Re: [c-nsp] 12.4(20)T oddities

I had the same issues with scrt and 20T, resolved it with the latest SCRT (some 6.1. beta) and a manual change to an .ini file. After this change SCRT works fine again with 20T. I have seen issues with trace backs as well, I do not have the exact text at hand, but each time I do a write after

Re: [c-nsp] GEIP or PA-GE

Tried Ebay? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sridhar Ayengar Sent: Thursday, 13 November, 2008 22:35 To: Cisco NSPs Subject: [c-nsp] GEIP or PA-GE Anyone know where I can GEIP, GEIP+ or PA-GE cards cheap? I'm running a

[c-nsp] 7600-RSP720-10GE - which IOS ?

Hi list, I will problably receive a rsp720-3CXL 10G to replace an rsp720-3C-GE later this week, and I am curious if any of of you can give me advice on which IOS version to go for.. I see I can choose from SRC,SRC1,SRC2 and SRD versions. Anyone has good/bad experiences with one of the above?

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 TCAM overflows; certain hosts unreachable?

Nate Carlson wrote: We're having some really odd issues with a pair of 6500's. We know that our TCAM table is overflowed, but it's worked fine up until now (new pair of SUP720-10GE's on order, but not here yet, of course.) Here's the TCAM errors we are getting, which are pretty typical:

Re: [c-nsp] Non-Israeli E1-over-IP products

NM-CEM-4TE1 4 Port T1/E1 Circuit Emulation over IP NM cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net wrote on 12/12/2008 11:24: Hi Team, I recommended RAD products for a client looking to accomplish TDM over IP. However, they say they cannot accept any products from Israel. :-) I was wondering

Re: [c-nsp] 32 bit ASN

My Cisco SE told me lat week 32b ASN will be supported in: 12.2(33)SRE for 7600 and 7200, due Q3 2009 :-( 12.4(24)T for ISR 28xx/38xx and 7200, due april 2009 Martin cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net wrote on 17/12/2008 17:32: Thanks Brian. IOS-XR and NX-OS seem the only OS's in the

Re: [c-nsp] Any good filters for syslog output

Eric Van Tol wrote: -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tuc at T-B-O-H Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:54 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Any good filters for syslog output Hi,

Re: [c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

1841 doesn't do voice. (It has no DSP's) 28xx surely will do the trick, and also 2600XM with NM-HDV2-1T1/E1. Martin On Wednesday, 24 December, 2008 22:17 L'argent wrote: I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in

Re: [c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/voiceden sity.pdf On Wednesday, 24 December, 2008 22:17 L'argent wrote: I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian phone

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

On Friday, 20 February, 2009 00:50 Justin Shore wrote: Jared Mauch wrote: another 'new' download area? as bad as the rejig they gave it last time? :-( Worse You now have to navigate a tree that may or may not tell you anything useful. Yeah, it's awful. And you can't sort by

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP temperature sensor

Do a snmpwalk on 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.3.1, this gives info on all the temp sensors in the box. Martin On Wednesday, 15 April, 2009 07:10 Engelhard Labiro wrote: Couldn`t find doco on cisco that state it has a temp.sensor..but sh env of the module indicates that the chassis is able to show

Re: [c-nsp] E1 packet loss

E1 errors are often caused by clocking issues - are you shure you should provide clocking on the A-end? Often clocking is provided by the network. Tried to switch on crc4? Martin On Friday, 11 June, 2010 14:18 Rens wrote: Hi all, I have 2 routers that are connected via a 3rd party E1

Re: [c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP autodiscovery

Hi Andrey, I have the same problem, but did not find the time yet to dive into this problem. Martin -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Anrey Teslenko Sent: Tue 15-Jun-10 11:43 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] H-VPLS BGP

[c-nsp] Cisco L2tp class with password and rancid

Hi lists, I have an issue when I configure a l2tp-class with a password in it, every time I do a sho run the level 7 encrypted password is shown differently. When using Rancid for config backups, every time Rancid runs I receive a complaint my config has changed. According to Cisco's TAC this is

Re: [c-nsp] [rancid] Cisco L2tp class with password and rancid

Thanks guys... I was afraid I would hear your solutions I think I will try to persuade Cisco to solve this issue, and in the mean time have Rancid ignore the level 7's :-( Martin -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]

Re: [c-nsp] [rancid] Cisco L2tp class with password and rancid

Hi John, My piece of l2tp config: l2tp-class class-name authentication more config lines password 7 level-7-encrypted-pass more config lines Martin cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net wrote on 07/07/2010 07:14: Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Alan Buxey: Hi, I have an issue

Re: [c-nsp] CRC fixing

2 options, Faulty serial port or issue with the link (have the provider check it) You see the crc's on both sides? - more likely link issue First check is ask the provider to loop the link facing your equipment and see if you still have the errors cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net wrote on

Re: [c-nsp] show interface summary cisco

See http://lmgtfy.com/?q=show+interface+summary+cisco cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net wrote on 09/07/2010 08:59: show interface summary cisco need description ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Hughes v iDirect

We host around 10 iDirect hubs for several customers, after quite a lot of issues with previous sw versions I don't hear a lot of complaints from the customers on stability, as far as I know the iDirect product has matured. An issue with bigger hubs could be the large number of servers needed for

[c-nsp] Erspan on 7600

Hi list, Does someone have experience with erspan on a 7600? Is this loading the CPU (rsp720 / ws-x6748-ge-tx) or is it handled in hardware? Martin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Erspan on 7600

have). In no case do we use the sup CPU to perform ERSPAN encap/decap. Tim At 07:10 AM 8/10/2010, Martin Moens averred: Hi list, Does someone have experience with erspan on a 7600? Is this loading the CPU (rsp720 / ws-x6748-ge-tx) or is it handled in hardware? Martin

Re: [c-nsp] Cellular Modem on Aux

From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: 23/10/2010 11:09 To: Peder Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cellular Modem on Aux Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:40:19PM -0500, Peder wrote: router croaks too.

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew K. Subject: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router From my digging around the smallest device I can see supporting these features would be a 2811. Anyone use

Re: [c-nsp] VPN over satellite

Hi Rens, It depends of course largely on the transmission speed you need, but most cisco device up from say an 1841 for low speed links will do quite well. The only thing you should keep in mind that the majority of the TCP enhancers cannot optimize encrypted traffic very efficiently, so you

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Over FR

It would be helpfull if you make your posts a bit more readable... From: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of M K gunner_...@live.com Sent: 06 October 2013 17:08 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OSPF Over FR Hi , I have

Re: [c-nsp] %BGP-6-MSGDUMP_LIMIT: unsupported or mal-formatted message

Looks like the want to be *_very_* sure there traffic flows through as174 :-) M -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: 27 November 2013 04:26 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] %BGP-6-MSGDUMP_LIMIT:

Re: [c-nsp] snmp monitoring me3600 mpls pseudowire bytes xmit/rcv

Stop.. my mistake, below are for service policy's Martin -Original Message- From: Martin Moens Sent: 15 January 2014 18:47 To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] snmp monitoring me3600 mpls pseudowire bytes xmit/rcv Aaron, receive oid should

Re: [c-nsp] snmp monitoring me3600 mpls pseudowire bytes xmit/rcv

Aaron, receive oid should be 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.15.1.1.11.x.y transmit oid should be 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.15.1.1.18.x.y The x and y likely will change between reboots... gl... Martin -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of