Re: [boinc_dev] New Vboxwrapper builds

Is there any way we could have an app version configuration flag that the project could set? Something like “do not use windows COM” set for an app version? This would allow support for both scenarios/configs, with one exe, without requiring recompiles. There are advantages to COM, I'm

[boinc_dev] BOINC Account Manager - Custom Resource Shares not restored, when detaching+reattaching

then have to go into BOINCStats web, and manually set them for the ~60 projects, to a different value, then back to original value, in order for the reply to set them correctly on the client. Can you please try to repro and fix? Thanks, Jacob Klein BOINC Cheerleader

Re: [boinc_dev] Devolpement of BOINC

has done enough, and the estimates are still way off, contact the project to see how they can help. Long story short: If no tasks are deadline miss, BOINC should be honoring your resource share. If tasks are deadline miss, BOINC prioritizes those ahead of resource share. Regards, Jacob Kl

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

nks, Jacob ____ From: Jacob Klein <jacob_w_kl...@msn.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 7:38 PM To: David Anderson Subject: Re: [boinc_alpha] [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates Survey says? I'd like your "go ahead", before I nudge RN

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

know, Thanks, Jacob From: Rom Walton <r...@romwnet.org> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 9:30 PM To: David Anderson; Jacob Klein; Juha Sointusalo Cc: BOINC Developers Mailing List; Boinc Projects; BOINC Alpha Subject: RE: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualB

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_projects] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

: vboxwrapper_26198ab7_windows_x86_64.exe --- Size: 1,696,768 Theory version: vboxwrapper_26198ab5_windows_x86_64.exe --- Size: 1,695,744 Kind Regards, Jacob From: Laurence <laurence.fi...@cern.ch> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 3:17 AM To: Jacob Klein; David Anderson

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

Version" resolved, maybe consider doing another version bump to 26201, for reasons of sanity :) Then let me know when to retest it - I'm getting good at it. Thanks, Jacob ____ From: Jacob Klein <jacob_w_kl...@msn.com> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 5:37 PM To

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

Thanks David, I don't suppose there's any chance you could test, too, to see if you can get any repro? Wishful thinking? :) From: David Anderson <da...@ssl.berkeley.edu> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 4:53:53 PM To: Juha Sointusalo; Jacob Klein Cc: Rom

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

<juha.sointus...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 3:09:12 PM To: Jacob Klein Cc: David Anderson; Rom Walton; BOINC Developers Mailing List; Boinc Projects; BOINC Alpha Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates On 5 November 2017 at 11:14, Jacob

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

drop that exe, have no fear." Yeah, still working on it .. From: David Anderson <da...@ssl.berkeley.edu> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 8:06 PM To: Juha Sointusalo; Jacob Klein Cc: Boinc Projects; BOINC Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [boinc_dev]

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC - October 2017 VirtualBox and VBoxWrapper updates

is to get RNA World to use a wrapper that's compatible with VirtualBox 5.2.x, which is important because of compatibility with Windows 10 while running the project's super-long-running monster tasks. Let me know when I can test a new VBoxWrapper, please! Thanks, Jacob Klein

Re: [boinc_dev] 7.8.3 client released for testing

Wow, I don’t understand you. What is your complaint exactly? David requested immediate testing of a version he’d like to release soon, which has key fixes. Seems reasonable to me. Let's test per the Alpha instructions, then report results n the Alpha web page. Fun indeed! From: Charles

[boinc_dev] VirtualBox 5.2 - vboxwrapper update

boxwrapper update might be necessary soon.. after VirtualBox 5.2 is finalized in the upcoming days/weeks. Thank you, Jacob Klein ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu https://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscr

Re: [boinc_dev] 7.8.0 or 7.8.1 ??

Now I'm seeing 7.7.2 being offered! lolwut? http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php Did the code that progresses that Development version number, get stuck in Reverse? I once had a car do that - go in reverse when it was in drive - had to get it fixed :)

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Time for version 7.8.1?

Another thing to check is the ability to do RPCs over port 31416, which is the default BOINC port I believe. See if it is getting blocked by some firewall? From: Richard Haselgrove Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 6:48 AM To: Filip

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Time for version 7.8.1?

Friday, August 11, 2017 8:24 PM To: Jacob Klein; Juha Sointusalo; Charlie Fenton Cc: boinc_dev email List; boinc_alpha email list Subject: Re: [boinc_alpha] [boinc_dev] Time for version 7.8.1? Great. I'll use 5.1.26. On 8/11/2017 3:19 PM, Jacob Klein wrote: VirtualBox 5.1.24 will be, at this

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Time for version 7.8.1?

VirtualBox 5.1.24 will be, at this point in time, the bare minimum necessary to work correctly on the upcoming Windows 10 Version 1709 release (Fall Creator's Update - September 2017). This is because of Microsoft's changes, with the VirtualBox breakage detailed here, with the solution version

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Disappearing BOINC Icon in System Tray (7.7.2) Requiring Manual Restart on Boot-Up

Correction: I think Clifton originally reported it, and I confirmed it, and tried to describe the behavior completely. Anyway…I hope it gets fixed. From: Jacob Klein<mailto:jacob_w_kl...@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 9:09 PM To: Richard Haselgrove<mailto:

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Disappearing BOINC Icon in System Tray (7.7.2) Requiring Manual Restart on Boot-Up

back home, I will confirm this behavior on my other Windows 10 > > machine, then do the Creator upgrade and see if the launch problem > > resolves itself. I do not have this problem on this machine running > > Windows 10 Creator -- but then I don't think I ever saw that &qu

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] BOINC 7.7.2 released for Win

t;Add Project" with nothing to add and clicking Cancel allows it to continue; other times, the manager doesn't even show up to the user even though the client is running in the background! Regards, Jacob Klein From: boinc_alpha <boinc_alpha-boun...@ssl

