meone add point 2. as a feature request?
Best wishes.
Davide
___
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4246
Thanks.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
al stencil. %}
{ r16. r32
\once\override Rest #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\override Rest #'text = \markup\lower #0.8 "16"
r16. r32 r4 r2 }
Done.
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4245
James
___
rg/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4239
For now.
Thanks and Happy New Year!
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
.
So c8 4. 2 is like c8 c4. c2 but the point (I think) is that if you
*don't* put a pitch before the duration (i.e. the duration is 'bare')
then what you get - in the example - is a single note printed with the
combined duration of the pitch-assigned duration (i.e.
ontributor-big-page#requirements-for-running-lilypond>
>
Thanks for reporting this
An issue has been opened for this:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4228
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
use a
'_\markup' that counts I think as a 'trypescript'.
But I am sure if I am wrong someone will speak out.
James
P.S. CCing Dan too as I think this is the same thing he reported
--snip--
On 07/12/14 03:57, Dan McMahill wrote:>> I'm not top posting.
>
>
Jan,
On 06/12/14 06:59, Urs Liska wrote:
> forwarding ...
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Jan Hakenberg
> Gesendet: 6. Dezember 2014 07:35:15 MEZ
> An: James
> CC: Urs Liska
> Betreff: 3 new lilypond issues
>
> Hi,
>
> I brie
.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4215
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
r Simon Rattles introduction as a
> description in the litterature list entry, but I think Han-Wen and/or
> Jan are the right persons to comment in this case... ???
>
Thanks added as issue
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4206
James
_
>
> I believe I can workaround this (basically by just making two
> totally different versions of the score block, one for layout
> and one for MIDI, where the latter omits the lyrics and uses
> \partcombine to combine the two piano staffs). But it seems
> pretty unnecessa
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
This has been added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4188
Thanks
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 02/11/14 08:44, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Werner LEMBERG wrote Sunday, November 02, 2014 7:03 AM
>
>> [release/2.19.15-1-13-gdd5a6e7]
>>
>> with this input
>>
>> \relative c' {
>>8[ r ]
>> }
>>
>> I would expect that there is at least a tiny distance between the rest
>> and the sharp, b
ilyPond ist ein Notensatzprogramm, das es sich zum Ziel gemacht hat,
> Notendruck von der bestmöglichen Qualität zu erstellen."
>
> Stylistically even better would be:
> "LilyPond ist ein Notensatzprogramm, das es sich zum Ziel gemacht hat,
> Notendruck in bestmöglicher Qualität zu erstellen."
>
> Kind regards,
> Markus
>
CCing the translation list.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
0/6
\time 9/1 d1
}
}
Thanks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4180
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
hould replace it with
GUILE rationals.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4179
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
digit
\time 10/1 d'1
}
Thanks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4178
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
to 4", since group 1 starts
> already before part P1.
>
>
Thanks.
Added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4177&thanks=4177
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
eak
> a4 b c d
> \break
> a b c d\stopTextSpan
> }
> \layout {
> ragged-right = ##t
> }
> }
>
Thanks, added as:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4173
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ult-y="-15", this seems to be wrong
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4172
Thanks
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
devel?) in case of questions. What do you think?
Write to the translators list, as pointed out by David.
I wrote a slim guide for translators which is easier to read and more up to
date. James offered to integrate some parts of that guide into the
documentation but the task is still pending:
Yes
eed to fix you can give me a new patch and so on.
The Google tracker, can also be updated (I cannot add you to that
though), and we use this website to keep track of ALL patches that are
currently going through the review process.
James
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 2:31 AM, James wrote:
Erik,
O
ugh the proper review process. Although if
you do want to wait for people to comment (and I am not qualified to ...
sorry) then that is fine, but it will still need to be in patch format
in the end, it's up to you.
It's more likely to get more constructive reviews if it is a prope
On 07/10/14 09:08, Richard Shann wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 20:06 +0100, James wrote:
Richard,
[..]
Richard
I have created
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4154
I'll help shepherd this patch through via the standard review process
for this.
Thank you very mu
h for proper review and test; and saves having
to involve a third party (like me) and/or guaranteeing some kind of
proper review and so that your work is not ignored.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
nd_002dline-usage.html#invoking-lilypond
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
Good idea!
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4147
Thanks.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>>
> }
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Staff
> fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
> }
> }
>
> This seems to happend with 4th finger only (on v2.19, 2.18, 2.16 but not on
> v2.14).
