1. Grab a calculator. (you won't be able to do this one in your head)
2. Key in the first three digits of your phone number (NOT the area code)
3. Multiply by 80
4. Add 1
5. Multiply by 250
6. Add the last 4 digits of your phone number
7. Add the last 4 digits of your phone number again.
8.
David Hobby wrote:
They are. One of the justifications for the brazilian coup
d'etat in 1964 was that the then President had been the
Vice President for two periods, and since reelection of
the President was not allowed, he didn't have a legitimate
claim to Presidency. Also, when he fled the
Michael Harney wrote:
Humans, by contrast, have only been around for about 200,000 years.
It depends on how you define humans. If we consider the separation from
the chimpanzee(s), it would be _much_ earlier, 1 to 7 million years ago.
Alberto Monteiro
Selective quoting of William's post below.
William T Goodall wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/wtwtgod/3518375.stm
A survey of people's religious beliefs in 10 countries suggests the UK
is among the most secular nations in the world.
Ten thousand people were questioned in
On 27 Feb 2004, at 2:35 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
How many of the UK responses were from Northern Ireland?
Northern Ireland makes up 2.9% of the UK population. I presume the
pollsters followed accepted methodologies to include their views.
And how much has the Irish situation influenced the
I think it's a tad irresponsible, that there isn't a more concerted effort
to thwart the possible extinction of our species don't you? Sure, every now
and then they give us a decent documentary with someone like John de Lancie
as the narrator, to give it a feeling of awe and mystery. But in the
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040225/tech_summit_indecency_1.html
Reuters
Reuters Summit-FCC's Martin ponders indecency on pay TV, radio
Wednesday February 25, 6:31 pm ET
By Jeremy Pelofsky
NEW YORK, Feb 25 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators should consider whether
radio and television services carried by
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Harney wrote:
Humans, by contrast, have only been around for about 200,000 years.
It depends on how you define humans. If we consider the separation from
the chimpanzee(s), it would be _much_ earlier, 1 to 7 million years ago.
Alberto
Define Fascist.
Do you believe, then, that the Freedom of SPeech
clause should protect the right of broadcasters to
drop F-bombs or other inappropriate material over the
air on channels when sensitive viewers (i.e.
children)are watching?
Damon.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:05:47 -0600
Is Erik leaving the group?
Will other people complain?
Will the
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Define Fascist.
Do you believe, then, that the Freedom of SPeech
clause should protect the right of broadcasters to
drop F-bombs or other inappropriate material over the
air on channels when sensitive viewers (i.e.
children)are watching?
Yes.
Define Fascist.
You still did not define the above.
Yes.
Well that's just asinine and immature.
Damon.
=
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Define Fascist.
You still did not define the above.
Yes.
Well that's just asinine and immature.
Whatever.
When they came for my freedom from arbitrary search and seizure I said
nothing because I was not a drug dealer.
When they came
Whatever.
Then make a well structured, reasonable post, without
using it as an ipportunity to launch attacks against
whomever you have an agenda against, and explain your
position in a form that does not involve posting
random articles that seem to support your agenda.
When they came for my
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whatever.
Then make a well structured, reasonable post, without
using it as an ipportunity to launch attacks against
whomever you have an agenda against, and explain your
position in a form that does not involve posting
random articles that seem to
I've explained these things before. I'm not going
to do so again, just
because _you_ weren't reading.
I have been reading. You have not been constructing
arguments.
All of these right have been attacked by this
administration, and I've
posted multiple articles about the administrations
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:01:20 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
From: Matthew and Julie Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:59:20 -0500
My favorite stuff, the stuff I keep in my iPod, would be from the 80's.
Travis Edmunds wrote:
But in the grand scheme of things, nothing
is proceeding the way that perhaps it should.
Such is life, sadly.
Nothing is proceeding the way that perhaps it should reminds me of
Nothing succeeds as planned from Heller's Good as Gold, but without
the conviction.
Not that
Kevin Tarr wrote:
1. Grab a calculator. (you won't be able to do this one in your head)
2. Key in the first three digits of your phone number (NOT the area code)
3. Multiply by 80
4. Add 1
5. Multiply by 250
6. Add the last 4 digits of your phone number
7. Add the last 4 digits of your
my asking? Do you listen to the likes of Sepultura,
What a great band! I haven't heard/listened to them in
a long time. Not sure what era I like more (pre or
post Beneath the Remains...). Really liked Max
Cavalera as a drummer, but I heard the fired him(?).
Oh well...
Damon.
