Re: [c-nsp] BGP Hold time expired/ospf dropping 6500 Sup720-3BXL

2009-12-15 Thread Dave Kruger
Drew Weaver wrote: Howdy all, Last night I had an interesting encounter on one of my 6509s /w SUP7203-BXL. This switch has 3x iBGP sessions with full internet tables and is also running OSPF. Two of the three iBGP sessions randomly dropped with: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor

[c-nsp] 6500 with WS-SVC-IPSEC-1, traffic not reaching module.

2009-12-15 Thread Pär Åslund
Hi, I have problems with a WS-SVC-IPSEC-1 where I'm trying to setup a site-to-site tunnel. Last night, I got the tunnel up. But after applying a acl to the 6500, the tunnel went down and stayed down. Removing configuration just to get the tunnel up again and continue trying to get the

[c-nsp] 7200 for BGP

2009-12-15 Thread RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina
Hi all, I use the 3 7200 to connect to upstreams Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G1) processor (revision B) with 229376K/32768K bytes of memory. Max CPU usage:28% Cisco 7204VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory. Max CPU usage: 75% Cisco 7206VXR (NPE400) processor

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 OIR logging for transceivers

2009-12-15 Thread Pavel Skovajsa
Hi Brian, I have never seen any event (OIR or any other kind) generated when plugging/unplugging the SFPs on any Cisco switches. The way I check this is with usual 'show int status' or simply 'show int x/y' after making the physical change. Of course if the interface is up, then you will get

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 with WS-SVC-IPSEC-1, traffic not reaching module.

2009-12-15 Thread Lee
Do you have the inside and outside vlan for your ipsec traffic configured with a crypto connect? eg interface Vlan7 description outside:encrypted traffic no ip address crypto engine subslot 8/0 crypto connect vlan8 ! interface Vlan8 description inside:cleartext traffic ip address xxx

Re: [c-nsp] 7200 for BGP

2009-12-15 Thread Pavel Skovajsa
hi R. The G2 will certainly handle it, but I would look into the reason for having 75%, that sounds really bad. For the G1 and NPE400, I'd say you definitely need more memory - 512 MB or 1G to be fine. This is what Cisco says: The amount of memory required to store BGP routes depends on many

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 OIR logging for transceivers

2009-12-15 Thread Tim Jackson
We use rancid and show inentory raw command 2x an hour to log approx when an SFP was inserted/removed... Best way I've found to do it... It also nabs your serial numbers. -- Tim On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Brian Spade bitkr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing and can't seem

Re: [c-nsp] 7200 for BGP

2009-12-15 Thread Cory Ayers
I use the 3 7200 to connect to upstreams Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G1) processor (revision B) with 229376K/32768K bytes of memory. Max CPU usage:28% Cisco 7204VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory. Max CPU usage: 75% Cisco 7206VXR (NPE400) processor

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 with WS-SVC-IPSEC-1, traffic not reaching module.

2009-12-15 Thread Pär Åslund
Hi Lee, No, I don't have it configured with crypto connect. From what I read so far, I don't need that for site-to-site ipsec? The asa in the remote office can ping the remote peer ip configured on the 6500. Just seems like bad magic for me right now that for some reason the traffic doesn't seem

[c-nsp] VSS/12.2(33)SXI2a High interrupt load on SP

2009-12-15 Thread Daniska, Tomas
Hi, wonder if anyone came to this... XX-sp#sh proc cpu CPU utilization for five seconds: 100%/88%; one minute: 100%; five minutes: 100% and lasts for a week or two already. It's in ios-base, TID 6 XX-sp#sh proc cpu det 12311 CPU utilization for five seconds:

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 with WS-SVC-IPSEC-1, traffic not reaching module.

2009-12-15 Thread Lee
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Pär Åslund psl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Lee, No, I don't have it configured with crypto connect. From what I read so far, I don't need that for site-to-site ipsec? All the docs I read talked about the bump in the wire encryption. Somehow or other you have to

[c-nsp] Jay Shao is out of the office.

2009-12-15 Thread Jay Shao
I will be out of the office starting 12/15/2009 and will not return until 12/16/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. Please contact with net...@dtcc.com for any production issues BR_ FONT size=2BR DTCC DISCLAIMER: This

[c-nsp] IPv6 nd ra suppress broken on SXI3?

