So I have a query that returns the following..
Client_Code MenuName Client_Name
4938 Test Test Company
9328 Test Test Company
10349 Test Test Company
9283 Test Test 2 Company
What I'm
Hrm.. Still getting the same result.
The code that is actually printing it is
#currentQuery[currentField][currentQuery.currentRow]#
So I probably have to figure out how to remove the current row (since
#currentQuery[currentField]# doesn't work). It's probably forcing it to display
just on
group=Client_Code
It should work as long as its contained without a nested cfoutput as Dave
mentioned. Also, notice he is grouping by Client_Name instead of the code.
Be sure the query results are sorted by that column too.
-Leigh
*facepalms* That did it. I wasn't sorting the query by Client_Name. I was doing
it by Client_Code.
Thanks guys. I appricate the help. :)
group=Client_Code
It should work as long as its contained without a nested cfoutput as
Dave mentioned. Also, notice he is grouping by Client_Name
If this is SQL Server, than the GROUP BY has to match the un-aggregated
SELECT columns, so it would need to be something like:
SELECT COUNT(intMemberID) AS NewMembers,
DATENAME(mm, dteAdded) + '-' + DATENAME(, dteAdded) AS Month
FROM TABLE
GROUP BY DATENAME(mm, dteAdded) + '-' +
Your group by has to match your select in most cases...
Also, you are using reserved words in your query so that can mess stuff
up.
Try this instead...
Select count(intMemberID) as [NewMembers], dateName(mm, [dteAdded]) +
'-' + dateName(, [dteAdded]) as MTH
From table
Group by dateName(mm,
That was it.
I found the solution
SELECT
DATENAME(mm, article.Created) AS Month,
DATENAME(, article.Created) AS Year,
COUNT(*) AS Total
FROM Articles AS article
GROUP BY
DATENAME(mm, article.Created),
DATENAME(, article.Created)
ORDER BY Month, Year DESC
At the
Les,
I think the query as is will do what you want. Instead of fixing the
query use the Grouping function of cfoutput to only display the employee
name once, but the other data as it is.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:lesm...@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, October
Why not just
cfoutput query= group=name
b#name#/bbr
cfoutput
#area_name#, #office_name#br
/cfoutput
/cfoutput
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Les Mizzell lesm...@bellsouth.net wrote:
SELECT
employees.empID
employees.name,
Agha Mehdi wrote:
Why not just
cfoutput query= group=name
b#name#/bbr
cfoutput
#area_name#, #office_name#br
/cfoutput
/cfoutput
I could - but it's way more complicated than that...
This single query (example was simplified) is responsible for a
information.
You could make multiple columns address1, address2, etc but that is
considered really bad database design and isn't normalized.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:lesm...@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:58 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: GROUP
Which database server are you using? Some allow you the ability to return
an aggregate of values in the form of a comma delimited list. You might be
able to get your result set to look like this:
EMPID NAME OFFICES
1 DaveBoston (NE), Dallas (SW), Miami (SE)
2 JohnSan
Not sure if you can do that, but you might want to try getting the file
extension as a calculated column in the query
SELECT
(
RIGHT( filename, 3 )
) AS ext
Then, in the CFOutput, you could group=ext
..
Ben Nadel
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX7 Developer
cfquery name=foo datasource=bar
SELECT
filename,
right(filename, 3) AS ext,
othercol
FROM
table
ORDER BY
right(filename, 3)
/cfquery
cfoutput query=foo group=ext
that, of course, assumes you only have file extensions of 3
No, but you could select a column in your query that reads just the first 3
characters of the filename, give it a column alias, order by that column
alias, and then use that in your cfoutput group attribute. Something like
this (check your particular RDBMS for the Right() function or similar):
not grouping the gifs properly?
Any ideas what I'm missing?
Thanks guys,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 July 2007 16:24
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: GROUP BY RIGHT()?
No, but you could select a column in your query that reads just the first 3
An ORDER BY?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 July 2007 16:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: GROUP BY RIGHT()?
Thanks guys for the suggestion,
I'll agree that the calculated column is probably my best bet, you're right
Charlie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 July 2007 16:24
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: GROUP BY RIGHT()?