Re: [boinc_dev] Project application using more memory than it reports to BOINC

Hi Jord, To my knowledge, Windows does not have a way to accurately determine how much memory is truly being used by a VM. And thus, it is a special case. VirtualBox states: https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch03.html#settings-motherboard 3.4. System settings 3.4.1. "Motherboard" tab Base

Re: [boinc_dev] updating resource share resets to zero

Mike: Which project, and which URL, are you trying to change resource share on? I'm attached to ~60, and you never provided exact steps to reproduce... What are those steps? From: boinc_dev on behalf of mike bader

Re: [boinc_dev] problem with check pointing

Just a thought .. Do you happen to have any BOINC-related data in the following folder? C:\Users\{UserName}\AppData\Local\VirtualStore Data in the VirtualStore (which gets read/used FIRST by a program instead of the ProgramData data, apparently for compatibility reasons related to running

Re: [boinc_dev] Problems with cached memory under 64-bit Windows

I'd like to clarify a couple points. The Windows 10 setting which can use your computer's upload bandwidth to share updates to/from other PCs (peer-to-peer), can be found in Settings -> Update & security -> Windows Update -> Advanced Options -> Choose how updates are delivered. There's an

Re: [boinc_dev] Games with BOINC?

He never said without user's consent, and in fact later clarified that he would have the user's consent. This is a legitimate question, with no malicious intent, so far as I know. Try not to make assumptions. From: nicolas.alva...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:18:57 -0300 To:

Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority

...@btopenworld.com CC: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority I checked in a change that will run coprocessor jobs at BELOW_NORMAL, even if they use = 1 CPU. -- David On 29-Jan-2015 1:28 PM, Jacob Klein wrote: David, I expect coprocessor jobs

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] BOINC re-using slot directories without ensuring they're empty

the bug-chase until the weekend. On Monday, 11 May 2015, 9:42, Jacob Klein jacob_w_kl...@msn.com wrote

Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority

] set app priority I checked in a change that will run coprocessor jobs at BELOW_NORMAL, even if they use = 1 CPU. -- David On 29-Jan-2015 1:28 PM, Jacob Klein wrote: David, I expect coprocessor jobs (including gpu jobs), to be set at a higher priority than cpu jobs, in order

Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority

GPU' definition instead, and ignore the CPU fraction? From: David Anderson da...@ssl.berkeley.edu To: Jacob Klein jacob_w_kl...@msn.com Cc: BOINC Development boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority Jacob: BOINC

Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority

that would also require a full CPU core. Thoughts? Thanks, Jacob Klein Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:49:49 -0700 From: da...@ssl.berkeley.edu To: jacob_w_kl...@msn.com; boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] set app priority Currently, when the client runs an app

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Scheduler work fetch - Support coproc miner_asic

David has checked in a change that he believes fixes the problem. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/gitweb/?p=boinc-v2.git;a=commit;h=323d61bcee995f8411720a1f6b8112788aa5034a Thanks David! -- Jacob From: jacob_w_kl...@msn.com To: da...@ssl.berkeley.edu CC: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu Subject: RE:

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Scheduler work fetch - Support coproc miner_asic

David, Your updated 'miner_asic' server logic is still not working correctly for us. I'm trying to get ASIC work from Bitcoin Utopia, using an ASIC-ONLY work fetch request, but still running into problems, on my machine that has 3 NVIDIA GPUs. Rebirther requests that I relay the information to

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

, 03 Oct 2014, 10:10PM To: 'Jacob Klein' [jacob_w_kl...@msn.com]; 'Richard Haselgrove' [r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com]; McLeod, John [john.mcl...@sap.com]; boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu [boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu] Subject: RE: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed. On my computer, which

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

I'd like to see Prioritized to meet deadline in the UI, next to Running. From: Richard Haselgrovemailto:r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com Sent: ‎10/‎3/‎2014 9:19 AM To: McLeod, Johnmailto:john.mcl...@sap.com; boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edumailto:boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

; maybe we can show it in the event log in some better way. -- D On 03-Oct-2014 3:24 PM, Jacob Klein wrote: I'd like to see Prioritized to meet deadline in the UI, next to Running. From: Richard Haselgrovemailto:r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com Sent

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014, 2:22PM *To:* BOINC Development [boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu] *Subject:* Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed. Skipping queue to meet deadline ? -Juha On 3 October 2014 19:15, Jacob Klein jacob_w_kl...@msn.com wrote: I still would like to see Prioritized to meet

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINCscheduling plan class possible issue

Yes. Unfortunate. Back when my setup consisted of [GTX 660 Ti + GTX 460 + GTS 240] ... it was trial and error to see which applications would simply fail hard on that GTS 240. After the trial and error, I was able to build a pretty good exclude_gpu list in my cc_config.xml, such that I'd be

Re: [boinc_dev] Scheduler work fetch - Support coproc miner_asic

I saw that David checked in scheduler changes that will hopefully fix this problem. Thanks David! http://boinc.berkeley.edu/gitweb/?p=boinc-v2.git;a=log;h=HEAD http://boinc.berkeley.edu/gitweb/?p=boinc-v2.git;a=commit;h=c2a04210744d3ec9b3d23ec818e98bb755277f06 - Jacob From:

Re: [boinc_dev] Scheduler work fetch - Support coproc miner_asic

From: jacob_w_kl...@msn.com To: boinc_al...@ssl.berkeley.edu Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 02:08:42 -0400 CC: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [boinc_alpha] Scheduler work fetch - Support coproc miner_asic David replied to me privately. Although he is thinking about possible options for