On 13/03/2018 15:51, Ken Moffat wrote:
The latest firefox has now been released, but their process for
offering the source has changed (not a surprise to me, they've been
doing this for the 59 betas) -
Speaking of FF, I just changed my default browser from seamonkey to FF.
I have a question ab
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:24:10PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
> We usually don't care much about the extracted directory name. I can give a
> dozen of examples where the directory name does not match the package name,
> and we do not say anything...
>
I suspect that many *new* readers of BL
On 13/03/2018 15:51, Ken Moffat wrote:
> The latest firefox has now been released, but their process for
> offering the source has changed (not a surprise to me, they've been
> doing this for the 59 betas) -
>
> The SOURCE file at
> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/59.0/SOURCE
> is jus
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:00:02AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> What does 'Help->About Firefox' say?
>
> -- Bruce
>
59.0 (64-bit)
The betas I tried all claimed to be 59.0 - the 58 betas all said
they were -bNN
ĸen
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boo
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:51:16PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> And if I use wget the default filename is c61f5f5ead... .tar.bz2 but
> the directory within it is mozilla-release-c61f5f5ead.../
>
> Fine if you have a wide screen in which to read the book ;)
>
> I suggest that we recommend using w
On 03/13/2018 09:51 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
The latest firefox has now been released, but their process for
offering the source has changed (not a surprise to me, they've been
doing this for the 59 betas) -
The SOURCE file at
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/59.0/SOURCE
is just some te
