Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Nexus has it right - everything is "E" From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of aar...@gvtc.com Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 5:58 PM To: 'Nick Hilliard' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming This message originates from outside of your

Re: [c-nsp] cli auto-complete on configured names

There is a little bit of this on NXOS now - just a bit more each release, like tabbing out man-made prefix lists From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of aar...@gvtc.com Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 5:44 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] cli auto-complete on configured names This

Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

ens-dist uptime is 6 years, 2 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 52 minutes On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:35 PM Nick Cutting mailto:ncutt...@edgetg.com>> wrote: > My switch-stack entry: > > DSW-01#sh ver > Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version > 12.

Re: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ?

2.2(53)SE2 C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M 2 54WS-C3750X-48 12.2(53)SE2 C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 1:27 PM To: Aaron Gould ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ? Th

Re: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ?

Interested to see longest uptime on a switchstack. Cannot imagine it being more than 4 years. Stack disease always comes at you before long. From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 10:35 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you

Re: [c-nsp] 10/25 interface behavior

Or the way nexus does it - E for everything, best of all. From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Gehring Kai Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 6:41 AM To: Tom Hill ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10/25 interface behavior This message originates from outside of your organisation. At least

Re: [c-nsp] 3800 layer 2 Switch

No, but you might need to use the "force" and or the new command I got stuck on my first upgrade between these versions for hours before finding some obscure message board post about the force command. Something like this: Switch# software install file

Re: [c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

Is the tunnel source and destination IP addresses in vrf TEST, with routes? - Like a F-VRF. If this operates like an ASR/ISR4k - Then you can put the tunnel IP in whatever table you choose. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Peter Olsson Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF flapping between Nexus 7000 and ASR 1001x

Is that a dark fiber P2P or a an ISP provided "L2 over L3 P2P"? If it's the latter like an eLine link - could they be re-routing traffic on their underlay where the mtu changes maybe? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Richard Mikisa Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:58 AM

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Replacement

Don't forget the PHD in rocket surgery required for smartnet -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 12:05 PM To: ??ukasz Bromirski Cc: Gert Doering ; Cisco-nsp (cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Replacement

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 3548 No Traffic on a Port

What is the port? There is a certain port on that code that stops passing traffic like 17 or something -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 3:01 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 3548 No Traffic on a Port This

Re: [c-nsp] Migrating a LACP bond on Catalyst to a vPC on Nexus

Just run a trunk between the two with all the VLANs you need while you are migrating. It will not be hitless when moving the port-channels, as the LACP ID's will not match between the 3850 and the VPC member switches. Be conscious of your gateways, and check spanning tree is forwarding on

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 9K tcam carving question

ot; hardware access-list tcam region span 256 hardware access-list tcam region svi 0 hardware access-list tcam region sFlow Northstar 0 hardware access-list tcam region span 0 -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 3:25 PM To: Satish P

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 9K tcam carving question

Are you using a span session? If so - then you cannot run SFLOW at the same time. Is this a GEN1 or GEN2 9300? EX or FX? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Satish Patel Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 3:15 PM To: Cisco Network Service Providers Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 9K

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol

But I think the discussion is not the CE-PE IGP relationship that gets put into a L3VPN, then tunneled via MPLS, but connecting the CE to his internal IS-IS (possibly not in a VRF) that is used to connect his BGP loopbacks in his SP network? I may have the wrong end of the stick -Original

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

(tstevens) Cc: Nick Cutting ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance This message originated from outside your organization. Thanks Tim, Here is the output of show hardware rate-limiter. ( i believe it's 40k) This is my first time dealing with SFLOW, Can

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

Stevenson (tstevens) Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:20 AM To: Nick Cutting ; Satish Patel ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance This message originated from outside your organization. Make sure you distinguish between N9300 (1st generation) and N9300

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

We use sflow on 9300's, no performance hit - but you cannot use span sessions at the same time. Newer code revisions support netflow, without the SPAN session limitation, although we have not tried netflow on the 9300 yet. For a collector We use NFSEN - opensource, and quite a big install

