Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Troy Lucero wrote: Seems there is no option here. The QSFP-40G/E-LR4 doesn't have an MPO connector like its' SR4 counterpart, so there is no MPO break-away option to choose from if I want to go 10gig over singlemode. Correct, LR4 is 4 10G CWDM waves over a single fiber

Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

Traditionally most people aren't using those for long reach applications just higher top of rack density, or within the same datacenter. But now switches are starting to come with more and more qsfp+ ports. Good news is optics vendors like Avago, Finisar, etc. are making what you want

Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

Thanks for the heads up on a 4x10 sm breakout, Phil. Do you happen to have a link for more info? I can't seem to find it in any online literature, or http://finisar.com/products/optical-modules/QSFP Probably something I will have to call and ask for. :-) tal -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] Changing ve id doesn't withdraw old prefixes

Hi Jason, It was myself on the packet exchange forum with the issue. After removing the config and reading the issue resolved itself. Have you tried removing the full config for the vfi and associated member ports and re-adding? Nick On 21/06/2013 00:37, Pshem Kowalczyk

Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out ofbox?

Thank you for the response, Mikael. Using the link you provided I was able to find the updated finisar presentation. (Note years later they are still using the good, bad, and the ugly bit.) Luckily there is now a slide illustrating precisely what I am looking for. (Page 9 on the following

[c-nsp] Point to Point L2VPN on ASR9K

Hi, Im working out P2P L2VPN between ASR9K and IOS platforms. Attachment circuits at both ends are configured with Vlan encapsulation. On IOS platform (NPE-G2), PW VC type is detected as ETHERNET VLAN (type 4) and on ASR9K, by default it is detected as ETHERNET (type 5). I changed the transport

Re: [c-nsp] Point to Point L2VPN on ASR9K

Hi, I have the same configuration as you describe. asr9k ---vc--- c7201 My PW is working. c7201#sh mpls l2transport vc 3882 Local intf Local circuit Dest addressVC ID Status - -- --- -- -- Gi0/1.3882

Re: [c-nsp] QSFP to SFP+ over 300 meters: Can it be done out of box?

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Troy Lucero t...@osihardware.com wrote: Anyone care to comment on trying to go from a 40gig port to a 10gig port over 300 meters? Yes its possible. No idea if Cisco offer it but certainly other vendors do. Its not a IEEE 'standard' but it certainly exists,

[c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Dear Friends, I am working on IPv6 deployment at our Backbone. Our network design is as below: PEs --- MP-BGP ---RR ( address-family vpnv4 ) RR-- BGP-IGW ( address-family ipv4 ) what i understand is : - Add address family IPv6 at PEs : address-family ipv6 neighbor x.x.x.x activate

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Dear Friends, I am working on IPv6 deployment at our Backbone. Our network design is as below: PEs --- MP-BGP ---RR ( address-family vpnv4 ) RR-- BGP-IGW ( address-family ipv4 ) what i understand is : - Add address family IPv6 at PEs :

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: We can say MP-BGP ( vpnv4 ) will carry IPv6 packets as a label across IPv4 MPLS Backone. Thanks in advance for sharing info. vpnv6 is what you need for 6VPE (IPv6 VRFs). 6PE is for Internet IPv6, and there you do it under address-family ipv6 unicast

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Thanks Mikeal, I have seen this dos and it is super useful, but still i need to confirm the plan for you guys !!! Regards, Ahmed On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Dear Friends, I am working on IPv6

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Thanks Mikeal. address-family ipv6 unicast but you add send-label. at PEs RR ? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: We can say MP-BGP ( vpnv4 ) will carry IPv6 packets as a label across IPv4 MPLS Backone.

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Check the link below http://eng-mssk.blogspot.com/2012/10/mpls-l3-vpn-6pe-ebgp-pe-ce-routing.html BR, Mohammad Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:57:16 +0300 From: hilmy...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE Dear Friends, I am working on IPv6 deployment

Re: [c-nsp] Changing ve id doesn't withdraw old prefixes

Hi Jason, I'm actually surprised it works for you with manually defined RDs on ME switches, looks like Cisco got that one fixed, yet unfortunately still not quite there with the bgp signaled VPLS I see :) adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

Hello Mikael, it is clear to add send-label at PEs RR. Now i am thinking about IGW, if we consider it as a PE so we have to enable MP-BGP. RR is directly connected to IGW, i am thinking to establish a new link for native IPv6 ? So at RR has two links connected to IGW, one of them is address

Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool

Hi all and thanks for the kind repliesActually i need it for my own , so I am looking for free tools BR, From: p...@wozney.ca Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:29:41 -0700 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Drawing Tool To: gunner_...@live.com CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:17 AM, M K

Re: [c-nsp] ipv6

Here is what we sort of followed: * Get your IPv6 block from your RIR; typically a /32 but we were able to negotiate a /28 * Come up with a good IPv6 address plan; spend some good time on this * Enable IPv6 connectivity to your upstream and public peering connections along with BGP *