Re: [blfs-dev] proposal: archive fuse2

2019-09-19 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: Now gvfs-1.42 has been ported to use fuse3 and nothing depends on fuse2. Should we archive it? Last time I checked I needed fuse2 for exfat-fuse / exfat-utils . How would you mount exfat USB sticks without? I don't really care whether it's

Re: [blfs-dev] firefox-69.0 ftbfs

2019-09-03 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote: On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: Looks as if dbus-glib should now be

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice-6.3.0 , Version 2019-08-22, rtld(GNU_HASH) , libraries questions

2019-08-26 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Mon, 26 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: My worry (Hoping to be paranoiac) and this concern the book: - Libreoffice Book directives are such, that 77 components are added/downloaded within external/tarballs directory, this between the configure phase and the build

Re: [blfs-dev] Build libreoffice-6.3.0.4, glibc-2.30, kernel-5.2.5, success but... (a clue?)

2019-08-15 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: first... /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc contents seems ok to me I did not even mention pkgconfig stuff, because I was rather sure libxml2 installed it identical for all of us, otherwise I would have expected trouble way before trying to

Re: [blfs-dev] Build libreoffice-6.3.0.4, glibc-2.30, kernel-5.2.5, success but...

2019-08-15 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: On 08/15/2019 03:20 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: setting a symlink as /usr/include/libxml -> /usr/include/libxm2/libxml is good enough for libreoffice build to be successful.

Re: [blfs-dev] Build libreoffice-6.3.0.4, glibc-2.30, kernel-5.2.5, success but...

2019-08-15 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: I am able to build libreoffice-6.3 without trouble [...] libxml2 generate include files as /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/*.h Confirmed. setting a symlink as /usr/include/libxml -> /usr/include/libxm2/libxml is good enough for

Re: [blfs-dev] Unable to build libreoffice-6.3.0.4

2019-08-12 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: Has anyone managed to build libreoffice-6.3.0.4 ? Yes, me too, just now. I'm getting what looks, to me, like a C++ error. This is with glibc-2.29. glibc-2.29, gcc-9.1.0, icu-64_2 and --with-system-icu here [build CXX]

Re: [blfs-dev] svn-2019-07-29 libreoffice + JDK, autgen.sh error?

2019-07-30 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote: Trying to compile libreoffice on 8.5 and get an autogen.sh error [...] Furthermore, I see no reference to java/jdk with recommended or optional list. Interesting. I wasn't even aware it would be building without. At least

Re: [blfs-dev] rustc-1.36 broken

2019-07-17 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, baldu...@units.it wrote: Actually, the culprit seems to be the librsvg-2.45.7 distro: in Makefile.in I find: 8< $(CARGO) --locked build $(CARGO_VERBOSE) $(CARGO_TARGET_ARGS) $(CARGO_RELEASE_ARGS) --features "c-library" \ && $(AR) d $(RUST_LIB)

[blfs-dev] rustc-1.36 broken

2019-07-16 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, for the brave: librsvg-2.45.7 works fine for me for some time now. If compiled with rustc-1.35. But trying to compile it with rustc-1.36 (get it from https://fossies.org/linux/misc/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.xz) fails. A pretty late linking error - missing symbol deep down in what seems to be

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] Things could get much worse for bzip2

2019-07-01 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi all, bringing this to blfs-dev for a reason: On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: That would be bad, but for LFS we can work around by converting everything that needs bz2 to either xz or gz. That's what I was thinking/doing for *many* years. You either want stuff to be

Re: [blfs-dev] RFC: remove `&&' in our instructions

2019-03-27 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: instruction A && instruction B && instruction C The script does not exit if either instruction A or instruction B fails, but the following instructions are not executed... This may lead to a script completing successfully, while

Re: [blfs-dev] meson-0.50.0 dislikes -Dselinux=disabled in glib

2019-03-21 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi all, On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: My build of recent svn is progressing *slowly* and glib seems to have moved on to 2.60 since I started (or else I forgot to update the version). But either way, with meson-0.50.0 and glib-2.58.3 I'm getting: meson.build:1:0: ERROR:

Re: [blfs-dev] Error building firefox 63.0

2018-11-09 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: You did not mention that people using old ICU (e.g. 60) also had the problem. Because I do not agree with that: For me, firefox-63 built just fine without patching with either its internal icu (ISTR despite system icu-63) or with system

Re: [blfs-dev] Error building firefox 63.0

2018-11-03 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi all, On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: After the clang build (probably) fails, can you try commenting out ac_add_options --with-system-icu Thanks, that's it, at least for me: Build fails with system icu4c-63.1,

Re: [blfs-dev] Error building firefox 63.0

2018-10-25 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi all, On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: Tue Oct 16 19:10:44 CDT 2018 icu4c-62.1 I have -63_1 ^ - see the end of my reply After the clang build (probably) fails, can you try commenting out ac_add_options --with-system-icu Thanks, that's it, at least for

Re: [blfs-dev] Error building firefox 63.0

2018-10-24 Thread dueffert--- via blfs-dev
Hi, On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote: Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the following error: so far I fail to build FF63 too (while 62.0.3 was fine)... This is with gcc 7.3.0 and the system_graphite2_harfbuzz-1 patch, but without node.js ... with gcc 8.2.0 and

Re: [blfs-dev] mplayer and transcode

2018-08-24 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, Bruce Dubbs wrote: mplayer. The most recent version is 1.3.0, but that was released Feb 2016. It does not build at all in 8.3. Unexpected. Worked in previous build... *Checking* Confirmed. I do see 2 issues, only the first kept me from building MPlayer-1.3.0 and it's

