Christopher Jordan wrote:
This really doesn't sound like a ColdFusion discussion anymore. Perhaps
those involved could take it to a non-CF list, or off-list, or to CFOT
or something.
So getting back on topic: I can't get Homesite to run under Vista.
panic! Anyone else had this problem?
AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
Christopher Jordan wrote:
This really doesn't sound like a ColdFusion discussion anymore. Perhaps
those involved could take it to a non-CF list, or off-list, or to CFOT
or something.
So getting back on topic: I can't get Homesite to run
time you want to do something in Linux?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
Arg!!! I suppose I will be happy with XP :) Maybe linux would be a nice
change of pace
: Saturday, February 17, 2007 8:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Taking the Vista Plunge
I am not bashing here, but I had a co-worker who needed to
edit an excel workbook and let me send it back to Corporate
while we were at a convention.
She had just gotten her laptop before our trip with Vista
: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
say what you will but thats the way it is on vista.
granted, maybe there is a way around that but if I wanted to try and polish
a turn, i'd just rub Will's balding head.
The funny thing is I seam to recall a lot
On 2/19/07 11:35 AM, Eric Roberts wrote:
There are some interface changes, just like we had changes in each version
of Windows (or any other graphical OS for that matter).
I think one issue the geeks-that-know have with Aero is the poor design of
the GUI system. Look what Aqua is able to do on
Eric Roberts wrote:
I have the same complaint for any software or hardware manufacturer who
doesn't have updates or drivers for Vista. I find it very unprofessional.
There is no excuse for any company not to have been ready for the release...
Having been a part of a company that produced
I guess I am not a geek that knows...how is it poor design? It looks fine
to me.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:41 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
On 2/19/07 11:35 AM, Eric Roberts wrote
level. After the final is released, they can then tweak away and add
final features.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
Eric Roberts wrote:
I have the same complaint
2007
Subject: RE: Taking the Vista Plunge
I guess I am not a geek that knows...how is it poor design? It looks fine
to me.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:41 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Mon Feb 19 18:38:24 2007
Subject: RE: Taking the Vista Plunge
As long as they had to test drivers for Vista, there is no excuse. They
could at least, like Creative did(they learned their lesson when they didn't
have drivers for XP
-Original Message-
From: Sandra Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Running Homesite under Vista - WAS RE: Taking the Vista Plunge
I have it running. What version are you trying? I was successful with
5.5
As was I
and much more secure.
TK
- Original Message -
From: Eric Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 8:23 AM
Subject: RE: Taking the Vista Plunge
I really like it. Yeah, the constant checks to make sure that you are
requesting
Well, with the exception that behind linux password typing
the system is actualy doing security related tasks while
windows gives you an illusion of security with nagging
questions ... read some blogs related to VISTA security
or how its missing in action. XP is still 20- 30% faster
this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave l
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Feb 18 05:15:18 2007
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
wow Russ, never thought I'd hear you say something like
Don't log into your desktop as an administrator, and a lot of those
questiosn will go away.
I like the security features that Vista adds. IT only annoys people who run
poorly written programs that require administrator privileges.
I have no intention of upgrading to VISTA until Service Pack 1
After reading about Vista it seems like forever, this seems
like when we went from dos to windows. If you put it on an
existing machine it will probably crawl I have read.
Actually, most benchmarks have shown it to be about the same as XP.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/
actually no Dave, I never did complain about viruses and spyware, I believe it
is Will who gets hit by the viruses.
My issue was that I'd be working along and the system would freeze up then go
to BSOD and then I couldnt get back into it to get my data out and this was
always happening, and
This really doesn't sound like a ColdFusion discussion anymore. Perhaps
those involved could take it to a non-CF list, or off-list, or to CFOT
or something.
Thanks,
Chris
Dave l wrote:
actually no Dave, I never did complain about viruses and spyware, I believe
it is Will who gets hit by the
On 2/16/07, Eric Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would compare the features before settling on Home. Business and
Ultimate have more features than home does...especially in dealing with
networking.
I went through some Vista Training.. 2 days of it with Mark Minasi (who is a
VERY good
Home Premium does not include the drive encryption
capabilities.. it DOES include IIS (I posted a link to the MS
web site earlier in this thread) and it DOES include the
media center functionality (someone mentioned earlier that
that only Ultimate had the media center functionality, and
On 2/17/07, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't aware that Home Premium included IIS.
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/86026b03-18b0-4c42-9884-5af83226e2bd1033.mspx?mfr=true
For drive encryption, I'd rather use TrueCrypt, I think.
We use PGP to encrypt our
I did put the business version on my mac, and all I gotta say is what a
gigantic piece of crap vista is, honestly, I was hoping there was something on
there that made me go wow but there isnt, too little too late..
Im surely not going to be installing cfm on there or anything else, i just
Arg!!! I suppose I will be happy with XP :) Maybe linux would be a nice
change of pace too.
Doug B.
- Original Message -
From: Dave l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
I did
version.