=
JDG wrote:
A much closer analogy would be a society that had always only
permitted same-sex unions... alas, any such ociety would now no
longer exist.
I think this is common in some animal groups: there are bands of
same-sex animals and rogue individuals of the other sex, who
[during the
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:25:04 -0600
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whatever.
Then make a
The articles are not an argument in and of
themselves. I may be wrong, but
that sounds like what Damon is saying.
That's exactly what I'm saying. I'm also asking The
Fool to back up the assertation that the US Government
is somehow Fascist by asking him to define fascism.
Otherise its just
Doug said:
Do you oppose SSM and if so, why?
I don't oppose it, but there's at least one reasonable argument against
it: marriage is not just an agreement between two people but also an
agreement by which the government (at least the UK government!)
provides tax benefits for married couples in
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Oh yes thank you for reminding me, I had almost forgotten all
about
you Erick.
Come to mention it I also forot these words: bully, adipose,
corpulent, fleshy, gross, heavy, obese, overblown, overweight,
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also heavily disagree with his assertation that
Freedom of Speech defends one's right to use crude
language or show inappropriate material where it may
be exposed to minors. I think hiding behind this
element of the
JDG said:
Another difference that I anticipate will develop will be the
incentives for producing and raising children. These incentives will
be applied to marriages, but not to civil unions. Civil unions, will
however, acquire many of the rights of marriage that currently
formalize the
JDG said:
At any rate, I find it has hardly been established that there somehow
exists a universal right to marry a person of the same sex.
If we start from the premise that men and women should have equal
rights, then it's obvious, isn't it? After all, women have the right to
marry men,
Jan Coffey wrote:
However, you would think that if it's ok to raz someone claiming that
they look pathetic becouse of something they did, why is it not ok to
raz them back about looking pathetic becouse of something they did
not do? (Namely get enough exercice for their caloric intake) Or if
Well then, would it be inapropriate for me to ask
you to please
provide the definition of Free and Speech which
allows freedom
of speech to align with your doctrin?
My definition is freedom from persecution from the
STATE for what one says. Specifically, I would define
it as the freedom to
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:16:47PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
I don't oppose it, but there's at least one reasonable argument
against it: marriage is not just an agreement between two people
but also an agreement by which the government (at least the UK
government!) provides tax benefits for
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug said:
Do you oppose SSM and if so, why?
I don't oppose it, but there's at least one reasonable argument against
it: marriage is not just an agreement between two people but also an
agreement by which the government (at least the UK government!)
At 01:25 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
1. Grab a calculator. (you won't be able to do this one in your head)
2. Key in the first three digits of your phone number (NOT the area code)
3. Multiply by 80
4. Add 1
5. Multiply by 250
6. Add the last 4 digits of your phone number
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:38:32PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You know, I'm a little touchy about this right now. Maybe I shouldn't
be, but I am.
Funny, the comment didn't even register on me. Most of it is because I
don't pay a lot of attention to Jane's posts anyway since the S/N is so
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:19:58 -
SNIP!!
Personaly I would have prefered no personal attacks at all, but
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Well then, would it be inapropriate for me to ask
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:38:32 -0600
Jan Coffey wrote:
However, you would think that if it's ok to raz
Michael said:
Are sterile heterosexual couples denied marriage? What if the couple
does not want children? IOW, is having children a requirement for
marriage? The answer: No, it is not.
There's a rough analogy here between state-supported marriage and
patents. In the one case, the state
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Earth almost put on impact alert
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:12:08 -0800
Travis Edmunds wrote:
But in the grand scheme of things, nothing
is proceeding the
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:29:26 -0800 (PST)
my asking? Do you listen to the likes of Sepultura,
What a great band! I
At 04:39 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Well then, would it be inapropriate for me to ask
you to please
provide the definition of Free and Speech which
allows freedom
of speech to align with your doctrin?
My definition is freedom from persecution from the
STATE for what one says. Specifically, I
What exactly makes an obscenity obscene? Aside from
something obscene being
labled an obscenity of course.
That's a good question and perhaps one worthy of
exploration. However, its also pretty academic IMHO.
Whether you think the F-bomb or other obcenities are
indeed unacceptable or not, I
Michael Harney wrote:
It depends on how you define humans. If we consider the separation from
the chimpanzee(s), it would be _much_ earlier, 1 to 7 million years ago.
