Do you ever hear that REP is in an exam
!!
This is a case am facing
!
SW4 , SW5 and SW6 are
Hi allI have the below setup
SW6 / \SW4 SW5 | | R1
R2 \ / LAN (Customer) Now SW4 , SW5 and
SW6 are running REP where the blocking occurs on the segment between SW4 and
SW5What the customer is asking
for your template.
On May 5, 2015, at 7:44 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Sure not wrong , but the issue is that each customer has a different setup
and some of them has no NMS system and some of them does not allow any SNMP
communication to be made , we have to visit each customer
arrive the site
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Preventive Maintenance Template
From: ja...@lixfeld.ca
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 07:39:43 -0400
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To: gunner_...@live.com
What would be wrong with using an NMS?
On May 5, 2015, at 7:33 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
I
utilization? What kind of hardware? Or
are you talking about checks for what your hardware is actually doing? i.e.:
BGP checks, ISIS checks, etc?
On May 5, 2015, at 6:09 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi allI was searching for the most important commands to use for devices
Hi allI was searching for the most important commands to use for devices health
check , I found a lot of lists but I just want to use your experience to get
the most precise and valuable check in order to build my template
Thanks in advance
Am trying to run EEM script , but the log message below appears
eem_server[190]: %HA-HA_EM-6-FMS_POLICY_TIMEOUT : Policy 'mssk.tcl' has hit its
maximum execution time of 20.0 seconds, and so has been halted
How Can i increase execution time?
Am not trying to bother anyone , behave urself
From: luky...@hotmail.com
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] EEM Execution Time
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:59:45 +0200
Am trying to run EEM script , but the log message below appears
eem_server[190]:
He is only interested in inbound traffic , other than BGP what other options do
I have ?
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Incoming Traffic Load Balancing
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:05:30 +0200
On 20/Apr/15 15:01, M K
Hi allI have a customer connected to my Edge router via two routers , each with
one connectionThe public subnet will be given to him from my spaceHis main
concern is load-balancing for incoming traffic Should I establish BGP session
with him or there is a better solution?
Thanks
Thanks all
From: luky...@hotmail.com
To: mack.mcbr...@viawest.com; n...@foobar.org; gunner_...@live.com;
chuckchu...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Storm-control Issue
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:16:59 +0200
A link to the article/web page would be helpful
the output of 'show int capab' tell you if it's got that ability?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Hilliard
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 11:33 AM
To: M K; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Storm-control Issue
The line card in use is 48 10/100 mb rj45
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:39:26 +0200
From: n...@foobar.org
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Storm-control Issue
On 13/04/2015 16:29, M K wrote:
Hi allI have CISCO7606-S with
bootdisk:c7600rsp72043
Hi allI have CISCO7606-S with
bootdisk:c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin image When i am
trying to configure storm-control , I get the below error
7606(config)#interface FastEthernet2/27606(config-if)# storm-control multicast
level 10.00Command Rejected: Multicast suppression is
How can i modify an existing as-path-set on Cisco IOS XR ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
...@live.com
Why would i want this blocked again , if you can give me 5 good reasons as to
why
Barry
On 2 Apr 2015, at 14:24, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Sure am not the one who will decide to block a service I love like this :)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Whatsup Calls
Whatsup released voice recently , i wonder does Cisco SCE has the ability to
block it ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
VPLS support came after lots of kicking and screaming. Cisco
had initially left it only for the ME3800X, but the ME3600X got it
soon after launch.
Mark.
On 1/Apr/15 15:14, M K wrote:
Thanks Mark
But what do u
Sure am not the one who will decide to block a service I love like this :)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Whatsup Calls
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:29:58 +0200
On 2/Apr/15 12:06, M K wrote:
Whatsup released voice
Thanks MarkBut what do u mean by full VPLS support.?From: gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; ulrik.iv...@excanto.se
Subject: RE: Limited number of VFIs
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:12:57 +0300
Even with a different IOS image ? or template change ?
From: gunner_...@live.com
To:
Hi allI have ME3600X with the below software and licence
System image file is flash:/me360x-universal-mz.153.binLicense Level:
AdvancedMetroIPAccessLicense Type: Permanent
I am configuring several VFIs , when I reach number 27 (total) I get prompted
that I have reached the maximum number , is
Even with a different IOS image ? or template change ?
