I mean a lot of it is discovery based on what you may know, people leak, etc..
I’ll say this in public (now) - Changing the security posture on the VTYs is a
great reason to not use this product at the moment. I’ve seen many people not
monitor their devices for these types of changes, and this is a great case to
study.
Time for some retraining of people.
- Jared
> On
> On Jun 2, 2019, at 3:50 AM, James Bensley
> wrote:
>
>
> I recently upgraded from eXR 6.5.2 to 6.5.3 and pushed the files using
> SCP to the router from a jump box, which was on the same LAN as the
> management interface on the RSP. It was copying at 100Mbps (the speed
> of the OOB switch)
> On May 20, 2019, at 11:03 PM, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>
> Little follow up.
>
> On a ASR9906 6.3.3 (32bit) the usb key comes up as usb: but on 6.3.3 (64-bit)
> it's disk2:
>
>
> Copying the 6.3.3 migration files from a USB Key was 182 seconds, with HTTP
> it was around 1 hour. (1.3 G File)
Host your own. Here’s a good one:
https://github.com/adolfintel/speedtest
Jared Mauch
> On Aug 12, 2018, at 7:00 AM, ring...@mail.com wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to ask how do you guys handle the customer complains about slow
> Internet speed? Today alm
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Charles Sprickman <sp...@bway.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>>
>> Take a look at the UBNT Edgepoint gear as well. Fairly cool, comes in
>> 10G/
found them.
>
> Thanks,
> Christina
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Harold 'Buz' Dale" <buz.d...@usg.edu>
> To: "Jared Mauch" <ja...@puck.nether.net>, "C. Klam" <ck...@ias.edu>
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Sent
If you just need one port, there is this box that works quite well:
https://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-fiber-to-copper-converter.html
It does not have an integrated splice tray though.
- Jared
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Christina Klam wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I am hoping
I’ve found if you go a few rounds with Cisco they will blame 3rd party, then
realize their driver is buggy and fix.
Or you have a bad card :-)
I’d opt for the latter, but the former does occur at times.
- Jared
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
>
> I
What’s helpful is rolling v6 while doing nat on V4. Reduces your state on v4
and avoids issues like the google captcha problem that heavy NAT environments
encounter.
- Jared
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:47 PM, CBL wrote:
>
> Any problems with Google saying there are too many
nd the NP direction of research.
Also, what type of optics, etc are involved? There may be
additional diagnostic data you can extract from the XFPs to determine
what is going on based on the INF-8077 type data in the EEPROM.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finge
.
I see this as an inelegant change on the part of Cisco, but ultimately
we have little control of this.
Thoughts? Please honor reply-to and send your requests to me directly.
Thanks,
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http
Nothing inherently wrong with 6.x aside from it's still Cisco. You likely want
5.3.4 if you have any trident based linecards.
Jared Mauch
> On Mar 9, 2017, at 5:23 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 9/Mar/17 00:54, Ted Johansson wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 4:37 AM, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
>
> 2017-02-23 5:49 GMT+01:00 Curtis Piehler :
>> Local market route
>> reflectors do solve the issue of sub-optimal routing from a local market
>> perspective.
>
>
> There is another solution to
ould be fine.
If you have anything more complex, don't expect it to be easy.
They presume you're doing it wrong, and you must be open to that as a
concept. Remember the KISS principle.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++;
course this depends
on the ability to triage yourself. I've generally not had any issues with a
vendor when we say it failed, we swapped with spare, here's the serial.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; |
I would slide it in. If it doesn't work load 5.3.4. It will perform the best it
can under those circumstances.
Jared Mauch
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote:
>
> What I'm trying to figure out is how to put this (2) port 100 gig module into
>
t: Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:18 PM
> To: 'Aaron' <aar...@gvtc.com>; 'Tom Hill' <t...@ninjabadger.net>;
> cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; 'Jared Mauch' <ja...@puck.nether.net>
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 2 port 100 gig module - ASR9000
>
> I think cisco does these backwards compat
I would not run anything earlier than 5.3.4 these days personally.