I was speeking of humans as a species (homo sapiens),
But we don't know _for sure_ if Homo erectus was a race of Homo
Damon Agretto wrote:
my asking? Do you listen to the likes of Sepultura,
What a great band! I haven't heard/listened to them in
a long time. Not sure what era I like more (pre or
post Beneath the Remains...). Really liked Max
Cavalera as a drummer, but I heard the fired him(?).
Oh well...
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a constant speed, on
your left side there is an abyss. On your right side you have a fire
engine and it keeps the same speed as you. In front of you runs a pig,
larger than your car. A helicopter is following you, at ground level. Both
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patents. In the one case, the state gains the benefit of new citizens
by granting tax breaks and other advantages to married couples. In the
I'm not a tax expert, but AFAIK, there aren't any tax breaks for being
married
here in the US. In fact, it's
From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a constant speed, on
your left side there is an abyss. On your right side you have a fire
engine and it keeps the same speed as you. In front of you runs a pig,
larger than your car. A helicopter is
That's a good question and perhaps one worthy of exploration. However,
its also pretty academic IMHO. Whether you think the F-bomb or other
obcenities are indeed unacceptable or not, I think the majority of
people in the US, FREX, would define those words as obcene.
So we're going to put
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 06:15:34PM -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
Seems the problem is a bit unconstrained...
I predict a pun may is in the offing...
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Travis Edmunds wrote:
I think it's a tad irresponsible, that there isn't a more concerted effort
to thwart the possible extinction of our species don't you?
A big impact like the one that ended the Cretaceous would _not_
cause the extinction of our species. Or do you
At 05:10 AM 2/27/04, Kevin Tarr wrote:
1. Grab a calculator. (you won't be able to do this one in your head)
FWIW, I suspect that there are at least some here who are capable of
performing the calculations below without a calculator (or even pencil and
paper). (I probably would have started
At 04:01 PM 2/27/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Well
At 04:05 PM 2/27/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:38:32 -0600
Jan Coffey wrote:
At 12:12 PM 2/27/04, Dave Land wrote:
Travis Edmunds wrote:
But in the grand scheme of things, nothing
is proceeding the way that perhaps it should.
Such is life, sadly.
Nothing is proceeding the way that perhaps it should
Just as a matter of interest, who is it who decides how things should
- Original Message -
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
I also heavily disagree with his assertation that
Freedom of Speech
In a message dated 2/27/2004 5:41:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But we don't know _for sure_ if Homo erectus was a race of Homo
sapies or a different species. There are some hints that it was possible
to exchange genes from H. erectus to H. sapies - this would place
Ronn! wrote:
Just as a matter of interest, who is it who decides how things should
be proceeding?
I believe that would be me, and for a small monthly subscription I can
keep you up to date.
--
Doug
8^)
___
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 05:10 AM 2/27/04, Kevin Tarr wrote:
1. Grab a calculator. (you won't be able to do this one in your head)
FWIW, I suspect that there are at least some here who are capable of
performing the calculations below without a calculator (or even pencil and
paper). (I
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Sure, we are adults. (Some of us). But a child above three can turn on a TV
or radio.
Above? Try under. We had to put a shield over the TV controls to
keep Sam from playing with the power switch on the big TV. There's a
small TV upstairs set up so's we can watch in the
Bryon Daly wrote:
I'm not a tax expert, but AFAIK, there aren't any tax breaks for being
married
here in the US. In fact, it's generally been the opposite, where married
people
can end up paying more tax than two equivalent single people would. I think
Bush's recent tax cuts may have
Bryon wrote:
I believe these legal rights and standings aren't provided by the
government to reward baby production, or even as a reward at all, but
because the government is recognizing that marriage joins two people
together as next of kin for all legal intents and purposes.
We get a
At 06:44 PM 2/27/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Sure, we are adults. (Some of us). But a child above three can turn on a TV
or radio.
Above? Try under. We had to put a shield over the TV controls to
keep Sam from playing with the power switch on the big TV.
Heck, a *cat* under
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Harney wrote:
It depends on how you define humans. If we consider the separation
from
the chimpanzee(s), it would be _much_ earlier, 1 to 7 million years
ago.
I was speeking of humans as a species (homo sapiens),
But we don't know
- Original Message -
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs
Speaking of strange and probably unintended consequences of changing the
subject line . . .
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 27 Feb 2004, at 2:35 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
How many of the UK responses were from Northern Ireland?
And how much has the Irish situation influenced the views of those in
the UK?