From: gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Limited number of VFIs
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:58:46 +0300
SW(config)#l2 vfi test autodiscovery
Maximum number of VFIs 26 have been configured.
% Cannot create more
SW(config)#l2 vfi test autodiscovery
Maximum number of VFIs 26 have been configured.
% Cannot create more VFIs
From: gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Limited number of VFIs
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:55:47 +0300
Hi allI have ME3600X with the below software and licence
I have several BGP uplinks with full routing table , there is a specific AS
number that I want the upload to it to use a certain link/neighbor , can i use
as-path access-list to do that ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hi allWhat is the best Asset Management (free) software to use ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
to be advertised to another
link (for redundancy) ?
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:05:26 +0100
From: g...@greenie.muc.de
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Outbound Traffic
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:55:40PM +0200, M K wrote:
Can i Control the outgoing
Can i Control the outgoing traffic for a specific prefix to use a specific
neighbor and the incoming traffic for the same prefix to use also the same
prefix ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I have two connections to my service provider (one is active and the other is
standby)The provider gave me /29 public subnet to use , am establishing the BGP
with him over private subnetI have an exchange server that is assigned an IP
address from the public poolNow , we had another new
I have the below setup
R2 -- R3| /R1
Each router has a PC connected to itThe setup implement a flat OSPF setup (area
0)
Now , the trace from PC1 (Connected to R1) to PC3 (Connected to R3) will go
through the link between R1 and R3 which is normalNow , I have raised the cost
from the
...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 3/8/15, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
HiWhat is the best setup for NTP to be implemented in a network ?Linux
server with ntpd package installed and all devices pointing to it ? or a
core router with public access synchronized with public clock
/collateral/switches/me-3400-series-ethernet-access-switches/prod_white_paper0900aecd806ec6fa.pdf
- Ed
On Mar 3, 2015, at 09:39, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
I have the below topology
SW1 -- SW2 -- SW3SW1 and SW2 already ar part from a ring that is running REP
(i.e. no spanning -tree
HiWhat is the best setup for NTP to be implemented in a network ?Linux server
with ntpd package installed and all devices pointing to it ? or a core router
with public access synchronized with public clock and all devices pointing to
it ?
I have the below topology
SW1 -- SW2 -- SW3SW1 and SW2 already ar part from a ring that is running REP
(i.e. no spanning -tree on the link between SW1 and SW2)No , I got a new switch
(SW4) and connect it to SW1 and SW3 (which means I have now closed circuit)My
questions is , would that be an
:15:14 +
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DR location
From: and...@2sheds.de
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:45 PM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hii have a customer requesting to have a DR in another country (other than the
primary one)What is the best
Hii have a customer requesting to have a DR in another country (other than the
primary one)What is the best solution to offer ? He is asking for the same IP
address to move to the DR in case of the failure of the primary node is that
possible ?!
:32:14 +0100
From: g...@greenie.muc.de
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L2 Switchover
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:28:39AM +0200, M K wrote:
I practiced IP SLA and EEM before but my question is if he using only one
subnet between him and me
...@greenie.muc.de
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: mkkai...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L2 Switchover
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:10:10AM +0200, M K wrote:
Thanks for the repliesI am establishing eBGP session with this provider ,
but because the distance is far
HiI have ASR9k , I got a new connection from a provider through SDH (active ,
backup)How can I trace if I lost connectivity as there is L2 device in between
and move the traffic over the backup link
___
cisco-nsp
timers does failover for you. Second, use BFD,
and you will have subsecond failover.
Best Regards.
15 Фев 2015 г. 18:03 пользователь M K gunner_...@live.com написал:
HiI have ASR9k , I got a new connection from a provider through SDH (active ,
backup)How can I trace if I lost connectivity
I have ME3400 with one of the connections is configured as trunk and port-type
nniI applied storm-control on the interface and service was degraded , when I
make the port access everything is fine , is there any restriction on the
trunk/access setup on the port?
Hi I am configuring storm-control for broadcast and multicast trafficThe
service is affected even on the unicast frames
From: luky...@hotmail.com
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Storm-Control
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:52:51 +0100
I have ME3400 with
Hi allI have ASR9k running CGN NAT44 and I need to graph some outputsFirst ,
how to pull a specific output if it has no OID ? and Does Cisco has OIDs for
ASR9k ISM ?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi I have configured policy-map on SVI with a rate of 600M and I noticed that
there was a drop and solwness on did not reach the configured vlaue , smaller
vlaues works fine , is there anything extra has to be configured ?