>
> TIA,
> Pierre
>
http://code.google.com/p/lily
the attached image shows just what the OP describes:
> The first acciaccatura notes are not on the same line as the others and
> the stems point in different directions.
I misunderstood the description, sorry.
Entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4144
James
__
ill apply it when you create one.
>>
>
> It's also a way to keep music and style separated.
>
> Bug Squad, what about adding it to this chapter of Usage manual?
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/gene
h-table mydrums)
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceOne \CymbalsA }
> >>
> } % end of score
in latest (2.19.15) this doesn't seem to be the case
See attached
I haven't checked latest stable (2.18.2) though. So if you are using
2.
Urs
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2908
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
On 07/09/14 15:18, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as suggested by James, I come up with a suggestion on how to clarify the
> meaning of DynamicLineSpanner and similar.
>
> 1. In
> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/objects-and-interfaces>,
>
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Composer not right-aligned
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:12:01 +0200
From: Aurélien Bello
To: James
Hi James,
thanks for your answer.
I’m using 2.19.14 und I saw that the bug is already known and will be
corrected in 2.19.15.
Sorry!
Thanks
o _also_
> find things like \staffsize.
>
> This kind of "let LaTeX do its jobs for dimensions" would be exacerbated
> by LaTeX and LilyPond having entirely different ideas of cm and \cm.
> Indeed, LilyPond complains if you are using cm, and LaTeX does not know
> \cm.
>
g-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
which version are you using?
This could be fixed already in the current master (i.e. will be in 2.19.15)
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=7801babeb37b4cb
On 16/09/14 13:55, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>>> \markup\italic "This is almost a fix"
>>> \new Staff = "main" \relative c'' {
>>> c4 b d c
>>> <<
>>> { c4 b d c }
>&g
\magnifyStaff #2/3
> firstClef = ##f
> }
> { e4 d f e \grace { \stopStaff s } }
> >>
> \time 3/4
> c4 b c
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
So this is no longer a 'bug'?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
27; { f\< f f f\! }
> \midi {}
> }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff \relative e' { f f\< f f\! }
> \midi {}
> }
>
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu
the perceived behavior than a
documentation one. So for now I will make a tracker using a label that
relects that.
Thanks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4103
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
n language.)
>
>
>
Thanks
Flagged as:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4101
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 02/09/14 21:58, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2014-09-02 12:44 GMT+02:00 MING TSANG :
>> James & Phil:
>> I comment out line 421 which call solfege-engravers - both versions run ok.
>> Un-comment out line 421 - v2.19.12 run ok; but fails with v2.19.13.
>> I don't k
On 01/09/14 20:48, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Am 01.09.2014 um 19:34 schrieb James:
On 31/08/14 13:04, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
upon reading the list of markup commands in the NR, I noticed
several issues, which I’d like to report. I apologize for not making
a patch myself; firstly, I have
ter example using '.. a nested
property' (whatever that is :) ) then I feel free to make a patch or
update the tracker and I can make a patch.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4089
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
;' { a4 a a \key a \major a a a }
>>
best,
Peter van Kranenburg
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4088
Thanks
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
art a new
email thread with just that discussion, and if the group agree then we
can start on getting patches made.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 01/09/14 09:27, Mike Solomon wrote:
On Sep 1, 2014, at 11:16 AM, James wrote:
On 31/08/14 08:22, Mike Solomon wrote:
On Aug 31, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Jürgen Reuter wrote:
Mike,
appearently, the following patch works fine for my purposes (i.e. for flexa /
porrectus shapes):
diff --git a
s. The predefined command
\fermataMarkup is provided for adding fermatas.
Note: Markups attached to a multi-measure rest are objects of type
MultiMeasureRestText, not TextScript. Overrides must be directed to the
correct object, or they will be ignored. ...
etc.
James
_
On 25/08/14 21:46, Ralph Palmer wrote:
You've got it, Federico. I'll take Friday.
Ralph
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Federico Bruni <mailto:fedel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Il 25/ago/2014 17:16 "James" mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
&
-page.html#bug-squad-checklists
Take your pick.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
e4 f gis \breathe cis | \break
> e,4 f gis \breathe cis, |
> }
>
> \layout {
> indent = 0
> }
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lis
y to review but also not leave the
documentation in an even-worse state than it was before.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
gt;
It's been pushed. Merging is taking place now.
author James Lowe
Wed, 6 Aug 2014 21:07:49 + (22:07 +0100)
committer James Lowe
Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:18:38 + (19:18 +0100)
commit 2bcfd84f0d276e0db06d6248ed54a05685e8cca6
Thanks
James
_
in X direction. Other numerical values may
also be specified.
