04 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought I
give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly
On 12/25/20 4:04 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought I
give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly
On 12/25/20 1:52 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/24/20 4:56 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I
thought I give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly, in the
exact order
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought
I give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly, in the
exact order as already in the book.
Apart from many bug-fixes and enhancements. there are just minor changes
to the build:
On 12/3/20 10:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
In some cases PAM may use Berkeley DB libraries. We should probably
change the bdb build to move the libraries to /lib:
...
../dist/configure --prefix=/usr \
--libdir=/lib \ <-- added
On 12/1/20 11:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 3:02 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 5:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against
On 12/1/20 5:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against
bdb, because I had installed bdb since my last pam build.
As I'm not really fond of including bdb in all
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against bdb,
because I had installed bdb since my last pam build.
As I'm not really fond of including bdb in all installations using pam,
I found out that by specifying
--enable-db=no
at configure time, pam will be build
Hi all
I'm just about to build llvm 11 as in current blfs, and wondered if it
would be better to install it in /opt/llvm11, instead of /usr.
The reason I'm asking is that llvm seems to be updated quite often and
I'm not sure about the compatibility of different versions with mesa,
rustc and
Hi all
I'm in the process of building BLFS 10, which is the first time that I
will have to build elogind.
I'm currently a bit lost regarding the circular dependencies in this
case, is this the correct order:
1. build X libraries
2. build dbus, without elogind
3. build elogind
4. build
Hi all
When building nss 3.57 and waiting ages for the tests to be compiled, I
checked the Makefile and found out that, by adding
NSS_DISABLE_GTESTS=1\
to the make command, the build time can quite drasctically be reduced,
as compiling (not even running) the tests seems to
On 9/25/20 8:39 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just noticed that although there was a new release of libnsl, version
1.3.0, released on Jul 6, it is not in the book, nor is there a ticket
for it.
I have downloaded and successfully built it on a fresh lfs 10.0 system
Hi all
I just noticed that although there was a new release of libnsl, version
1.3.0, released on Jul 6, it is not in the book, nor is there a ticket
for it.
I have downloaded and successfully built it on a fresh lfs 10.0 system,
with minor modifications to the instructions from 1.2.0:
-
Hi all
Maybe a bit off-topic, but a while ago, the BLFS book had instructions
on how to build openssl with symbol versioning, so openssl-1.0 and
openssl-1.1 can be mixed. As openssl-1.0 is out now, this seems to have
been removed, but maybe somebody still remembers the instruction. I now
On 9/4/20 5:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/20 8:35 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
I assume that ppp gets some kind of revival due to some ISP's
requiring it for fiber connections. Therefore I'd vote for
de-archiving the package. It now even has systemd suppport
On 9/4/20 5:03 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 9:27 AM Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
<mailto:blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org>> wrote:
On 9/4/20 8:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 9/4/20 12:36 AM, Tim Tassonis via bl
On 9/4/20 8:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/20 12:36 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/20 2:12 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:44:31AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote
On 9/4/20 2:12 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:44:31AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:47 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:47 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe with vlan tagging
for fiber connections, I wondered if vlan tagging could get supported
in the network scripts.
As I found out
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe with vlan tagging for
fiber connections, I wondered if vlan tagging could get supported in the
network scripts.
As I found out via https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VLAN, one can
create a tagged VLAN using
ip link add link
Hi all
Due to fact that my currently quite outdated gcc toolchain fails to
compile latest firefox, I tried to build firefox with clang10.
In case anyone wants to try this, too, I found out that you can run into
problems with c++ libraries built with clang or gcc, I think the root
problem
On 4/9/20 8:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/9/20 12:46 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/9/20 7:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:23:24PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that I do get quite different build sizes
On 4/9/20 7:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:23:24PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that I do get quite different build sizes for thunderbird than
other maintainers, so I thought I will give a few infos about how I build
thunderbird
Hi all
I noticed that I do get quite different build sizes for thunderbird than
other maintainers, so I thought I will give a few infos about how I
build thunderbird. Maybe this helps to find out what's going on here.
du -hs /lgl-bld/thunderbird-68.7.0/
reports
4.2G
On 4/4/20 7:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/4/20 5:09 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As dhcpcd 9.0.0 changed the location of its pidfile(-s), the
/lib/services/dhcpcd bootscript has to be updated.
I did this, but I dont know how then to prepare the needed tar.xz
Hi all
As dhcpcd 9.0.0 changed the location of its pidfile(-s), the
/lib/services/dhcpcd bootscript has to be updated.
I did this, but I dont know how then to prepare the needed tar.xz package.
Can anybody tell me how to go about this?