[c-nsp] DFZ on Nexus 9300EX/FX

Newer versions of NXOS for these platforms support "internet peering mode" Up to 1,000,000 routes. Is anyone using this hardware / routing template and taking in the full table? Table 3. LPM Routing Modes for Cisco Nexus 9300-EX Series Switches LPM Routing Mode CLI Command: system routing

[c-nsp] DFZ on Nexus 9300EX/FX

Newer versions of NXOS for these platforms support "internet peering mode" Up to 1,000,000 routes. Is anyone using this hardware / routing template and taking in the full table? Table 3. LPM Routing Modes for Cisco Nexus 9300-EX Series Switches LPM Routing Mode CLI Command: system routing

Re: [c-nsp] Console connections

We use lots of opengear. Expensive - but awesome I did just roll out a cisco 4431 with 3 octal cables for a client though, but opengear has way more features and supports 2 people at once on the lines etc -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday,

Re: [c-nsp] Connect "normal" Service instance to Vlan on Switch module

Cutting Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Connect "normal" Service instance to Vlan on Switch module This message originates from outside of your organisation. Ambiguous because dot1 could be dot1ad or dot1q ? Aaron > On Nov 16, 2018, at 3:14 PM, Nick Cutting wro

[c-nsp] Connect "normal" Service instance to Vlan on Switch module

I am not sure if this is possible. I have an ISR (IOS XE, 16.8) And I have a working service instance bridging the two WAN ports interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 no ip address negotiation auto service instance 901 ethernet encapsulation untagged bridge-domain 901 interface

Re: [c-nsp] Has there been a Cisco network device with GE management port while other ports are FE or lower?

Hmm I seem to remember on some older version of the CSR code (cloud services router) they had a G0 interface. Also - the only other place you might see it is on a 8xx series router. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Martin T Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 12:27 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] What causes mac table relearning?

If it is a trunk to a server - enable "portfast trunk" so it is unaffected by TCN's. When you say you do not run spanning tree - what do you mean by that? You disabled it for certain VLAN's or the whole switch? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Garrett Skjelstad Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] Idiot checking LC compatibility across different 7600 chassis.

The 6148's are so bad - I think they share 1g of bandwidth per 8 ports. I saw a client dropping TB's a day with these linecards. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Tom Hill Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Idiot

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN 1 troubles?

Sorry my 12.2 code is: Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) I pasted in the bootloader earlier -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 9:07 AM To: John Osmon ; cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN 1 troubles?

Well the big change that I seemed to care about was they added local routes to the route table, the /32 of configured interfaces. I can't say I've ever seen anything different with the way tagged and untagged traffic was treated. We have a Vmware lab environment on 3560G's, running both 12.2 and

[c-nsp] VTI support in ASA multiple contexts

gle mode only. Regards, Nick Cutting ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gb for VSAN

Nexus 93xx are also suitable for this task. We have tested VSAN on these. They talk about buffers in the VSAN Docs? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Tom Hill Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 8:20 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10Gb for VSAN This message

[c-nsp] ASA VTI tunnel OSPF Support

Cisco peoples, Any plans to implement VTI OSPF support? Or is this a limitation because of ASA Multicast support. I ask because ASA multiple contexts share a single BGP process, but not OSPF processes. Thank you Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's

Quick question as I am clueless on large SP networks (I'm a MSP guy not an ISP guy )- why not area 0.0.0.0 ? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:08 PM To: ring...@mail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] Leaked Video or Not (Linux and Cisco for internal Sales folks)

I like Cisco - feels good when I type commands into the CLI. I have faith in my fingers Having too strong an opinion is bad for your internal chill zone, do not be mean to cisco man, not on this list ! -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Tails Pipes Sent: Friday, June

Re: [c-nsp] DHCP server

I agree with Mark - why not do this on a server? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of james list Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2018 8:24 AM To: c...@marenda.net Cc: cisco-nsp NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP server This message originates from outside of your organisation. Just one

