Thanks Ivan for sharing the Thread, I just glanced the thread quickly, in
our setup, there is no QOS applied as of now.
The interface is a 1 Gig interface only and here is the show controller
output.
show controllers ethernet-controller gigabitEthernet 0/1
Transmit GigabitEthernet0/1
Hi Muthu,
As per that thread the default buffer size for the Gi interfaces is very
small and can be increased with a QoS policy as Warris described.
I was seeing Total output drops increasing in the output of show int
gi0/x AT a quick glance I can't see this information in the output you
Hi all,
I think I might be a little confused on this so I'm asking here:
Is a DCEF720 card like the WS-X6708-10G-3CXL supported together with a
Supervisor 720 and a bunch of classic and CEF256 line cards?
If it's supported: Would there still be any remaining benefit in using a
DFC-equipped
HI
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lars Fenneberg
Sent: venerdì 21 settembre 2012 14:42
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] DCEF720 card together with CEF256/classic line cards in
Hi
Would it make sense to enable authentication on IIH packets -when running
ISIS over leased Ethernet circuits please?
I was confronted with an advice about authentication on IIH packets as a
base security when running ISIS over leased circuits (e.g. when you order an
Ethernet circuit and you
On (2012-09-21 16:36 +0200), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
I'd like to hear the other's opinion on IGP authentication in the core in
general
I would do MD5 for hello and lsp in ISIS. It's not hard to config, as it
does not require downtime.
Maybe some old link is repurposed as core link and you leave
Hi
While I'm searching the web I'd love to hear your ideas on this
Are there any standards/recommendations on how to set the Ethernet SLA
probes for proper measurements please?
Thanks
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
OMG
I shouldn't know this now I'll have nightmares for the rest of my life
Ok Lesson learned
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 4:47 PM
To:
Well, I did the switch from the 2900 to the 2960, everything works fine except
for one thing...
Port 22 on the original switch is set to be a vlan trunk that links to another
switch (sw2, also a 2900XL) in another building with a different set of vlans
on it.
interface FastEthernet0/22
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Joseph Mays wrote:
interface FastEthernet0/22
description Trunk to sw2.dist.win.net
duplex full
speed 100
switchport access vlan 22
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,201-224,1002-1005
switchport mode trunk
no cdp enable
The client on the remote switch, vlan 202, does not
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Joseph Mays m...@win.net wrote:
Well, I did the switch from the 2900 to the 2960, everything works fine
except for one thing...
Port 22 on the original switch is set to be a vlan trunk that links to
another switch (sw2, also a 2900XL) in another building
On 9/21/12 8:56 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Joseph Mays wrote:
interface FastEthernet0/22
description Trunk to sw2.dist.win.net
duplex full
speed 100
switchport access vlan 22
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,201-224,1002-1005
switchport mode trunk
no cdp enable
The
Thanks.
What could be a good replacement for 7600s to overcome this limitation?
ASR9K?Nexus7K?
By the way, I have tried netflow on 7600 and tcam shoots up.
I am still researching as to why 7600 sucks on this.
thanks
From: Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:48:29AM -0400, Joseph Mays wrote:
I don't know what might be causing this, unless something about the vlan
database is not created by cutting and pasting the config from the 2900XL to
the 2960.
Most likely exactly this: the vlan 202 is not existing, since the
On 21 Sep 2012, at 18:06, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
(Stupid move. Even more stupid, still the same with vtp v3
The cynic in me wonders what you expect if you use vtp? :-)
Nick,
ex-vtp user, blood-stained t shirt and all
___
cisco-nsp
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:04:09PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 21 Sep 2012, at 18:06, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
(Stupid move. Even more stupid, still the same with vtp v3
The cynic in me wonders what you expect if you use vtp? :-)
Nick,
ex-vtp user, blood-stained t
Don't do this!
Conf t
Ethernet cfm global
If you do, 75 seconds later IP reachability, OSPF, MPLS, L2VPN (vpws) PW's,
will all come crashing down.
I lost a cell tower on my Ethernet cell backhaul network, and sent a CO Tech
speeding down the road in his truck to reboot that
Actually, I just installed a 10G LR fiber optic module in each of them in order
to connect to the 5Ks.
I was sure to add the spanning-tree port type edge trunk command on the Nexus
so I didn't risk ISSU support.
The way I see it, we should be able to keep this working by making sure no
hosts
Haha. For our datacenter migration, we are traveling over about two miles of
singlemode fiber with the 10G links. (5 patches total!)
I know it's not best practice, but we are doing this to avoid having to
readdress servers during the live transition. Once the transition is complete,
the Nexus
Also, why LR optics? Unless you need to distance, SR optics are 1/4 the price.
Or if you are patching into the same rack, twinax cables even cheaper.
Ive generally placed 5k in a central location near core / aggregation switches,
then distributed the 2k over the data hall with multimode fibre.
Im assuming your 3560 has gigabit ports to connet the 5ks?
Then you can do jumbo frames on those interfaces, as per the following from
cisco.com
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configuration_example09186a008010edab.shtml#c3
You will need to reboot the switch
PMTUD should take care of the rest...
Andrew Jones
-Original Message-
From: Conkel, Joshua [mailto:conk...@wems-llc.com]
Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2012 10:47 AM
To: Andrew Jones
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?
22 matches
Mail list logo