Bye
Tim
--
On 4/3/20 11:00 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 09:56 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has to be created and that user
needs to have access to /var/lib/dhcpcd
I thought of doing something similar to openssh:
install
Hi Ryan
On 3/30/20 8:50 PM, Ryan Marsaw via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello all.
When building v4l-utils per BLFS instructions I get the following at the
configure stage:
[...]
checking for SDL2... no
[...]
The only way I could get v4l-utils to recognize SDL2 was to set
SDL2_LIBS and SDL2_CFLAGS:
Hi all
I just built samba 4.11.0 and while the book says to require
Python-2.7.17, the Release Notes say it requires python3.
From the Release Notes
(https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.11.0.html):
Python2 support
---
Samba 4.11 will not have any runtime support
Hi all
I just tried to build Talloc-2.3.0, using the mentioned
--extra-python=PYTHON
option. However, this does not seem to be supported anymore:
waf: error: no such option: --extra-python
Or am I missing something?
If nobody objects, I'll create a ticket and remove that option from the
On 11/12/19 3:40 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 11/11/19 6:20 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Has anybody tried to install latest pycairo with DESTDIR
While
python2 setup.py install --optimize=1 --root=$DESTDIR
works, both
python2 setup.py install_pycairo_header
Hi all
Has anybody tried to install latest pycairo with DESTDIR
While
python2 setup.py install --optimize=1 --root=$DESTDIR
works, both
python2 setup.py install_pycairo_header --root=$DESTDIR
python2 setup.py install_pkgconfig --root=$DESTDIR
fail, with
error: option --root not
On 11/4/19 4:57 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 11/3/19 7:40 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
After detecting that evince 3.34.1 does not build with the required
depencies, I digged in a bit more and found out the following:
As both GNONE and gentoo recommed appstream
Hi all
After detecting that evince 3.34.1 does not build with the required
depencies, I digged in a bit more and found out the following:
As both GNONE and gentoo recommed appstream-glib as solution, I found
out that:
/usr/share/gettext/its/appdata.loc
Hi all
I tried to build evince-3.34.1 by the book and get the following error:
GEN evince-pdfdocument.metainfo.xml
/usr/bin/msgfmt: cannot locate ITS rules for
evince-pdfdocument.metainfo.xml.in
make[3]: *** [Makefile:922: evince-pdfdocument.metainfo.xml] Error 1
After digging around,
On 10/22/19 9:21 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 22/10/2019 00:15, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/22/19 12:09 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
I just studied the elogind page, where
On 10/22/19 12:09 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just studied the elogind page, where it says that I should modify
/etc/pam.d/system-session, to include the elogind stuff.
I'm a bit reluctant to do so
Hi all
I just studied the elogind page, where it says that I should modify
/etc/pam.d/system-session, to include the elogind stuff.
I'm a bit reluctant to do so, as I've got several systems running as
servers and routers, with no graphical user interface and no dbus present.
As I
Hi all
Sorry if this is an already answered question, but I found no clear
answer on the list.
I have noticed the inclusion of elogind in BLFS and so far, I did not
care about it, as it seemed a Gnome thing and I'm using Xfce.
But as I'm going to do an all new build of everything soon, I
On 10/14/19 2:17 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
For a long time, fetchmail has warned about running as root. For
6.4.1 I'm inclined to try running it as user fetchmail and group
nogroup. But that raises the question of which uid to assign.
Looking at /postlfs/users.html (or
On 10/3/19 10:50 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 03/10/2019 21:45, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/3/19 1:56 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I'm going to try to become "upstream" for the standalone localed
daemon. I think I'll take the openrc implementation rather than
On 30 September 2019 19:23:04 Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all,
so far i have built a nice Xfce system avoiding python2, gtk2 and
rustc at all and Xfce-4.14 builds/runs fine without gtk2. For librsvg
i use the old non-rust version 2.40.20 which still works pretty well -
ok, i
On 9/21/19 1:19 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/20/19 5:04 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When trying to upgrade mupdf to the latest release an checking the
linked libraries, I stumbled across error due to missing
libmupdfthird.so
libmupdfthreads.so
libmupdfpkcs7.so
On 9/21/19 12:44 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 12:04:53AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When trying to upgrade mupdf to the latest release an checking the linked
libraries, I stumbled across error due to missing
libmupdfthird.so
Hi all
When trying to upgrade mupdf to the latest release an checking the
linked libraries, I stumbled across error due to missing
libmupdfthird.so
libmupdfthreads.so
libmupdfpkcs7.so
it turns out that mupdf-1.16.1-shared_libs-1.patch on line 32 to 34
sets the names to:
+THIRD_LIB =
On 10 September 2019 19:51:22 Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 9/10/19 12:36 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that initd-tools is gone from BLFS and seems to have been
replaced by lsb-tools. I also noticed that BLFS bootscripts have been
updated with tons of fixes
Hi all
I noticed that initd-tools is gone from BLFS and seems to have been
replaced by lsb-tools. I also noticed that BLFS bootscripts have been
updated with tons of fixes for dependency information, so thanks for all
the work on that!
