I have a local squid proxy and on Windows machines using it the Chrome
installer never finishes (I can download the first, small .exe which
then initializes and tries to download the main installer). When not
using squid it works fine. When using other proxies like tinyproxy, it
also works fine.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 22:38, Eric Roman ero...@chromium.org wrote:
Omaha doesn't support manual authentication for proxies, so if your
squid proxy is requiring a username/password that could be the
problem.
Yes, I know about this problem (it's documented in the help message
linked when the
Michał, Chris: could you comment on security aspects and give some
recommendations?
Ben, could you comment on the user interaction / usability aspect?
We have few choices here, I'm not sure which one is preferred.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 23:23, Benjamin Smedberg bsmedb...@gmail.com wrote:
For
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 23:01, Chris Evans cev...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Evan Martin ev...@google.com wrote:
Since the proposed vulnerability is that I have cd'ed into a specially
crafted malicious directory then type out google-chrome
some-particular-url, at
Is there any security risks with passing raw ftp listings to the
renderer in case we can't parse them? We already have a check in the
code so that we will only make a data connection to the server we have
the control connection with.
If it's ok to do so, I'd also like to include some message
We have http://crbug.com/4436, and the problem is that if you launch
chrome index.html (with index.html in the current directory) it will
try to navigate to http://index.html/ instead. This behavior is useful
for cases like chrome www.google.com, and generally I don't see a good
solution to this
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:25, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Is there another way to do it? Perhaps ui_test should register its own
NotificationObserver with the AutomationProvider framework? Or is that a
bogus approach?
I'd really suggest starting with a browser_test instead. It's
I was thinking about many DirectoryWatcher problems, especially on
Linux, and now noticed http://crbug.com/20832.
User scripts are the only user of DirectoryWatcher. DirectoryWatcher
has many quirks - on Windows it behaves in a weird way on XP so we
can't test it reliably (and hits the disk on UI
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 21:23, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org wrote:
I wrote up this section under our Tree Sheriff page:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/tree-sheriffs#TOC-Disabling-tests
Thanks! I expanded the section to also mention the FLAKY_ prefix
(which is very helpful in
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:22, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
The closest thing I found to what I want is the LoginPromptTest ui_tests,
but these seem only to work on Windows because the automation framework
doesn't yet support NotificationType::AUTH_NEEDED on anything but windows:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 00:19, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Is this thought to be http://crbug.com/29240, or are there other
problems with the signal handler? The change to fix that is out at
http://codereview.chromium.org/460094.
I'm not sure. The failures are not deterministic.
Thanks so much! It's nice to learn some things about webkit. Some ideas for
the next round of talks:
- how sandboxing works on Linux and Mac
- ChromeFrame internals (how it interacts with IE, ExternalTab magic etc)
- performance tests
- Valgrind and ThreadSanitizer
- plugins in the multi-process
I hit at least few cases when I broke the views and/or chromeos buildbot
with a CL which doesn't touch the views code directly (which would trigger
submitting it to the views trybot). Today another change in a gypi file
triggered a compile failure on views bots, while all other trybots have been
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 22:34, Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Evan
Triaging Linux Jank bugs. Probably not many that are actionable right
now, though.
That's not exactly Jank issue, but on a lot of our bots we're getting
leftover processes on Linux. It seems they don't respond
Just FYI, I checked in a patch to disable the test isolation for
net_unittests.
The thing is, it exposed further problems with the tests. I will investigate
that offline. Sorry for a day of increased flakiness. I hope it will pay off
in the future with less debugging mysteries with Singletons
Just compiled Chromium Linux from trunk and downloaded the sample buildbot
extension. I got two warnings while doing this:
- when downloading, that the file might be dangerous and hurt my computer -
do I want to continue
- and second, whether I want to install the extension
It may be a better
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 19:24, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
The first prompt is not shown when you install from the gallery, so
for 99% of cases users won't see it.
Ah, sounds great. By the way, I'm really happy how extensions in Chrome work
in general. Instant installation etc. And
Could you document that on some Mac wiki page on code.google.com/p/chromium?
This way if anyone decides to use Xcode editor at any time will see this
handy tip.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 21:31, Dave MacLachlan dmacl...@chromium.orgwrote:
If you don't ever use Xcode as an editor, don't ever want
Currently we don't start the request in ResourceDispatcherHost until the
user script is ready (or not needed). UserScriptListener handles that. We
also wait for SafeBrowsing, Plugins, etc. We're going to wait for
PrivacyBlacklists.
