Dmitry... everyone is of course entitled to their opinion - but as one of the
brain-washed masses I feel I need to at least reply (!). Sorry Cara...
I am not happy with the direction OS X is going. Too much emphasis on eye
candy and not enough on underlying technology.
Fair enough, but it
Hi
Those are the only two brands out there that I know of too.
Depending on what sort of experiments you will be doing (high, medium or
low troughput ? Full characterisation ?), one model might be better suited
than the other.
I would consider TTP labtech ChipCAL too.
Not wanting to introduce
Hi
I am refining my 2 angstrom strucutre using phenix windows based software.
After many refinements my clashscore is not at all reducing and showing a
value of 12. Can anybody suggest how to reduce the clashscore. Is there any
technique to do it. Or i have to deal with each individual clashes
On Jan 22, 2013, at 11:20 PM, Nat Echols wrote:
The real difficulty is integrating Macs into a
Linux-centric environment, for example configuring NFS, NIS, etc.
That's because NFS and NIS are antiquities left over from the days of
mainframes. Distributed file systems and user information
Hi Careina,
If your protein is expressed in E. coli, you can have a prediction of its
solubility on this website: http://biotech.ou.edu
Hope it helps!
Alberto Manfrin
From: Careina Edgooms careinaedgo...@yahoo.com
Reply-To: Careina Edgooms careinaedgo...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Supratim,
I am afraid so, yes, you'll have to do it manually. Model building is
the other half of creating a model, and time-wise surely the more time
consuming one. On the other hand it is also the more scientific one
where you feel less
Hi Supratim,
The clashscore gives the relative number of clashes, not their severity.
This makes it difficult to see what your specific problem is. Sever clashes
(with large overlaps) are usually the result of errors in your model and
need individual attention. Light bumps can usually be solved
I am of the opinion that the truth lies somewhere in between ...
Here are my two cents based on personal experience ...
For example, I am happy myself using a MacBook Pro, which is sufficient for all
my activities, and has all software and data that I need.
Thus, I am myself on the 'new'
Indeed there are many web tools predicting solubility.
My personal bias is that your brain is the best tool for ideas on how to design
expression constructs.
(since one question in a multi-domain protein, is which bit is interesting ...!)
Many brains are better than one (talk to your colleagues
Cara you have re-ignited the perennial Mac v PC debate!!! You'll be asking
about depositing raw diffraction data next ;)
Cheers
Ashley
Sent from my iPhone
On 23/01/2013, at 10:29 PM, Anastassis Perrakis a.perra...@nki.nl wrote:
I am of the opinion that the truth lies somewhere in between ...
In the great internet tradition I'll chip in with my opinion even though it
doesn't differ substantially from those already stated earlier in the thread.
I'm responsible for a mixed bag of Windows, Linux and Mac boxen used for
crystallography and structural electron microscopy.
In terms of
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 01:54 -0700, James Stroud wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 11:20 PM, Nat Echols wrote:
The real difficulty is integrating Macs into a
Linux-centric environment, for example configuring NFS, NIS, etc.
That's because NFS and NIS are antiquities left over from the days of
Dear All ,
Could anybody suggest the best possible manner to measure the halflife time
of a protein-ATP complex? Our protein binds to ATP and we would like to
measure its half life time after it is bound to radiolabelled ATP. Looking
forward for your valuable suggestions.
Best wishes,
Jan
At the Structural Biochemistry Institute (ICS-6, Forschungszentrum Juelich,
Germany), we are looking for two highly motivated PhD students interested in
biochemical and structural studies on photosignaling proteins and enzymes. The
positions can be filled starting from March 2013.
The project
I assume nobody of you is running an actual Osx server ? I mean the upgrade to
a full server version of the commonly distributed normal Osx releases ?
I have not done it yet but I do think many of the issues mentioned regarding
NFS/NIS could be addressed there. Regarding the missing macpro
We did work with a full blown OSX Server in 2004 - indeed many issues on NFS
were Ok, but NIS was a problem - or we could not figure it out.
We used it as server for developers, running X-grid, SVN, WebObjects servers
for a couple of EC networks, but never deployed it fully
as a
We have 10.510.6 servers and briefly tested 10.7 server.
Last time I tried, Ubuntu 12.04 box would not authenticate users registered on
the OS X Open Directory server.
Before that, 10.04 clients would cause random user lockouts.
NFS GUI is gone as of 10.7
Regards,
Dmitry
On 2013-01-23,
Hi,
I'm running a mac mini server.
The file sharing seems to work fine - I'm not running NIS.
There is a lag in software starting up - up to 20-30 s but once the software is
loaded, it runs fine.
We did some benchmarking with phaser last week there was no perceivable
difference in running it
Is anyone aware of any datasets taken at near absolute zero? I was
wondering what would happen...
Jacob
--
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Postdoctoral Associate
HHMI Janelia Farms Research Campus
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
On 01/23/13 10:11, Jacob Keller wrote:
Is anyone aware of any datasets taken at near absolute zero? I was
wondering what would happen...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12718921
New techniques in macromolecular cryocrystallography: macromolecular
crystal annealing and cryogenic helium.
On 23 Jan 2013, at 14:05, Bosch, Juergen wrote:
I assume nobody of you is running an actual Osx server ? I mean the upgrade
to a full server version of the commonly distributed normal Osx releases ?
At the moment we have two OS X servers. One runs open directory for user
authentication.
CCP4BB members,
I am writing to recruit protein crystallographers who work with
undergraduate students to consider submitting an abstract to present a
short talk at the 2013 American Crystallographic Association Meeting
(July 20-24, Honolulu, HI) in our session, (13.08) Building Protein and
Coming next :
Negative Absolute Temperature for Motional Degrees of Freedom
http://m.sciencemag.org/content/339/6115/52
isomorphism?
Did anyone else come across this behavior? Could it be intended?
Best regards,
Wolfram Tempel
cad.20130123.log
Description: Binary data
Since there may some on this bb who have modelers as colleagues...
On behalf of the PSI GPCR Network group:
--
Dear GPCR modeling and docking researcher,
We are writing to announce the 3rd round of the GPCR Docking and Modeling
Assessment, GPCR Dock 2013, and to
Hi all,
By the way, thanks for all the suggestions on the linux versions. I
went against my better judgement and just stuck with Fedora, mainly
because I'm familiar with it. I have to admit, I kind of like it. I was
able to get it up and running, run nfs to mount local drives, and
install
On 23 Jan 2013, at 16:07, Dave Roberts drobe...@depauw.edu wrote:
Anyway, we have an old Indigo SGI that runs our NMR. It's a console only
system, and we access it via the network from another old SGI (toaster model
- blue). The console does not have a video card (nor space for one), so I
27 matches
Mail list logo
