jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippage
I'm not sure yet how the new Democrats will really
look like, especially
since most of them were elected from the liberal
northeast.
Several Western states, Colorado included, elected
Democratic governors; indeed, our state legislature
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ask a question that has a LITERAL meaning that you didn't
intend,
someone here WILL take it literally and call you on it, one way or
another.
If only I believed that were true. Based on Nick's reaction, its my
jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ask a question that has a LITERAL meaning that you didn't
intend,
someone here WILL take it literally and call you on it, one way or
another.
If only I believed that were true. Based on Nick's
- Original Message -
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: Bad intelligence
GWYDK: I Googled voteview.com and came up with this page at UCSD
(and
we _know_ the kinds of whackos come out
Julia Thompson wrote:
If you'd just started with a If the President asked you for advice
about Iraq, what would you say (...)
Or: if some guy who works with the President may read your e-mails,
what would you write about Iraq? :-)
I know they read me...
Alberto Monteiro
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett narnett@ wrote:
You didn't ask what George Bush would do if he were president,
which
would
be silly, since he is. You asked what *I* would do. I haven't
been
elected, so I'd
On 11/10/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that some people would just much rather get in their partisan
digs than have a serious discussion *shrug*
Allow me to invite you to try a new direction, John. I am serious. And I
have been.
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL
Nick Arnett wrote:
I just hope that all the talk from both sides about
partnership rather than partnership amounts to something
more than politics as usual.
Now who is optimistic? It's a two-party system; there's no
way two players unite in a zero-sum game.
Alberto Monteiro
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the kind of political discussions such as the
ones we have here are also a healthy sign.
You mean like the discussion that produced this exchange?
O.k., Nick - you've been made President of the United States.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Many of the new democrats elected are significantly more conservative
than the democrats of old and it seems clear to me that people like
Is this really true? One of the biggest upsets of Tuesday night was in
New
On 11/9/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't ask what George Bush would do if he were president, which
would
be silly, since he is. You asked what *I* would do. I haven't been
elected, so I'd resign.
Do you really not understand that I simply don't want to play the game of
- Original Message -
From: jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: Bad intelligence
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the kind of political discussions
- Original Message -
From: jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: Bad intelligence
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Many of the new democrats elected
On Nov 9, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Robert Seeberger wrote:
The popularity of Obama now seems like a harbinger and less of a
bubble phenomena as has been posited here.
Isn't Obama actually one of the more liberal members of the Senate?
This ranking actually has him to the left of Hillary, Kerry
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't ask what George Bush would do if he were president,
which
would
be silly, since he is. You asked what *I* would do. I haven't been
elected, so I'd resign.
Do you really not understand that I simply don't want
On 11/9/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I understand that you have absolutely no interest in being
constructive on a difficult issue like Iraq. Rather, you are much more
comfortable just engaging in partisan criticism, without having to offer
any constructive suggestions for
jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't ask what George Bush would do if he were president,
which
would
be silly, since he is. You asked what *I* would do. I haven't been
elected, so I'd resign.
Do you really not understand that I simply
again, he apparently was given bad intelligence and
optimistically (his word) went ahead with something that was doomed to
failure. At least this time it didn't kill anyone.
And Rumsfeld's resignation (good riddance!) is not connected to the fact
that the nation clearly disapproves of the war
On 11/8/2006 8:34:23 PM, Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I just hope that all the talk from both sides about partnership
rather than
partnership amounts to something more than politics as usual.
Did you mean partnership rather than partisanship?
If so, I would agree.
My thinking
rather than partisanship?
Yep. My bad... intelligence? ;-)
I believe that the message to republicans is not that conservatism is
undesirable, but that the extremes of conservatism are not places the
country wants to go. The exact same message should be understood to
apply to liberals
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Bad intelligence
On 11/8/06, Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/2006 8:34:23 PM, Nick Arnett ([EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
