David said:
Rich, who has, however, argued elsewhere that he thinks that states
ought to introduce a kinship registry and cease recognising marriages
altogether, leaving them as a private and/or religious matter.
Interesting, but I'm not sure what you mean. (Where's elsewhere?)
Elsewhere
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:57:03PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
In fact, I have had the same BMI at a time when I was woefully out of
shape as I had a few years later when I'd gotten into the best shape
of my life, because I'd lost as much fat weight as I had gained muscle
weight. :)
I think
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:36:47 -0800 (PST)
What exactly makes an obscenity obscene? Aside from
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Earth almost put on impact alert
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:49:47 +
Travis Edmunds wrote:
I think it's a tad irresponsible, that there isn't a
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thru out Gov't
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:04:47 -0600
At 04:01 PM 2/27/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
What
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:07:10 -0600
At 04:05 PM 2/27/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
Biology taking
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:38:32PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You know, I'm a little touchy about this right now. Maybe I shouldn't
be, but I am.
Funny, the comment didn't even register on me. Most of it is because I
don't pay a lot of attention
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Earth almost put on impact alert
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:20:09 -0600
At 12:12 PM 2/27/04, Dave Land wrote:
Travis Edmunds wrote:
But in the grand
At 03:21 PM 2/27/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
I've explained these things before. I'm not going to do so again, just
because _you_ weren't reading.
But honestly, was *anyone* reading?
Or at least reading *and* taking it seriously?
JDG
___
At 02:49 PM 2/27/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Are sterile heterosexual couples denied marriage? What if the couple does
not want children? IOW, is having children a requirement for marriage?
Of course not. if it were, that would necessitate a post facto way of
invalidating childless
At 02:15 PM 2/26/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose that, in an effort to control world overpopulation
Everyone is free to marry anyone they want from the
same sex, but not of the opposite sex. Would you consider
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:18:11AM +1100, Andrew Paul wrote:
Erik, I am a little confused.
I agree.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:26:33 -0600
On the other I find repetitious use of such language to be
At 09:35 PM 2/27/2004 + Richard Baker wrote:
JDG said:
At any rate, I find it has hardly been established that there somehow
exists a universal right to marry a person of the same sex.
If we start from the premise that men and women should have equal
rights, then it's obvious, isn't it?
At 10:19 PM 2/27/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
What it says to me is that it is a ban on ALL new marriages both
heterosexual and homosexual. It will remove all 1049 'marriage' rights
that now exist for all existing married couples.
Shirley, you can't be serious.
There's the word require in the
At 04:47 PM 2/26/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
Actually, speaking purely for myself, I find I'm MUCH more defensive when
challenged offlist. I _always_ ask why said conversation couldn't take place
onlist.
I think that you are in the minority in preferring to be criticized in
public, rather
At 05:12 PM 2/26/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
A great quote from ABC's The Note blog on the Constitutional
Amendment:
Whatever one thinks about the merits of such an amendment, we are
amazed (OK: not really) at the degree to which the [mainstream press]
casts the President's decision in purely
At 06:05 AM 2/26/2004 -0800 Richard Baker wrote:
I seriously find it very hard to imagine being freaked out by the idea
of gay marriage.
I think a lot of people consider marriage to be the fundamental building
block of society.
At this time, this buidling block is, in their minds, being
Reviews?
JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world,
it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
At 09:24 AM 2/25/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:17 PM 2/24/2004 -0600 Robert Seeberger wrote:
To be honest John, this is one of those discussions where you give the
appearance of being a run with the pack kind of guy. I don't mean to
be insulting,
Travis Edmunds wrote:
What exactly makes an obscenity obscene? Aside from something obscene being
labled an obscenity of course.
serious
In the recent months, the only time I seriously considered
_censuring_ TV for my kids was when they started asking
questions about astrology, that they got
Richard Baker wrote:
Even if we disregard polyamorous relationships
or whatever, surely friendship is one of the bases of civil society -
so why not formally recognise friendships in law?
And what prevents a group of people to create a new firm
whose purpose is just to share their hourse?
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:14:27 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:56:24PM +, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
serious In the recent months, the only time I seriously considered
_censuring_ TV for my kids was when they started asking questions
about astrology, that they got from the TV [Nickelodeon].
I find that much more obscene than
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
women.
Actually, he isn't. He's calling Jan Jane because Jan keeps calling
Erik by variants of his name with additional or alternative letters.