Re: [c-nsp] DHCP server

ISR-44k is much cheaper than ASR 1k for forwarding in hardware But DHCP server is all done on CPU - so you could get away with a much cheaper software router like a ISR43xx Do you mean the catylyst 9300 series? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of james list Sent: Friday,

Re: [c-nsp] Looking for PoE switch with low depth, preferred stackable

Does it need routing protocols? If not, the new fanless 2960-L series (the white ones) seem to be quite a bit thinner. The 48 port is 11.5 inches. The 24 port is 10.45 inches NIckC -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of chiel Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 7:39 AM To: 'NSP -

Re: [c-nsp] Back on this list? How? cisco-nsp balancing on portchan (4500X->ASR1006)

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Alisha Valente Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 12:11 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Back on this list? How? cisco-nsp balancing on

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 93240YC-FX2 Switch

One more question - I see the FX series supports up to 1.7 million routes, but is slightly slower at pure pps forwarding. Are these positioned as more of a "router" than the EX series? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of N

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 93240YC-FX2 Switch

YC-FX2 Switch This message originates from outside of your organisation. On 5/14/2018 09:22, Nick Cutting wrote: > This is an interesting looking switch. > > There does not seem to be any specific documentation outside of the hardware > install and the generic nexus guide. > I imagine t

[c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 93240YC-FX2 Switch

This is an interesting looking switch. There does not seem to be any specific documentation outside of the hardware install and the generic nexus guide. I imagine there will be a little show on these and its buddies at cisco live. Does anyone know if like it's generation 1 brother the Nexus

Re: [c-nsp] VPN tunnel between two Cisco 3825's

This license should be fine the SEC-K9 was a requirement for 29xx, 39xx and 4xxx - but 28xx and 38xx just needed the right IOS. As other have said - you should debug, while sourcing pings from the interesting source traffic. Maybe open IP on the ACL to the peer address while you are

Re: [c-nsp] MACSec Stages

I agree - I spent weeks with TAC cases open etc. and Cisco has no idea how this works either. I gave up and built a L3 routed VPN. I am waiting for the How-to article by Jeremey Stretch! -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Alex K. Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] Open Networking Switches feedback

I am also interested in hearing about success or horror stories relating to this. We have some many complex connections between clients and public clouds and old / new datacenters, with MacGyver solutions and spaghetti everywhere - I sometimes think I need those 271.5 features in my top of rack

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast in VRF

Like Aaron said - sounds like it is switching from receiver -> RP receiver -> source tree, it usually does after one packet. Where is the RP if you are using spare mode? 10.0.0.1 - did you have the config for that? Are you testing from a host on the source VLAN of just from the 6500 ?

Re: [c-nsp] many 2960-X rebooting today

I'm reasonably certain it was exploited - the last MSG is related to the bug. "Stack for process SMI IBC server process running low" -Original Message- From: Brandon Applegate [mailto:bran...@burn.net] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 2:28 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@e

Re: [c-nsp] many 2960-X rebooting today

] On Behalf Of Brandon Applegate Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 1:19 PM To: cisco-nsp mailing list <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] many 2960-X rebooting today This message originates from outside of your organisation. > On Mar 16, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Nick Cutting <ncutt..

[c-nsp] many 2960-X rebooting today

Anyone seen a number of internet facing 2960-X switches restart today? We have had 3 different clients, 6 different switches all reboot today. No uptime in common, no code version in common. One of them has WS-C2960X-24TS-L - Version 15.2(2)E6 The only thing they do have in common is that

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920

use BPDU's were not processed on this VLan it may be bad. NIck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 7:06 AM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: R

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920

on't think this is possible with an untagged frame on the client side - unless anyone else has any ideas? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 5:07 PM To: Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu>;

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 5:04 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com>; Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for loc

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920

Sorry to drag this one up - Gert did you ever get a working config for this? I plan on using a pair of 920's with a layer 2 broadcast domain on the 12 gigabit Ethernet ports, and using the 10g ports to connect to separate carriers, bust also use 1 10g port to carry the HSRP for the /24 customer