These are fine cards and work well.
- jared
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 3:54 PM, Aaron wrote:
>
> Is anyone using this or familiar with it ?
>
>
>
> If so, please let me know what the minimum RSP and IOS XR
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
>
> Very interesting.
>
> 7280SR look perfect for us. (if the price is OK; I will call my local Arista
> representative).
>
> We are another content AS and we push 150gps approx in peak.
> We plan to upgrade from our
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 9:32 AM, Tim Durack wrote:
>
> I have a vendor that does not support SFP DOM SNMP polling. They state this
> is due to EEPROM read life cycle. Constant reads will damage the SFP.
>
> We SNMP poll SFP DOM from Cisco equipment without issue.
>
> Not
acy.
If you see examples on the internet using them
or access-lists to do route filtering, please don't copy
those examples.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only m
; "service unsupported-tranceiver"
BTW, Cisco has indiciated to me you may need both as
the global command doesn't unlock certain code paths because bad
developers. The 9K team thinks they're a unique snowflake so
deserve to set 2 bars vs the single global bar.
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > ___
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipe
.
Jared Mauch
> On Jul 13, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Nick Griffin <nick.jon.grif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello, looking for some details in regards to an ASR9000 code upgrade.
> Currently running software version 5.1.1 with the following packages:
>
> Committed Packages:
>
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
>
> I have tried that too and got this error.
>
> R1(config-router)#neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx route-map RTBH out
> % "RTBH" used as BGP outbound route-map, tag match not supported
> % not supported match will behave as
> On Jun 19, 2016, at 10:07 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
>
> I have added "ip bgp-community new-format" in global config, but i
> don't have following command in my ASR1006 router
>
> neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx remote-as 200 send-community
>
> so i have added
>
> neighbor
I would consider upgrading to at least 5.3.1 + SMUs or 6.0.1. I seem to recall
a number of issues back in the 4.3.x images.
4.3.1 is quite crusty. If you need to stay in 4.3.x perhaps 4.3.4. I would
avoid 5.3.3.
- Jared
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Nemeth Laszlo wrote:
We have had no more severe issues than prior releases. Make sure you load the
IPv6 PSIRT SMU of course.
Jared Mauch
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Robert Williams <rob...@custodiandc.com> wrote:
>
> have you had any significant
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:32 AM, Robert Williams wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for this, we’ve not considered 6.0.1 yet, mainly due to it being
> relatively new and I’m not aware currently of anyone running it in production
> on a 90xx, so slightly apprehensive :)
We
If you are buying new look at the 9910.
Jared Mauch
> On May 17, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Satish Patel <satish@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So we are good with those parts or i need to worry?
>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jeremy Bresley <b...@brezworks.com> wrote
please ignore.
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
> On May 12, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2016 at 17:42, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> Has not worked out for us.
>>
>> Elephant flows (particularly of a non-IP nature) cannot be solved with
>> Juniper's adaptive load balancing. I
> On May 11, 2016, at 12:06 PM, quinn snyder <snyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 11, 2016, at 08:43, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>>
>> FYI: you may want to look at 6.0.1 which was just (re)-posted to CCO as
>> well. For
FYI: you may want to look at 6.0.1 which was just (re)-posted to CCO as well.
For us it fixes a number of critical issues which are not in the 5.3.3 EMR.
- Jared
> On May 11, 2016, at 6:24 AM, Christian Kildau wrote:
>
> Hi cisco-nsp,
>
> we're currently experimenting with
-7124S-24-Port-10-Gigabit-Ethernet-Managed-Switch-/141984188598?hash=item210eeac8b6:g:wHwAAOSw3mpXH528
- Jared
> On May 8, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Satish Patel <satish@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I need all fiber interface with 20G ingress and 20G egress.
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at
If you purchase via enterprise channel you will get those prices. Are you doing
only Ethernet?
