In your HQ GK config you have not specified the IP address to which the GK
will be bound, commented below in blue:
gatekeeper
zone local HQ cisco.com <<< NO IP specified here, router will pick
one (see below)
no zone subnet HQ default enable
zone subnet HQ 10.1.5.3/32 enable
zone subne
Josh,
I think the reason why you have this because you are missing the binding
under the Voice vlan interface
make h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.1.130.1
*h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.1.110.1 1719*
*
*
*
*
*also there could be routing issue so you might need to do this in all your
routers*
Check your retry interval on device -> gatekeeper
On Aug 10, 2013 6:42 PM, "Karen Johnson" wrote:
> when we shut Gatekeeper, it always take time to go back up.
> is there any command to speed it up ?
>
> K
>
> ___
> For more information regarding indust
Guys I got the fix,
The problem was a typo error due to my fast copy and paste
in SB router i type gateway command by default and that resulted the
following
R1#sh gatekee end
GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
CallSignalAddr
Calls work when he is not in SRST so 3... must be sending to CUCM to be
processed and set to phones at site B. They are registered and work but
when unregistered they fail to work.
If we are going on this little snippet of his GK config we might need the
entire thing and those on the GW's to figu
Sorry, I assume wrongly that SBGW will ever take the call for "3...".
Your normal path is for both "2..." and "3..." to be pointing to CUCMTRUNK
only. Given that both SBGW and CUCMTRUNK are registered to the same zone,
it would be necessary to exclude SBGW from ever getting the call destined
to
Hi Hesham,
Essentially, the gw-priority is to advise the gatekeeper to choose SBGW
over CUCMTRUNK. The higher the number, the higher the priority. Without
this it will distribute the call to "3XXX" to both CUCMTRUNK and SBGW in a
round robin fashion.
If you give higher priority to SBGW, then
Hi Hesham,
If the problem is on the gatekeeper, it could be as simple as the zone
prefix not configured to point to CUCM for the pattern "3..."
Given that in normal situation, the zone prefix would be pointing "SBGW"
either dynamically or statically.
The configure with static zone prefix set wou
Hi Somphol,
HQ & SB are in the same zone
and i don't understand
> zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW
I think I should disregard it as they are int he same zone
It's all just the CUCM Trunk and has both 2XXX and 3XXX
I think that could make it work
Thank you very much for ur great inpu
Hi Hesham,
I have a few ideas. I want to remove a few things out of the equation,
first try to set codec for all inter-region to G711. Second, if you are
using Local Route Group (LRG), replace it with a more straightforward
settings -- i.e. point the RL directly to HQ gateway in your case for
r
Hi Hesham,
Thanks for the detail explanation and well thanks for sharing the case. I
find it very intriguing.
I'm working on some idea, but for now, I just want to forward your reply to
the group, in case anyone else can help too.
--Somphol
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Hesham Abdelkeree
Dear Hesham,
As far as I understand from your email, SiteB is now in SRST mode, which means
that SiteB WAN connection is down. In this case, SiteC won't be able to reach
SiteB phones over the WAN through GK but you will have to configure a lower
preference dial-peer to reach it through PSTN in c
Hi Hesham,
> knowing that Gatekeeper is working with SiteB under normal operation but
doesn't work with CFUR
Could you please clarify the problem you are facing? What do you mean
when you say the gatekeeper is not working with CFUR?
> Any Ideas,
I think we will need to simplify the scenario t
gt;
> Take care, All the best.
>
> --
> *From:* Hesham Abdelkereem
> *To:* vignesh sethuraman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 March 2013 12:38 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
>
> Wow nice over there:)
> I like Sw
s
Michael Sears
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas MICHEL [mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:10 AM
To: Sears, Michael (msears)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE
Hi Michael
Check that the device pool associa
Hi Michael
Check that the device pool associated to the trunk got a Call Manager
group with both Pub and Sub.
