I earlier reported that I was successful getting CFAnywhere running
entirely from CD -- this is still true!
But it has been pointed out to me, by Steve Duys, that the McKoi db may
lack some basic features that you would likely need to run youron CD
or on the Desktop.These are:
-- a rather
( Sorry for the Off Topic post, but you're the guys who will know what I'm
looking for )
There's a spyware app or trojan or something changing the home page on my
browser all the time and it's giving me a lot of heartburn.Every time I
delete the app that changes it, and all references to it in
( Sorry for the Off Topic post, but you're the guys who will know what I'm
looking for )
There's a spyware app or trojan or something changing the home page on my
browser all the time and it's giving me a lot of heartburn.Every time I
delete the app that changes it, and all references to it in
Mike Kear wrote:
There's a spyware app or trojan or something changing the home page on my
browser all the time and it's giving me a lot of heartburn.Every time I
delete the app that changes it, and all references to it in the registry, it
finds its way back again. I'll track it down eventually
I suggest running spybot-search and destroy - and increasing the security level
of IE.
==
Our Anti-spam solution works!!
http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=1069
I definatly second Spybot SD.The new version (1.3) seems to be a lot
more effictive at blocking such things.fixmy (dot) net is another place
you can obtain it along with more spyware info..
-mike
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Demaret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
The online tests at www.pcpitstop.com http://www.pcpitstop.com/may find
some of the simpler security holes for you: they'll automatically (if you
choose) set IE and Outlook to more secure settings.It's not a really
spyware/virus scanner (although they do offer an online virus scanner) but
rather a
Hi,
I've inherited an app that does not lock session variables.The app runs under CF5.0.
Have read cflock best practice for CF5.0. Here are a few questions:
(A) CFLOCK
1) heard that cf5 server and cfmx server handles cflock differently, so, would cflock best pratice for cf5 applicable to cfmx if
I lied - it appears they have begun offering an online spyware/adware
checker at pcpitstop.com
Jim Davis
_
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT How to prevent someone changing my home page
The online tests at
I use Ad Awarehttp://www.ad-aware.comIt's very good.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Mike Kear
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 11:42 AM
Subject: OT How to prevent someone changing my home page
( Sorry for the Off Topic post, but you're the guys who will know what I'm
looking
I am a bit rusty on this topic, but this is all what I remember. If anyone
finds a mistake please correct me.
-Original Message-
From: Chunshen (Don) Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: the ever popular cflock best practice revisited
Hi,
First, Tom, let me thank you for your knowledge and sharing.Please see my follow-up below.
Don
I am a bit rusty on this topic, but this is all what I remember. If anyone
finds a mistake please correct me.
-Original Message-
From: Chunshen (Don) Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to have someone download a software that is not on my
server, it's on the server of a member, for which I have the URL but I don't
want anyone to know that real URL.
I don't know if I 'm clear...
I have members who has software accessible on their websites
[Tom Kitta]
The name is used when you don't actually lock the
persistent scope
variables. The lock doesn't care what's in it, it just
single threads all
requests.
Thanks for the clarfication, good to know, in other words,
when NAME is used regardless of the value of NAME itself
CF server
I'm writing anemailing application and we're going to be selecting our
addresses from 3 different subscribertables, based on a whole bunch of
criteria. I want to merge the 3 queries from the tables into one, then
de-dup so we only send one email to each subscriber.
Is the followingthe best
I don't know if I 'm clear...
Perfectly.
The only way I can see is to get the file yourself with CFHTTP, then send it to your user.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this
This sounds like a syntax error. Can you post the manage.cfm file, or lines
15-25 or so.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Do what the spammer do. Convert all your characters to there url
equivalent... it
see this page for conversion... http://www.kerryr.net/pioneers/html2.htm
Eric Jones
Editor Caffeineinfused.com
http://www.caffeineinfused.com/ http://www.caffeineinfused.com
-Original Message-
From:
Pat,
I'm looking for a way to have someone download a software that is not on my
server, it's on the server of a member, for which I have the URL but I
don't
want anyone to know that real URL.
Can someone gave me ideas on how to do this?