However, I noticed that lsb-tools is implemented in
On 9/10/19 6:32 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/09/2019 17:49, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
After installing yad, a gtk3 shell-script dialog implementation, I finally
decided to solve my long-standing issue of some applications (evince)
complaining about
GLib-GIO
Hi all
After installing yad, a gtk3 shell-script dialog implementation, I
finally decided to solve my long-standing issue of some applications
(evince) complaining about
GLib-GIO-Message: Using the 'memory' GSettings backend. Your settings
will not be saved or shared with other
On 9/3/19 7:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Looks as if dbus-glib should now be required
On 9/3/19 7:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Looks as if dbus-glib should now be required
On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:08:09AM +0200, gabriele balducci via blfs-dev wrote:
Looking at fedora,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/tree/master they seem to
On 8/28/19 4:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/28/19 6:10 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Despite the current freeze, I have taken the thunderbird ticket, as I
just can'r wait to get my hands on the new version...
I will of course not update the page until I'm told
Hi all
Despite the current freeze, I have taken the thunderbird ticket, as I
just can'r wait to get my hands on the new version...
I will of course not update the page until I'm told to, but will try to
build the new version and note the changes needed.
Having started now, I can already
Hi all
I just did a huge audio/video update extravaganza on my system and
realized that alsa-plugins-1.1.9 does not seem to use ffmpeg anymore.
This does not really change any instructions on the book, only that the
optional dependency to ffmpeg should be removed.
If nobody has a
On 8/20/19 3:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/19/19 8:17 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
Good evening folks,
I noticed something in my Google Highlights app on my phone that
looked interesting:
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15816#c8
It referenced a bug in
On 8/14/19 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
For the last couple of days, I've been running xfce and using
xfce-terminal (old 4.12). And a lot of the time, when I try to
paste something I get pop-up warnings:
Warning: Unsafe Paste
Pasting this text to the terminal may be dangerous
Hi again
I've just closed the ticket 12389: xfce 4.14 and I think compiling xfce
4.14 like it is now in the book is correct. However, I might have missed
some new optional dependencies and some that don't exist anymore. What I
did change, apart from just the version bumbs:
- added an
On 8/14/19 12:08 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 4:44 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 11:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 3:29 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 9:57 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.08.2019, 19:58 +0200
On 8/13/19 11:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 3:29 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 9:57 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.08.2019, 19:58 +0200 schrieb Tim Tassonis via
blfs-dev:
Hi all
For anybody using xfce4 as their desktop, I wanted to share
On 7/31/19 10:01 AM, hykwok1--- via blfs-dev wrote:
2. For Gnome, the default font name of "Monospace font" is "Source Code Pro".
(Reference:
https://github.com/GNOME/gsettings-desktop-schemas/blob/master/schemas/org.gnome.desktop.interface.gschema.xml.in)
The font can be downloaded from:
On 7/12/19 1:08 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/11/19 5:28 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:39:23PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
As you can see in my mail headers, I now managed to compile
thunderbird-60.8.0 with rustc 1.35.0, using
Hi all
As you can see in my mail headers, I now managed to compile
thunderbird-60.8.0 with rustc 1.35.0, using the following two sed commands:
sed -i -e '/#!\[deny(missing_docs)\]/d' servo/components/style/lib.rs
sed -i -e 's/#!\[deny(unsafe_code,
missing_docs)\]/#!\[deny(unsafe_code)\]/g'
On 7/11/19 8:02 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:34:48AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev <
blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
Hi all
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird
On 7/11/19 6:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Tim, dear Douglas,
On 7/11/19 6:34 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build out of
the box with rustc 1.35.0. I'm currently looking
On 7/11/19 6:53 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/11/19 6:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Tim, dear Douglas,
On 7/11/19 6:34 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build
On 7/11/19 6:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Tim, dear Douglas,
On 7/11/19 6:34 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build out of
the box with rustc 1.35.0. I'm currently looking
Hi all
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build out of
the box with rustc 1.35.0. I'm currently looking for solutions/patches,
seems that ubuntu has something. If anybody has seen a patch regarding
"fix-missing-docs-error", I'd welcome any pointers, of course.
The
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