Beside of that I don't know
Regards
PS: Never ask to answer ASAP please :) We are like you and owe nothing
but help if we can :)
Nic
Le Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:43:06
Hello Steffen,
One of the requirement of this task:
you are not allowed to use zone prefixes in this task. What are the other
way to achieve this.
Regards,
Ramcharan Arya
How should we send call to SUB vs PUB in this given situation and we are
not allow to
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Stef
You can define a gw-priority for the trunks to each endpoint.
Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013 schrieb Ramcharan Arya :
> Hello,
>
> I have a small query about Gatekeeper in single zone configuration it is
> prefer PUB as call processing ( as per ARQ message).
>
> if lab requirement says make subscrib
It because you have Inbound faststart configured on your gk trunk. You do this
so your sip phones will be able to call from cme to hq. The thing is the call
is G729 but call manager will negotiate G711 with faststart enabled going that
direction. Take off the checkmark for inbound faststart and
I think I remember some tone a k this situation.
You chance the setting is service parameters for intra region to g729
HTH
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:10 PM, Krishna wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I configured the gatekeeper on the Hq router, and when i call from hq to
> br2(c
Post the output of "sh call leg active summary" in cme.
Also, share br2 config plz.
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2012, at 8:10 AM, Krishna wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I configured the gatekeeper on the Hq router, and when i call from hq to
> br2(cme) the call set
voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2012, 11:22
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
Why not try getting it to work first without the tech-prefix
Try this:
gk
shut
zone local UCM cisco.com
zone local UCME cisco.com
zone prefix UCM 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
z
n Spicer
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
Hi Kevin,
Yes, gateway command was there and the "show gatek en" showed the BR2-RTR as
registered.
How does the technology prefix works in this situation (two zones)?
- Original Message -
From: A NN
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:47 am
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
To: Kevin Spicer
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Yes, gateway command was there and the "show gatek en" showed the BR2
t: Wednesday, 30 May 2012, 5:56
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
Hi, is ucme registered to the gk? (gateway command missing?)
On 30 May 2012 03:08, "A NN" wrote:
Hi list,
>I configured a GK with two zones:
>Zone UCM for CUCM
>Zone UCME for Br2 router
&
Hi, is ucme registered to the gk? (gateway command missing?)
On 30 May 2012 03:08, "A NN" wrote:
> Hi list,
> I configured a GK with two zones:
> Zone UCM for CUCM
> Zone UCME for Br2 router
>
> When I make Calls from CUCM to CME (3xxx) call fails as per debugs below.
> I'm not using any CUBE.
Still nothing. I give up for the moment. The behaviour is the same in all
cases. Thank you guys for your time and advices. If you have other ideas...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Spicer wrote:
> I've seen supplementary service fail when CUCM invokes network hold and
> MOH doesn't suppo
I've seen supplementary service fail when CUCM invokes network hold and MOH
doesn't support the codec of the call (real world CUCM 6 intercluster
trunk), so might be worth disabling MOH to check.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:56 AM, The Masterplan wrote:
> Supplementary services still fails with all
om: "Mohd Baqari" >
> To: "san r"
> Cc: >;
> "The Masterplan"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk
>
>
> Hi,
>>
>> If the command "emptycapability" then it ha
Try to add:
!
voice service voip
sip
midcall-signaling passthru
!
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Mohd Baqari"
To: "san r"
Cc: ; "The Masterplan"
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk
Hi,
I
Try to put call on hold and see myopia is invoking from router.
Sh sccp
On May 24, 2012 11:26 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> Supplementary services still fails with all these commands.
> Results of debug voip ipipgw are below. In case of call from cme to ucm:
>
> May 24 06:13:49.148:
> //1515/761E
Supplementary services still fails with all these commands.
Results of debug voip ipipgw are below. In case of call from cme to ucm:
May 24 06:13:49.148:
//1515/761E975F86AF/H323/cch323_set_h245_state_mc_mode_outgoing:
call_spi_mode = 3
May 24 06:13:49.148:
//1515/761E975F86AF/H323/cch323_set_h245
Hi,
If the command "emptycapability" then it has to work assuming that u kept gk in
media flow through mode.