Rich
___
Bob Z wrote:
the current trend seems to be to view the hominids of the last millenia as
seperate species. the dna evidence suggests that neanderthal was a seperate
species and erectus was pretty different from sapien.
Yes, but there are traces of Neaderthal and Sinanthropus erectus that
are
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Speaking of strange and probably unintended consequences of changing the
subject line . . .
Unintended? No, it was intended :-P
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
The Fool wrote:
Use a password protected screensaver.
I gave it up when my kids learned that a simple reset would
remove the screensaver :-)
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
From: Matthew and Julie Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:16:59 -0500
On 2/27/04 1:04 PM, Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You like
Travis said:
Do you mean (A) singualarity? If so, I saw one the other night on TNG.
If not...then could you explain? I probably am familiar with what you
speak of, but it's not exactly rolling of my tongue.
He doesn't mean a physical singularity like the thing in the middle of
black holes: he
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:24 AM 2/25/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:17 PM 2/24/2004 -0600 Robert Seeberger wrote:
To be honest John, this is one of those discussions where you give the
appearance of being a run with the
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:18:11AM +1100, Andrew Paul wrote:
Erik, I am a little confused.
I agree.
Well, thats what happens when people don't explain themselves properly.
It was a fairly simple question.
Andrew
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Do you mean (A) singualarity? If so, I saw one the other night
on TNG. If not...then could you explain? I probably am familiar
with what you speak of, but it's not exactly rolling of my
tongue.
The Singularity Robert's talking about is metaphorically like a
black
At 08:09 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Why is there no hope? Can't it go to the supreme court? Additionally, the
Massachusetts legislature is trying to work on an ammendment to their state
constitution that can counter the courts ruling. Some Republicans have said
leave it to the
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And of course, an infertile heterosexual couple can adopt a child while
meeting that child's reasonable expectations for a mother and a father.
A
homosexual couple, by definition, cannot.
that child's reasonable expectations for a mother and a
From: Richard Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
women.
Actually, he isn't. He's calling Jan Jane because Jan keeps calling
Erik by variants of his name with additional or alternative letters.
Yes, quite possibly, I
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:09 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Why is there no hope? Can't it go to the supreme court? Additionally,
the
Massachusetts legislature is trying to work on an ammendment to their
state
constitution that can counter the courts ruling.
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:41:40AM +1100, Andrew Paul wrote:
Anyway, no matter, they do go on like a pair of old women don't they !
You do go on like a doofus, don't you?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Fool wrote:
Use a password protected screensaver.
I gave it up when my kids learned that a simple reset would
remove the screensaver :-)
Login. in NT / 2000 / XP / 2003 the login password is the same as the
screensaver password (the
At 08:39 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
that child's reasonable expectations for a mother and a father
How many children have you questioned regarding this, particularly, how many
orphans or other children put up for adoption or are in foster care? I
think it's far more important to
At 08:49 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Yes, and the national amendment process can take up to seven years after
it's already been passed in both the House and the Senate.
Let's see, leave it to the states: 2 years. Deal with it on a national
level: 7 years. Methinks you have your
At 12:58 PM 2/25/2004 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At any rate, I find it has hardly been established that there
somehow
exists a universal right to marry a person of the same sex.
Has it been established that there is a universal right to marry a
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:39 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
that child's reasonable expectations for a mother and a father
How many children have you questioned regarding this, particularly, how
many
orphans or other children put up for adoption or are in
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:49:18AM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
Given that every child is produced by a mother and a father...
Within a few decades, this will almost certainly be proved false. Then
you would have no reason for restricting the rights of gay couples
anymore, JDG, huh?
--
Erik
Erik said:
You do go on like a doofus, don't you?
I don't know if Andrew does, but I know I do!
Rich
GCU Single Line Reply
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:49 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Yes, and the national amendment process can take up to seven years after
it's already been passed in both the House and the Senate.
Let's see, leave it to the states: 2 years. Deal with it on a
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reviews?
What kind of sadomasochist would be willing to go see a film that has 45
minutes of nothing but the most viscious bloody torture, almost
pornographic in it's gore?
___
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:39:22PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik said:
You do go on like a doofus, don't you?
I don't know if Andrew does, but I know I do!
Occasionally, everyone does I think. But your S/N is quite high. So far
as I have seen, his is very low.
--
Erik Reuter
At 09:46 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
A US Constitutional Amendment can, from time to time, move more quickly
than that.
Examples, please. Show me that a US Amendment can pass faster than 2 years.
Kevin Tarr posted the relevant excerpts from the US Constitution. That
process can
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone See The Passion Yet?