2009-12-15 Thread Grzegorz Janoszka
We recently upgraded one of our routers to 12.2(33)SXI3 (from SXF). Soon after the upgrade one of our customers complained that he started to see RA messages. From the beginning on his interface we have ipv6 nd ra suppress, I added ipv6 nd ra mtu suppress, but the customer says he still sees

[c-nsp] 7600/RSP720 + SIP-400

2009-12-15 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Can someone with a SIP-400 module execute the sh platform hardware capacity system command and send me the output? I would prefer people with 7600/RSP720. -- Tassos ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Password Recovery for CISCO IGX

2009-12-15 Thread Phil Bartlett
Hi Does anyone know of a way to recover/reset the password on a Cisco IGX. I have found nothing when searching Cisco.com. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. Rgds Phil Bartlett Comtek Network Systems (UK) Ltd === DDI: -    +44 1244 283 054

Re: [c-nsp] 7600/RSP720 + SIP-400

2009-12-15 Thread Hank Nussbacher
At 18:49 15/12/2009 +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: Can someone with a SIP-400 module execute the sh platform hardware capacity system command and send me the output? I would prefer people with 7600/RSP720. Not a RSP720 but close: petach-tikva-gp#sh platform hardware capacity system

[c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco 7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use the same group of subnets for each VLAN and I tried using loopbacks but it doesn't work. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong? interface Loopback 2 ip dhcp

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote: I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco 7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use the same group of subnets for each VLAN and I tried using loopbacks but it doesn't work. Any ideas

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 08:30 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote: I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco 7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use the same group of subnets for each

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Frank, Can you please explain what do you want to achieve? I think this should be done in a different way. Also, what HW do you have? Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk - iName.com Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
It's my understanding that BVIs on the 7600-platform only bridge non-IP traffic, so that wouldn't work. Frank -Original Message- From: Antonio Querubin [mailto:t...@lava.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:30 PM To: Frank Bulk - iName.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
I have 5 remote sites where I'm doing FTTH and transporting the traffic over a third-party transport gear to our HQ. Each site-HQ link is a separate VLAN and uniquely numbered. My preference is to burn up only one port on the Cisco 7609-S (RSP720-3C with WS-X6748-DFC3C) and transport gear by

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 OIR logging for transceivers

2009-12-15 Thread Brian Spade
Thanks Pavel and Tim for the quick answer. I must be losing my mind... I thought I saw this logged before. /bs ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Frank, The right way to solve it would be to use the ES20 (or more actually the more recent ES+) modules. This would allow you to create a separate EVC/EFP (service-instance) per site, using whatever VLAN IDs (even reusing them, or using QinQ) and then bridge-domain them all to the same central

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 OIR logging for transceivers

2009-12-15 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
7600 SRD3 offer it: %TRANSCEIVER-DFC1-6-INSERTED: transceiver module inserted in GigabitEthernet1/8 %TRANSCEIVER-DFC1-6-REMOVED: Transceiver module removed from GigabitEthernet1/8 -- Tassos Brian Spade wrote on 15/12/2009 21:56: Thanks Pavel and Tim for the quick answer. I must be losing

[c-nsp] Controllers for a VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1

2009-12-15 Thread james edwards
I have a 2811 which I am trying to set up an ATM T-1 on. T-1 card and AIM are detected: Cisco 2811 (revision 49.46) with 249856K/12288K bytes of memory. 2 FastEthernet interfaces 1 Gigabit Ethernet interface 1 Channelized (E1 or T1)/PRI port 1 ATM/Voice AIM The VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1 came in a bundle

Re: [c-nsp] Controllers for a VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1

2009-12-15 Thread Everton Diniz
Hey JAmes, did you try card type command under global config? card type {t1 | e1} subslot http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/1700/1721/software/feature/guide/t1e11721.html#wp64656 Regards, On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:31 PM, james edwards lists.james.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: I have

Re: [c-nsp] Controllers for a VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1

2009-12-15 Thread Gerteisen, Stephen (US SSA) (Contractor)
I believe the command you're looking for is... Router(config)#card type t1 0 0 Steve M. Gerteisen Senior Network Analyst BAE Systems  -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of james edwards Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [c-nsp] Does the entire BGP routing table for IPv6 fit on a Cisco 2600 with 64 MB of DRAM?

