On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 21:52 -0500, Jonathan Charles wrote:
We just deployed a 6513E with a Sup720.
It is running IOS, but when it reboots it goes straight into rommon
and you need to type boot to get it to load... once you do that it
boots fine...
My worry is that this site has power
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:55:54PM +0800, Daniel Hooper wrote:
... I
really need to start running VTP across our network as we've got far to
many VLAN's and way to many switches to be logging into to provision a
new customer or VLAN ...
Don't use VTP.
We run a medium-sized data center
Hi all,
I have a 2940 switch with an SFP based gigabit uplink port. Im plugging it
into an Alcatel radio unit, which seems to be reporting that the link is
up (there is a tick showing up in the management interface that represents
Port Up which also goes away when I unplug the fibre), but on the
I can't believe there isn't:
int blah0/0
vtp block in/out
...Skeeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2008 5:16 PM
To: Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Blocking VTP
Hi Tom,
Could you paste the running-config interface Gi0/1 section?
Are you using some kind og EC protocol, like LACP or PAgP? If so, try
pasting a show etherchannel X detail, where X is the Port-channel
interface Gi0/1 is part of.
Regards,
Peter
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:27 +0900, Tom Storey
You can take away the VTP hassle .. change switch manufacturer :)
Foundry gear looks hot these days.
-Dan
-Original Message-
From: Skeeve Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2008 3:33 PM
To: 'Gert Doering'; Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
As far as I remember, you should insert SFP and then reload switch.
If you inserted SFP after boot - SFP port will be disabled, because
onboard 100FX port will be selected as 'active uplink'.
Bingo that was it.
I didnt think to restart it, as I didnt think it would be something as
simple as
I thought so too, except that we have 3% CPU usage; we have other 3550s
with 30+ VSI interfaces moving considerably more traffic without issue. The
anecdotes I've read say that # of routes is what makes them fall over, and
we're not even close.
1- u mentioned u transferred the affected VLANs to
Hi list
We are getting N times STM-1 connections delivered over GbE (SDH
network). Currently we are running MPLS-TE over these GbE for
loadbalancing.
The problem is that we have seen failures where we loose part of the
capacity, e.g. loose 2 STM out of 4, and we are unable to detect this
failure,
Standby is for backup interfaces.
Do you have switchport backup interfaace xxx in your config?
Regards
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Storey
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:28 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp]
Hi MKS,
if the LSR hasn't visibility into the SDH layer and there is a
separate box doing EOS, there is not much accurate actions the
LSR can take by itself. For example, the LSR could send probes
across the link and detect packet loss or increased delay either
of which would be good hints for
Skeeve Stevens wrote:
I can't believe there isn't:
I'm sorry to say whether you believe it or not has little to do with the
reality of the situation. To the best of my (by no means encyclopaedic)
knowledge, there is no such thing.
In any event, Tassos has already suggested:
1) make the port
Anyone else shocked at the appalling rack mounting supplied for 7201 ?
Single ears at either front or back is simply not good enough for that sort
of box. Look at any 1U server (equivalent value/weight) and you'll get a decent
adjustable rail that can go front to back and offer a proper stable
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Dale Shaw wrote:
Jonathan,
This should sort that out:
conf t
config-register 0x2102
end
copy run start ! or wr mem
sh boot
remote command switch sh boot
In my experience, if the RP shows the correct confreg value, and the
SP doesn't, a wr mem on the RP usually
So would that be a lot 7204/7206 which of course are 3U with substantial
brackets.or lots of 1U 7201 ?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dean Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7201 rack
racked a lot of 7200's. never had a problem with them drooping alarmingly.
tighten your screws.
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message --
From: Dean Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else shocked at the appalling rack
There was set vtp port x/x disable in catos at least for 6500s .
I don't think it ever worked it's way into ios though.
Number 2 will do the job for you.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Wednesday, April 23,
+1
We've gotten great results with IGP/BGP tuning.
