Jens Link li...@quux.de writes:
On the bright side: Download worked for me using Debian Testing +
Firefox.
I stand corrected. It doesn't. :-(
Jens
--
-
| Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:03:44PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
Also, if you got the Walker Survey, make sure your sales rep
understands the impact this has on your responses. Their bonus is
impacted based on this response.
Now I understand why our sales rep is changing at least once
Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net writes:
I talked to Oscar, while I do agree with the image that you paint, he
also claimed that there was testing on more than 1 platform/OS.
Well Windows 2000, XP, Vista and 7 are different operating systems. And
testing isn't any good if you ignore the
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 02:53:29 pm Gert Doering wrote:
Now I understand why our sales rep is changing at least
once per year...
Oh yes - if your Sales rep. doesn't meet their quota (with
you), they will, very likely, be rotated at the end of the
fiscal year.
I've always been
-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Gert Doering; Jared Mauch
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced download procedure
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 02:53:29 pm Gert Doering wrote:
Now I understand why our sales rep is changing at least once per
year...
Oh yes - if your Sales rep. doesn't meet their quota (with you
On 9/18/09 5:59 AM, Eric Van Tol wrote:
My impression is that they take their feedback from customers that
don't use the Cisco site all that often and are caught up in the
mythical Web 2.0 garbage that keeps infecting the internet.
Except that, in Cisco's case, it's Web 2.0(45a)SXB12b. And
On Sep 21, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 9/18/09 5:59 AM, Eric Van Tol wrote:
My impression is that they take their feedback from customers that
don't use the Cisco site all that often and are caught up in the
mythical Web 2.0 garbage that keeps infecting the internet.
Except
The following might be of interest as a workaround.
Create a bookmark in your favorite browser and add the following in the
Location/URL field (all as one line):
javascript:eval('dlf_cart=' + cartData); for (dlf_i = 0; dlf_i
dlf_cart[goodCartContent].length; dlf_i++) {dlf_curcartpos =
Jared Mauch wrote:
fileName:s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SXI2a.bin
filePath:/swc/esd/03/crypto/3DES/281569550/contract
ftpServerName:download-sj.cisco.com
I was working on a greasemonkey-script for emulating the Java-applet, but hit a
couple of snags concerning binary output, so I did some
Stig,
I ran into a little trouble with your script at first, I was going to download
now, rather than the cart and it wasn't matching the page. I changed the
included page to http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/DownloadCart.x*
and now it matches for both download now and add to cart -
Ryan West wrote:
I ran into a little trouble with your script at first,
I was going to download now, rather than the cart and
it wasn't matching the page. I changed the included page to
http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/DownloadCart.x*
and now it matches for both download now and
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Stig Johansen wrote:
I've gone this road in the past a few times - feedback forms, Gold partner
escalation, emailing Cisco managers, and other than burning my time -
nothing good comes of it. Cisco has shed any people that truly understand
how things should work and what
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:50:28 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote
On Sep 17, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So, no GUI+java, no software center. Period.
~Seth
Actually, No javascript no software center.
Are you sure? The requirements list java, and when I disable it and leave
javascript
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Stig Johansen wrote:
Oscar Bauer wrote:
Unfortunately we cannot enabled Wget, cURL, Fetching URLs,
crawling or scripting as these may have been possible to use
in the past but were never supported when download software
from Cisco.com. However
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 6:37 AM
To: Stig Johansen
Cc: Cisco Mailing list
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced download procedure
Hi,
On Thu, Sep
] Enhanced download procedure
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:56:14PM +0200, Stig Johansen wrote:
Oscar Bauer wrote:
Unfortunately we cannot enabled Wget, cURL, Fetching URLs, crawling
or scripting as these may have been possible to use in the past but
were never supported when download
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:21:26PM +0100, Oliver Dewdney wrote:
1. You can download up to 25 files at a time.
Now this is obviously a wonderful replacement for this old-fashioned
mget *-is.vz* thingie those poor geeks must use in the ancient times.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 7:41 AM
To: Oliver Dewdney
Cc: Gert Doering; Cisco Mailing list
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced download procedure
Hi
I don't seem to be able to make it work at all, I get
There was a problem retrieving your cart information due to application
error. Please contact applications support.