2009-12-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
The tunnel is up against HE's TunnelBroker service. The Cisco 2600 is reporting just 612 KB in use. Frank C2600#sh bgp summary BGP router identifier a.b.c.d, local AS number 53347 BGP table version is 2299, main routing table version 2299 2269 network entries using 301777 bytes of memory 2269

[c-nsp] EEM BGP

2009-12-15 Thread Tony Varriale
I've been having some issues with BGP peers dropping/flapping and tried to come up with a little EEM applet that would not only down a peer based on syslog entries but bring it back up. The bringing down part is easy and tested to work great. But I'm having a hard time with the bringing up

[c-nsp] SSL cert for tools.cisco.com revoked?

2009-12-15 Thread Tim Utschig
Apologies if this is off-topic... Is anyone else seeing Peer's Certificate has been revoked. while attempting to access tools.cisco.com? Currently using Firefox. I found a Windows PC, and it seems that MSIE care even after enabling CRL checking. I can only visit the site in Firefox if I

[c-nsp] https://tools.cisco.com/ certificate revoked?

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Rathlev
Hi, Am I the only one hit by the HTTPS certificate for tools.cisco.com having been revoked? FF 3.5 won't access the pages, instead returning sec_error_revoked_certificate. I can connect with OpenSSL s_client manually. -- Peter ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] EEM BGP

2009-12-15 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Tony, An easy trick is to insert a delay in your script that does the shut, and then after the delay to do the unshut. As there is no wait action in older EEM codes, you can use a trick with a ping that would never be answered, and a long timeout value. event manager applet delay event syslog

Re: [c-nsp] SSL cert for tools.cisco.com revoked?

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:42 -0800, Tim Utschig wrote: Apologies if this is off-topic... Is anyone else seeing Peer's Certificate has been revoked. while attempting to access tools.cisco.com? Hadn't seen your message when I posted mine, but yes I see the exact same thing. Thanks for the tip

Re: [c-nsp] Controllers for a VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1

2009-12-15 Thread David Barak
you're missing the command card type t1 0 0 Until you do that, the router doesn't know whether it's a T1 or an E1.  David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com - Original Message From: james edwards lists.james.edwa...@gmail.com To:

Re: [c-nsp] https://tools.cisco.com/ certificate revoked?

2009-12-15 Thread Tony Varriale
I was getting that as well. Works now. tv - Original Message - From: Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:29 PM Subject: [c-nsp] https://tools.cisco.com/ certificate revoked? Hi, Am I the only one hit by the

Re: [c-nsp] EEM BGP

2009-12-15 Thread Tony Varriale
No, I haven't as I couldn't figure out how to get that delay to work. Let me put this up in the lab and see what happens. Thanks! tv - Original Message - From: Clyde Wildes cwil...@progrizon.com To: 'Tony Varriale' tvarri...@comcast.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [c-nsp] SSL cert for tools.cisco.com revoked?

2009-12-15 Thread Tim Utschig
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:42:25PM -0800, Tim Utschig wrote: I found a Windows PC, and it seems that MSIE care even after enabling CRL checking. Insert doesn't before care. MSIE users will not notice this security issue. Even after checking the box Check for server certificate revocation*

Re: [c-nsp] EEM BGP

2009-12-15 Thread Clyde Wildes
Tony, Have you considered using EEM multiple event support: event manager applet t1 description Test applet to demonstrate event correlation event tag e1 syslog pattern syslog msg 1 pattern event tag e2 syslog pattern syslog msg 2 pattern trigger delay 10.0 correlate event e1 or event e2

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
Looks like I will be creating separate L3 domains. ARIN, here I come. =) Thanks again to this group for this helpful information. Frank -Original Message- From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:avay...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:14 PM To: frnk...@iname.com;

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Upgrade to SXI3

2009-12-15 Thread Charles Spurgeon
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 07:44:33AM -0800, Bautista, Noel wrote: We're contemplating on upgrading our SUP 720 3BXL from 12.2(18)SXF15a native IOS to 12.2(33)SXI3 modular IOS but I read from the releasenotes that the Install command has been deprecated. On Cisco's Safe Harbor IOS Release, they

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

2009-12-15 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote: Looks like I will be creating separate L3 domains. If you can live with knowing what part of the IP pool belongs in what vlan then you can (this works with static addresses (no dhcp) anyway) route the individual parts of the unnumbered