Re: [c-nsp] SSH through ASA to switch inside

Miller Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 3:38 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SSH through ASA to switch inside This message originates from outside of your organisation. Just to update, I went the VPN route, worked great. Thank you all. On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Nick

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

Thanks ! I have the newest driver to try tomorrow. I have not tried windows on the 12SZ yet From: George Giannousopoulos [mailto:ggian...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 2:40 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSO

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

Cooper Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 2:30 PM To: cisco-nsp (cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net) <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB This message originates from outside of your organisation. > On 5 Mar 2018, at 19:20, Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com>

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

[mailto:ch...@marget.com] Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 1:54 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB This message originated from outside your organization. Hi Nick, I can't help, but never having seen one, I'm c

[c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

I cannot for the life of me get the USB - USB console port to work on the 12 port ASR920 It is running 3.18 - I see this because I can see text at boot time, but it will not let me type anything at all. The lead time at the moment on the EIA/232 converter is 75 days. This is what I used to

Re: [c-nsp] SSH through ASA to switch inside

This only works through a VPN, and only with "management access inside" enabled on the inside interface. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Miller Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2018 12:47 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] highly available ipsec vpn

What devices? ISR / ASR ? static VTI tunnels or DMVPN? Try not to mix HSRP and routing - HSRP is just for gateways. If you need two tunnels you will need a routing protocol. Send us the design you need to accomplish -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Core layer device n7004 vs n9396px

I have use both of these as campus core's before(years apart), simple setups. I believe the 9396PX is far cheaper for the speeds you get. Just remember what is missing - such as OTV / VDC. Done many nexus 9k deployments in the last year, no complaints. All the BGP I have done on the 9k has

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ISR 4331

Speed or features? These devices have feature parity with the previous generations of ISR. 2900 / 2800 etc -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Harry Hambi - Atos Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 8:34 AM To:

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

Big dog mpls multiprocol bgp etc but the fancy stuff is missing Nick Cutting > On Jan 18, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN > <cisco-...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote: > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > Hi, > >> On

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

Like Tristan - we have not made the Jump to Denali yet either. Most of our 3850's and 3850 stacks are on client sites that do not need the MPLS functionality. I have also no used the rollback command switch at upgrade time -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

What did you upgrade from? It is the microcode (asic programming) that takes the longest time. I have never waited longer than 45 minutes - but that is on 3.x -> 3.x Denali is where they added MPLS, which is a major overhaul in this "slow part of the upgrade" - the ASIC programming

Re: [c-nsp] RAM for 4431 with full BGP table?

I would also like to know the answer to this. I always get scared and buy 16 gig if I'm taking in the full routing table. (4431/4451/4351 so far) I'm sure I could get away with 8. Not sure about 4, would love to know -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Opinions

Netflow - Requires an extra license Only works at 1gig So we did not bother. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 1:31 PM To: Cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G backplane throughput

[mailto:ckn...@savage.za.org] On Behalf Of Chris Knipe Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 7:38 AM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp (cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net) <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G backplane throughput This message originated from

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G backplane throughput

Of Nick Cutting Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 7:29 AM To: Bryan Holloway <br...@shout.net>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G backplane throughput This message originates from outside of your organisation. Use this command: sh platform pm platform-block Should be on

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G backplane throughput

Use this command: sh platform pm platform-block Should be one ASIC per 24 ports, so a TS should have 1 asic for the normal ports and one for the SFP's. On a my 48portTS, the SFP's are shared across the two normal ASIC's (48 copper ports) I just removed my lab 3560g-24TS so I can't be 100

Re: [c-nsp] multiple GRE on the same gear

I'm am 99 percent certain this does not happen on anything but the 6500, it is something to do with the hardware forwarding not able to handle an extra field to index something. One of Ivan Pepelnjak's webinars talked more about it (the 6500 having the issue) - and he mentioned ISR / ASR did

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-area Summarization problem on Nexus 9508