"
I think it would be well worth adding to the last sentence:
The unit is half the object width.
Richard Shann
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4054
Thanks
James
___
bu
35b33a4be38b10baeb40f8e660e3d55c
"
* Re-ordered some of the @nodes so that they are grouped more logically"
I forgot to change/check the 'menu' ordering
So the 'truth' is the sectioning.
I'll fix that in a patch now.
Interesting that this doesn't break a full doc for me.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ubsec Minimal page breaking
>1626:@unnumberedsubsubsec One-line page breaking
>1643:@unnumberedsubsubsec Optimal page turning
>
>
> Which one to believe saying the truth?
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Charles
>
> Comes from
> aec8
> simplicity):
>>
>>
>> Score accepts...
>> |- GrandStaff
>> |
>> |- StaffGroup accepts...
>> | |- GrandStaff
>> | |- PianoStaff
>> | |- ChoirStaff
>> | |- StaffGroup
>> |
>> |- ChoirStaff accepts...
>> |- GrandStaff
>> |- PianoStaff
>> |- StaffGroup
>>
>>
>
> Perhaps the following could be added to the Nested Staff Groups section
> of the page
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displaying-staves
>
> "By default Piano Staff, Grand Staff and Staff Group can be nested
> inside a Choir Staff and any of these can be nested inside a Staff
> Group."
> perhaps immediately before the sentence "New nested staff group contexts
> can be defined."
> Thanks for the clarifications, I see what I can reasonably check now.
>
> Richard
>
Your wish etc. etc.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4052
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
% END
>
> This error message should be a warning and give some line number to the
> offending code.
>
> Knute Snortum
> (via Gmail)
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/m
mit;h=09412c25cce3fdffce7cefe491cb3849ece0ae3e
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
f1~ \break
> | f2 f2
> }
> The natural here appears two times in the second bar.
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4010
?
James
___
so.
>
> Bug squad: given the frequency of reports about translated manuals on bug@,
> should we say that these should be sent to the translation list? Need to be
> subscribed to post to lilynet?
Sure. Why not?
Do we just fwd them 'as is'?
James
> On Jul 20, 2014
On 20/07/14 12:13, Karol Majewski wrote:
>> It seems to me (from my limited playing about with 2.19.8) that if you
>> comment out either/or 'two-sided' or 'binding-offset' then the problem
>> 'goes away'. So is this a 'binding-offset' issue
binding-offset is disabled, changing
> global-staff-size does not affect inner-margin size.
>
> Best
> --Karol
>
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4019
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
inding-offset is disabled, changing
> global-staff-size does not affect inner-margin size.
>
> Best
> --Karol
Actually that is not a minimal example.
You don't need the
'top-markup-spacing' line
It seems to me (from my limited playing about with 2.19.8) tha
On 19/07/14 15:18, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> James writes:
>>
>>> Does it also matter that the clef is different when you run it back
>>> through midi2ly (at least it was for me running 2.19.8)
>> Yes, for 2.16.2 also.
>>
st it was for me running 2.19.8)
I assume so in which case that is a second bug report right?
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 13/07/14 14:57, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, James wrote:
I have no preferences either way - we have done this for articulate.ly
for instance - but unless we know that philomelos and LilyPond's
versions are reasonably close to start with we could end up with each
ve
On 13/07/14 15:21, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Helge Kruse writes:
>>>
>>>> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>>>
>>>>> 4q
>>>>> W
and this thread talks
about repeated chords/notes using 'q'.
So if you could give me some appropriate tracker titles, I can hunt down
the relevant threads and create the trackers more quickly.
Thanks
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 13/07/14 13:36, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2014-07-11 0:20 GMT+02:00 James <mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com>>:
>
> I'm not sure a single tracker to 'keep track of progress' is that
> useful
> for the long term vs. say a tracker each time we get a fix
ough our normal
processes, I just don't have the programming skills to do that - only
the 'admin' ones.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
nglish doc.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
iling list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I ran strace and have attached it here (not that I know what any of it
means).
James
strace_ouput.txt.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
cis! \once \omit Accidental cis d!
