Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:22 PM David Sinn wrote: > Except that is actually the problem if you look at it in hardware. And to > be very specific, I'm talking about commodity hardware, not flexible > pipelines like you find in the MX and a number of the ASR's. I'm also > talking about the more

Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check

Salve, On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 8:08 PM David Sinn wrote: Rewrites on MPLS is horrible from a memory perspective as maintaining the > state and label transition to explore all possible discrete paths across > the overall end-to-end path you are trying to take is hugely in-efficient. > Applying

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920: egress ACL on BDIs

Hi, On Sun 19. Jan 2020 at 12:23, Gert Doering wrote: > replying to myself with a few... interesting... discoveries we've made > in the meantime... > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:57:54AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > > quick question to the group - ACLs on BDIs on ASR920s, is this something > >

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2T multicast hardware forwarding missing

Hi, On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: Christian, What does the 'show mls cef exception status’ say? If you want, send the SR # to my @cisco.com address (lukasz.bromirski) and I’ll look into what’s going on at the TAC end. summary to the list. This turned out to be plain old run

[c-nsp] Sup2T multicast hardware forwarding missing

fine for 4 years and then broke over night. [1] We initially wanted to upgrade to 151-2.SY12 in the service window but the issu upgrade failed miserably and we had to had to hard reboot sups from the cmp. But that is another story. Any ideas ? Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer

[c-nsp] Add-Path Selection on IOS-XE (maybe also on other platforms)

Hi list, considering my following situation, which seems to me pretty ordinary: Two RRs responsible for a domain of iBGP clients. Two iBGP clients share for redundancy reasons the same customer via eBGP, sometimes also by other protocols or even just statics/connected networks of customers.

Re: [c-nsp] memory issue asr1002-x

ome kind of IOS redundancy feature to run two IOS processes on a box splitting up memory between them. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax:

[c-nsp] IPv6 FHS Etherchannel support for 4506/Sup7LE

oadmaps for the 4506. We will be dropping port-channels for the time being to get dhcpv6 interface-id from customer ports. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4506 dhcpv6 interface-id, remote-id

of static prefixes 2. logging of assignments to customers Apprently there are some new commands in IOS 3.9 that I will need to test tomorrow. Still hoping per interface user configurable interface-id or remote-id will be available on the platform soon. Greetings Christian kind regards Psh

[c-nsp] Cisco 4506 dhcpv6 interface-id, remote-id

configurable ipv6 opt18 or 37. Is a feature like this somewhere on the roadmaps for the c4506 platform ? Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax

Re: [c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

, I think. RSP440 is going EOS this summer, so not much left to chose from. :-/ -- Christian Meutes - Wiesbaden, Germany JESK-RIPE - tel:+49.176.32370305 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

Hi Frederic, On 01/05/2017 16:02, frederic.jut...@sig-telecom.net wrote: Why dead QNX ? Dead for Cisco (seam that the automobile manufacturer are using QNX) ? Dead because of the late support of 64bits platforms ? dead because of everyone putting it's expenditures into Linux, and so also

Re: [c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

Hey, On 01/05/17 15:12, Lukas Tribus wrote: Seriously? I thought only Trident cards ended support in 5.3.X. IOS XR 6.x *DOES* support Typhoon, just not in the 64-bit flavor. yeah, based on dead QNX, not with Linux and LXC architecture. -- Christian Meutes - Wiesbaden, Germany JESK-RIPE

[c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

Hi list, does someone know for sure that XRe will never support Typhoon based linecards? So XR has no future for <100G kit? Thanks Christian -- Christian Meutes - Wiesbaden, Germany JESK-RIPE - tel:+49.176.32370305 ___ cisco-nsp mailing l

Re: [c-nsp] Wierd MPLS/VPLS issue

st to test these devices intensively on all possible usecases. cheers Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] netflow real AS instead of uplink provider?