I was thinking about refactoring RDH so that it would be easy to
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 20:57, Tim Steele timste...@google.com wrote:
It seems like the test should wait for the title to update, and not the
navigation to finish.
I'm pretty sure it's not a waiting problem. I followed what the test does
manually, and I could still reproduce the issue. I also
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:33, Tim Steele timste...@google.com wrote:
There are only a couple places where WebCore tells the client that the
title changed (looks like 3, search FrameLoader for
dispatchDidReceiveTitle). There are conditionals wrapping each such call
and also, in some cases,
A little background: SessionHistoryTest.LocationReplace rarely fails on the
buildbot (isn't even on the flakiness dashboard), but seems to be #1 flaky
test on the trybot, where it fails almost every time (or so it seems to me).
It also reproduces very consistently on my Windows VM, so we have a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 00:07, Evan Stade est...@google.com wrote:
sounds like http://crbug.com/22560
Thanks for finding it. /me votes for removing the Mstone-X label from it,
bumping priority to Pri-2, adding a FlakyTest label and details about
SessionHistoryTest.LocationReplace, and finally
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 23:34, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
We could define a function that must be called before you can use code in
base/. You could add a call to this everywhere that we currently create the
AtExitManager. Or, maybe we could combine those somehow.
Thanks for
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:22, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@google.com wrote:
It's really about the unit tests, not in chromium.
I guess we could probably leak the singleton in the unit tests too on
each reset. Pawel, what do you think?
Note to all the static local makers: you create an
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 19:52, Chris Bentzel cbent...@google.com wrote:
Have there been any thoughts about adding gcl patch and unpatch commands
which will grab the file diffs as well as duplicate the CL metadata in
src/.svn/gcl_info?
It's not trivial to correctly apply a patch in svn (file
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 21:05, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Your analysis is correct. However, a virtual destructor is not needed
in the case where you never delete through the Base*. It turns out
for our codebase that is very common (due to lots of observer-like
patterns), so we
Do you have some idea how to get rid of the Singletons in base/time_win.cc?
They don't play very well with base::SystemMonitor, MessageLoop, and test
code.
Here's the scenario we're hitting right now (in browser_tests):
1. HighResolutionTimerManager is created to enable high resolution timer
Not sure if that's related, but bugdroid started to behave strangely. I see
new comments for commits from before a week.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 20:27, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just a heads' up ... we've discovered a bug in Issue Tracker that has
caused a few of our
It turns out that WATCHLISTS aren't fully effective because git-cl doesn't
support them. It doesn't look very hard to implement the support for git-cl
because there is already a watchlists.py file, but then there are some
questions:
- should the watchlists.py file (from depot_tools) be copied to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 20:43, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Evan Martin ev...@google.com wrote:
Since we're talking about style, I'll note that this pattern is no
good (and I've seen it explicitly called out somewhere before).
The problem is
I was just looking at the buildbot cycle stats at
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/stats and realized that on many
bots the most frequently failing tests are browser_tests and ui_tests.
Then I checked how early they are run by each bot (the earlier we know about
the failure, the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:26, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
My question still stands: if this list is needed in order to process the
first network request, why add extra complexity to RDH to make more things
asynchronous, when either way any IO is basically blocked on the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 21:28, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:13 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.orgwrote:
per our chat on irc, I think if a new privacy blacklist is added while
running, it should be loaded on the file thread, and when it's available
Initially I got an advice to use PauseRequest and ResourceHandler to wait
with servicing requests until all privacy blacklists are loaded. However,
there are problems with that.
When you look at ResourceDispatcher code, we need a Blacklist::Match* even
before creating URLRequest.
I thought about
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:00, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.org
wrote:
To do that, I'd need to listen for BlacklistManager notifications in RDH
(on IO thread). Does it seem OK to make RDH
Note however that you can build specific projects. When working on base or
net for example, you can build just base_unittests and net_unittests. When
working on webkity things, you can sometimes compile just the test_shell,
and not chrome.
--
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Dave MacLachlan dmacl...@google.com wrote:
I haven't looked into it, but I'm assuming the reason it's so slow is
because of the bad DSYM parsing in Leopard. It should be much faster in
Snow
Leopard, but that probably doesn't help you.
That's probably
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 08:56, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Why don't you pass an Extension instance?
It's in a test. Mocking an Extension is not trivial as well. :( Or maybe...
I didn't read all of the extensions unit tests, maybe it's not that hard.
