The MPLS TE signaling usually uses the RSVP, but in the global
configuration i didn't see any RSVP configuration, why? Is the the default
configuraion?
Many thanks.
Hu Xu
在 2012年2月20日 下午9:03，Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com写道：
ok.. you can also leave out the “autoroute-announce”
Hi Guys.
I am using GRE on ME3400 with my Core 7600.
I am not sure why I cant ping outside the GRE tunnel even though routing is
correct already.
I tried doing a debug ip packet and Im getting the output below;
Feb 21 07:58:34.074: FIBipv4-packet-proc: route packet from Tunnel2 src
10.200.1.81
On 21/02/2012 8:18 PM, ar wrote:
Any known issue with ME3400 metroipaccess IOS?
I am thinking that as the ME3400 is more of a Catalyst switch than a
router, it won't be supported (or if it does work at all it will be in
software not hardware) in much the same way that other low end Catalyst
Hi,
Do anyone ever configure Cisco routers / switches in MPLS network for PTP
traffic?
-FJ
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hu,
you indeed want to configure
rsvp
interface ..
bandwidth …
in order to be able to use non-zero banwdith reservations. That’s part of your
basic MPLS-TE config, which I didn’t include in my config example..
By default, the bandwidth is zero on interfaces enabled for MPLS-TE
It's actually working on ME-3400G-2CS-A.
But this time, I got ME-3400G-12CS-A. And is behaving differently.
But same IOS.
From: Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net
To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February
Many thanks :-)
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 20/02/2012 17:20, selamat pagi wrote:
Can the managment port on a Sup2T be used as a regular port and can
pass user traffic ?
As far as I understood this is not possible. Is my understanding correct ?
On 2/21/2012 6:13 AM, ar wrote:
It's actually working on ME-3400G-2CS-A.
But this time, I got ME-3400G-12CS-A. And is behaving differently.
But same IOS.
SDM Template maybe? Even though it *should* work without the default
template. It sure complains about routing without it.
Hey All,
I would greatly appreciate it if somebody would point me to the release
notes for the change I see in 15.1 where BGP neighbor route-map
configurations happen in real time, without needing any clearing, soft
or otherwise.
Much obliged.
Best,
Joe
I know this feature exists in 12.2(33)SXI4, but I believe it was more
accurately classified as a bug and I *thought* it was fixed in a later release.
I'd also like to hear if this is actually an intended change or just a
regression. If intended, I'd like to know how to prevent this behavior as
On Feb 21, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
I would greatly appreciate it if somebody would point me to the release notes
for the change I see in 15.1 where BGP neighbor route-map configurations
happen in real time, without needing any clearing, soft or otherwise.
I see the same thing in
Can you check whether you are getting the advertisement of your IP pools
from both ISP. pls check from any route server.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Chuck Church chuckchu...@gmail.com wrote:
And to add, has it ever worked? If you administratively shut one neighbor,
does the remaining
when you do zone based firewalling on an ISR router. traffic from one
inside interface to another inside interface should not be affected by the
firewall correct?
TIA
Scott
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi Everyone,
I did a few searches of the archives and was not able to find an answer to
what I'm trying to do. What we are trying to do is put a rate limit on
certain TCP ports for traffic on customer VLANs. I have put into place a
policy map that does not seem to be working. We are limiting both
Hi Drew,
First of all, the first line of the 'show version' is required to decode this.
Additionally, as the message says RP is being reset by the SP, the
routing processor is reset by the switching processor, so you need to
get the crashinfo (mainly the traceback) from the SP, which is
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know if these type of interfaces can be used without a services
blade? Also is there a specific version of XR required?
I have been scouring documentation and can't really find anything. Would
InterFlex interfaces do the same thing? I am looking to have 1 link in a VRF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Ryce wrote:
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know if these type of interfaces can be used without a
services blade? Also is there a specific version of XR required?
I have been scouring documentation and can't really find anything.
Would InterFlex
Thanks for the suggestions...
I checked the fibre with Fluke meter, the loss is very high in one of the
cores, i cleaned with proper solutions provided by fluke. In this case, is
it possible that one side the link is down and other side there is no link
change in the switch ?
Thanks,
Ambi.
On
See below for exemplar for vrf-aware ra-vpn on IOS:
!! c7206vxr / npe-g1 / vam2+
!
ip vrf VRF-LITE_RA-VPN
description (VRF Lite) RA-VPN to (MPLS VRF) RA-VPN for remote access
vpn applications
rd 200:1000
aaa authorization network aaa-list local group
AAA-AUTHORIZATION_GROUP-LIST_LOCAL
aaa
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ambedkar
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012 2:37 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Fibre link flapping
Thanks for the suggestions...
I checked
Hi Bruce,
I was hoping to have an easy way out from import / export :-)
Nick
On 22 Feb 2012, at 00:21, Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Ryce wrote:
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know if these type of interfaces can be used without a
services
21 matches
Mail list logo