>
>
> Urs
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Thanks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3992
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ose mode (ready?) I get:
--snip--
lilypond --verbose --pdf test.ly
Log level set to 287
GNU LilyPond 2.19.8
Relocation: is absolute: argv0=/home/james/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond
PATH=/home/james/lilypond/usr/bin (prepend)
Setting PATH to
/home/james/lilypond/usr/bin:/home/james/bin:/usr/local
ast-pair siblings)) grob))
'(-2 . 5
\relative c'' {
\override Tie.extra-offset = #my-callback
c1 ~ \break
c2 ~ c
}
@end lilypond
@bye
--snip--
Then run
lilypond-book --pdf foo.tely && texi2pdf foo.texi && evince foo.pdf
I use this to check
On 26/05/14 18:19, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 26 May 2014, at 18:45, James wrote:
>
>>> Another issue is: this script cannot output correct MIDI for ornaments that
>>> use auxiliaries other than what given by the staff and its key signature,
>>> as LilyPond does n
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Which is correct? The xml file mentioned inthe email subject or the body?
I assumed the subject.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3974
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 24/06/14 21:37, Andreas Wenger wrote:
> 01b-Pitches-Intervals.xml from the Unofficial MusicXML test suite contains
> only a single measure in MusicXML, but there should be 41
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3973
James
_
ed already - see the 'See also' at the end of the
section.
The request therefore is invalid.
Sorry for the noise.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
hms#tuplets
>
> Knute Snortum
> (via Gmail)
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3971
Thanks
james
_
On 26/06/14 08:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
> Sorry, I should have written "syntax" instead of "format"
>
> 2014-06-26 9:27 GMT+02:00 James <mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com>>:
>
>
> Can you be a bit more specific as I don't understand wha
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I'm still not sure how to process this in terms of reporting this as a
'LilyPond Bug' can anyone offer some advice other than just creating a
tracker and cutting pasti
script.
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Can you be a bit more specific as I don't understand what you are stating?
James
___
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3969
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
gt; '(-2 . 5
>
>
> \relative c'' {
>
> \override Tie.extra-offset = #my-callback
>
> c1 ~ \break
>
> c2 ~ c
>
> }
>
>
> --David
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-li
e else know what this is about?
Thanks
james
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
this
> respect the two statements are misleading. But are there other circumstances
> where both sentences as written are correct? I can't think of any.
>
>> So I like James' suggestion for a more thorough explanation that would
>> remove this ambiguity.
> Inde
ommands".
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thanks.
Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3956
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
."
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3955
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 25/05/14 10:09, Jakob Schöttl wrote:
> Sorry for that mess..
>
> Am 25.05.2014 08:06, schrieb James:
>> Jakob
>>
>> Don't forget to include the bug list
>>
>> That error code is a general Windows return code. (0xc005) so it
>> doesn'
nitely run into
>> problems very soon.
> Not really.
>
>> But I assume this is not what you _want_ - you will want to have the
>> polyphonic part with independent stems.
> Yes, that's plausible, but your above reasoning about << >> remains
> incorrect.
> }
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3953
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 12/06/14 12:58, Federico Bruni wrote:
2014-06-12 13:51 GMT+02:00 James <mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com>>:
To the other bugsquad members: What is our current bug
scooping schedule
like in consequence? Should we try recruiting replacements?
Yes, we should.
und the email list during the day for Mon-Fri (as
work allows) and add the odd tracker when I can.
James
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ccing bug list
On 02/06/14 02:37, MarcM wrote:
> I thought this bug had been reported but apparently not. I just recompiled
> the same file with LilyPond_2.19.7 and the triplet line still collides with
> either the fingering or with the slur.
>
> \version "2.19.7"
> \language "english"
> {
> \rel
On 26/05/14 17:07, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 26 May 2014, at 16:16, James wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3928
Thanks
Thanks, you too. Another issue is: this script cannot output correct MIDI for
ornaments that use auxiliaries other than what given by the staff and its
On 26/05/14 14:51, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 26 May 2014, at 07:24, James wrote:
Can you be more explicit what it is you are requesting (for those that
file bug reports and don't understand the nuances of \pralls and \trills
necessarily)?
There might be needed a series of parameters, settin
e
> d ~ d16 c4 |
> }
> }
>
> \score {
> \music
> \layout {}
> }
>
> \score {
> \unfoldRepeats \articulate \music
> \midi {}
> }
>
>
>
>
Can you be more explicit what it is you are requesting (for those that
file bug rep
301 - 400 of 904 matches
Mail list logo