It seems like you are
So, the problem with Extensions has been solved (thanks to Aaron), but
there's stil the original issue that may bite at any time (please see the
first message for context):
Is there a big difference between a Singleton and LazyInstance? I was
thinking about making NPAPI::PluginList a Singleton
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:50, Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
- make ExtensionsService a BlacklistPathProvider and write a test which
loads an extension and verifies that BlacklistManager notices that (I'm
working on it now)
This is done. To clarify: you can't yet load
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 06:50, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
*The solution*
1+2: Use ChromeThread::PostTask and friends (i.e. PostDelayedTask,
DeleteSoon, ReleaseSoon) which are safe and efficient: no locks are grabbed
if the target thread is known to outlive the current thread.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 16:58, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm not sure which news you're referring to. :)
To the one that the files are supposed to by svn-copied by git, that there
is a command to check for that, and that you offered to help in case of
problems. :)
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 19:08, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
I've also been known to use the built-in GNU emacs from a terminal shell
(especially when working remotely/SSH-ing). I see no reason why you can't
have the same experience that you do with your Linux box, although you'd
Recently I started working more and more on Mac OS X, and I'm trying to find
an editor that would work the best for me.
On Linux I used GNU Emacs with many customizations. Some of the most handy
ones for working on Chromium were Google Style script and launching the
compilation from the editor. I
I encountered another problem related to Singletons in unit tests.
PluginService is a Singleton, and it listens to extensions notifications. In
one of my tests when I was using the extensions notifications the
PluginService crashed because I passed NULL as the Extension* - because the
listener I
I think that the right fix is to switch interactive_ui_tests to
browser_tests launcher (jcampan did some great work to make the launcher
more flexible, it may be quite simple to do the switch now - if there are no
UI tests in interactive_ui_tests).
I also suggest bumping the priority of
If you have less than 1 GB of RAM, I wouldn't even try to link the biggest
binaries. 2 GB of RAM should be sufficient, although with 4 and more it's
better. And you will notice the change after switching to gold.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 18:58, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct
I'm getting this compile error when compiling on Ubuntu 9.04 (scons):
Compiling
/home/ph/chromium/src/sconsbuild/Debug/obj/libxslt/libxslt/libxslt/xsltutils.o
Generating version information
Creating library /home/ph/chromium/src/sconsbuild/Debug/lib/libxslt.a
Indexing
That's a good news. Can that info be put somewhere in the UsingGit wiki
page?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 23:56, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm doing some refactoring in the chromium worker code, and I got the
26, 2009 at 09:05, Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
Please don't make non-trivial changes to chrome/browser/privacy_blacklists
if possible. I have a big change which I'll be soon (today) submitting for
review. It will be needed to integrate privacy blacklists with extensions
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 16:35, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
I suspect this happens when the theme resources aren't correctly
built. Perhaps we should have this check early on in ui tests so that
we don't run any tests if this check fails.
Yeah, I was even thinking about a build
Please don't make non-trivial changes to chrome/browser/privacy_blacklists
if possible. I have a big change which I'll be soon (today) submitting for
review. It will be needed to integrate privacy blacklists with extensions.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium
I get this when compiling unit_tests on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard:
/Users/ph/chromium/src/chrome/browser/cocoa/bookmark_bar_controller_unittest.mm:689:0
/Users/ph/chromium/src/chrome/browser/cocoa/
bookmark_bar_controller_unittest.mm:689: warning: 'stringWithCString:' is
deprecated (declared at
I'm going to use PauseRequest for privacy blacklists. It seems that I should
create a new ResourceHandler, and resource handlers seem to wrap another
resource handlers. Then I'd have to add code to use the new ResourceHandler
in ResourceDispatcherHost.
I'd need to write a ResourceHandler which
That fixed it, thanks!
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 22:00, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:
... more hotfixes for you to install
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-windows
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote
I'm consistently getting this error when linking (fails 57 times when
compiling the entire chrome.sln):
2shell32.lib(shguid.obj) : fatal error LNK1103: debugging information
corrupt; recompile module
I'm using Visual Studio 2005, fresh checkout. Should I just try clobber?
Today I reviewed some old bugs which didn't get any attention and tried to
correctly mark/assign/close them. Feel free to reassign a bug if I assigned
it to you - I was generally looking for people familiar with the area so
that they can decide what to do next (please not that the status of such
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 20:53, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think the bigger issue is how/when Area-Misc bugs get triaged. Do they
ever? If not, we should probably change that.
I sometimes review old bugs and close those which no longer reproduce, and
ask for more details in
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:01, Jickae Davis jick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I agree with PhistucK. I think a progress bar may help though it's
not so accurate.