Unless your server is actually serving the file to the
[Tom Kitta]
Well, as always in these situations I did a quick check as how things are in
the real life. Here is my code:
cfset mm = GetTickCount()
cfloop index=m from=1 to=1 step=1
cflock timeout=30 throwontimeout=Yes type=EXCLUSIVE scope=SESSION
cfset session.blob = 123
/cflock
/cfloop
[Tom Kitta]
Well, as always in these situations I did a quick check as
how things are in
the real life. Here is my code:
cfset mm = GetTickCount()
cfloop index=m from=1 to=1 step=1
cflock timeout=30 throwontimeout=Yes
type=EXCLUSIVE scope=SESSION
cfset session.blob = 123
/cflock
I too use AdAware 6.0 (along with the memory resident Ad-Watch) in addition to Symantec virus protection software. Further I also have a firewall in place as provided by my Belkin wireless router.The entire set of product types are required to provide a good defense to the various intruders our
since your running DNS It's probably safe to assume you have a webserver that handles multiple sublevel domains
you can use site headers (or identities in IIS) in your webserver to do it.
I have many different projectsand they are all viewed by http://projectname.mydomain.com all set up through
Tom,
I'm re-writing that portion of other's code using SCOPE attribute of value session for locking now to support concurrent users for the app.
Will test it to see result and update you and Isaac.
Thanks again.
Don
P.S.
Incidentally I noticed a lot of people using createUUID()
for the named
Does CF (v5) have a means of doing math with very large numbers?Example:
cfset a = 57104432845826048260
cfset b = a + 1
cfoutput
pre
a= #a#
b= #b#
b= #NumberFormat(b, )#
/pre
/cfoutput
Output:
a= 57104432845826048260
b= 5.71044328458E+019
b= 57104432845826048000
[Todays
I love mud, Issac, :)
I think you made some valid points.To create a cf lock like
cflock name='session' ... is totally and obviously senseless.
Don
[Tom Kitta]
Well, as always in these situations I did a quick check as
how things are in
the real life. Here is my code:
cfset mm =
Don wrote:
In sum, it seems applying cflock is part of best practice for both
preCFMX and CFMX.
Yes, it's a part of each but for different reasons.In CF5 on down, you
lock persistent scopes because if you don't you are taking your
application's life in your hands.As was said earlier, you can wind
One would never expect a production server running with 256 MB RAM but it's true I just found out from my client.The thing is it's totally beyond me that Dell would roll out a machine with this little amount of RAM and label it as a SERVER and sell to customers even three or fours years ago.
Now,
With 5 to 10 concurrent users the box will run, but will be somewhat kludgy,
especially if the SQL DB is on the same box (not recommended)
Recommended minimum RAM is 1 GB
If the Existing RAM is ECC RAM, the upgrade will be around $450.00, but is just
DR RAM, the upgrade will be about half that
Don,
If they're PowerApp web 100 servers then I can believe it as I used to have
four of those in a load balanced array running IIS5/CF5 on 256Mb RAM. Not
one of the applications used the session scope at all though. We turned it
off and opted for the client scope so we could have roaming
Paul,
Thanks for sharing your experience with DELL server, sorry I did not provide more info about the DELL server, it's 1550 for WEB server (IIS 5.0) and 2550 for Access 2000.
About client variable vs. session variable, I'll keep it in mind.
Don
Don,
If they're PowerApp web 100 servers
Thanks.
They are Dell 1550 for WEB server (IIS 5.0) and 2550 for Access 2000 (intend to upgrade to SQL Server) (they have a total of 4 boxes).
And I intend to recommend installing CF5 on a box that has most RAM and Access db on the box that has second most RAM.
With 5 to 10 concurrent users the
It will be good to upgrade to SQL2k, because concurrency is an issue with Access
2000, and it will not scale up very well.
==
Our Anti-spam solution works!!
http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
Agree 100% and that's what I advised my client and thanks for being on my side :)
It will be good to upgrade to SQL2k, because concurrency is an issue with Access
2000, and it will not scale up very well.
==
Our Anti-spam solution works!!
Of course you can easily handle 1 request per second with Access and
that equates to more traffic than many sites need to deal with. Who
cares about concurrency when you don't need it?
-Matt
On May 29, 2004, at 8:52 PM, Doug White wrote:
It will be good to upgrade to SQL2k, because
Client wants to run 30 concurrent users testing/training. Still Access?
And I don't want to argue with a client.
Of course you can easily handle 1 request per second with Access and
that equates to more traffic than many sites need to deal with. Who
cares about concurrency when you don't need
Evening,
I'm using a modified CFC originally from the Macromedia site to grab a
RSS News Feed. The .cfc file is in the same folder as the doc calling
the CFC.
It works perfectlly on my local machine. However, when I put it out on
the server, I get a Document Root Element is Missing error
37 matches
Mail list logo