Dave.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, blo...@newpaltz.edu wrote:
Words fail. Does Cisco not get this web thing?
No, and they never have. Anyone who's ever tried to -find- anything on
their sites (internal facing or external facing) knows that. :)
Boggle.
--
david raistrick
Jay Hennigan wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought
Dale W. Carder wrote:
Is there a workaround?
I found a workaround. I couldn't download a file due to
some stupid java error, so I opened a tac case for them
to give me the file.
Maybe after this happens enough times and costs them real
money it will get fixed.
That's even better than my
. Carder
Cc: Cisco Mailing list
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced download procedure
Dale W. Carder wrote:
Is there a workaround?
I found a workaround. I couldn't download a file due to
some stupid java error, so I opened a tac case for them
to give me the file.
Maybe after this happens enough times
I don't know if this will push Cisco. My experiences with TAC suggest that
they could throw several people on the job of ftp'ing files full time and it
would only lead to their competent TAC people solving real problems quicker;
one would no longer need to escalate every case immediately to get
Rodney Dunn wrote:
Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the direct
contacts for feedback.
They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
Rodney
Helpful constructive feedback ?!
I lost quite some time yesterday just to find out, that this
On Thursday 17 September 2009 02:38:22 pm Marian Ďurkovič
wrote:
I lost quite some time yesterday just to find out, that
this enhanced download is totally broken on Unix OS and
despite all the navigation through the directories it
always creates filenames in my home directory containing
From http://www.cisco.com/web/Downloads/SDS/Software_Downloads/FAQs.html#faq23
Q. The software file seems to download, but I cannot find it. What do I do?
A. If you are using a Unix based system such as a MAC, we have a known issue. The file name is getting prefixed with
the folder name. E.g
I hope everyone is engaging your account team and support orgs on this.
This download process is not acceptable, we still need the ability to
get at the direct link for images to stage them to a UNIX host in the
cloud.
I can not be placed in a position of supporting my network from a
On 17/09/2009 12:47, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
A. If you are using a Unix based system such as a MAC, we have a known
issue. The file name is getting prefixed with the folder name. E.g - if
you downloaded the file 'xyz.bin' to a folder 'abc', the file name in
the Unix directory will be
I have already given feedback quite a few times regarding my download experience (generally i don't like the idea of
using my account team for obvious things).
I welcome this new kind of downloader, but as i have wondered back then
(http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nspm=124712980900460w=2) this
Nick Hilliard wrote on 17/09/2009 15:20:
For the record, it took just over 5 minutes and about 30 mouse clicks to
find the software image I was looking for, starting off from the home
page. Once it started downloading, the rate meter was mostly pegged on
189kB/sec, but would
Jay Hennigan wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought
hi,
Your New Software Download Experience
its an experience alright. I'll give them that.
just not a good one :-(
alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
(Bcc of this goes to our account manager who should start shooting at
Cisco webmonkey headquarters, please)
jmai...@ttec.com (Joe Maimon) wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou ach...@forthnet.gr writes:
I had exactly the same experience too. To be honest i was hoping Cisco
would have atleast coded an applet capable of maxing download speed or
splitting the file in multiple parts and downloading all of them
concurrently.
If that improves
There are a lot of factors that can influence your max download speed.
Instead of messing with TCP window parameters for a 200ms distance, i would prefer to
open multiple connections for a small timeframe.
After all, i'm not going to download hundreds of images. I just need max speed for a few
There are a lot of factors that can influence your max download speed.
Instead of messing with TCP window parameters for a 200ms distance, i would prefer to
open multiple connections for a small timeframe.
After all, i'm not going to download hundreds of images. I just need max speed for a few
On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It
completely hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing.
Is there a workaround?
I found a workaround. I couldn't download a file due to
some stupid java error, so I opened
This wouldnt be such a problem if folks in the know could use nice
standardized
methods such as FTP or lynx compatible HTTP to download what they want,
regardless of which download method of the day is currently in effect.
Indeed. I have several of these odd network devices (they don't
- Rodney Dunn rod...@cisco.com wrote:
| Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the
| direct contacts for feedback.
|
| They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
I've sent them complaints before and filled out their surveys. And this comes
along.