Do you have "bgp attribute-download" under router bgp ? Best regards, Chris On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Nemeth Laszlo wrote: > Hello > > I tried to get the source or destianton AS of a flow from our ASR9001 > (iosxr 4.3.1) router. > > But i got this: > >

Re: [c-nsp] A9K Netflow export drops

We also do not see any significant issues with 6.0.1. CPU load on the RSP did drop by 50% tough. That is for ASR9001 terminating a couple hundred BGP sessions. Best regards, Chris On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > We have had no more severe issues

Re: [c-nsp] A9K Netflow export drops

> > > > Did they conclude that you were actually losing real Netflow data or not? > Is that just bad wording on the bug? > > > > Cheers! > > > > *From:* ckil...@unixhosts.org [mailto:ckil...@unixhosts.org] *On Behalf > Of *Christian Kildau > *Sent:* 14 Jun

Re: [c-nsp] A9K Netflow export drops

Hi, bug id is CSCuz91132. Best regards, Chris On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > we've finally received clarification from TAC: > > In our case this was a bug within IOS-XR 5.3.X. > > For us, this is fixed in 6.0.1

Re: [c-nsp] A9K Netflow export drops

Hi Robert, we've finally received clarification from TAC: In our case this was a bug within IOS-XR 5.3.X. For us, this is fixed in 6.0.1 which we wanted to upgrade to anyway due to extended netconf support. hth, Chris On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Robert Williams

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR 5.3.3 add Yang Models

Hi all, sorry for not replying earlier. We will continue evaluating YANG in the lab as we have now upgraded one box to 6.0.1 and there is Cisco-IOS-XR-ipvX-acl-cfg.yang. Currently we still have other issues with 6.0.1 like totally broken netflow... Best regards, Chris On Thu, May 12, 2016 at

Re: [c-nsp] A9K Netflow export drops

Hi all, we're seeing the exact same symptoms on our all our 9001s. I have opened a TAC case regarding this issue last week. Will keep you posted! Best regards, Chris On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Christian Kildau <m...@chrisk.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > we're seeing the exac

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR 5.3.3 add Yang Models

(That last message was actually intended for the list.) On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > On 11/05/16 14:56, Christian Kildau wrote: > >> >> That's pretty bad news, as the supplied models don't offer much >> funct

[c-nsp] IOS-XR 5.3.3 add Yang Models

Hi cisco-nsp, we're currently experimenting with netconf/yang on IOS-XR 5.3.3 (asr9k). The out of the box supported yang models are somewhat limited. E.g. there is no model that supports editing ACLs. I have found https://github.com/YangModels/yang which lists lots of yang models, but have not

[c-nsp] ASR920 - Service instane

Hello everyone, I'm trying to configure an ASR920 with service instance, this is not working as planned, in other words is not working. Scenario: CPE Router Gi0/0 <-> Gi0/0/10 ASR920 <- - -> ASR920 Gi0/0/13 <-> Te0/0/1/0 ASR9K My CPE router have a couple of sub-interfaces, that I want to

Re: [c-nsp] BGP multipath load balancing.. broken sessions upon hash change

Correct, in order to have a "sticky" session, the device would have to keep the TCP session state in a table somewhere (like a NAT table), which ECMP and CEF do not do. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > Peter, > > > On 02 Sep 2015, at 22:49, Peter

Re: [c-nsp] New IOS release time frame, when bug is identified

with other network vendors. this is the time for: favourite-rant-about-the-virtues-of-open-source-hardware/ immediately followed by: favourite-rant-about-the-availablity-of-open-source-hardware/ Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email

[c-nsp] Cisco ACI - Unsupported/Alternativ transceiver

Hi, I'm looking it to a project using Cisco ACI, and is curious about if I can use alternative QSFP transceivers between Spine and Leaf, the reason for going down this path is pure cost, the connection between half og the setup will be on QSFP-40G-LR4 optics, due to the distance and cables

[c-nsp] ME2600X FTTH design, shaping, road map questions

to be always on so the dumb FTU units we have deployed see gigabit frames and bring their link up. I would be happy to hear from others using or evaluatiing the ME2600X for their experiences. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de

[c-nsp] Tapping a PPPoVPDN and/or PPPoE subscriber session the ASR1000

a mediation device is required which we do not have Any hints will be appreciated. thanks, Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] traceroutes via mpls network - works for on-net but not for off-net (def rt)

On 2014-09-04 19:16, Aaron wrote: In my network traceroute works fine for on-net (known) subnets. I can see the mpls lsr P hops. But when I traceroute to internet destinations off-net (unknown) subnets and my packets follow default routing, I do not see my mpls lsr P hops. What is the

Re: [c-nsp] traceroutes via mpls network - works for on-net but not for off-net (def rt)

On 2014-09-05 15:41, Aaron wrote: 123.123.144.1 is one of my l3vpn customer subnets and I can trace to it and see all my mpls p hops along the way... (mpls p boxes are 172.20.x.x) (not sure why the penultimate hop times out but perhaps that's another topic) (1) You are sure that