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:33:26 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Conversation: [c-nsp] MPLS L3 VPN over TE - Load Balancing per Customer
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS L3
Peter / Dean
Thanks for your input on this. I'm glad (and not so glad) that other people
are seeing the same issue. It is a shame that SPs are not implementing
these commands when this is exactly what they are designed for. Anyone know
why an SP would not add a remove-private-as command to
All
I have a static route that I am redistributing into BGP. However, I only
want to redistribute it if the next hop is available. For example, if I
have ip route 88.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.35.1.1, I only want to redistribute it
if the 10.35.1.1 next hop is still available. I won't go into detail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
racked a lot of 7200's. never had a problem with them drooping
alarmingly. tighten your screws.
It IS a problem with 1U front mounted stuff. Even 3750's suffer from
it.
The solution is to turn the brackets around and move the rack posts
back. This doesn't work very
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
racked a lot of 7200's. never had a problem with them drooping
alarmingly. tighten your screws.
It IS a problem with 1U front mounted stuff. Even 3750's suffer from
it.
The solution is to turn the brackets around and
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:55:54PM +0800, Daniel Hooper wrote:
I work for a company with the exact same problem, we interconnect with a
bucketload of other carriers providers with dot1q trunks and I haven't
been able to find a way to block VTP on those ports, the worst bit is I
really need to
6513(config)#config
6513(config)#config-register 0x2102
6513(config)#^Z
6513#wr
Building configuration...
[OK]
6513#remote command switch show boot
BOOT variable = bootdisk:s3223-ipbase_wan-mz.122-18.SXF8.bin,12;
CONFIG_FILE variable does not exist
BOOTLDR variable does not exist
Configuration
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 13:27 +0200, Brian Turnbow wrote:
There was set vtp port x/x disable in catos at least for 6500s .
I don't think it ever worked it's way into ios though.
12.2(33)SXH seems to have something called Per port VTP
enable/disable, where you can put vtp disable under an
Not really on topic, but we just finished mounting three 6509-V-E
chassis; I know they come with some stub shelves, but otherwise they
just hang in seven 4 mm long screws in each side. (It doesn't matter how
many rack mouting nuts you use, the panel you fasten to the rack is
fastened to the
Gary Roberton wrote:
All
I have a static route that I am redistributing into BGP. However, I only
want to redistribute it if the next hop is available. For example, if I
have ip route 88.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.35.1.1, I only want to redistribute it
if the 10.35.1.1 next hop is still available.
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 15:27 +0100, Gary Roberton wrote:
Thanks for your input on this. I'm glad (and not so glad) that other
people are seeing the same issue. It is a shame that SPs are not
implementing these commands when this is exactly what they are
designed for. Anyone know why an SP
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
It's probably something they lifted from CatOS; I heard that it was
their plan to make the SX train have the same features as CatOS...
Do you happen to know if that would that include GVRP?
--
Ross Vandegrift
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll second Adams point -- BGP will only announce your static route if
it's already in your routing table.
There's a caveat though: The static route might well be in your routing
table even when you'd expect it to have disappeared. A static route
pointing to a host on a connected interface might
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/command/reference/lsw_u1.html#wp1013452
I guess enabling vtp on your internal ports and disabling it on your external
ones would accomplish
the needed security.
I don't know what happens if global vtp (on) and per-port vtp (off) are
configured
Peter Rathlev wrote on 23/4/2008 8:48 μμ:
(Or convince Cisco to implement BFD for static routes in regular IOS...)
Regards,
Peter
Isn't that supported in SRC? Or maybe i misunderstood the regular keyword...
--
Tassos
___
cisco-nsp mailing
I don't know if the service providers equipment is MEF certified, but
MEF 16 / E-LMI might help here. Some Cisco equipment already supports
E-LMI (ME3750, ME3400, 7600) and more will in the future. I know that
the Nortel OM3500/OM6500 boxes which provide GbE over SDH services
support at
You have several things to consider before you start worrying about the 14
screws. First is the shear force necessary to break the screws, and second
is the fact that a properly mounted chassis will result in the friction
between the mounting gear and the rack post taking up most of the weight
Hi,
How efficient (regarding CPU resources consuming in router) is adjusting
MSS on Cisco to avoid fragmentation?