What code are you running? On my N9k it accepts both: Software BIOS: version 07.61 NXOS: version 7.0(3)I6(2) BIOS compile time: 04/06/2017 NXOS image file is: bootflash:///nxos.7.0.3.I6.2.bin NXOS compile time: 10/17/2017 19:00:00 [10/17/2017 21:48:10] SW-01(config)# router ospf

Re: [c-nsp] cisco ip nat question

There is more to it. What is the model and code version of the router? - we need these to help you with the configuration. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 6:50 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] CISCO-AVAGO CISCO-FINISAR etc SFPs

NOT be supported by TAC. If you can get a third party optic to work without the command – are they supported by TAC? It is a grey area for sure. From: CiscoNSP List [mailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:24 AM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com>; Doug McIntyr

Re: [c-nsp] CISCO-AVAGO CISCO-FINISAR etc SFPs

No, they still rip you off big time. Just got quoted on a 10g SFP+ singlemode SFP for roughly 70 times more expensive than the equivalent component in fiberstore. I gave the client the option for both - $40 $2,847.76 And they went with the genuine cisco part, because of our scary disclaimer

[c-nsp] Cisco Catalyst 9300

Given that these are running 16.5 (Everest) and it is very new - is anyone running these in production yet? I feel the 3850/3650 will be EOL in the next year or so - and these are reasonably priced. I think if these are production ready we could begin to buy these for our clients and be more

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

...@foobar.org] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:26 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump This message originated from outside your organization Nick Cutting wrote: > I didn’t seem to be able to use that command on a N

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:13 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump This message originated from outside your organization Nick Cutting wrote: > Doesn't look like sfl

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

Wouldn't the syntax be "-s 1000", rather than "-s -1000"? jms On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, Nick Cutting wrote: > So as usual - my netflow routers are coming up with the correct size data in > nfsen, but sFlow is about 2.5 times as much traffic. > > Does anyone have

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

So as usual - my netflow routers are coming up with the correct size data in nfsen, but sFlow is about 2.5 times as much traffic. Does anyone have a cisco sflow config that works with nfsen - sampling rate etc? sflow sampling-rate 4096 <-- this is 512? sflow max-sampled-size 128 sflow

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 3850 eigrp - sending goodbye - can't ping any 224.0.0.10

Ahh sounds like one of many bugs in the early release of the 3850 series. Do you know what code they are on? -Original Message- From: Aaron Gould [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 8:37 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net S

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 3850 eigrp - sending goodbye - can't ping any 224.0.0.10

What is the type of link between the devices - does it support multicast? What happens is you use the neighbor command to force unicast? Please provide configrations and run "sh eigrp plugins" on both to check versions. Also check "sh ip eigrp events" And then turn on debugs debug ip eigrp

Re: [c-nsp] RSPAN and IP phones

can think of to do it will one destination port and RSPAN is use a third switch as the destination. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:05 PM To: Steven Pfister <spfis...@dps.k12.oh.u

Re: [c-nsp] RSPAN and IP phones

It has been a while since I have done this - but I have battled this exact setup a few times. I seem to remember that the local switch needs to have a physical span destination, i.e not the rspan vlan - needs to be a port, and only the remote switch needs the rspan destination. The second

[c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

- or is it just that rocksteady? How comprehensive is the sFlow support - this is one reason we are moving away from solarwinds. (and we got rid of all our CaatOS gear - solarwinds was great at CatoS!) Any input greatly appreciated Nick Cutting ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7707 as Internet Edge Router?

Coming from the MSP (managed service provider) world where I am - EIGRP is great - I can summarize anywhere - and our cheap clients will only ever buy IP base licensed 3xxx switches. Even though they are on the 42nd floor of a 10 million dollar office with a giant leather rhinoceros...

