[c-nsp] VXR skips 12.2(31)SB6

2007-08-24 Thread roy
Hi List, Has anyone ever run into this same scenario where a VXR would skip booting on 12.2(31)SB6 specified on startup config and would instead boot into JK9S-M 12.4? conf-reg set at 0x2102; valid images on disk. Hardware: 7206VXR / NPE-G1 / 1GB DRAM PA's: PA-8T-V35= PA-2FE-TX PA-A3-OC3SMI=

Re: [c-nsp] Subject: Re: Annex-M 877

2007-08-24 Thread Will Hargrave
Brad Henshaw wrote: I don't see a point to buying the non-M variant other than to fulfill existing orders for the vanilla 877, or to cover requirements when the -M's are out of stock. This has presumably been enabled by a chipset change on the DSL frontend - you might want to keep on buying

Re: [c-nsp] gigabit ports/modules for 7507 and 7513 routers

2007-08-24 Thread Masood Ahmad Shah
Supported GE modules are GEIP and GEIP+... Maximum data throughput 350 Mbps to 400n Mbps. It can vary in some circumstanz. Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:22 AM

Re: [c-nsp] VXR skips 12.2(31)SB6

2007-08-24 Thread Niels Bakker
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (roy) [Fri 24 Aug 2007, 08:42 CEST]: Boot: boot system flash c7200-p-mz.122-31.SB6.bin boot system flash c7200-jk9s-mz.124-1.bin #sh bootvar BOOT variable = c7200-p-mz.122-31.SB6.bin,1;c7200-jk9s-mz.124-1.bin,1; CONFIG_FILE variable does not exist BOOTLDR variable does not

[c-nsp] EIGRP as core routing protocol on MPLS network

2007-08-24 Thread Kris Price
Hi, I've been trying to find out the implications of using EIGRP to distribute the loopbacks for a BGP/MPLS network instead of the usual OSPF or ISIS. But either it isn't a very well covered topic or my Google-foo is seriously bad. I've lab'ed it up in a very simple environment and for

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP as core routing protocol on MPLS network

2007-08-24 Thread Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\)
Kris Price wrote on Friday, August 24, 2007 1:42 PM: Hi, I've been trying to find out the implications of using EIGRP to distribute the loopbacks for a BGP/MPLS network instead of the usual OSPF or ISIS. But either it isn't a very well covered topic or my Google-foo is seriously bad.

[c-nsp] NetFlow times wrong on 12.2(25)S12?

2007-08-24 Thread null yathrib
Has anyone seen problems with 7300s running 12.2(25)S12 and exporting NetFlow? Specifically, the flow record's StartTime and EndTime are incorrect. They should be the sysUpTime at the start and end of the flow, but boxes running the above code frequently report incorrect (smaller) values, mucking

[c-nsp] Cisco 7500 CPU SDRAM/Packet SDRAM

2007-08-24 Thread Masood Ahmad Shah
Can someone describe the functions and difference between CPU SDRAM and Packet SDRAM for platform 7500. Also the difference of SRAM and DRAM for same platform. Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] cannot ping MLPPP local IP address

2007-08-24 Thread Zhao, Wenmei \(Sarah\)
Hi All, I have a MultiLinkPPP session up. Everything is working, traffic is flowing and I am able to ping the remote side of the link, but I can not ping the local MLPPP IP address. Is that intentional? Or is there some other configuration prohibiting the ping? Regards, Sarah Zhao

Re: [c-nsp] cannot ping MLPPP local IP address

2007-08-24 Thread Alex Balashov
Are you inadvertently pinging it from a default source interface that cannot route to that IP address due to access lists, route maps, etc? Try extended ping options and specify your source address explicitly. On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Zhao, Wenmei (Sarah) wrote: Hi All, I have a MultiLinkPPP

Re: [c-nsp] cannot ping MLPPP local IP address

2007-08-24 Thread Zhao, Wenmei \(Sarah\)
Hi Alex, Yes, I did extended ping, but the result was the same. The local MLPPP IP is on the same subnet as the remote IP, and the route is in the routing table. So it's supposed to work. This behavior is not observed in a Juniper router with similar configuration. So I thought it's something

Re: [c-nsp] cannot ping MLPPP local IP address

2007-08-24 Thread Tolstykh, Andrew
Works fine on all Cisco gear. PRU-CORE01sho ip int brie | i Mu Multilink1 192.168.141.29 YES NVRAM up up Multilink2 192.168.141.50 YES NVRAM up up PRU-CORE01ping 192.168.141.29 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos

Re: [c-nsp] NAT on one interface

2007-08-24 Thread Collins, Richard (SNL US)
Hi Michael, I was looking at the Cisco document - Nat on a stick. I understand you should have the ip nat inside on your internal interface and also the PBR. The loopback2 will be the ip nat outside and not your WAN interface. For example: int eth0/0 ip nat inside ip policy route-map

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP as core routing protocol on MPLS network

2007-08-24 Thread omar parihuana
I know that Traffic Engineering is only possible with IS-IS or OSPF... so EIGRP won't be a good option... Rgds. On 8/24/07, Kris Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been trying to find out the implications of using EIGRP to distribute the loopbacks for a BGP/MPLS network instead of

Re: [c-nsp] Possible BGP memory leak?

2007-08-24 Thread omar parihuana
Try... sh ip route summary You get the total memory used by routing table... On 8/20/07, Ed Ravin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a 7513 router running 12.0(S), we're running rather low on memory. Yes, I know of the futility of fitting two full Internet feeds into 256M, and I'm working on

Re: [c-nsp] Output packets getting process switched on GSR?

2007-08-24 Thread Jon Lewis
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Matt Addison wrote: A pair of my GSRs with 2CHOC3/STM1-IR-SC cards have just started process switching all outbound traffic on those cards (according to show int stat). Only the 2CHOC3/STM1-IR-SC cards seem to be affected, 12 DS3 and GE-GBIC-SC-B cards in the same shelf

Re: [c-nsp] Strange problem w/ 3560 and Linksys Switch

2007-08-24 Thread Garry Glendown
Aaron Riemer wrote: Hi there, Have you checked the arp table on switch b to see if the mac's already exist for the addresses you are attempting to ping? I had a similar problem and I No, MAC address for that host isn't in the table ... with debug arp I see the arp request being sent out on