Re: [blfs-dev] Progress towards 8.3

2018-08-23 Thread dueffert
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:56:04PM +0200, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote: On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Bruce Dubbs wrote: chapter 13: rustc 1.25.0 1.28.0 #9168 rustc-1.28.0 works fine for me with a single change: "quiet-tests" is

Re: [blfs-dev] Progress towards 8.3

2018-08-23 Thread dueffert
Hi all, On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Please go ahead and comment in line or in the open tickets. OK. I'm not exactly following the books but use them as a reference in case of trouble and therefore are rather close to them. And I completed rebuilding my system yesterday. Therefore

Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help

2018-03-26 Thread dueffert
Hi all, On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Bruce Dubbs wrote: These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at: #10506 glib-networking-2.56.0 -- Using: mkdir build && cdbuild && CFLAGS=-I../tls \ meson --prefix=/usr\ -Dlibproxy_support=false \

Re: [blfs-dev] Samba 4.8.0 requires libtirpc

2018-03-24 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Sat, 24 Mar 2018, Ryan Marsaw wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 23/03/2018 20:22, Ryan Marsaw wrote: Samba 4.8.0 requires libtirpc.  Without it, the configuration stage fails with the following: This is related to the same issue involving rpcsvc-proto.  One of

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r19968 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/sysutils introduction/welcome x/lib

2018-03-19 Thread dueffert
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Armin K. wrote: On 19.3.2018. 17:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 03/19/2018 11:02 AM, Armin K. wrote: On 19.3.2018. 03:18, via blfs-book wrote: Author: bdubbs Date: Sun Mar 18 19:18:21 2018 New Revision: 19968 Log: Update to pango-1.42.0. Modified:    

Re: [blfs-dev] wayland-protocols and mesa

2018-02-24 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Tim Tassonis wrote: Does anybody else use mesa without wayland? I used to for quite some time. The reason for me to start with wayland (and mesa support for it) was gtk4 (3.91.*), which refused to build without at some point. Other packages using wayland now (gtk3,

[blfs-dev] certificate issue

2018-01-12 Thread dueffert
Hi, I do have a TLS certificate issue in BLFS, maybe someone can enlighten me what's happening here: Trying to build rustc-1.23 fails for me, due to curl not willing to download from https://dev-static.rust-lang.org . The CA that signed it ("Starfield Technologies, Inc") seems to be in

Re: [blfs-dev] dependency oddity

2018-01-05 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 05/01/2018 17:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote: The only reason for shadow in BLFS is to add PAM/cracklib.  The term 'Required' may be a little inconsistent, but we need something stronger than 'Recommended'. Maybe remove any dep in shadow, since it'd

Re: [blfs-dev] alpine

2017-12-10 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Bruce Dubbs wrote: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mail.pine/FxWD5iqciB8 Thanks for the link. We can keep alpine but will need to update the url if/when it changes. If you notice a url change, can you please let us know here. Not actually a "url

Re: [blfs-dev] alpine

2017-11-28 Thread dueffert
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 28/11/2017 16:38, Bruce Dubbs wrote: The alpine package does not seem to be maintained any more. As pointed out before - it still is. The url we are using says: "Website is temporary sleeping" and they want the owner to upgrade to a commercial

Re: [blfs-dev] RFC - Proposed patch to glib

2017-10-13 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I run a lot of commands from the command line. Many of the graphical applications such as gedit use glib. I get a ton of spam on the terminal when I run them Same here, though it is more like dozens instead of tons of messages. I've written a

Re: [blfs-dev] pango 1.14.10 seems to require gtk-doc

2017-08-23 Thread dueffert
Hi, On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Tim Tassonis wrote: It seems that latest pango seems to now unconditionally require gtk-doc. Seems stupid, but I have not found a way around it. We did promote gtkdoc to recommended in pango. With a little more work, I think you could remove

Re: [blfs-dev] glibc-2.26 : xlocale.h has gone

2017-08-17 Thread dueffert
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Ken Moffat wrote: failed in icu: digitlst.cpp:67:13: fatal error: xlocale.h: No such file or directory This is documented in https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.26#Removal_of_.27xlocale.h.2 Fixed by the following: sed -i 's/xlocale.h/locale.h/'

Re: [blfs-dev] aspell-0.60.6.1 fails to compile

2017-05-11 Thread dueffert
On Fri, 12 May 2017, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote: On Thu, 11 May 2017, Bruce Dubbs wrote: The '\0' is an old way to check for a null string. It probably can be fixed with strlen(top.do_check) == 0 or possibly top.do_check == (char*)'\0' But I doubt this was the intention. It seems

Re: [blfs-dev] aspell-0.60.6.1 fails to compile

2017-05-11 Thread dueffert
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Bruce Dubbs wrote: modules/filter/tex.cpp:177:72: error: ISO C++ forbids comparison between pointer and integer [-fpermissive] if (top.in_what == Parm || top.in_what == Opt || top.do_check == '\0') The '\0' is an old way to check for a null string. It probably can be

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso

2016-04-18 Thread dueffert
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote: dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote: if uncluding mc, then its dependencies - at least glib and libffi. libssh2 has been handy here too (for virtual sftp file system support), though I recognize it is not even in the book :-( Yes, of course the dependent

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso

2016-04-18 Thread dueffert
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS. It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X implementation. What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following: [...] Sounds good! What else? if