No, but you could select a column in your query that reads just the first 3
characters of the filename, give it a column alias, order by that column
alias, and then use that in your cfoutput group
Check out datepart.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 7:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Group By Hours
Hello Guys,
I have a bunch of records of log data, all with a datetime stamp on it,
and I'm looking to have SQL
select logid, classid, datetime, datepart(year, datetime) + '/' +
datepart(month, datetime) + '/' + datepart(day, datetime) + '/' +
datepart(hour, datetime) AS groupbyvalue
from table
order by datetime
That looks sort of weird, but I think what you'll need to do is make sure
you're grouping by
Subject: Re: Group By Hours
select logid, classid, datetime, datepart(year, datetime) + '/' +
datepart(month, datetime) + '/' + datepart(day, datetime) + '/' +
datepart(hour, datetime) AS groupbyvalue
from table
order by datetime
That looks sort of weird, but I think what you'll need to do is make
Don't Worry,
Onto something now with that date part stuff.
I'll let you know how I get on.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 May 2007 13:48
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group By Hours
Thanks for the suggestion Pete,
I'm sure
Ok,
So I now have this grouping as I want it too, using that date part function,
I just need a little help with the counting. Look below for my current query
and the results returned.
!--- Query to Obtain Records ---
cfquery name=LOCAL.qGetAllDateRangeForUnitByDay datasource=
SELECT
It's pretty much as you said, except the syntax is:
SUM(CASE WHEN logclass_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as sent
On 5/1/07, Robert Rawlins - Think Blue wrote:
Ok,
COUNT(WHERE LogClass_ID = 1) AS Sent
COUNT(WHERE LogClass_ID = 2) AS Failed
COUNT(WHERE LogClass_ID = 3) AS Postponed
Perfect Deanna,
That works nicely, glad I've got you guys on hand, I would have NEVER gotten
that one on my own.
Thanks a million,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 May 2007 14:23
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group By Hours
It's pretty much
arrgh, couldn't work it out so have created a list and appended to it on each
output so i can use a listfind to prevent duplicate ID's happening. rough but
works.
thanks for your help.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
When you instruct the system to only return one of a group like that,
you have to tell it which of the possible selections to make. So, you
need to either group by the other columns (which will return a row for
every distinct entry in that column) or use an aggregate function to
only return
not sure i follow ben, i don't want to include the category/collection info in
the GROUP BY as this will give me the exact same result as not using GROUP BY?
could you give an example of using the min/max on the other columns?
thanks mate.
mike
When you instruct the system to only return
select id, max(otherfield) as otherfield
from table, othertable
where table.id = othertable.id
group by id
order by otherfield
This is just off the top of my head, but I hope it gets the idea across.
--Ben Doom
Mike Little wrote:
not sure i follow ben, i don't want to include the
Just to throw in my two pennies worth:
I have a CMS where there are about 20 websites which use the same
editor, file upload etc.
I do this the following way - I have a table with the web site
specifics in, like the various upload directories, image directories
etc, and then a User table.
Well, here's what I do.
I use Active Directory groups to manage access to different areas of our
intranet. There are a few instances where I create pseudo groups from
our main business system, but in the near future, that's going to change
to use Active Directory as well.
I have an OU, in AD,
I'm building a content management application targeted at
small-businesses.
I quite agree with Barney's description.
What you describe here would be role based security.
However, for small business, a permission based security would probably
be more appropriate.
Depends how small is you small
The typical name for that arrangement is role based security, and
it's typical counterpart is permission based security. To align the
terminology, let me restate what you said.
With role based security, your application has a set of defined roles
that users are assigned to. These roles are then
Barney gave a pretty good overview. When I wrote AccessMonger, I
pretty much followed the same model he describes. Permissions give
you absolutely granular control over literally anything you please,
but as your system grows you could potentially wind up with zillions
of permissions. To help
You could either do something like selecting the content as a substring
(which will work in group by) or you could skip the Group BY and run the
count as sub-query
SELECT
...
SUBSTRING( clubroom.cb_content, 0, 1000 ) AS cb_content
...
FROM
...
GROUP BY
sort of like this?
SELECT clubroom.cb_id, clubroom.cb_dCreated, clubroom.cb_dModified,
clubroom.cb_content, clubroom.cb_isArchive,
(
SELECT COUNT(cbi_id) AS image_count
FROM clubroom_images
)
FROM clubroom LEFT OUTER JOIN clubroom_images
ON clubroom.cb_id = clubroom_images.cb_id
hmmm...
now i cannot get at my getArticles.image_count variable ??
sort of like this?