Plz share the output of debug ipipgw on cube
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On May 23, 2012, at 7:50 PM, san r wrote:
> emptycapability
___
Can you configure the same commands on Gk?
On May 24, 2012 12:21 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> Yes, I have mtp on trunk. In the media resource group list assigned on
> trunk I have first a media resource group containing the hardware mtp and
> second a media resource group with the transcoder.
>
Yes, I have mtp on trunk. In the media resource group list assigned on
trunk I have first a media resource group containing the hardware mtp and
second a media resource group with the transcoder.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:46 PM, san r wrote:
> I believe it's supposed to be there on GK. Do you ha
I believe it's supposed to be there on GK. Do you have Mtp on trunk?
On May 24, 2012 12:11 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> No, only the gatekeeper configuration needed to route calls and the
> following:
>
> voice service voip
> allow-connections h323 to h323
> allow-connections h323 to sip
> al
No, only the gatekeeper configuration needed to route calls and the
following:
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 PM, san r wrote:
> Do you have the same on
Do you have the same on GK as well?
On May 24, 2012 12:05 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the cme side relevant config:
>
> voice service voip
> allow-connections h323 to h323
> allow-connections h323 to sip
> allow-connections sip to h323
> allow-connections sip to sip
> h323
Hi,
This is the cme side relevant config:
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
h323
emptycapability
h225 connect-passthru
h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
sip
bind control source-in
Please paste your configs
On May 23, 2012 11:23 PM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> I configured that, but the result is the same.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:50 PM, san r wrote:
>
>> Try the following commands in voice class or H.323 voice-service
>> configuration mode - h323 end
>>
>> h225 connect
I configured that, but the result is the same.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:50 PM, san r wrote:
> Try the following commands in voice class or H.323 voice-service
> configuration mode - h323 end
>
> h225 connect-passthru
> emptycapability
> h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012
Try the following commands in voice class or H.323 voice-service
configuration mode - h323 end
h225 connect-passthru
emptycapability
h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:35 PM, The Masterplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following setup:
> Sip IP phone <---> CME <--->h323<--
Also as I remember, the IPIPGW tech prefix has to match the Destination
Zone prefix.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Steven <
forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net> wrote:
> @Boris
> @Leslie
> @Amit
> I got some other issues too.
> I skipped to check the GK-only functionality (BIG mistake).
> Aft
@Boris
@Leslie
@Amit
I got some other issues too.
I skipped to check the GK-only functionality (BIG mistake).
After i fixed the normal (without outvia) GK functions i revisited the
CUBE issue.
It turns out i accidently put the allow-connections on the Br2 instead
of the HQ.
Thanks for your tim
If the Voice service Voip commands are all configured...A restart has always
helped me ...
From: Boris
To: Steven
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZO
and do you have at least one h323 dial-peer on the HQ router
Leslie Meade
- Original Message -
From: "Boris"
To: "Steven"
Cc: "ccie voice"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:19:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not fin
Hi Steve,
Do you have This in your config?
Voice service voip
Allow h323 to h323
If not, add it and do no gateway/gateway
Your cube should appear as H323 type in show gatek end.
Sent from my mobile device, sorry for typos.
---
Regards
Boris
On 18/01/2012, at 7:22, Steven wrote:
>
Hi Justin,
Create a new Region with 729 codec only, create new Device Pool with this
region and assign your trunk to this new Device Pool.
Cheers,
Boris
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Justin McIntyre <
justin.mcint...@blackbox.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> ** **
>
>
There is not way to force Codec in CUCM (except setting the lowest
bandwidth consumption codec)
When you configure Regions settings in CUCM, that actually sets the Maximum
allowed codec within/between regions. Not the Codec itself.
So for instance, when you set G711 within a Regions, that means th
gatekeeper will not send calls back out the sending trunk; so calls from
CME are fine, and usually calls from CUCM are fine but when we have two
CUCM trunks registered there is a risk of calls leaving one CUCM trunk and
trying to send the call to the other.
hth
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:42 PM
Can we see the output of show gatekeeper endpoints?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:33 PM, datucha123 datucha123 <
datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are no Zone Prefixes defined,
>
> As for endpoint, only the CUCME and CUCM H323-IDs are registered, NO CUCME
> IP PHONES.