From: gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Policing on 7613
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:19:44 +0200
Hi I have configured policy-map on SVI with a rate of 600M and I noticed that
there was a drop and solwness on did not reach the configured vlaue , smaller
vlaues works
Hi allHave anyone tried tools for MPLS networks penetration testing?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
09, 2014 03:07:33 PM M K wrote:
Hi allHave anyone tried tools for MPLS networks
penetration testing?
What is MPLS penetration testing?
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Does the E1 interface support MPLS ?Anyone tried E1 interface on GNS3 ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi allI have the below topologyCE1 -- PE1 -- P -- PE2 -- CE2RIPv2 is the PE-CE
routing protocol
Now , I have configured two VRFs , one for each customer They are unable to
communicate due to the route-target import values on both endsWhen I add the
import value to each PE , they are able to
Hi all , I was testing some issues regarding the start-up configuration
fileWhen I issued the command delete flash:config.text and reloaded the router
, the start-up configuration gone , so the question is the start-up
configuration is saved on NVRAM or flash?
Thanks
Hi , I have the below EEM script and am trying to do it using IOS XR
event
manager applet SLA_OUT
event snmp oid 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.42.1.2.9.1.6.2
get-type exact entry-op eq entry-val 1 exit-op eq exit-val 2 poll-interval 5
action 1.0 syslog msg Test
action 1.1 cli command enable
action
In MPLS network if a router receives the same route from global and at the same
time through a VRF , will there be a problem ? it will prefer one over the
other ? we are using the same routing protocol
Thanks
Hi
I have two IOS XR boxes , am establishing iBGP relation based on their loopback
0 interfaces
What am trying to do is to filter a route from being advertised
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR2#sh bgp ipv4 unicast neighbors 10.10.10.10 advertised-routes
Wed Jun 4 17:52:20.748 UTC
NetworkNext Hop
Hi all
I am having issue establishing ISIS between IOS and IOS XR
IOS
R1#sh run int lo0 | inc ipv6
ipv6 address 2001::1/128
ipv6 router isis 1
R1#sh run int fas1/0 | inc ipv6
ipv6 address 2001:192:102::1/64
ipv6 router isis 1
router isis 1
net 49.0001...0001.00
is-type level-2-only
Thanks man !
From: oboeh...@cisco.com
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISIS IOS and IOS XR
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:17:33 +
-Original Message-
From: M K gunner_...@live.com
Date: Tuesday, 3 June 2014 11:03
To: cisco-nsp
Hi all
I have configured the following
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR2#sh run int lo3
Thu May 29 14:47:34.482 UTC
interface Loopback3
ipv4 address 192.168.200.20 255.255.255.0
!
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR2#sh run int lo4
Thu May 29 14:47:36.912 UTC
interface Loopback4
ipv4 address 192.168.201.20 255.255.255.0
Hi all
I have the below configuration
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#sh run ipsla
Mon May 12 14:23:06.005 UTC
ipsla
operation 1
type icmp echo
destination address 192.168.102.1
frequency 5
!
!
schedule operation 1
start-time now
life forever
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#sh ipsla statistics 1
Mon May 12
Thanks a lot man , I forgot about it !
It worked well
BR,
From: darre...@outlook.com
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CsC IOS XR
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:03:02 +0100
What does your MPLS config look like? You need /32 static routes on XR for
labelled
Hi all
I am simulating CsC using Cisco IOS XR (on GNS3)
The topology looks like below
R5 -- R1 -- XR1 -- R2 -- R3 -- R4 -- R6
I am using BGP as the PE-CE routing protocol in order to achieve connectivity
between R1 lo0 and R4 lo0 and it's done
Now , I have configured OSPF as the routing protocol
add send-lifetime .. to the key? It might not be active without
it..
key chain KEY
key 1
key-string password cisco
cryptographic-algorithm md5
send-lifetime 01:01:00 january 01 2014 infinite
-Original Message-
From: M K gunner_...@live.com
Date: Wednesday, 23 April
...@gmail.com
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I think the next line after authentication keychain is
cryptographic-algorithm MD5
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:55 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi all
I am facing an issue when configuring EIGRP authentication between IOS
Hi all
I am facing an issue when configuring EIGRP authentication between IOS and IOS
XR
R1#sh run | sec key chain
key chain KEY
key 1
key-string cisco
R1#sh run int f0/0 | inc authen
ip authentication mode eigrp 1 md5
ip authentication key-chain eigrp 1 KEY
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#sh run key
Can ERSPAN be simulated on GNS3 with virtual machines ?is there any router
model like 7200 that can support ?