If so check someone like Arista or Brocade.
Jared Mauch
> On May 8, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Satish Patel <satish@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Seriously?
>
> I check with CDW and pr
You can buy nice new routers for less than that. Hopefully you don't need TDM
interfaces.
Jared Mauch
> On May 5, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Satish Patel <satish@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Need your input or suggestion, I have check with one of company and
> they sales *used Cisco eq
emove TFTP support for this reason. You should
make sure you do all the right things to make TCP faster, including
selective-ack
amongst other options.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My s
-more-damages-here-someone-using-wrench-to-drive-nail-image58686199
Jared Mauch
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 3:03 PM, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Guys - Have some of our "sales" team at Cisco Live atm, and they are
> raving about Tail-f /
https://ripe67.ripe.net/presentations/131-ripe2-2.pdf
Jared Mauch
On Mar 11, 2016, at 5:32 AM, Lukas Tribus <luky...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> We are running dwdm with just splitters and amplifiers at 100 GE with no
>> issues.
>
> You run multiple 100GE circuits over (semi
If you are only doing 10g there are a lot of inexpensive solutions in this
space for the distances you mentioned.
Jared Mauch
On Mar 9, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Lukas Tribus <luky...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Tim, thanks for your great info! Appreciate it.
>>
>> Hey Bill,
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
>
> On 08/03/16 09:27, James Bensley wrote:
>> This issue didn't show up in lab testing and we haven't been able to
>> replicate it (nor have TAC). It seems to be something about the
>> ordering of patching and that was the
rs connected to these devices.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puc
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:54 PM, James Bensley wrote:
>
> On 26 February 2016 at 22:43, Phil Bedard wrote:
>> How you upgrade the whole OS is still a bit hazy though. They have said it
>> involves using a self-extracting ISO distribution similar to other
The key question is what software are you attempting to boot and what images
are in the bootflash/sup-bootflash/disk0: etc
Having console output here is key to understanding what’s going on.
- Jared
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 1:52 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
>
> Hey folks.
We’ve been having some interesting issues with the ASA that have kept us pegged
at a specific release. Upgrading even a minor release causes all traffic to be
dropped without any clear explanation and TAC was not much help. I’m thinking
of just replacing the ASA with something that is easier
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Wilmer wrote:
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> Probably a stupid question, but I can't find an obvious answer on Cisco.
>
> Are the following SFP's able to be used to together:
>
> One device is using at GLC-FE-100EX & the other end is using
> a
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:34 PM, James Bensley wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed the full table requirement.
I’ve used 9904 for this before.
- Jared
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Apologies for the spam overnight. Rules are now in place to block these
messages.
- Jared
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Chuck Church wrote:
>
> Isn't game traffic fairly small in bandwidth need, but very latency
> dependent? QOS seems like a good fit here. Priority queue the game traffic
> based on matched ACL, and best effort everything else, re-marking it
You may also find useful help at the dns-operations list.
- Jared
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Murat Kaipov wrote:
>
> Hello folks!
>
> I have little question about DNS servers that you use in your environment?
> We use bind on freebsd servers now. I did some benchmarks
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Aaron wrote:
>
> and scp/sftp
>
The issue I’ve seen here is a directional one, there is no SCP/SFTP support to
copy data out:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Router#copy ?
/recurseRecursively list subdirectories encountered
WORDCopy
_
> From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Jared Mauch
> <ja...@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 8:46 AM
> To: Aaron
> Cc: John Heasley; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TFTP/SCP
>
>> On N
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Aaron wrote:
>
> sftp isn't under copy. Not sure why it isn't.
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:2051a-lab#sftp ?
> WORD [[user@][host[:]]][source-filename]
>
It’s not made accessible to any other parts of the system either, so isn’t
properly
seem to test it often so if you
report a bug, it takes quite some time to find the code caretaker.
Jared Mauch
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 19/Nov/15 15:54, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>
>> We use FTP as
Yup. You can filter by IP address and check image checksum after if it's
something without a crypto signature.