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:46:58 -0600
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reviews?
What kind of sadomasochist would be
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:51:02 -0500
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:39:22PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reviews?
What kind of sadomasochist would be willing to go see a film that has
45
minutes of nothing but the most viscious bloody torture, almost
pornographic in it's
I think the Fool (again) doesn't understand the movie,
so the only reaction he can have is a knee-jerk one.
Damon.
=
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:46 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
A US Constitutional Amendment can, from time to time, move more quickly
than that.
Examples, please. Show me that a US Amendment can pass faster than 2
years.
Kevin Tarr posted the relevant
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:35 PM 2/27/2004 + Richard Baker wrote:
JDG said:
At any rate, I find it has hardly been established that there
somehow
exists a universal right to marry a person of the same sex.
If we start from the premise that men and women should
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the Fool (again) doesn't understand the movie,
so the only reaction he can have is a knee-jerk one.
Who says I don't understand. I just don't help spread Vile memes which I
happen to disagree with.
In a message dated 2/28/2004 9:45:40 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but there are traces of Neaderthal and Sinanthropus erectus that
are similiar to the sapiens populations that came to the region that they
lived, suggesting that they _might_ have traded genes.
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone See The Passion Yet?
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:29:35 -0600
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D.
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone See The Passion Yet?
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:11:58 -0600
From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the Fool (again) doesn't understand the
From: Steve Sloan II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:22:33 -0600
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Do you mean (A) singualarity? If so, I saw one the other
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reviews?
What kind of sadomasochist would be willing to go see a film
From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: another riddle?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:13 -0500
Q: You are sitting behind the wheel in a car keeping a constant speed, on
your left side there is an abyss. On your right side
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone See The Passion Yet?
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:35:55 -0600
You are implying that I am somehow against violence. Nothing could be
further from the
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and now New Paltz
Huh?
- jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Ah, but if you have ever seen how flies cluster about the brimming milk
pails on a dairy farm in early summer...
All the dairy farms I've hung out on were using milking machines, no
pails, no access to vast quantities of milk for the flies
Julia
and there
In a message dated 2/28/2004 7:27:56 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reviews?
JDG
Saw the 10:50PM showing as previously stated.
It is a movie.
The spiritually hyper people all left the theater before the end credits
actually started, with the credit for
Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Domestic Terrorism: was Great Britain
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:39:54 -0500
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interestingly the
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 07:33 PM 2/27/04, The Fool wrote:
Use a password protected screensaver.
On your TV?
No, use one of these:
http://www.onestepahead.com/jump.jsp?itemID=115itemType=PRODUCTlGen=detailiMainCat=117iSubCat=27181iProductID=115change=117
or
http://tinyurl.com/2h7jf
At 09:42 PM 2/27/04, Doug Pensinger wrote:
What it says to me is that it is OK to outlaw civil unions or any aspect
of them. That SSUs can never expect to have the same rights conferred
upon them that traditional marriages do and that homosexuals are thereby
second class citizens. IMO it
At 09:22 AM 2/28/04, Steve Sloan II wrote:
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Do you mean (A) singualarity? If so, I saw one the other night
on TNG. If not...then could you explain? I probably am familiar
with what you speak of, but it's not exactly rolling of my
tongue.
The Singularity Robert's talking
At 09:49 AM 2/28/04, Michael Harney wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:09 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Why is there no hope? Can't it go to the supreme court? Additionally,
the
Massachusetts legislature is trying to work on an ammendment to their
state
At 04:12 PM 2/28/04, Horn, John wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and now New Paltz
Huh?
That made two of us . . .
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 04:15 PM 2/28/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The spiritually hyper people all left the theater before the end credits
actually started, with the credit for muppet-controller..
Proof positive that both reviewers ans viewers basically see only what they
want to see.
Sorry. Huh?, again.
--
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 04:12 PM 2/28/04, Horn, John wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and now New Paltz
Huh?
That made two of us . . .
It is a city in New York that has been in the news. The mayor has
recently
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:22 AM 2/28/04, Steve Sloan II wrote:
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Do you mean (A) singualarity? If so, I saw one the other night
on TNG. If not...then could you explain? I probably am familiar
with what you speak of, but it's not exactly
The Fool said:
The difference is that computer processor speed / # of transistors,
RAM Size and Hard-Disk storage have all _continued_ doubling every 18
or so months, and will continue to do so. It's actually slightly
faster than that (there are two exponents, the rate of doubling is
also
In a message dated 2/28/2004 3:57:26 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The spiritually hyper people all left the theater before the end credits
actually started, with the credit for muppet-controller..