By the way, if I want to add such a bar with chromium, how should I start?
Is there a method that tells the size of the resources to
Just a while before one of my tabs (GMail) started using a lot of CPU time
(67% while I was compiling in the background). The browser and the system
were responsive at all times, but processing power was wasted.
We have a warning dialog for hanged renderers offering to kill them. What do
you think
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 21:25, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I could't imagine many users understanding a feature like this much less
finding it particularly useful.
That's right, an average user would be only confused. Just exposing this
info (cpu-hungriness) to extensions seems
(adding people more familiar with the release process...)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 20:16, Amit Kishnani akish...@adobe.com wrote:
Hey Elliot,
thanks for quick turnaround.
the trunk (svn) : http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/VERSION is
MAJOR=4
MINOR=0
BUILD=222
PATCH=1
but I
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 02:02, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org wrote:
Once we start tagging the flaky tests, we will monitor the flakiness
dashboard and make sure
that a test that is no longer flaky has its FLAKY_ tag removed.
It may be a good idea to expand the number of tests listed
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:26, Thomas Van Lenten thoma...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:24, Thomas Van Lenten
thoma...@chromium.orgwrote:
Brad landed support for depending on all the python
Confirmed. It is flaky. I'm going to disable it when I have a while. Feel
free to disable it earlier.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:19, Eric Roman ero...@chromium.org wrote:
Looks like FTPCacheURLCredentials is flaky; none of these changes touched
that code...
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:14 PM,
We still have problems with resources, examples:
[FATAL:tab_renderer.cc(132)] Check failed:
waiting_animation_frames-width() % waiting_animation_frames-height()
== 0.
[FATAL:image_operations.cc(373)] Check failed: rgb.width() == alpha.width().
[FATAL:resource_bundle_win.cc(155)] Check failed:
I don't
think we depend on all the grit .py files. I think these changes are
rare enough that we can just clobber as needed.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
We still have problems with resources, examples:
[FATAL:tab_renderer.cc(132
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:24, Thomas Van Lenten thoma...@chromium.orgwrote:
Brad landed support for depending on all the python files that go into
grit, so that part would have worked. The not always rebuilding for .h
files is the problem.
Does it mean we're missing some deps in the gyp
What's the best way to attach the debugger to a browser started by a UI
test? How about doing that only in case of a crash?
I'm looking for solution both for Windows and Linux, so if you have good
techniques, it'd be really nice. I can even document them on the wiki, but
currently I'm using LOG
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 17:40, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
3 PM : two failing ui tests are disabled by the webkit sheriff
I was looking at the UI tests and it wasn't immediately obvious that a
webkit update might break them. Can we run all the UI tests on the webkit
canary bot?
The slowness dashboard is ready at
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/slowness-report/
There are some problems with it (like garbage in test names), and it could
possibly display more data (like median and stddev), but it's generally
usable.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You can mock the HostResolver to make it fail to resolve anything (possibly
except localhost). For examples, see HostResolver's unit tests and possibly
other places where it is used.
You can also make it fail to resolve specific hosts, which should also be
handy.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 13:54, TJ
Looks like a good candidate for LinuxDebugging wiki page.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 17:04, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
http://chipx86.github.com/gtkparasite/
We had looked into using parasite back in the early days, but I forgot
about it due to 32/64-bit stuff.
But now that we've
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 17:22, Ian Fette i...@chromium.org wrote:
Out of curiosity, could this be integrated in our testing framework to have
less-flaky UI tests (at least for some subset of the functionality currently
tested with UI tests)?
I don't have idea how to use it for that purpose.
DevToolsSanityTest flips frequently between enabled and disabled. It seems
to be mostly caused by changes in WebKit. I see two nice ways to prevent
that:
- run the tests upstream on webkit.org bots (probably hard)
- run the tests on our webkit canary bot (should be doable)
What do you think?
For me it was obvious, but if people are surprised by this, then improving
the documentation is probably a good idea.
Just curious... the change has been submitted to trybots before landing,
hasn't it?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:03, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
An external contributor was
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:16, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
In this case, the code may have been submitted by a committer
without using the trybots (tsk, tsk). We don't currently mention
the trybots on dev.chromium.org. Is it time to?
Submitting without trybots and breaking the
I think you can execute javascript with automation (see
chrome/test/automation/tab_proxy.h). It is possible to submit forms using
javascript.
If you want to add a new automation request, see
chrome/test/automation_messages{,_internal}.h and add a new message there.