Jared Mauch
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:54 AM, Daniel Brisson <dbris...@uvm.edu> wrote:
>
> What about protecting credentials? Do you use a service account that has 0
We use FTP as the image isn't something that needs to be protected from
eavesdroppers.
Jared Mauch
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 6:46 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 19/Nov/15 12:25, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
Some of these limits are per-platform, so remember there is no “generic ios-xr”.
On the 9K you may need to set your profile to match your use case. It’s less
obvious compared to a generic central CPU platform like most XE devices are.
- Jared
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Adam Vitkovsky
ptic and their EEPROM validation code wasn't perfect.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@
Is pim enabled on the interface?
On Aug 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote:
Colleagues,
A 7206VXR (NPE-G2) is not sending ntp broadcasts nor multicasts, and I
even cannot recofigure ntp settings on an interface (see below).
Any idea what the problem could
On Aug 18, 2015, at 8:47 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
XR doesn't do it at all,
hrmph)
We have been asking about this as well, it might be worth revisiting.
- Jared
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
___
cisco
the
configurations. SSH for login as another example.
Paranoia about breaking things when you're not standards compliant is
pure lazy gamesmanship.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:37:34AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
Cisco really needs to implement a 'show config dead' or similar type
command that displays all these orphaned policies.
I have a hard enough time with cisco parsing their own
configs though I can't push on this now
While off-topic, I thought this would be of interest for people who see issues
with their routers as this captures many of the situations we operators see on
a regular basis.
http://honestnetworker.wordpress.com
- Jared
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
.
The cases where I have used console are generally to
recover a device that has gone south in a really-bad way.
Trying to use a console port for anything more than that
will result in frustration.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue
Cisco does a poor job of reading the SFF MSA fields from their own optics let
alone
what they describe as “3rd party”.
You may find it easier to use something to read/validate the optics yourself
if that works for your logistics. (shameless plug: i have something that might
be interesting
On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:50 AM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
As per titleordered a bunch of our usual single mode SFP's. and they are
badged as LH, but when inserted into router/switch, they report as ZX.can
I connect our LH to the new ZX ones
or have I lost the plot?
Thanks!
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger
mailman was not running and I since restarted it.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On May 15, 2015, at 1:28 AM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Bug is still private(i.e. Details not publicly viewable) - but located
here: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuu32800
Can provide SR if needed.
It’s cisco policy that any defect hit by customer in
We collect things along the following lines:
a) interface status
b) BGP status (for all address families)
c) interface descriptions
d) interface IPs
e) ISIS/OSPF neighbor(s)
This is fairly easy to script and automate if you have an existing RANCID
installation. You can then snapshot pre+post
The solution is simple. Call the engineer. When they say they are going to
research say I'll hold.
Works wonders to motivate them.
Don't be afraid to ask for their manager or the duty manager.
Jared Mauch
On Apr 30, 2015, at 5:20 AM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk wrote:
Does
What version of IOS-XR? What are the interface MTUs?
There were a number of TCP enhancements that went in around the 5.1 timeframe
which impact the way window scaling works as well.
Also, do you have path-mtu enabled on all the devices?
on XR you want something like this:
tcp selective-ack
my_regex
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:1.2.3.4
session transport udp
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
codec g711ulaw
fax-relay ecm disable
fax rate disable
fax protocol pass-through g711ulaw
no vad
!
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja
Rancid seems to work well for our network. We can get the location of any
serial number from the history in CVS as an example.
On Mar 26, 2015, at 2:25 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi allWhat is the best Asset Management (free) software to use ?
On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Dan Brisson dbris...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious what folks do in the situation where you have redundant links to
your customers. I'm speaking primarily in co-lo environments where you offer
redundant Internet connectivity to co-lo customers. So for
.
Is there some solution?