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM

feeds. The boxes in question have since been upgraded to 16GB with third party memory and everything is fine now. Regular experience just does not apply to this box. It just looks similar but is totally different under the hood. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK

[c-nsp] No more duplex auto on Cisco 4506E WS-X4640-CSFP-E-Gbic

else seen or notices this. I have not been able to find anythin in the release notes yet. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032

Re: [c-nsp] Hierarchical FIB on Cisco 7600

On 26 Apr 2014, at 12:50, Cydon Satyr cydonsa...@gmail.com wrote: I see. But then is there any effect of having repair path installed with bgp additional-paths install command on platform without Hierarchical FIBs or is it purely cosmetic? Regardless of PIC through ADD-PATH you can make use

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 tracelogs

this? Here, rancid didn´t detect IOS XE anymore after an ASR OS upgrade from 3.7 to 3.10. Because of that, the builtin tracelogs filter didn´t match. I had do change if (/cisco ios .* IOS-XE/i) { $ios = XE; } to if (/Cisco IOS-XE/i) { $ios = XE; } in /usr/lib/rancid/bin/rancid Regards, Christian

Re: [c-nsp] SPA Module compatibility

detection as you also mentioned. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Mobile

Re: [c-nsp] SPA Module compatibility

desire to offer various bandwidth options between 100mbit/s abd 1git/s. I just don't fully trust their shaping/policing solutions to provide the inbetween bandwidths. Old school interfaces that had configurable clock rate did the right thing (tm) out of the box. Greetings Christian Thanks, Blake

[c-nsp] Sup2T-XL vs Sup720BXL FIB TCAM

-XL has a larger FIB TCAM (2M) than the Sup720-BXL. Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2T-XL vs Sup720BXL FIB TCAM

, the default setting provides for 512 K IPv4 entries, and this can be increased through configuration control to support up to 1 M entries if required. On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Christian Schmit wrote: Today I tested a Sup2T-XL and a Sup720BXL in the lab with full bgp feeds for ipv4 and ipv6. To my

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2T-XL vs Sup720BXL FIB TCAM

to accommodate more of one type of forwarding entry. For example, in the PFC4XL, the default setting provides for 512 K IPv4 entries, and this can be increased through configuration control to support up to 1 M entries if required. On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Christian Schmit wrote: Today I tested a Sup2T

[c-nsp] terminating double tagged vlans on ASR1000

-interfaces in a future release? Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] multicast 3750X

Hi, On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, selamat pagi wrote: yep, *ip multicast-routing* distributed is configured you also have the correct sdm template setup on the switch ? I assume you could not configure multicast routing otherwise. Greetings Christian cheers, keti On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35

[c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

Christian P.S. features are enabled of course ;-) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

, Please share us SW2 int vlan200 config. and ping result from sw1 to sw2 On 08/09/2013 03:52 PM, Christian Kildau wrote: Hi Cisco-NSP, we're having some very strange issues while adding HSRP to our Nexus 5020 where both HSRP peers are up, but don't recognize each other, thus causing some

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian Kildau Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 9:33 AM To: Rati Berikaant Jokhadze Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues sw2# sh run int vlan200 !Command: show running-config interface Vlan200 !Time: Fri Aug 9

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

Morris al...@qix.co.uk wrote: You do have the L3 daughter card installed in both your 5k's, right? I think without the card you can configure IP but HSRP won't work. Aled On 9 August 2013 16:34, Christian Kildau li...@unixhosts.org wrote: Nope, there's no access-list, no CoPP, no nothing

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

Yes, vlan200 goes trough vpc peer-link: # show vpc Legend: (*) - local vPC is down, forwarding via vPC peer-link vPC domain id : 1 Peer status : peer adjacency formed ok vPC keep-alive status : peer is alive Configuration

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

Active vlans -- --- -- --- -- --- 1 Po2 up success success200 2 Po3 up success success200 On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Kildau li

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

Well, at least there is feature bgp, ospf and ospfv3 (Altough not available with our license) But feature hsrp is available and I can configure it, so I think this should work?! On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 6:23 PM, James Ventre network...@ventrefamily.comwrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:48 AM,

Re: [c-nsp] Nexu 5020 HSRP issues

just because you can configure it. But I'd be happy for you if I were wrong on this. Aled On 9 August 2013 17:33, Christian Kildau li...@unixhosts.org wrote: Well, at least there is feature bgp, ospf and ospfv3 (Altough not available with our license) But feature hsrp is available and I

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Wireless VOIP IP phone issue

on the wireless to force faster roaming. Wish I could find that PP. that would propably be EAP-FAST for fast reauthentication. Greetings Christian snipp/ -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997

[c-nsp] ASR1001 which memory RP1 oder RP2 ???