-Original Message-
From: Dave l [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 6:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
I did put the business version on my mac, and all I gotta say is what
I am not bashing here, but I had a co-worker who needed to
edit an excel workbook and let me send it back to Corporate
while we were at a convention.
She had just gotten her laptop before our trip with Vista
and Office 2007.
After using help, etc. and 20 minutes I will never get back,
trying to
say what you will but thats the way it is on vista.
granted, maybe there is a way around that but if I wanted to try and polish a
turn, i'd just rub Will's balding head.
The funny thing is I seam to recall a lot of windows ppl on here making fun of
macs when it was a bit of a pita to install
.
The line between windows and mac is really starting to blur...
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 8:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
Arg!!! I suppose I will be happy with XP :) Maybe linux
wow Russ, never thought I'd hear you say something like that.
parallels is pretty amazing at this point but what you'll find is that you
don't open it very much and when you do its fairly transparent and when you
minimize it to dock it doesnt take up much resources, so if you need to leave
it
I'm pretty sure those will all run just fine on Vista Home Basic.
If you don't want Aero Glass, and you don't need the media center features,
Vista Home Basic should do just fine - or Vista Business. Gotta get Home
Premium or Ultimate if you want Aero Glass and/or media center
functionality.
Assuming CF7 runs on Vista at all =) Has anyone tested it?
I'm sure dave the disruptor has tested it extensively. :)
Will
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 MX7 integration create powerful cross-platform
and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
Team Fusebox
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 3:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
I'm pretty sure those will all run just fine on Vista Home Basic.
If you don't want
Thanks Sandra. Maybe I will just leave CF and SQL 2K on my server and just
run Homesite, Dreamweaver and Flex Builder on the machine and let the server
to the serving.
On 2/16/07, Sandra Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running it (it took a long time to get it running).. FYI, SQL Server
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 4:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
Thanks Sandra. Maybe I will just leave CF and SQL 2K on my server and just
run Homesite, Dreamweaver and Flex Builder
Bruce Sorge wrote:
OK, so I am going to take the Vista plunge this weekend. What is the minimum
version I need to run SQL Server 2000, CF7 and IIS?
I know that SQL 2000 is not supported on any version of Vista...I don't
know if that means it won't run, though.
According to the chart at:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2068721,00.asp
you're going to need at least Vista business, enterprise or ultimate to run
IIS
Of course you can probably run Apache on any home version.
-nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/
On 2/16/07, Bruce Sorge [EMAIL
Thanks Nate. That helps a lot.Guess it is going to be business version then.
On 2/16/07, Nathan Strutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the chart at:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2068721,00.asp
you're going to need at least Vista business, enterprise or ultimate to
run
or so if its your
first time), and it will probably be easier then getting CF to work with IIS
on vista.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 4:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
Thanks Nate
: RE: Taking the Vista Plunge
It still amazes me how many people would rather spend more money rather then
learn apache. If you need other features that the business version
provides, then by all means go for it, but I don't think IIS is worth paying
the extra $ for.
You can set up apache in about
Well since I have a server that has Win2K3 Server, CF7.2 and SQL 2000, I may
just go ahead and get the home version. Since my dev machine is a desktop
and my server is a Dell PowerEdge, I really see no reason to shell out the
extra $40.00 just to get IIS. I have DW set up to load the files to the
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
? IIS is free.
I think the point was that in order to get IIS with Vista, you have to
go to the Business, Enterprise or Ultimate version. Therefore, if the
only reason you are going to those versions is IIS, then it is not free.
It still amazes me how many people would rather spend more
money rather then learn apache. If you need other features
that the business version provides, then by all means go for
it, but I don't think IIS is worth paying the extra $ for.
You can set up apache in about 10 mins (ok
I think the point was that in order to get IIS with Vista, you have to
go to the Business, Enterprise or Ultimate version.
Exact, but what developer would only get the home version anyway ?
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See
to it in the next 1 1/2 years.
Sandra Clark
=
http://www.shayna.com
Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
Team Fusebox
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 6:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista
On 2/16/07, Nathan Strutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the chart at:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2068721,00.asp
you're going to need at least Vista business, enterprise or ultimate to
run
IIS
A more valid answer from microsoft.com:
OK, so I am going to take the Vista plunge this weekend. What
is the minimum version I need to run SQL Server 2000, CF7 and IIS?
Out of curiosity, why do you want to upgrade to Vista? Because that's
probably going to be a more important determining factor in what version to
buy than anything
I believe any of the premium editions and ultimate have IIS included (not
sure about the home versions. Check out tigerdirect.com...they have
Ultimate for 199...
I have been running for a couple of weeks now and I love it. I am running
it as a desktop and not a server though. Make sure you
a lot
of flak over the XP version of IIS heheheh
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 4:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Taking the Vista Plunge
? IIS is free.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House
: Taking the Vista Plunge
Well since I have a server that has Win2K3 Server, CF7.2 and SQL 2000, I may
just go ahead and get the home version. Since my dev machine is a desktop
and my server is a Dell PowerEdge, I really see no reason to shell out the
extra $40.00 just to get IIS. I have DW set up
49 matches
Mail list logo