[c-nsp] Physical Network TAP devices

appreciated. Thank you, Nick Cutting ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnels on 9k

ospf 200 area 0.0.0.0 tunnel source xx.xx.xx.xx tunnel destination xx.xx.xx.xx mtu 9000 bandwidth 10 no shutdown From: Arie Vayner [mailto:ar...@vayner.net] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:42 AM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com>; cisco-nsp (cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net) <

Re: [c-nsp] Embedded Packet Capture on ASR-920

On 21 Jun 2017 22:55, "Nick Cutting" <ncutt...@edgetg.com> wrote: Has anyone used this? I have used it on other IOS-XE routers 44xx/3xxx with no issues. My captures are empty on the ASR-920 Code running is: 03.18.01.SP.156-2.SP1-ext Any experiences greatly welcomed. Nick Hi N

[c-nsp] Embedded Packet Capture on ASR-920

Has anyone used this? I have used it on other IOS-XE routers 44xx/3xxx with no issues. My captures are empty on the ASR-920 Code running is: 03.18.01.SP.156-2.SP1-ext Any experiences greatly welcomed. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnels on 9k

Sorry - I mean nexus 9k, rather than ASR9000 And the ASr920 tunnels were ASR - ASR, not ASR -> nexus -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:25 AM To: cisco-nsp (cisco-nsp@puck.nether.

[c-nsp] GRE tunnels on 9k

Good morning, I am having some really crazy results when testing GRE tunnels on nexus 9k's. They seem to work about 10 percent of the time. I am going a little mad thinking about where the stars and planets were when these tunnels worked. This is with the source and destination in the global

Re: [c-nsp] Migrating multi 1Gb port-chan member ints to 10G .....possible withot having to create a new portchan?

I think this is possible, but with a little bit of downtime when you change the new links from 1000 to ten gig. You should be able to lab this up with 1000Mbit and 100Mbit on an old switch, nothing laying around? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] ASR-920 10g License question

I have 4 x 10g ports on one of our ASR-920-4SZ-A's I am using 2 of them, but want to use the other 2. Does the 10g license do all 4 - or pairs of two ports? Index 5 Feature: 10GEupgradelicense Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use

Re: [c-nsp] Intelligent Bandwidth Management

I would also like to know these things. My boss is constantly talking about some kind of magical SD-WAN and how we need it. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Mason Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 2:46 PM To:

[c-nsp] 10g Copper Transceivers for SPF+

I brought this up in 2015 - and they were new to market then. I got a couple of greedy replies from traseiver vendors, but nothing from the wise old network wizards. The GLC-10G-T - which seems to fool the switch into thinking it is SR , so yes I agree with the naysayers it sounds like a bad

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Haha Gert your comments are the best. Probably so that a sales guy in a room crafting an expensive solution can use the NCS branding for more of the design he/she is proposing. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] STP and PVST..

On cisco switches - the next spanning tree instance after you hit the limit, is NOT created. I worked at a place that had cisco HP blade 3120's that had a hard limit of 128 instances, and we had 180 vlans. 50 or so of the vlans were NOT running spanning tree - but were blocked upstream on the

Re: [c-nsp] STP and PVST..

Once you get all devices to agree on the root bridge for RPVST+ (make sure vlan1 is allowed on the inter-vendor trunks) , You will also need for fast failover, to configure the downstream ports (servers / esx hosts etc) must be running portfast / portfast trunk. This stops them from

Re: [c-nsp] C3850 and NAT

I am 99 percent sure it is not supported, or if it is will be sent to the CPU. Look at nexus 3k or 9k for a $12000 line rate NAT switch. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of james list Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:17 PM To:

[c-nsp] OTV on ASR1001-x

Are there any throughput documents for OTV enabled ASR1k's ? In the design guide it only talks about not worrying about fragmentation for traffic under 1Gbs. I am specifically wondering about OTV throughput on a 10 gig Link. For maybe 1400 byte packets. Is anyone using this technology on a

[c-nsp] Nexus 93108TC-EX Breakout Support

This is the second generation 10 gig copper leaf switch with 100 gig uplinks. The first generation did not support 40 gig x 10 SFP+ breakouts on the uplinks. I believe this Generation 2 version does - (you can run the 100's at 40, and the 40's should support breakouts) I have looked at the

  1   2   3   >