Thanks
From: gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: ERSPAN
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 01:09:10 +0300
Hi AllI was looking into the Cisco software advisor looking for
Hi AllI was looking into the Cisco software advisor looking for the ERSPAN on
the 3560 model , but did not find the keywordis the feature supported ? what is
the minimum ?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Is there what so called Layer 7 NAT ?I know layer 3 and Layer 4 (PAT) !
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi I have two hosts connected to vlan 10 on the same switchI want to prevent
the communication between the two hostsI have tried using vlan access-map and
it functioned wellBut when I configure mac access-list it did notmac
access-list extended MCLdeny any host ..interface fas0/0mac
the router due to
unreachabilityand as EEM only triggers on up-down
transition, it only takes action when the probe was up at least once. so this
is good..oliFrom: M K gunner_...@live.commailto:gunner_...@live.comDate:
Wednesday, 5 March 2014 09:26To: Oliver Boehmer
oboeh...@cisco.commailto:oboeh
Hi allI have configured private vlans on one switch and all is working as
expectedNow , I have connected another switch and placed one of the community
Vlan hosts to the second switchMy question is from the second switch the
promiscuous port will be the trunk port or there is additional
:22:00 +
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Private Vlans
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
You need to replicate the private vlan to the second switch.
Jey S.
Network Engineer
CCIE #41608
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Mar 2014, at 15:16, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi
Hi , thanks and sorry for the late replyI am facing some issues with the script
, when the IP SLA is down , the router did not wait for the 5 minutes , it
reloaded directly
From: oboeh...@cisco.com
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Event Manager Script
Hi allI am trying to do a event manager script that will do the below and need
some assistanceI want to ping to a specific destination and if the ping request
timed out for a period of for example 5 minutes , the router should be reloaded
Thanks
Hi allCan I control the session timeout via CLI ? i.e. I want each PPPoE
session to be disconnected automatically after for example 24 hours?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Thanks for the replyU mean the timeout absolute 1400 0 , for example for 24
hours it should be 1440 ?
BR,
From: c...@marenda.net
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: AW: [c-nsp] PPPoE Session
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:43:50 +0100
Hi all
Can I control the session
Hi allCan anyone share good LLD documents template?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi I am trying to configure DHCPv6 , i am using
c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.152-4.S2When I configure the server I found all the
commands But when I configure the client I cannot find the command ipv6 address
dhcp from interface configuration mode ?I enabled ipv6 unicast-routing
@puck.nether.net
You have to use :
Ipv6 address autoconfig
Jey S.
Network Engineer
CCIE #41608
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Jan 2014, at 12:17, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi I am trying to configure DHCPv6 , i am using
c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.152-4.S2When I configure
of ND to achieve this and stateless autoconfig
There are different methods to autoconfig in IPv6 you may want to research
this, like EUI-64 which makes use of the end systems mac address.
Jey S.Network EngineerCCIE #41608
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Jan 2014, at 19:49, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote
2014 23:12:59 +0200
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCPv6
From: eu...@imacandi.net
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: sjeyamur...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:52 PM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Yes I am aware of the ND and EUI-64 methods , but i want to implement this
methodI
HiI have two routers connected to each other via two serial connections I have
two subnets on R1 : 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24192.168.0.0/24 is used for
Data and 192.168.1.0/24 is used for VoiceNow , I want to use the first
connection for the Data traffic , and the other connection for
...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
2 AS would not do the job if its connected routes, only if you learn
the destination via EIGRP, the 2 AS solution will work.
Jey S.
Network Engineer
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Dec 2013, at 08:07, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
HiI have two
Hi allI was working with named eigrp configuration , i was trying to apply
offset-list for a route i learned through ospf which was redistributed into
eigrp The issue i was facing is that when i set the offset to 1000 , the metric
increased by 7 , 2000 it increased by 15 , 3000 by 23why?