Firmware version: 15.0(1r)S # show inventory NAME: module R0, DESCR: Cisco ASR1001 Route Processor PID: ASR1001 , VID: V02, SN: xxx Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

On 06.03.2013, at 09:26, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:. How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing without PIM? I'll admit I'm a bit rusty and only know about PIM-SM and PIM-SSM, what other methods are there for controlling routed multicast? You need

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

On 01.03.2013, at 07:44, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: Proper way (at least it was in XR 3.6 - 3.8 time) is to put multicast sources into BGP address-family multicast. By default, if the source is only in BGP af-unicast then it's not considered valid for multicast RPF check in

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes Do you have your sources addresses in IGP? Nope, BGP SAFI unicast. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

On 01.03.2013, at 13:06, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com wrote: On 01/03/2013 10:58, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote: On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS routed pseudowire between ASR9k and 7600 with LAN cards

mtu on IOX is L2, IOS treats it as packet mtu. -- Christian On 27.02.2013, at 07:49, Artyom Viklenko ar...@viklenko.net wrote: 26.02.2013 08:13, Aivars пишет: interface PW-Ether555 mtu 9216 [...] 7600: interface TenGigabitEthernet3/4.555 encapsulation dot1Q 555

Re: [c-nsp] pros and cons for IPTV multicast in rosen-mvpn vs GRT

A lot of complexity, protocol overhead, data mdt scalability, more state, more bugs, PIM pimping / RPF vector, more RPs in case of sparse-mode... If VPN is mandatory I would go MLDP if supported. -- Christian On 18.02.2013, at 16:09, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote: Hi folks

Re: [c-nsp] stp on me3600 on efp's with locally connected older switch

There isn't much you can do afaik: STP on ACs (CE-only, and consistent port configurations / prone PVSTP), waiting for MST-AG or even MC LAG, keep away from loop-capable ACs per L2 site. I'am really missing here s/w support for H-VPLS based setups. Currently I see no way other then running

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 odd arp behavior

On 30.01.2013, at 19:48, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote: Thanks Christian. Can you elaborate on what side effects from uRPF I need to be aware of when using the glean HWRL? Dropped packets, especially when using stuff like eg. dhcp-relay on these boxes - even if programmed exception ACLs

Re: [c-nsp] stp on me3600 on efp's with locally connected older switch

On 24.01.2013, at 23:44, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: This isn't surprising. An me3600 can handle up to 4000 bridge domains (http://goo.gl/0gz4n), each with their own topology, but only supports 128 rstp instances (http://goo.gl/RLQ05). While rstp has more flexibility than mst, it

Re: [c-nsp] stp on me3600 on efp's with locally connected older switch

On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: with rstp you can have a different topology per vlan, but you max out at 128 vlans. With MST you're stuck with 16 topologies per area, but you can use all 4094 vlans. I believe you mean PVRST and not RSTP.

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 odd arp behavior

On Jan 25, 2013, at 10:16 PM, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote: Am I understanding the issue correctly? I ran into those issues back in 2008 when the CoPP docs haven't been that clear about the relationship between CoPP, ARP and the glean HWRL. You should mostly be safe when you enable the glean

Re: [c-nsp] stp on me3600 on efp's with locally connected older switch

On 24.01.2013, at 21:40, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Ugh, I asked this question like a month ago! I knew it seemed familiar :) thanks folks for putting up with me :) Hey! Did y'all know that efp's only support MSTP !! lol Which translates at least to 802.1d, 802.1w and 802.1s,

Re: [c-nsp] stp on me3600 on efp's with locally connected older switch

And if anyone has any suggestions about designing loop prevention via me3600's when I'm connecting legacy vlans over vpls via my mpls cloud then fire away. There isn't much you can do afaik: STP on ACs (CE-only, and consistent port configurations / prone PVSTP), waiting for MST-AG or even MC