(for high traffic rate)
ip tcp adjust-mss 1400
Thanks,
Alaerte
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Well, seems I was overlooking some simple facts about the mounting.
Thanks for the points on and off list. And yes, of cource Cisco has done
the calculations. To my untrained eyes it just appeared unimpressive. I
stand corrected. On top of that it was OT. :-)
The drooping of 1U boxen is the real
I am not sure whether this is normal behavior or not. I was looking into
a problem where a server appears to hang network connections to it at
about 15 minute idle intervals. I checked the usual suspects, speed,
duplex, port errors etc. No discrepancies there.
The switch in question is a 6509E
Hi MKS
does your EOS ESP supports Link capacity adjustment Scheme (LCAS) ?
if yes , so its SNMP MIB should contain some objects about links failures
and restoration so you can monitor these condition via SNMP Traps .
best regards
--Abo Zaid
On 4/23/08, MKS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list
Very minimal to negligible from what I've seen on up to 45m links. Just be
sure to adjust on both sides.
Much more efficient than clearing the DF bit, and allowing the remote side
to reassemble.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How efficient (regarding CPU
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
We've had to do this in many of our wiring closets. The 3750s are usually
OK, but the 3750-Es are deeper and heavier and really need to be center
mounted. The 3560-Es are deeper and heavier still, reaching a point where
The ME6524s had some of the best Cisco brackets I've seen to date. I
don't believe they wrap under the chassis like the Cabletron ones I was
referring to but they are however very long. They are better than a
foot long if memory serves me correctly. ME6524s are not light either.
Peter
Yes Gary this is a default behavior performed by BGP Scanner process which
validates NH reachability and manages BGP advertisements and BGP doesn't
advertise routes not exist in RIB
but if u configure a static route with NH as IP instead of interface , even
if the interface went down and its
I can't believe there isn't:
int blah0/0
vtp block in/out
In recent software: vtp mode off
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I have seen the same output in cards than have double connections (2x20) to the
fabric (i.e.
X6704-10GE WS-X6748-GE-TX) and use DFC cards. But that didn't cause any
problem.
I guess ... FE = Forwarding/Fabric Engine or Fabric Enabled?
--
Tassos
Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote on 23/4/2008 10:03
Have an interesting issue, and no testbed available to evaluate my
options, curious if anyone has been there, done that...
Have a pair of ASAs running multiple contexts in active/active failover
mode. They are basically multiple contexts with an inside and
outside interface.
The insides are
The catos command blocks the processing and forwarding of vtp packets recieved
on the interface. i'm not sure about how the ios version works.
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: mercoledi 23 aprile 2008 20.14
A: Peter Rathlev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Grant
i think there is no way to do that in software unless u can get Giga
Ethernet bundling modules but the other way is to rely on routing protocols
instead of L2 features
best regards
--Abo Zaid
On 4/23/08, Grant Moerschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all. We have a 6509 core
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Grant Moerschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it a viable and recommended option to instead portchannel those two gig
ports
on both sides to both double the bandwidth and eliminate spanning tree
issues? If so, on the core switch side should one gig link be on,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:05:26PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
If this were IOS, I'd just copy straight to startup-config and reload,
but the ASA's don't seem to want to play that game.
Interesting that it doesn't work. But how about the following: Save the
new startup config to
Grant Moerschel wrote:
Greetings all. We have a 6509 core with dual trunked layer 2 access
switches connected on gig ports. So we use spanning tree in case one of
the core to access connections fails therefore one link is always
blocking. I'd like to get some opinions about improving this. Is
Hi All,
Does anybody here using CSG ? If yes, do you have issue regarding GPRS user
problem accessing Friendster site ? I just want to make sure the problem is
on the CSG not the other part of the system (billing quota server for
example). Because after bypassing the traffic from the CSG,
51 matches
Mail list logo