This will depend on the platform. you may need to enable
bgp attribute-download depending on what you are using.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements
and
immediately delete all copies of the message.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via
Network Architect
Zcorum
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja
And why is that?
We have many non-cisco optics deployed without trouble.
I would avoid the cheapest-of-the-cheap optics, as those have been rumored to
have trouble, slow i2c responses, or other issues that the software is poorly
coded to handle.
We’ve done this with SFP, XFP, SFP+ and CFP
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:29:41PM +, Rick Martin wrote:
I am glad to see this thread, we are on the cusp of making the plunge into
aftermarket optics
Whatever aftermarket optics are - I would not go and by
+ i’ve ordered has worked 100% and they are priced right.
--
Matthew S. Crocker
President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
E: matt...@crocker.com
P: (413) 746-2760
F: (413) 746-3704
W: http://www.crocker.com
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Jared Mauch
their first
party optics.
- Jared
-Warjack
On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 11:37:59 AM Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:29:41PM +, Rick Martin wrote:
I am glad to see this thread
On Jan 20, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 19:13 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
In IOS 12.2(33)SRE7a in order to read an interface description we did:
snmpwalk -v 2c -c snmp read community rtr1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.2.1.1.28
[This is the Cisco
.
Did you report the issue to Cisco so they can fix this?
We've ended up building a regression suite to test the SNMP stack of any
new release that checks for these types of defects.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http
On Dec 12, 2014, at 12:38 PM, David Deutsch david.deut...@telna.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have a 7201 router running an ITP image that is used as an SS7 STP, it in
turn is connected to a Cisco 4948E which is trunked into a series of Dell
M8024K blade switches (I know, I know). I've been
mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine
Do you mean single strand of fiber? If so many people make and sell these
bx/bi-di optics for both 1 and 10G. Keep in mind there are two types up vs down
and note the frequencies and transmit power for these as there are 10/20/40 and
80km varieties out there.
Of course make sure you have
There are a number of SMUs you should load if using 5.1.3, I don't think they
all have been posted publicly.
Happy to provide you a list in private.
Jared Mauch
On Nov 24, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Alfred Wandati wandati.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
We are looking at upgrading a number
I would say avoid Cisco.
The IOS-XE based switches take *forever* to boot and can easily last 5-10
minutes during the entire process.
We have tried for nearly a decade now to educate Cisco on why this is important
and they have often missed the boat in what is feasible or otherwise.
(boot
You should be able to do 120km with a ZR XFP @ 10G without anything.
If you later want to add equipment to the sites, you can look at doubling your
optics and something like this:
http://www.perle.com/products/10-Gigabit-Standalone-Media-Converters.shtml
- Jared
On Sep 4, 2014, at 5:36 AM,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 07:13:05PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 02:17:43 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
Wait for 5.1.3 it will be out soon. We have had a number
of minor issues in 5.1.2 including the vtys not working.
Now that I recall - I did have the console manager
Wait for 5.1.3 it will be out soon. We have had a number of minor issues in
5.1.2 including the vtys not working.
Jared Mauch
On Aug 21, 2014, at 5:43 AM, Mattias Gyllenvarg matt...@gyllenvarg.se wrote:
Dear List
I would love to hear some feed back on the 5.1.2 Train of IOS XR
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine
.
We never ran 4.3 but I have heard that 4.3.4 is fairly stable as well.
I would hold off on 5.1 until 5.1.3 is released, which should be soon.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My
On Aug 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
Don't use a router as a DNS resolver for customers. Just don't.
Or if you are, use something that is properly designed for that function.
Check out the UBNT EdgeRouter stuff, cheap, vyatta (JunOS-like), and gives you
Can get more luck with voodoo dolls some days.
Jared Mauch
On Aug 15, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Łukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net wrote:
Open a case with TAC. That's what they are for, right?
--
./
On 15 Aug 2014, at 18:05, Sascha E. Pollok s...@iphh.net wrote:
Frank, Jared,
I
1 - 100 of 471 matches
Mail list logo