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 odd arp behavior

On Jan 24, 2013, at 7:01 PM, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote: Is there something that would prevent ARP from discovering these newly added devices when the switch would be soliciting the network segment for the MAC address for a certain IP? I was leaning towards bug... or I have some unintended

Re: [c-nsp] ACS 5.x and ASA - Webtype ACL

Unfortunately I have another call. Sent from my iPad On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt wrote: Guys, I was trying to send an large Webtype ACL from ASA5.3 to ASA8.4. To do that, I use the Cisco AV Pairs. This is configured under Policy

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and IP forwording

On 20.12.2012, at 19:46, zaid zaidoo...@yahoo.com wrote: how the forwarding will be if i have 2 parallel links between two routers one with mpls enable and the 2nd without mpls ? suppose to see both in cef ? right one with lable and the 2nd with out label ? any reply correct.

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS TE

Still missing relevant informations, but I guess you miss the backup-path TE configuration on your protecting core interfaces. On 20.12.2012, at 19:38, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote: R2 router isis 1 net 49.0001...0002.00 is-type level-2-only metric-style wide passive-interface

Re: [c-nsp] recommendation for upgrade-paths pls

On 20.12.2012, at 09:54, Harald Kapper h...@kapper.net wrote: I'd be happy to receive recommendations whether to go the ASR-1000 route or skip this and go directoy to 760x-systems (using which RSP/SUP?). Relevant question is here really how much interfaces and how much bandwidth do you

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x - g0/25 ?!

Happens when you insert SFPs in the SFP+ interfaces. Only way to get rid of them is a reboot. -- Christian On 20.12.2012, at 03:29, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Any idea why I see an interface g0/25 on my me3600x? this may be following the ios upgrade to 15.3(1)S There are only 24

Re: [c-nsp] All multicast punting to CPU on 6500

rely entirely on the availability of h/w-based rate-limiters of your PFC platform. For example if there wasn't a HSRP rate-limiter shipped with the SX code you could quite easily kill the box with few Megs of HSRP. The same is true for all other B/Mcasts. -- Christian On 16.12.2012, at 23

Re: [c-nsp] route-target import on non-leaking PEs

On 14.12.2012, at 02:42, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: So after thinking about this a little more, I realized that my ME3600 example was incorrect. The reference device wasn't actually sitting equidistant between the two PEs sourcing the default routes. When I check the routing

[c-nsp] private vlan ports

isolation ports do only work for IPv4? Thanks in advance, Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] route-target import on non-leaking PEs

You need add-path on both sides, yes. But as Phil already noted your RRs are definitely tie-breaking to different pathes. On 13.12.2012, at 22:12, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: On 13/12/12 15:04, Jason Lixfeld wrote: On 2012-12-13, at 9:56 AM, Phil Mayers

Re: [c-nsp] Moving Routing from 7206VRX to 6509-E

Start with learning PFC-based QoS and downgrade your expectation regarding your current policies: shaping and multiple priority queues only supported on the WS-X6904-40G-2T (and only two PQs supported). I hope for you that this keeps the main limitation... -- Christian On 13.12.2012, at 00

[c-nsp] ME3400 roadmap for IPv6 first hop redundany

know if hsrp for ipv6 (perhaps even with a global address) is anywhere on the roadmaps for the me3400 ? If not what box does cisco expect us to use for ipv6 CPE applications ? Greetings Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c

Re: [c-nsp] URPF MAC check

This feature makes sense, but you would need peers understanding your filtering policy. Further, fib support for this would only makes sense if cisco would also implement uRPF for feasible routes like in junos. -- Christian On 23.11.2012, at 16:15, Aled Morris al...@qix.co.uk wrote: On 23

Re: [c-nsp] can not configure modem by router

at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht

Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2

. The 4GB are not all available to the IOS. If you want lots of full feeds on the box go for 8GB from the beginning. Check the archives for lots of discussion on this. Greetings Christian Cheers. Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:46:16 +0300 From: s...@ytti.fi To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

Re: [c-nsp] Change BGP default-originate to IGP?

The best way is here really to inject the defaults via ISIS. On 27.09.2012, at 04:04, Tom Lanyon tom+c-...@oneshoeco.com wrote: Hi list, In an enterprise network I have a core of 4900Ms with a few ASR1ks hanging off to handle upstream connectivity. As an example: Upstream1 -

Re: [c-nsp] Best Ipam software?