Bruce A. Locke wrote:
- Rodney Dunn rod...@cisco.com wrote:
| Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the
| direct contacts for feedback.
|
| They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
I've sent them complaints before and filled out their
I have opened a dialog and have gotten what seem to be reasonable
responses from this person, who seems interested in our feedback.
Oscar Bauer - ba...@cisco.com
However, I just about had a Joe Wilson moment when he sent me the
following:
While we have seen some customers have challenges
Jay Hennigan wrote:
I have opened a dialog and have gotten what seem to be reasonable
responses from this person, who seems interested in our feedback.
Oscar Bauer - ba...@cisco.com
However, I just about had a Joe Wilson moment when he sent me the
following:
While we have seen some
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:38:22AM +0200, Marian ??urkovi?? wrote:
And, during the download it kept displaying that my download speed is
56 kb/s while the real speed was orders of magnitude higher.
When I noticed my download speed rapidly flickering back and forth
between 10kb/s and 1000kb/s I
On Sep 17, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
I have opened a dialog and have gotten what seem to be reasonable
responses from this person, who seems interested in our feedback.
Oscar Bauer - ba...@cisco.com
However, I just about had a Joe Wilson moment when he sent
On Sep 17, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
I have opened a dialog and have gotten what seem to be reasonable
responses from this person, who seems interested in our feedback.
Oscar Bauer - ba...@cisco.com
However, I just about had a Joe Wilson moment when he sent me the
following:
Rodney Dunn wrote:
Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the direct
contacts for feedback.
They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
Rodney
I'm really not in the mood for banging my head against the wall, so I'm asking
for help from all on this list.
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 13:41 -0700, Jay Hennigan wrote:
However, I just about had a Joe Wilson moment when he sent me the
following:
While we have seen some customers have challenges with the new
Java requirements, once we have been able to assist them getting their
configurations setup
- Stig Johansen stig.johan...@atea.no wrote:
| Oscar Bauer wrote:
| Unfortunately we cannot enabled Wget, cURL, Fetching URLs,
| crawling or scripting as these may have been possible to use
| in the past but were never supported when download software
| from Cisco.com. However there are
Stig Johansen wrote:
Rodney Dunn wrote:
Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the direct
contacts for feedback.
They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
Rodney
I'm really not in the mood for banging my head against the wall, so I'm
asking for
On Sep 17, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
So, no GUI+java, no software center. Period.
~Seth
Actually, No javascript no software center.
- Jared
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
-nsp] Enhanced download procedure
Rodney Dunn wrote:
Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the direct
contacts for feedback.
They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
Rodney
I'm really not in the mood for banging my head against the wall, so I'm
Jay Hennigan wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Dream on.
-Hank
I have opened a dialog and have gotten what seem to be reasonable responses
from this person, who seems interested in our feedback.
Oscar Bauer - ba...@cisco.com
However, I just about had a Joe Wilson moment when he sent me the
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought us
enhanced
It should work after you allow it.
Btw, it took me 1 hour to download an ASR1k IOS today with the new downloader!!!
And i couldn't find another way to download it.
--
Tassos
Jay Hennigan wrote on 15/09/2009 20:39:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in order
to download a file? What exactly is that Java applet doing? Could it
do something malicious? How do you know for sure?
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 -
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:09 PM
To: Cisco Mailing list
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced download procedure
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in order
to download a file? What exactly is that Java applet doing? Could it
do something malicious? How do you know for sure?
I can't
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access
your file system, since it presents its own file manager looking
thing so you can pick where to save the files. No way to know for
sure though.
Another reason to use
Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access your file
system, since it presents its own file manager looking thing so you can pick
where to save the files. No way to know for sure though.
But every browser has a built-in download utility so this
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in
order
to download a file? What exactly is that Java applet doing? Could
it
do
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access
your file system, since it presents its own file manager looking
thing so you can pick where to save the files. No way to know for
sure though.
But
Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the direct
contacts for feedback.
They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
Rodney
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I
You probably need to enabled cookies.
--
Tassos
Seth Mattinen wrote on 15/09/2009 21:22:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in order
to download a file? What exactly is that
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access your
file system, since it presents its own file manager looking thing so
you can pick where to save the files. No way to know for sure though.
I agree 100% It makes no sense to force people to use proprietary download
managers, especially when they fund the bandwidth used to retrieve the
file. :thumbdown:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:19 PM,
67 matches
Mail list logo
