no cdp advertise-v2 will stop these messages, since the unmatching duplex
reporting
functionality (+ native vlan mismatch) has been added in CDP v2.
--
Tassos
Jay Hennigan wrote on 3/12/2007 7:30 πμ:
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting on a 3640 running (C3640-JK9S-M), Version
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Some non-Cisco gear relays CDP frames out all interfaces which results
I would say ALL non-cisco devices will relay CDP frames (and rightly so).
Only exception would be if someone else also implemented CDP.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL
Dear List,
I've a number of Catalysts switch 4507 using 12.2(25)EWA1 IOS. This
catalyst running SAA service measurement and everything seems ok.
A#sh rtr responder
RTR Responder is: Enabled
Number of control message received: 17275 Number of errors: 2
Recent sources:
172.18.23.20
Jefri Abdullah a écrit :
B#1(config)#rtr ?
% Unrecognized command
Is my 12.2(25)EWA10 doesn't support SAA measurement?
The rtr command has been renamed. Does ip sla work instead ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 12/3/07, Christophe Fillot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jefri Abdullah a écrit :
B#1(config)#rtr ?
% Unrecognized command
Is my 12.2(25)EWA10 doesn't support SAA measurement?
The rtr command has been renamed. Does ip sla work instead ?
It's not work
D2-BOO-MLS#1(config)#ip sla ?
Hi,
In what situation Total output drops increase?
---
FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is AmdFE, address is .. (bia ..)
Description: **
Internet address is *.*.*.*/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability 255/255,
Dear colleagues!
Consider simple output of show sdm prefer command on cat3560G
LOP3-1#sh sdm pref
The current template is desktop default template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
...the
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:13 +0300, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
Dear colleagues!
Consider simple output of show sdm prefer command on cat3560G
LOP3-1#sh sdm pref
The current template is desktop default template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this
At 07:13 AM 12/3/2007, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
Dear colleagues!
Consider simple output of show sdm prefer command on cat3560G
LOP3-1#sh sdm pref
The current template is desktop default template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features
Hi,
Tonight we tried to bring up a second link between two 6500 (backup
link). After bringing the link up one of the 6500 started logging
(6500-2, config below):
Dec 4 01:54:13.067 NZDT: %SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU
with inconsistent peer vlan id 53 on GigabitEthernet1/48 VLAN55.
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:51 +0100, Peter Salanki wrote:
On Dec 3, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
It's not just no switchport interfaces, SVIs are also routed
interfaces in this context.
I disagree, you can have tons of SVIs even if your sh sdm says 8
routed interfaces. I have
Thanks for all replies!
So in my understanding the 8 is some number derived by Cisco Systems in
their own
unrevealed environment for which it guarantees catalysts proper
functionality without any problems.
Probably this environment can be imagined as L3 configuration with most
features
You'll often see that problem when there are non-Cisco layer 2 devices
between the neighbors.
Some non-Cisco gear relays CDP frames out all interfaces which results
in CDP reporting direct connections which in reality are not. The only
workaround of which I am aware is to disable CDP on
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:23 -0500, Gary Stanley wrote:
8 routed interfaces are 8 layer3 (ie: no switchport etc) ports.
It's not just no switchport interfaces, SVIs are also routed
interfaces in this context.
Regards,
Peter Rathlev
___
cisco-nsp
This normally happens due to interface congestion. May be you can try and
adjust interface speed/duplex to see if it helps. Else look for any of the
congestion management/avoidance mechanisms.
Thank you,
-Noble
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I disagree, you can have tons of SVIs even if your sh sdm says 8
routed interfaces. I have never tested more than 8 physical routed
ports though.
Sincerely,
Peter Salanki
Solutions Architect
Procera Networks
On Dec 3, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:23
Is the new backup link just a dark fiber connection between the two
boxes? From the error message it looks like the frames are being
seriously corrupted at some point and that is causing the problems.
The SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_PVID_ERR error message indicates that the PVST+
BPDU for vlan 53 was
Jefri List,
Cisco IP SLAs (IP SLAs=IP SLA/SAA/RTR) is not supported on the Cisco
4500 Series currently.
We recommend you do not enable this features CLI or SNMP as it may have
adverse affect on the device.
Please contact your Cisco Account Team or Reseller for more information.
Thanks
E.