SELECT clubroom.cb_id, clubroom.cb_dCreated, clubroom.cb_dModified,
clubroom.cb_content, clubroom.cb_isArchive,
(
SELECT COUNT(cbi_id) AS image_count
FROM clubroom_images
)
FROM
Message-
From: Mike Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 6:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: GROUP BY error
hmmm...
now i cannot get at my getArticles.image_count variable ??
sort of like this?
SELECT clubroom.cb_id, clubroom.cb_dCreated, clubroom.cb_dModified
I've used it.
Can you show us the SQL you are having a problem with?
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:243360
Archives:
Here is a simple example using the Northwind database in SQL Server
The key to the GROUP BY clause is that is needs to be used in aggregate
functions
SELECT COUNT(P.ProductID) AS ItemTotal, C.CategoryName
FROM Products AS P INNER JOIN Categories AS C ON P.CategoryID = C.CategoryID
GROUP BY
-Original Message-
From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005?
Here is a simple example using the Northwind database in SQL Server
The key to the GROUP BY clause is that is needs
: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005?
Ok...I had read a message that mentioned the aggregate function
requirement...but how would I write my example query to include an
(unneeded
By Book_Genre
Order By Book_Genre
Seems strange to require an unneeded aggregate function...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005
Ok, I see what's going on. You want to out put your records in a group,
thats a CF issue, not a SQL issue.
What you need to do is to use ORDER BY to get your records in the correct
order then user the GROUP attribute of the CFOUTPUT tag
GROUP BY in SQL is for compiling related data and
Are you trying to get a count of all of the books by Genre? Or are you
trying to get a list of all of the genres?
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
Message:
But why does it require that the count be calculated
if I don't need that information?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Morphis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005?
But it is needed
:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005?
But it is needed, that query is returning the count of the books per
book_genre
On 6/13/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally did get Express to give me the results I wanted...
Here's
Ok...I had read a message that mentioned the aggregate
function requirement...but how would I write my example
query to include an (unneeded?) aggregate function?
(And why would there be an aggregate requirement anyway?)
Query (MySQL version):
Select * from books group by genre
The
Just a list of the genres to fill out a dropdown list...
SELECT DISTINCT Genre FROM Book
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago,
???
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 3:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005?
SELECT DISTINCT(Book_Genre) AS MyGenre
FROM Books
ORDER BY Book_Genre
This will accomplish what you
Yep...it was one of those duh moments...
Thanks for your help.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group By function for MS SQL Server Express 2005?
Just a list of the genres to fill out
Question: What's the benefit to using the alias? Is there a
benefit or is its usage just required?
Could it just be:
Select distinct Book_Genre
from Books
order by Book_Genre
You don't need an alias. SELECT DISTINCT fieldname FROM tablename will do.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
Not really, it's just a habit. I like to explicitlly control the name of the
resulting variable.
Dave is right, as usual, you can just leave it and it will retain it's given
column name.
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
Also the GROUP BY clasue in SQL is a different beast than the group
attribute in cfquery
It is, and I think it's more what you're looking for. You don't have to
order a group by. By default, depending on your query, it would order it
the way it was entered.
SQL is really quite awesome, and
Only order the groups, not the subgroups?
On 4/11/06, Les Mizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to group output in a query and keep the groups together,
but with no order specified anywhere?
cfquery
Select myGROUP, mySubGROUP from myTABLE
!---(NO ORDER BY)---
/cfquery
I need
This idea may seem complicated, but it should work. Put the ORDER BY in the
SQL. Create an empty array. Do your cfoutput with the 'group' attribute. Use
cfsavecontent to put each Group's output into a variable in the array. Then
you can use some kind of randomizer to grab the output from the
I don't know what DB you're using, but have you tried using 'group by'?
Something like this:
select fname, lname, address, city, state, zip
from contacts
group by state, city, zip
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:00 PM
To:
CF doesn't care if the records are actually in order, it just processes
the outer loop when there's a change of value.
If myGROUP has a numeric primary key you could do your ORDER BY on that,
rather than on the name of it.
Failing that, you could sort in some strange way that might look random,
I'd suggest creating a SORT_ORDER (INTEGER) column for
each of the myGROUP records and ask your client what order he'd like
them in.
This is probably what's going to have to happen.
Otherwise, Yoda says, Solutions there are, but convoluted are they!.