Proof positive that both reviewers ans viewers basically see only
At 07:13 AM 2/28/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:07:10 -0600
At 04:05 PM 2/27/04,
At 04:59 PM 2/28/04, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 04:12 PM 2/28/04, Horn, John wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and now New Paltz
Huh?
That made two of us . . .
It is a city in New York that has been in
At 05:18 PM 2/28/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/28/2004 3:57:26 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The spiritually hyper people all left the theater before the end credits
actually started, with the credit for muppet-controller..
Proof positive that
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:59 PM 2/28/04, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 04:12 PM 2/28/04, Horn, John wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and now New Paltz
Huh?
That
In a message dated 2/28/2004 4:34:06 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As someone who generally stays until the end of the credits, however, my
observation is that *most* people do not stay through the credits of *any*
movie, so I was wondering if your point was there
Ronn! wrote:
So many possible smart-aleck responses come to mind that I cannot decide
on the one I like best, so I will respond by simply quoting the
above-cited second amendment:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and
lasted, and San Francisco is
*still*
handing out faux marriage certificates.
Well:
news
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040228/D810BC3G0.html
Calif. Court Refuses to Stop Gay Weddings
In yet another setback to conservatives opposed to same-sex marriage,
the California Supreme Court declined
[This goes against conventional wisdom on the Orion's Arm world building list.
Why?]
Once upon a time there was a place called Origin, a ship called Relative, and
a cute little wormhole with two terminii called Wormy. One day Origin on a
whim asked Relative to take one terminus of Wormy on a
Doug Pensinger wrote:
Ronn! wrote:
So many possible smart-aleck responses come to mind that I cannot decide
on the one I like best, so I will respond by simply quoting the
above-cited second amendment:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the
I realise that you have to be pretty gutsy to be a conservative on
Brin-L and I hope everyone here appreciates that fact.
We should be thankful that *our* conservatives do not fit any of the
stereotypes of the kind that are common to ...Say USENET.
I'm sorry, but this is nonsense. It doesn't
The Fool wrote:
I gave it up when my kids learned that a simple reset would
remove the screensaver :-)
Login. in NT / 2000 / XP / 2003 the login password is the same as the
screensaver password (the screensaver 'locks' the computer and you have
RE-login to get back in).
(1) my kids only
Erik Reuter wrote:
Within a few decades, this will almost certainly be proved false. Then
you would have no reason for restricting the rights of gay couples
anymore, JDG, huh?
But children that are not produced by a mother and a father [like,
for example, clones or twins] don't have a soul,
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Within a few decades, this will almost certainly be proved false. Then
you would have no reason for restricting the rights of gay couples
anymore, JDG, huh?
But children that are not produced by a mother and a father [like,
for example,
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 04:12 PM 2/28/04, Horn, John wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and now New Paltz
Huh?
That made two of us . . .
It is a city in New York that has been in the news.
At 09:34 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
Children don't know where children come from until they are told, therefore,
it is not the child's expectation, but yours.
Nevertheless, we can reasonable deduce what a child capable of rational
thought would reasonably expect. After all, every
At 04:50 PM 2/28/2004 -0600 Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
If other
states are affraid of judicial activism, they can amend their own
constitutions a lot faster than you can amend the US Constitution.
I think the argument is that without a national amendment in place, any
State law or amendment to
At 12:39 AM 2/28/2004 -0500 Bryon Daly wrote:
- The political differences between Catholic Church leadership and most
Protestant leadership these days are rather small, leaving them mostly
on the same side of the political aisle.
Well, the leadership of the Catholic Church leans very strongly
At 11:13 AM 2/28/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
You mean, the same Supreme Court that decided Roe vs. Wade and Casey vs.
Pennsylvania?
No, it is not the same supreme court that issued Roe v. Wade. As for Casey
v. Pennsylvania, I am simply unfamiliar with it. There are many judges on
the
At 12:08 PM 2/28/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
One of the most irrational of all the conventions of modern society is
the one to the effect that religious opinions should be respected.
I can just imagine the outrage if I ever said that one of the most
irrational of all the conventions of modern
At 08:11 PM 2/28/2004 -0600 Robert Seeberger wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In other words, when I present novel arguments and opinions, their
lack of
repetition in other sources is prima facie evidence that my
arguments and
opinions are not credible.
On the other hand, if I
- Original Message -
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:39:22PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik said:
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