Sup, On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:18 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: I use netdot myself. It's unashamedly web 1.0. It won't do overlapping subnets and there are some aspects of it which need some work, but I find it to be very good (I'm the freebsd port maintainer for netdot). If

Re: [c-nsp] Inter AS MPLS hybrid thingy...

ImportExport between the RDs and give the L3VPN-only customer also MPLS and eBGP session between them. On 13.09.2012, at 10:44, JC Cockburn ccie15...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We have a weird setup/requirement as following and I need some advise please: Working MPLS network serving

Re: [c-nsp] Inter AS MPLS hybrid thingy...

Hey Oli, I read it as Child_net1 is L3VPN with MPLS enabled (CsC) but I may be wrong... On 13.09.2012, at 11:53, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com wrote: Don't think this is going to work Christian. Child_net1's interface to Parent_net is actually in the global table, so any

Re: [c-nsp] Inter AS MPLS hybrid thingy...

. But not (and this is how I read it) between a Child_net L3VPN customer and the L3VPN customer on parent_net.. So enough speculating, let's wait for JC to clarify the requirements :-) oli On 13/09/2012 12:54, Christian Meutes christ...@errxtx.net wrote: Hey Oli, I read it as Child_net1 is L3VPN

Re: [c-nsp] Inter AS MPLS hybrid thingy...

On Sep 13, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Christian Meutes christ...@errxtx.net wrote: That's why I suggested to give the L3VPN customer also MPLS on the PE-CE link. So that just the L3VPN CE needs to have the CsC-customers eBGP nexthop tag. It's a while back when I played with CsC, but enabling tagging

Re: [c-nsp] Help on redistribute OSPF/BGP

Hi, On Aug 30, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Olivier CALVANO o.calv...@gmail.com wrote: but that's don't sent BGP route to the neighbor ospf (or i don't have the good command for see what route are sent ;=) You need bgp redistribute-internal under your bgp configuration. But take care of redistributing

Re: [c-nsp] bgp/ospf default route interaction

Hiho, On Aug 27, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com wrote: Now on CORE2 I add 'always' keyword to OSPF 'default-originate' command, making it: CORE2: router ospf 100 default-information originate always For some reason I don't understand it changes the game

Re: [c-nsp] bgp/ospf default route interaction

Hi, On 27.08.2012, at 22:57, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com wrote: Thanks for the reply. So what you're saying is that if ospf router itself injects ospf default in its ospf database then it would ignore any other ospf defaults it might receive (regardless of metric) In your case

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

Hi Waris, it's 15.2(2)S. On Aug 7, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Christian, Can you tell me the software release? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Loop/Unreachable problem with C6500/SUP720

Hi Sebastian, maybe due to load-sharing 10.1.66.51 takes other path back than 10.1.66.84? So maybe one hop is missing a route or has a wrong one? Just tapping in the dark because I didn't saw working traceroute forward and backward. Christian

[c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

gets aware of it. regards Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] m-vpn

Unfortunately the Juniper documentation sucks (don't they have Visio or equivalent?). The RFC6514 combined with RFC6513 is horrible long and quite complex because of a dozen of different options how to implement and run and ways what to use for LSP-setup/signaling, c-state distribution,

Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 in a VRF on a 7600

for hooking up v6 vrf lite setups over protected tunnels. Seems there is no such feature in feature navigator. Greetings Christian /Benny ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000v and distance

in the current IOS XR Configration guides. Either the feature is not available yet or my google foo is lacking the appropriate seeding ;) Greetings Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH -A Sent from my tablet; excuse brevity On 07/04/2012, at 13.59, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I have three

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000v and distance

still lacking understanding of new IOS XR concepts. Seems we do not have to worry about vlan id signifance so much as IOS XR just pushes and pops vlan ids from subinterfaces. Lets just hope this all comes together and we will find a way to transition smoothly ;) Greetings Christian

Re: [c-nsp] Add Path IOS

and don't do it by hitting reply to an existing thread. Otherwise your posting will get lost. Oh, yeah you are right - mail is so damn complicated. -- Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] About Cisco ASR 1006 Router performance

PE and RR scalability the ASR1k is afaik the best product from Cisco (~4M routes FIB, ~25M routes RIB/RR, 8k BGP-Sessions). -- Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

[c-nsp] Add Path IOS

Hi, does anyone have an idea when BGP Add-Path will be available in ordinary IOS (non-XE/XR)? -- Christian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

  1   2   3   4   >