>
> CUCME and CUCM are regis
There are no Zone Prefixes defined,
As for endpoint, only the CUCME and CUCM H323-IDs are registered, NO CUCME
IP PHONES.
CUCME and CUCM are registered also with the defaul Tech prefix.
But based on the config, there are two endpoints (CUCM and CUCME)
registered with Default Techs, So how does t
Hi ,
Gatekeeper will route the call without Zone prefix if all the endpoints are
registered in the same zone.
Thanks
From: datucha123 datucha123
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:30 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
Pls check the call routing diagram here , which has explanation.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a99c4.shtml
(Call Routing solely use tech-prefix here)
Some steps are not very descriptive , & no explanations available as well.
BTW can you send this output
What does the show gatekeeper end points command show?
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 17, 2011, at 3:00 AM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have a question about the GK.
> I could not understand how does the GK knows where to route call based on the
> following GK c
> dial-peer voice 1132 voip
> destination-pattern 01132T
> session target ras
> incoming called-number 01132.
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
> no vad
> !
> !
> gateway
> timer receive-rtp 1200
> !
> !
> !
> gatekeeper
> zone local GK ccievoice.co
urce Loopback0
ntp server 157.26.1.100
end
hq#
*From:* Amit Singh
*To:* Ray
*Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2011 4:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper
Mate.
Please let me know what exactly is the problem.
I wi
Just to clarify for my own sake - are you referring to the Volume II Lab 4?
No 2nd trunk from CUCM to the GK zone CUBE, if that is indeed what you are
asking.
What makes the CUBE work from GK is the keyword "outvia" at the end of the zone
that CUCM registers to.
BTW, I've just finished up 3 ne
t: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper
Mate.
Please let me know what exactly is the problem.
I will be able to help.
Sent from my iPad
On 6/10/2011, at 7:39 PM, Ray wrote:
lab4 gatekeeper advance
>Do we have to setup another trunk to point to the gatekeeper zone CUBE or
>should we u
Guys ,
the h323 bind command is not a GK command , its for the H323 GW so you
can have GK on interface and have the normal config of the GK
and the H323 bind under the interface which will work as H323 GW with the ccm
H323 bind can be usefull if you have Q said bind all media and
signalling to sp
Did you do a gateway in config mode on the branch rtr? Is it registered?
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 1:12 AM, darshan wrote:
>
>
> Dear All;
>
>
>
> I have 2 requirements and I don’t know which one is the correct
> configuration..
>
>
>
> 1. For SIte C CME g
Yes Mohd this is right..but In SiteC CME gateway it asks for Vlan 502 IP and
gatekeeper to use local loopback..so I am really confused.
Regards
Darsh
From: Mohd Baqari [mailto:baqari.voic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:37 PM
To: darshan
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OSL
In h323 only one interface can be used as source IP for all h323 messages. You
cant have two h323 sources in same router. Maybe typo error
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:12 PM, darshan wrote:
>
>
> Dear All;
>
>
>
> I have 2 requirements and I don
Stephen Manuel
12212 Reedpond Drive East
Jacksonville, FL 32223
Cell Phone: 904-607-4805
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of fresh ccie
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 6:18 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject
You can strip off the digits with a translation pattern
Hth
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2011, at 11:42 AM, "Stephen Manuel" wrote:
> I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems
> resolved, but one is stumping me and I think it’s because I ‘m frustrated and
You ae Right it is pretty easy
On the CUCM Trunk confg set in the inbound call set the Significant digit to
the number that matches your internal dial-paln for example if you use 4 digit
extensions set the significat digits to 4
Dude you have to take a rest
From: srman...@bellsouth.net
There are a couple ways to strip the tech prefix for incoming calls into
UCM, the simplest is the Significant Digits field on your GK trunk. Set
from all to 4 (or whatever works for your dial pattern). If this doesnt
work for you, ie TEHO, then use a translation pattern, ie: 1#. or 1#.!
using
I guess it's codec and region mismatch between CM trunk and CME dialpeer.