Hi I was working on a setup to test the OSPF conditional injection of a default
routeIt worked me fine for Serial connection , but for Ethernet media it did
not why ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi Oliver :)My config is so simpleR1 - R2 - R3
R2 is configured with a static route pointing to R1 (external network)ip route
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.12.1I configured an access-list matches the link
between R1 and R2R2access-list 1 permit 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.255route-map MAP
permit 10match ip
Hi I have two unequal cost paths to reach a specific destinationI configured
variance and the two routes are installed in the routing tableHow can I use the
low cost always with keeping the other one installed in the routing table ?
...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
- Original Message -
From: M K gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 1:55 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] EIGRP Variance
Hi I have two unequal cost paths to reach
Hi I have the below topologyR1 -- R2||R3 -- R4
I have configure MPLS L3VPN with R1 and R2 are my PE routersThe PE-CE routing
protocol is EIGRP AS 100All links are Serial connectionsNow , I have configured
vrf sitemap with bgp extcommunity soo equals to 100:1 (the same defined in the
VRF
I have Cisco CISCO7606-S (R7000) with 48 SFM-capable 48 port 10/100/1000mb
RJ45 moduleNow , I have 5 ports connected to my WiMAX ASN gateway via two vlans
one to the access side and the other one connected to the core sideThe issue am
facing now is some of the ports are into errdisable state
...@gmail.com
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Are you saying the actual IPSec peer is lost or simply the hosts become
unreachable? Could you give us a few show commands?
E #21508
Regards,
Ernest McCaleb
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:35 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote
The IPSEC is working fine , once I activate the NAT , i lose the IPSEC with
unreachable response to ICMP traffic The weird thing is that I am configuring
the access-lists properly , what could be the issue ?
From: gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: IPSEC and NAT
Date:
Thanks for the replies , I just wanted to know how these values were extracted
or if there was a specific formula like the one used for EIGRP metric or OSPF
cost
BR,
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:09:22 +
From: a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk
To: eng_m...@hotmail.com
CC: gunner_...@live.com;
What is the formula to assign a value of 19 to FE interfaces and other values
to other interfaces?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
HiWhat will be the Mac-address of an etherchannel ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi , If i have multiple DHCP pools configured on a router , how can I control
the client from which pool it should be assigned an IP address?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of M K
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 3:45 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] DHCP Server
Hi , If i have multiple DHCP pools configured on a router , how can I control
the client from which pool it should be assigned an IP
Hi all
I have the below setup
R1 - R2 - R3 - R4
R1 and R4 has loopback interfaces that needs to communicate via IPSEC
established between R1 and R4
R2 and R3 has EBGP relation
The IPSEC is working fine
When I configure a loopback interface on R2 and R3 and advertise it in BGP in
order for the
ad v6 prefixes
respectively. The latter is generally recommended.
Regards
Harold
Le 2013-11-03 08:54, « M K » gunner_...@live.com a écrit :
Hi Sander and thanks for the replyI actually converted the numbers into
hexadecimal , and am running dual stacked network IPv4 and IPv6but how
Hi all I was working on a test LAB on GNS3 , the Lab contains both IPv4 and
IPv6 with different routing protocolsThe starnge issue is that when I issue the
show ip bgp on one of the routers
I find the IP address 32.1.1.146 as a next-hopdid anyone face this before ?
Hi Sander and thanks for the replyI actually converted the numbers into
hexadecimal , and am running dual stacked network IPv4 and IPv6but how am going
to block this IP address from appearing in the show ip bgp output ?
Thanks again
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address
From:
Hi allI have a prefix that is originated let us say in AS 300 and the route is
installed in the routing table normallyR1 (the router that receives the route)
has an iBGP relation with R2Can I influence the origin of this prefix and
advertise it to R2 ?
Thanks
each router-pair
with loopback interfaces and static routes.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag
von M K
Gesendet: dimanche 6 octobre 2013 17:08
An: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Betreff: [c-nsp] OSPF Over FR
Hi , I
Hi , I have three routers R1 , R2 and R3R1 is the hub and is configured as below
R1#sh run int s0/0.123Building configuration...
Current configuration : 201 bytes!interface Serial0/0.123 multipoint ip address
192.168.123.1 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay map ip
192.168.123.3 103
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo