At 10:01 PM 3/14/2005 -0800, you wrote:
What's stunning is the ability of hypocrites to make
excuses for (or ignore) the most relentless and
deliberate politicization and political purge of our
officer corps.
Where can I find out more about this? I checked your website/blog but
didn't see
At 07:51 PM 3/14/2005 -0800, Dr. Brin wrote:
The following is from fomer brinneller Stefan Jones:
It's almost as if being a conservative has come to
mean never being
wrong. Since you're never wrong, the rules for mere
mortals don't
apply. No need for apologies, doubt, or second
thoughts.
Which
At 06:36 PM 3/14/2005 -0800, Dr. Brin wrote:
Moreover, the Saddam regime was begging to be
told where else inspectors wanted to visit.
What utter mularkey!
Hussein was dodging the inspectors left and right. Even Hans Blix never
accused the Iraqis of providing full cooperation!!! If he
At 12:01 PM 3/14/2005 -0800, you wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:59:18 -0500, JDG wrote
False.Iraq had a stagnant nuclear arms program - although nobody
could have verified that it was stagnant at the time. something
about them not complying with UN inspections
How do we know that
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:02:42 -0500, JDG wrote
We spent 12 years trying to verify it, and Iraq refused to comply
with the UN inspections to do so, even after being provided a final
opportunity. Indeed, we were uncovering a lot of evidence that the
Iraqis had something to hide.
And the
Behalf Of John D. Giorgis
Here is how Slate.com answered that question
Since grand jury investigations are secret, it's not clear whether
Novak has already
testified in front of the grand jury, has refused to testify,
Unless you are Bill Clinton, of course.
Or Barry Bonds, for
Behalf Of JDG
But - who would possibly want to save Taiwanese lives when the
sensibilities of the sort of people who run over peaceful
demonstrators with tanks is at stake?
Wouldn't fighting a war with mainland China cost a whole LOT of
Taiwanese lives? (Not to mention American and
Behalf Of JDG
I am sure that that aligning ourselves with Iran in taking over
their
country would have *really* endeared ourselves to the Iraqi
people.To
say nothing about endearing ourselves to the wider Arab
World, our Western
Allies, and the other members of the UN. Uh
On Mar 15, 2005, at 5:54 AM, JDG wrote:
At 07:51 PM 3/14/2005 -0800, Dr. Brin wrote:
The following is from fomer brinneller Stefan Jones:
It's almost as if being a conservative has come to
mean never being
wrong. Since you're never wrong, the rules for mere
mortals don't
apply. No need for
Warren,
On Mar 14, 2005, at 5:20 PM, Dave Land wrote:
The option to include text stating a right-click will save is
probably the optimal one.
And doesn't violate How The Web Works, either, although it does
activate Donald Norman's If you have to explain it, it is designed
wrong meme.
Well,
JDG wrote:
I think this had something to do with Bill Clinton being completely
snookered by the North Koreans, resulting in the DPRK building
plutonium-based nuclear weapons.
Only you, Dr. Brin, could manage to blame the Bush Administration for one
of Clinton's Top 5 failures as President.
- Original Message -
From: Trent Shipley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: Brin: Re: more neocons
On Monday 2005-03-14 23:01, Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:37:34 -0800 (PST), David Brin
On Mar 14, 2005, at 11:22 PM, Dave Land wrote:
I'm actually quite astounded at how easy Apple has made it to get a
web server up and running on Mac OS X
You mean Apache on BSD?
;)
--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The
On Mar 15, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
I do think there is
evidence that senior officers who voice strong criticism of Rumsfeld's
ideas do put their career at risk more than they would have under
previous
presidents.
You mean like whatsisname, the Army general who advised more troops
- Original Message -
From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Brin: Re: more neocons
But I do know that Other Posters on this list have asserted
claims and then, asked for cites, said they
On Mar 15, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Mar 14, 2005, at 11:22 PM, Dave Land wrote:
I'm actually quite astounded at how easy Apple has made it to get a
web server up and running on Mac OS X
You mean Apache on BSD?
;)
Yes, but the point is, you don't have to know that to make it
Heard this guy on the radio today and then found an email from my
health policy list. Not all the answers... but sounds like a good
start to combining prevention and healthcare which Debbie and
I both tend to focus on in any overhaul.
Dan wrote-
I racked my brain to try to figure out any means by which this can be
hyperbola for something that is actually happening. I do think there is
evidence that senior officers who voice strong criticism of Rumsfeld's
ideas do put their career at risk more than they would have under
You can get into a new _Star Wars_ movie for 1/2.5? Where?
You'll Laugh! You'll Cry! You'll Kiss Three I Mean Twelve Bucks
Good-bye! Maru
--Ronn! :)
Ronn, Warren, et al,
For Star Wars 2, I waved my arms softly, I repeated the magic chant, ''We
are not the Jedi ticket holders you
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where can
I find out more about this? I checked your
website/blog but didn't see anyhthing there and
couldn't find
anything in a news search either.
I have already said too much. What is public is a
consistent pattern from the hounding of Shinseki
Warren wrote-
But I do know that Other Posters on this list have asserted
claims and then, asked for cites, said they couldn't reveal their
sources. This behavior seems to havve been accepted from them. Is it
possible we've got a mirror of that here?
Dan wrote
The pattern's wrong. Look at
Dan wrote-
Well, what option would you have had him choose? I agree with Gautam that
the options with N. Korea are bad and worse.
(snip)
Anyways, which choice would you have suggested for Clinton? Do you see a
fourth choice?
From my limited understanding of N. Korea, I don't think any
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:38:18 -0600, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, fish seafood are on the allergen list for me, so I don't touch
any of them anyway.
So no Trout Ice Cream with Eyeball for you?
If you don't get it, then apparently you don't watch enough Iron Chef
or Iron
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:07:27 -0500 (EST), Jim Sharkey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Clearly, some people can't handle spelling either. D'oh!Oh, you're just
having a rough spell today . . .
You know, if puns could kill, one would have to have a
JDG wrote:
Where can I find out more about this? I checked your website/blog but
didn't see anyhthing there and couldn't find anything in a news search
either.
I think that you're just supposed to take his word for it that the Saudis
have a list of US Officers, and pick and choose the ones they
Big news for another list member. Our very own John
Giorgis has just been chosed as a Presidential
Management Fellow - one of the most prestigious
appointments in the civil service. Congratulations
John!
Gautam
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freedom is not free
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:08:28 -0800 (PST), Gautam Mukunda wrote
Big news for another list member. Our very own John
Giorgis has just been chosed as a Presidential
Management Fellow - one of the most prestigious
appointments in the civil service. Congratulations
John!
Congrats, indeed.
But
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Big news for another list member. Our very own John Giorgis has
just been chosed as a Presidential Management Fellow.
Which means what? Takwe pity on those of us who *don't* have Tom Friedman's
home phone number. :-)
Congratulations in any case, John.
Jim
--- Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Big news for another list member. Our very own
John Giorgis has
just been chosed as a Presidential Management
Fellow.
Which means what? Takwe pity on those of us who
*don't* have Tom Friedman's home phone number. :-)
On Mar 15, 2005, at 5:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ronn, Warren, et al,
For Star Wars 2, I waved my arms softly, I repeated the magic
chant, ''We
are not the Jedi ticket holders you seek'' then my girlfriend and I
walked
right in, sat right down and baby, let our hair fall down.
30 matches
Mail list logo