The USA was largely founded by people seeking religious freedom -
freedom from the established Catholic Church
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
However, you would think that if it's ok to raz someone claiming
that
they look pathetic becouse of something they did, why is it not
ok to
raz them back about looking pathetic becouse of something they
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:44 PM 2/27/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Sure, we are adults. (Some of us). But a child above three can turn
on a TV
or radio.
Above? Try under. We had to put a shield over the TV controls to
keep Sam from playing with
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly makes an obscenity obscene? Aside from
something obscene being
labled an obscenity of course.
That's a good question and perhaps one worthy of
exploration. However, its also pretty academic IMHO.
Whether
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Homo [was: Thoughts on gay marriage?]
In a message dated 2/27/2004 5:41:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But we don't know _for sure_ if
http://economist.com/opinion/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=2459758
The case for gay marriage
Feb 26th 2004
From The Economist print edition
It rests on equality, liberty and even society
SO AT last it is official: George Bush is in favour of unequal rights,
big-government intrusiveness and
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a constant speed, on
your left side there is an abyss. On your right side you have a fire
engine and it keeps the same speed as you. In front of you runs a pig,
larger than your car. A helicopter is following you, at
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:30 PM
Subject: Domestic Terrorism: was Great Britain
On 27 Feb 2004, at 2:35 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
How many of the UK responses were from
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:38:32PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You know, I'm a little touchy about this right now. Maybe I
shouldn't
be, but I am.
Funny, the comment didn't even register on me. Most of it is
because I
- Original Message -
From: David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: another riddle?
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a constant speed,
on
your left side
Richard Baker wrote:
I seriously find it very hard to imagine being freaked out by the idea
of gay marriage. It's in the same category as seriously believes in
Creationism. I suppose that's more evidence that those of us on this
side of the Atlantic are godless degenerates.
Hey, I believe in
At 09:07 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: another riddle?
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a
I just came back from watching The Return of the King--again.
It was only 201 minutes long.
Not 210 as in all other times previously watched.
I want my nine minutes back!
William Taylor
Damn gollum theatre chain!
___
In a message dated 2/27/2004 7:35:47 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a constant speed,
on
your left side there is an abyss. On your right side you have a fire
engine and it keeps the same speed
In a message dated 2/27/2004 7:35:47 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. A helicopter is following you, at ground level.
If it's at ground level then that Merry-go-round has a hole in it, or
somebody stuck the Merry-go-round into a hole to bring it down to ground
In a message dated 2/27/2004 7:35:47 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. In front of you runs a pig,
Now the definition of an animal running, usually involves the movement of
legs, and the displacement of the animal from one location to another.
The Merry-go-round
Culled from the MCMedia archive as my email program seems to be eating old
messages in my brin-l folder.
JDG wrote:
As I have hinted earlier, if I were forced to cast a vote, I would vote in
favor of the Federal Marriage Amendment. This is despite the fact, as
noted earlier, that I don't
Jan Coffey wrote:
Two people can have the same BMI, but a different percent body fat. A
person with adiquate muscle mass and a low percent body fat may have
the same BMI as a person who has a lot of body fat because BMI is
calculated using weight and height only.
In fact, I have had the
The Fool wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:44 PM 2/27/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Sure, we are adults. (Some of us). But a child above three can turn
on a TV
or radio.
Above? Try under. We had to put a shield over the TV controls to
In a message dated 2/27/2004 8:11:24 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What
will
you need to do to be able to stop?
Instantly, or when the ride's over?
Standing up and dropping your pants might instantly end the Merry-go-round
ride, but get you a ride in the black
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Culled from the MCMedia archive as my email program seems to be eating
old
messages in my brin-l folder.
JDG wrote:
As I have hinted earlier, if I were forced to cast a vote, I would vote
in
favor of the Federal Marriage Amendment. This is
At 07:33 PM 2/27/04, The Fool wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:44 PM 2/27/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Sure, we are adults. (Some of us). But a child above three can turn
on a TV
or radio.
Above? Try under. We had to put a shield over the TV
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interestingly the demographics are quite clear that the USA will become a
predominantly Catholic nation within the next twenty years.
Really? I've never heard that before - Is this due to immigration or rapid
population growth in certain Catholic
On 2/27/04 1:04 PM, Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You like Slayer!? Neat. How heavy are you willing to go, if you don't mind
my asking? Do you listen to the likes of Sepultura, Soulfly, Pantera, White
Zombie, Coal Chamber, or newer bands like Godsmack, Papa Roach, Korn,
Static-X,
From: Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Domestic Terrorism: was Great Britain
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:39:54 -0500
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interestingly the demographics are quite clear that the USA
91 matches
Mail list logo