Then add a new call to TabProxy
I like it! Like every feature which allows one to take a look under the
hood.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 15:54, Chris Evans cev...@chromium.org wrote:
Sounds like a moderate amount of work. IMHO, it would be acceptable from a
security standpoint to:
1) Fix any bugs turned up by fuzzing.
Even then, I'd need some way to verify the validity of the fixes. Mozilla
has some
So, RenderViewTest crashes very often. Now, thanks to maruel, we have a
stack trace:
[--] 16 tests from RenderViewTest
[ RUN ] RenderViewTest.OnLoadAlternateHTMLText
Backtrace:
GetStackFrames [0x00FF6085+306229]
_sbrk [0x00A7E5EE+70254]
_sbrk
The bug is about a firewall forbidding the connection. Why the trick won't
work? If I can't connect to the PASV port, I'd try PORT, even on successful
PASV response.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:52, Michal Zalewski lcam...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't think of any. It would be nice to have active
by the
chrome.dll suggests that this is the case.
Simon
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
Then probably you should just use AutomationProxy (directly, without UI
test
framework). Adapting tests would be harder - just build a small driver
these tests in their
own executable; they should all be in-proc browser tests.
- nick
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org
wrote:
So, here are the choices I currently see:
- let each binary only use one kind of tests (probably both UI)
- split each
You need AutomationProxy for that. See the line
server_.reset(CreateAutomationProxy(command_execution_timeout_ms_));
Please keep the discussion on the list. And I'll repeat my question: what is
your goal? I might guess that you are trying to re-use the browser between
test runs. It may be a bad
Then probably you should just use AutomationProxy (directly, without UI test
framework). Adapting tests would be harder - just build a small driver
program to launch the browser in a similar way UI test does, and uses the
AutomationProxy to send it NavigateToURL message. You may also want to take
The flakiness with resources has hugely decreased since I landed my infamous
hook, but it's still there.
I'm not sure what really happens, so I'm thinking about a special build step
(before UI tests etc), which would verify that all the expected resources
are present in the bundle and then fail.
.
Initially I'll be using the inputs to fix some of the dependencies. Does
this cover your concerns?
http://codereview.chromium.org/197007/show
-BradN
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
The flakiness with resources has hugely decreased since I
would be better.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:44, Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
I don't quite know how to solve the problem. When IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST is
used, a launcher that will isolate the test cases should be used (like
running them in forked processes or reloading a dll
If you disable a flaky test, please file a bug if needed, and assign a
FlakyTest label (I'm automatically CC-ed).
This way I can easily search for it. Sometimes a flakiness pattern is more
clearly visible then, and it helps. Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium
Chromium gives this notice when compiling on Gentoo:
QA Notice: The following files contain writable and executable sections
Files with such sections will not work properly (or at all!) on some
architectures/operating systems. A bug should be filed at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/ to make sure the
How do I create a SkBitmap of arbitrary size, filled with color of my choice
(on Linux)?
I'd need that for Linux extension shelf, and the Windows code for that seems
not easily portable to Linux.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
Seconded. Tags would make my work on packaging for Gentoo much easier.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:51, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Checking up on this. I don't see the tags in src.chromium.org yet. Can
we get this going for the next dev release?
- a
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:30
Thanks for all the answers, especially the first one from erg. I'm going to
use Skia, because another method (SetBackground in RWHV) requires that.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:33, Tony Chang t...@chromium.org wrote:
There's an example of how to do this with skia in
src/app/resource_bundle.cc
I'm in the middle of debugging a problem which is caused by singletons. It's
a very bad category of problems, because the results are initially very
mysterious, until you discover that it's a singleton which carries state
from one test to another.
Browser tests carry a lot of state. The entire
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 16:08, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
uh, for which binaries are in proc browser tests allowed? I know there
is one in interactive_ui_tests and it was causing problems (which
caused me to go and use the code to not use statics).
BrowserFocusUITests was the one.
I think it should only be allowed in tests that use a launcher which will
properly isolate test cases.
Currently interactive_ui_tests use in-proc tests. To make transition easier,
I'm going to allow in-proc in them, but try to get rid of it finally (or
make the launcher safer).
On Tue, Aug 25,
Cool! Thanks so much. I'm going to write a presubmit check for that.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:12, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
Including files like render_messages.h and automation_messages.h from other
header files is unnecessary and slows down the build (adds about ~100K
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 16:02, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
Any opposition to globally declaring an operator ostream overload for
TimeDelta in base/time.h?
This will pull the stream headers into all
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