Regards.
Khaled
From: michael.se...@compucom.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:29:29 -0400
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [GATEKEEPER DIAL FROM BR23001 TO BR11002 GET YOU'RE
CALL CANN
Hi Mike,
A few suggestions.
CUCM Trunk have a CSS assigned to it that can see the partition that the phones
are in?
Add "dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric h245-signal" to your dial-peer 15.
Since the destination phone isn't ringing, turn up 'debug ras' on BR2 and the
gatekeeper. Check that fo
Hi Michael - is your gkp trunk set to 4 digits in cucm?
b
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:29 PM, wrote:
> I cannot complete calls from BR2 CME to BR1 or HQ using gatekeeper on
> HQ-RTR. I’ve verified the Gateway in CUCM and the Gatekeeper in CUCM and
> the Trunk and still calls will not complete fro
Hi Mike,
Have you stripped off the tech prefix on CUCM?
If not, add a Translation Pattern in the none partition:
1#.[23]XXX with a DDI of Pre-dot (assuming your extensions at HQ and BR1 are
2XXX and 3XXX respectively - modify as set up in your lab).
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:59 PM, wrote:
> S
CUCM by default does slow start and cube does fast start, that is
called an interworking issue. You can try the following:
Make CUCM fast start by adding a valid resource with the right codec
on CUCM and on the MTP or you can add the "call start interwork"
command under voice service voip on the CU
The publisher is not the primary server, so the first option should be the
subscriber.
Though the GK question may not be specific about which server to use first,
I would still configure the server preference as according to the beginning
of the exam where it tells you which server is the primary
Hi Peter - you can use the "gw-priority 10 cucm-trunk_1" parameter
within the zone prefix command to ensure the publisher is always
selected first.
hth
On 17/07/2011, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the lab, suppose there is a general requirement like Subscriber should be
> the primary call processing
if the Questions ask to prioritize YES, i believe the Q will be clear enough
if they ask for this requirement in specific ,
if i am in the exam now and this is not specified clearly i will ask the
proctor and he must give me more accurate info about this :)
but General speaking they must tell you
Hi Ashraf,
Thanks for the response.
My question is, if there is no specific requirement in the Gatekeeper section
of the lab to have priority for Subscriber, are you supposed to do this
configuration using gw-priority command?
By doing, Are you going to lose any marks?
Peter
On Sun, 17 Jul 2
you would use something like this to proritize the call processing
zone prefix US 1… gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
zone prefix US 1… gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
zone prefix US 5… gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
zone prefix US 5… gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
By default the priority for each CCM will be server and you can prioritize
them using command Gw-priority .
Vik have explain/configure this in each GK config example he have in WB2
Thanks
Ash
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the lab, suppose there is a general requireme
one GK.
> --
> *From:* naser jalouk
> *To:* edot...@ams.net
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 6:45:12 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW
>
> Dears,
>
> I have tried the configuration, and it is working fine but for s
You would need to configure either zone prefix (priority) or tech-prefix for
routing within local zone GK.
From: naser jalouk
To: edot...@ams.net
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 6:45:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
Dears,
I have tried the configuration, and it is working fine but for some reason
the fourth call attempt is always giving CUCM error message "your call
cannot be completed as dialed please consult..."
below is part of my configuration on HQ router:
interface FastEthernet0/0.11
encapsulation do
ying to do. The PG did not specify
> anything specific as well.
>
> Should I not worry about this?
>
> Randall
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Roger Carpio
> *To:* Randall Crumm
> *Cc:* Online Study
> *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM
>
bject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC
That should do it. If they do not show the requested port after adding the
trunk name to the service parameter I would try resetting the trunk; resetting
CCM service, gatekeeper shut/no shut etc.