The way I understand it, is that the TCAM is optimised to support the
number of SVIs and Routed interfaces configured using sdm prefer i.e. a
total combined of 8.
If you use more than 8 then Cisco wont support the switch should there
be a problem. You might be abloe to go over 8 depending on
DO you have native vlan mismatch? Any chance?
Can you please post sh vlan brief and s hint gig 1/48 switchport?
Thank you,
-Noble
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pshem Kowalczyk
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:16 PM
To:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
(nor, in fact, for the additional money that they have to spend
on smartnet, as under this scheme smartnet becomes a required, rather
than an optional, purchase)
Actually, it isn't a required purchase, you can buy hardware maintenance from
others, perhaps including a
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm not sure I explained myself correctly..(And I don't
understand what your trying to accomplish above)
The setup looks like this :
TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2
| |
|-E0/0|-E1/0
|
ISP|unknown router|serial(Frame)|address 1.2.3.4
|
__|___
wic-1t
some cisco router
ethernet1.2.3.5
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 --this should send all you LAN
At 02:42 PM 12/3/2007, you wrote:
If I am not mistaken, Smartnet comes by with the equipment but I'm not sure
for how long.
I believe it is 90 days.
R
Tellurian Networks - Global Hosting Solutions Since 1995
http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211
Well done is better than well
If I am not mistaken, Smartnet comes by with the equipment but I'm not sure
for how long.
On Nov 30, 2007 11:22 AM, Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
For a $20K device you better damn well understand it IS low.
Name me one single automaker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron wrote:
I have run into a situation where i need to bridge my incoming
frame-relay t1 directly to an internal router's ethernet interface.
I have no practical experience with cisco so i'm hoping the list can
give me some pointers and
Robert Boyle wrote:
I believe it is 90 days.
It's 90 days on several of the router platforms things, it's a year on
some things like workgroup LAN switches, and fives years on optical gear
if I'm not mistaken. Of course Smartnet buys you much higher levels of
support.
I believe the 7200 is 90
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
A warranty is what the manufacturer is telling you is how long we
are going to GAMBLE that the thing will last. This is a huge difference
because the manufacturer knows that if they use crap parts, they
are going to get all of the failures back, and they will pay for
All,
For the sake of completeness, I thought I'd post again to say that the
TAC claim this is bug CSCsk84233, fixed in the upcoming 12.2(44)SE
release.
The bug description doesn't really seem to match my setup, but fingers
crossed it is sorted out in 12.2(44)SE.
cheers,
Dale
On Nov 20, 2007
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm not sure I explained myself correctly..(And I don't
understand what your trying to accomplish above)
The setup looks like this :
TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2
| |
|-E0/0|-E1/0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev man, 03 dec 2007:
I've got 3550-48's running with nearly all ports running as L3 routed
ports. It'd be nice if there were some way to examine TCAM usage and see
what sort of shape these switches are in. All I know is, they're working.
AFAIK a L3 routed port is no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev man, 03 dec 2007:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
(assuming a standard bell curve applies to device failures, which
it generally does)
Actually, hardware failures generally follow a bathtub curve, almost
an inverse bell curve. There is a certain amount of infant mortality
Eric,
Would VRRP be an option? VRRP is supported widely.
Cheers,
- Gaurav
on 12/03/2007 09:52 PM Eric Helm said the following:
Scenario is a customer with 1 'quality' link and 1 'lower-grade' link.
They want link redundancy and cannot run IGP or BGP.
I need similar functionality to Cisco
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
The setup looks like this :
TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2
| |
|-E0/0|-E1/0
| |
-
3640
-
Hi Guys,
I'm reviewing cabling solutions. Has anyone tried the ethernet over coax?
Has it improved over the years (they claim to reach 100Mbs)? especially with
using Cisco? splitters are still
going to be used and I assume there's no Switch 2900,3700 series that cisco
can support for these kind
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I can understand someone being a bit peeved if they purchased a 7200 for
roughly $25k and it failed on the 91st day with no Smartnet.
In the good old days, if that happened, you could call up cisco TAC, order
smartnet with a credit card and get a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 5:11 PM
To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco download problems
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
The question is what does 8 routed interfaces exactly mean?
Is it a maximum number of SVIs or routed ports that I can configure on a
switch?
What happens when I configure 9 or more SVIs?
I've no direct answers to your questions. But I have had run a 3560G
with
38 matches
Mail list logo
