Hi List,
Has anyone ever run into this same scenario where a VXR would skip
booting on 12.2(31)SB6 specified on startup config and would instead
boot into JK9S-M 12.4? conf-reg set at 0x2102; valid images on disk.
Hardware:
7206VXR / NPE-G1 / 1GB DRAM
PA's:
PA-8T-V35=
PA-2FE-TX
PA-A3-OC3SMI=
Brad Henshaw wrote:
I don't see a point to buying the non-M variant other than to
fulfill existing orders for the vanilla 877, or to cover requirements
when the -M's are out of stock.
This has presumably been enabled by a chipset change on the DSL frontend
- you might want to keep on buying
Supported GE modules are GEIP and GEIP+... Maximum data throughput 350 Mbps
to 400n Mbps. It can vary in some circumstanz.
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:22 AM
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (roy) [Fri 24 Aug 2007, 08:42 CEST]:
Boot:
boot system flash c7200-p-mz.122-31.SB6.bin
boot system flash c7200-jk9s-mz.124-1.bin
#sh bootvar
BOOT variable = c7200-p-mz.122-31.SB6.bin,1;c7200-jk9s-mz.124-1.bin,1;
CONFIG_FILE variable does not exist
BOOTLDR variable does not
Hi,
I've been trying to find out the implications of using EIGRP to
distribute the loopbacks for a BGP/MPLS network instead of the usual
OSPF or ISIS. But either it isn't a very well covered topic or my
Google-foo is seriously bad.
I've lab'ed it up in a very simple environment and for
Kris Price wrote on Friday, August 24, 2007 1:42 PM:
Hi,
I've been trying to find out the implications of using EIGRP to
distribute the loopbacks for a BGP/MPLS network instead of the usual
OSPF or ISIS. But either it isn't a very well covered topic or my
Google-foo is seriously bad.
Has anyone seen problems with 7300s running 12.2(25)S12 and exporting NetFlow?
Specifically, the flow record's StartTime and EndTime are incorrect.
They should be the sysUpTime at the start and end of the flow, but
boxes running the above code frequently report incorrect (smaller)
values, mucking
Can someone describe the functions and difference between CPU SDRAM and
Packet SDRAM for platform 7500. Also the difference of SRAM and DRAM for
same platform.
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi All,
I have a MultiLinkPPP session up. Everything is working,
traffic is flowing and I am able to ping the remote side of the link,
but I can not ping the local MLPPP IP address. Is that intentional?
Or is there some other configuration prohibiting the ping?
Regards,
Sarah Zhao
Are you inadvertently pinging it from a default source interface that
cannot route to that IP address due to access lists, route maps, etc?
Try extended ping options and specify your source address explicitly.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Zhao, Wenmei (Sarah) wrote:
Hi All,
I have a MultiLinkPPP
Hi Alex,
Yes, I did extended ping, but the result was the same.
The local MLPPP IP is on the same subnet as the remote IP,
and the route is in the routing table. So it's supposed to work.
This behavior is not observed in a Juniper router with
similar configuration. So I thought it's something
Works fine on all Cisco gear.
PRU-CORE01sho ip int brie | i Mu
Multilink1 192.168.141.29 YES NVRAM up
up
Multilink2 192.168.141.50 YES NVRAM up
up
PRU-CORE01ping 192.168.141.29
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos
Hi Michael,
I was looking at the Cisco document - Nat on a stick.
I understand you should have the ip nat inside on your internal
interface and also the PBR.
The loopback2 will be the ip nat outside and not your WAN interface.
For example:
int eth0/0
ip nat inside
ip policy route-map
I know that Traffic Engineering is only possible with IS-IS or OSPF... so
EIGRP won't be a good option...
Rgds.
On 8/24/07, Kris Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find out the implications of using EIGRP to
distribute the loopbacks for a BGP/MPLS network instead of
Try...
sh ip route summary
You get the total memory used by routing table...
On 8/20/07, Ed Ravin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a 7513 router running 12.0(S), we're running rather low on memory.
Yes, I know of the futility of fitting two full Internet feeds into 256M,
and I'm working on
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Matt Addison wrote:
A pair of my GSRs with 2CHOC3/STM1-IR-SC cards have just started process
switching all outbound traffic on those cards (according to show int
stat). Only the 2CHOC3/STM1-IR-SC cards seem to be affected, 12 DS3 and
GE-GBIC-SC-B cards in the same shelf
Aaron Riemer wrote:
Hi there,
Have you checked the arp table on switch b to see if the mac's already exist
for the addresses you are attempting to ping? I had a similar problem and I
No, MAC address for that host isn't in the table ... with debug arp I
see the arp request being sent out on
17 matches
Mail list logo