If I add a ORDER to the query, it obviously works - but, the client
doesn't WANT them in any order. He just wants the groups together.
I'm not trying to sound like a wiseass, but just point out a
perspective: if the client doesn't care what order they're in, what's
the harm in ordering them?
It may well be that they don't not care. They may be specifically
asking that they not be in any sort of discernible order.
Why are you using the group in the cfoutput instead of in the query?
--Ferg
Joe Rinehart wrote:
If I add a ORDER to the query, it obviously works - but, the client
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group - but with no order specified
It may well be that they don't not care. They may be specifically
asking that they not be in any sort of discernible order.
Why are you using the group in the cfoutput instead of in the query?
--Ferg
Joe Rinehart wrote:
If I add
I'm not trying to sound like a wiseass, but just point out a
perspective: if the client doesn't care what order they're in, what's
the harm in ordering them?
Client wants it in the order he typed it in, not an alpha sort or
anything. What the client don't get though is that he's not
: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Group - but with no order specified
I'm not trying to sound like a wiseass, but just point out a
perspective: if the client doesn't care what order they're in, what's
the harm in ordering them?
Client wants it in the order he typed
Correct, but if a filed being 'GROUPED' in CF is not ORDERed in SQL, then
disinct items in the 'outer loop' may beoutput more than once.
For example:
cfset test = QueryNew('name,item') /
cfset queryAddRow(test,6) /
cfset querySetCell(test,'name','Bob',1) /
cfset
I have never tried to add MAXROWS to an CFOUTPUT
Statement of a Group before, so I am not use it
Can be done, however the only other way I can
Think of is by creating your own counter and increment
It by 1 each time until you get the desired number
Of records.
CFSET grpCounter = 0
CFOUTPUT
I'm no SQL expert but I don't know if what you're describing is possible.
Retrieve a max of 5 rows for each group in the database.
I think that's going to have to be done in CF.
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
9:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group Query help.
I'm no SQL expert but I don't know if what you're describing is possible.
Retrieve a max of 5 rows for each group in the database.
I think that's going to have to be done in CF.
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc
Hi Bobby,
I am using SQl Server 2000.
Ben
Sorry for the delay in my reply.
- Original Message -
From: Bobby Hartsfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 3:34 AM
Subject: RE: Group Query help.
The only thing I can think of off
Jochem,
Thx.
I've reread your posts a few times. It will help next time.
-- gil
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 6:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: group by date, missing something
mayo wrote:
SELECT MONTH(saleDate
mayo wrote:
SELECT MONTH(saleDate) AS theMonth, sum(saleTotal) as dailyTotal
FROM sales
GROUP by theMonth
I know you already know how to solve your problem, but please
bear with me :)
The reason that your query isn't supposed to work (it will work
in some implementations) is that DBMS's
Did you try putting MONTH(saleDate) directly in the GROUP BY clause?
cheers,
barneyb
On 6/22/05, mayo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to do a group by date on an access db.
I have a list of sales and want to group by month and year. I can't get
even a test run to work
SQL below:
SELECT sum(saleTotal), saledate
FROM sales
GROUP BY saledate
- Original Message -
From: mayo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: group by date, missing something
I'm trying to do a group by date on an access db.
I
. That is the only way you can really group the results
correctly.
M!ke
From: eric.creese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 6/22/2005 6:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: group by date, missing something
SELECT sum(saleTotal), saledate
FROM sales
GROUP BY saledate
, 2005 7:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: group by date, missing something
SELECT sum(saleTotal), saledate
FROM sales
GROUP BY saledate
- Original Message -
From: mayo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: group by date
-
From: mayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: group by date, missing something
Thanks eric, but that gives a total for every day.
June 21 10,000
June 20 9,555
June 19 11,200
.
That's useful but I'm trying to get
It's setup using fusebox, but can be modified pretty easily
http://cfopen.org/projects/coldcalendar/
-Original Message-
From: Claremont, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Group Vacation Calendar?
Anybody got the workings for a
you need to add an ORDER BY clause to your query:
ORDER BY group, displayorder
('group' is a reserved word, btw...if that really is currently your
column name you might want to look into changing that)
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:10:35 -0500, Les Mizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have records in
Show us your SQL code. What does your ORDER BY look like?