Rgs,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at
1720
> no 40081 and 33277. This is what I am trying to do. The PG did not specify
> anything specific as well.
>
> Should I not worry about this?
>
> Randall
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Roger Carpio
> *To:* Randall Crumm
> *Cc:* O
and 33277. This is what I am trying to do. The PG did not specify anything
specific as well.
Should I not worry about this?
Randall
From: Roger Carpio
To: Randall Crumm
Cc: Online Study
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_
Randall,
Add the name of the GK-controlled trunk on the service parameter named "Device
Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720", then restart the
Trunk.
-Pablo Meneses.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm wrote:
> Hi,
> How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1
CCM service parameter under h323 section
-Original Message-
From: Randall Crumm
Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:39:19
To: Online Study
Reply-To: Randall Crumm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question
___
CCM service "Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720";
just type the trunk name.
Rgs,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm wrote:
> Hi,
> How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720?
>
> Thanks,
> Randall
>
> HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper
go to service parameters in Publisher, select your Pub, then call manager
active, search for 1720 and you will find it. There you put the name of
your gatekeeper controlled trunk. In your case it looks like you got it
named gk-trunk so use that or any other name you made your trunk.
On Mon, May
Go to service parameters, choose call manager and search for trunk and will
find the option to make the gatekeeper h225 trunk to use 1720, and then put the
name of your h225 trunk which is GK-TRUNK
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On B
In callmanager "system --> service parameters' search on 1720 and and replace
'None' with 'gk-trunk'
--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Randall Crumm wrote:
From: Randall Crumm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question
To: "Online Study"
Date: Monday, May 30, 2011, 10:39 AM
Hi,
How do I get gk-
Go to UCM service parameters and search for trunk. Then enter the name of
your trunk, save and then reset your trunk.
Thanks,
Chevy
On May 30, 2011 1:30 PM, "Randall Crumm" wrote:
> Hi,
> How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720?
>
> Thanks,
> Randall
>
> HQ-RTR(config)#do show gate
Remove the allow-connections commands.
Thanks,
Chevy
On May 30, 2011 2:41 AM, "donny f" wrote:
> hi all,
>
> what is command we need in "Gatekeeper" , so in "sh gatekeeper endpoint "
> , the CME will show as "VOIP-GW", rather than H.323 id ?
>
>
> tks
Are/How are your gateways registered to CUCM?
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:45 AM, donny f wrote:
> hi all,
>
> what is command we need in "Gatekeeper" , so in "sh gatekeeper endpoint "
> , the CME will show as "VOIP-GW", rather than H.323 id ?
>
>
> tks
>
>
Hello,
I think you are wrong for this question.
You must invoke a conference bridge on the router and thanks to the hardware
conference bridge it will support g729
Just add the codec g729r8 in the dspfarm profile conference ….
Should work.
Of course do not forget to put your conference bri
Hi,
For supplementary you have to setup an MTP,
For the call drop try to enable Inbound Fast Start
Naoufal
-Original Message-
From: Alex Goh [mailto:ncsalex@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:29 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL
Hi All,
Thanks very much for the reply. The issue is due to my mistake that
registering BR2 to wrong zone.
Now the CUCM Call to BR2 is working fine except the supplementary
service e.g hold, Moh doesn't
work, do I need MTP for this?
also, calling from BR2 Sip phone to CUCM is failling, phone rin
Hi,
You have to register the br2 with the UCME zone not the VIA zone.
Remove h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719
and replace it with
h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719
Thanks
Naoufal
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:
Also configure voice service on BR2 router
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-conn sip to sip
allow-conn sip to h323
h323
Thanks
Shrini
On 4/9/2011 10:42 AM, Alex Goh wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to get the solutions for question 4.2 to work, b
Hi Alex,
Uncheck "wait for far end ..." on Gatekeeper trunk configuration on CUCM.
Thanks
Shrini
On 4/9/2011 10:42 AM, Alex Goh wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to get the solutions for question 4.2 to work, but
apparently I'm missing something and hope someone can help.
I've search thru the list b
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