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 February 2005 02:11
To: CF-Talk
Subject: GROUP and ORDER Conundrum
I have records in a SQL Server database that I'm displaying by GROUP -
but need to
I have a query that currently looks like:
CFQUERY name=clicks_per_product_market_display datasource=#
Data_Source #
select *
from email_results, email_blast
Where email_results.emres_blast_sent_id = #URL.BLAST# AND
email_results.emres_prod_catagory = '#get_cat_info.Category#' AND
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want companyA to show up only once even if they clicked 5 times. Does
that make sense?
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group By Question
I have a query that currently
Why are you using GROUP BY if you dont have any aggregate functions in
your select clause (ie AVG() SUM() etc).
Try taking it out
-Original Message-
From: Ben Densmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November 2003 16:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group By Question
Dave
use
MAX(columnname) as alias
along with your grouping.
dave
- Original Message -
From: Ben Densmore
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: Group By Question
Dave,
That doesn't seem to do what I want it to. I modified the query to grab
just the fields I'm
That doesn't seem to do what I want it to. I modified the
query to grab just the fields I'm using and grouped by those
fields:
CFQUERY name=clicks_per_product_market_display datasource=#
Data_Source #
select
email_blast.embl_email,email_blast.embl_companyname,email_blas
Is the problem with your query or your output? Do you get the right results
when you run the query in some sort of query analyzer? If not, my first
question would be about the nested year(month( function. Do you need to do
it that way? Can't you just use year(column)?
If it's an output issue,
hey Deanna.
i figured it out..
was just the morning fog...
thanks..
-paul
cfquery name=rsDisMonth datasource=recycle
SELECT Year(Offload_Date) as yearEnterd, Month(Offload_Date) as monthEnterd,
SUM(Offload_Gallons) AS SumGal
FROM tblOffload
GROUP BY Year(Offload_Date), Month(Offload_Date)
I'm trying to group people by state, with two columns of names under each
state heading. This works, other than some states don't always fill the
second top column in the group. Some rows display correctly, and others
don't. I have some states with 3 names that work correctly.
I get
STATE
name1
You can't really use currentrow with group - it throws it off. Best thing
to do in those cases is create your own counter, that you refresh each time
the group is looped on, and use that to do MODs on.
That said, to do two columns the way you want, the manual counter bit won't
work either. I'd
look at the group attribute of cfoutput.
Should do what you want.
HTH,
Sam
- Original Message -
From: Dowdell, Jason G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:30 PM
Subject: group by in cfoutput
Hi all,
Here's a bit of a challenge. I
It does a portion of what I want. I need to restrict
the output of the group by to a max of 3 records per
parent category.
~jason
-Original Message-
From: Sam Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: group by in cfoutput
look
Can you put maxrows=3 in the innermost CFOUTPUT?
-Original Message-
From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: group by in cfoutput
It does a portion of what I want. I need to restrict
the output
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: group by in cfoutput
It does a portion of what I want. I need to restrict
the output of the group by to a max of 3 records per
parent category.
~jason
-Original Message-
From: Sam Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
That's the piece I'm working on now.
It won't allow you to do that since you must
specify a query in order to specify maxrows.
~Jason
-Original Message-
From: Everett, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: group by in cfoutput
Hi all,
Here's a bit of a challenge. I have a single table storing category
information similar to any search engine. The table structure looks
like this
IDNameParentIDLevel
1 Computers 0 1
2 Laptop 1 2
3
Even if you can, I suspect it's not a very efficient method.
Can you put maxrows=3 in the innermost CFOUTPUT?
-Original Message-
From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: group by in cfoutput
It does
Dowdell, Jason G wrote:
Here's a bit of a challenge. I have a single table storing category
information similar to any search engine. The table structure looks
like this
IDNameParentIDLevel
1 Computers 0 1
2 Laptop 1
I'm trying to group my query results by day. The field
I'm grabbing from
has a date/time stamp in it so what I'm getting are
results grouped by time.
I tried to fix this with this code which obviously doesn't
work. How can I
group this by date and ignore the time stamp?
cfquery
BY convert(char(14), logdate, 111)
ORDER BY logdate
Chuck McElwee
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
www.etechsolutions.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: group
In the select statement of your query you can use the SQL Server DatePart
function as I copy and paste from the SQL Server help file, any questions
let me know:
-Begin Shameless Copying--
Datepart ()
Returns an integer representing the specified datepart of the specified
date.
..
Thanks!
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Group by on date/time field
In the select statement of your query you can use the SQL Server
DatePart function as I copy and paste from the SQL
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
