Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Bulk TFTP File Upload

ving static files. > > -Ryan > > On Jun 6, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Charles Goldsmith > wrote: > > Thanks very much for this! Has anyone worked out an easy way to bulk > download this data? Say you have to rebuild or add a node to an existing > cluster and the customer doesn'

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Bulk TFTP File Upload

Thanks very much for this! Has anyone worked out an easy way to bulk download this data? Say you have to rebuild or add a node to an existing cluster and the customer doesn't have all of this info archived properly? On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:20 PM Brian Meade wrote: > Now on Github-

Re: [cisco-voip] 8821 Cases and Cisco chargers

The last time I messed with this, about 6 months ago, it did not fit the desktop charger. Also, audio quality through the case was not good. On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM Jason Aarons (Americas) < jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > > > > > 8821 with Belt Clip putting into Multi Charger?

Re: [cisco-voip] 8832s

Since the 8832 is a dual bank phone, shouldn't it have the old image on it in the backup bank? Maybe hardcoding the old image on the phone configuration and doing a reset will cause it to boot from it? On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 7:06 PM Ryan Huff wrote: > Sounds like the

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Broken Today?

Tell me more about this acquisition!! Sent via C=64 Mobile > On Apr 26, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: > > > I'm using the latest Cisco Chrome browser, though I've tried other browsers > as well. > >

Re: [cisco-voip] on boarding new employees

Prime provisioning is the official answer from Cisco, but YMMV on how well it works and it's a pain to setup. My advice is to look at Akkadian Labs aPME product. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:21 PM Scott Voll wrote: > Does anyone have a good solution for on boarding new

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Pre-Upgrade Checklist

manent, especially in the SMB space :). > > Though, I will admit it’s an awfully convenient Linux server in a pinch ;). > > > -Ryan- > > On Apr 24, 2018, at 19:22, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> wrote: > > Nothing better than having a pair of linux VM's

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Pre-Upgrade Checklist

Nothing better than having a pair of linux VM's to backup to, in geographically diverse locations :) For a temporary backup or COP source, enable ssh on the esxi host or I use my macbook as the sftp server. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:51 PM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>

Re: [cisco-voip] Looking for insight into how Cisco 8851 deals with DNS TTL

Anthony, it doesn't help that the SRND is also lighter in terms of total number of pages than it used to be. Back in the 8.x days, it was over 1400 pages. With all of the new technology and features added through to version 12.x, you would expect it to get larger, not smaller. On Fri, Apr 6,

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and Auto Fill Credentials

Anthony, pertaining to this tidbit about 3rd party password tools, I've found at least with LastPass this is not the case. In testing this, I'm using Firefox ESR latest, on Windows 7 fully patched and the latest Lastpass update that it's still allowing firefox to insert the credentials if you

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and Auto Fill Credentials

Interestingly, none of these files come up for me on a 11.5.1.13902 system. I can pull an XML file as Anthony showed previously, but not these files. On 9.1.2 and 11.0.1.2000 systems, I can view them just fine. Did something change in 11.5.1 or so to now allow these files? I don't receive an

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and Auto Fill Credentials

It's interesting, and scary, if you are on a system's network, wouldn't be hard to get people's passwords. I did confirm that I have access to about 20 different AD passwords from just 1 cluster. Thanks for the info Anthony On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:46 AM Anthony Holloway <

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and Auto Fill Credentials

I have noticed the auto population of the ssh account on multiple installs but never thought about the XML file. I’ll investigate tomorrow and report my findings. Sent via C=64 Mobile > On Mar 14, 2018, at 8:49 PM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: > > I'm working

Re: [cisco-voip] Disable Phone services in Jabber

t; > Sarjo > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 at 14:21, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> > wrote: > >> Remove the CSF is one way, another is through the end-user UC Service >> Profile >> >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:41 AM Sarjo Touray <sar...@gmail.com> wro

Re: [cisco-voip] Disable Phone services in Jabber

Remove the CSF is one way, another is through the end-user UC Service Profile On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:41 AM Sarjo Touray wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a requirement to disable phone services in Jabber but allow video, > this will be apply to certain group of people within our

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

We are seeing the same slowness with 11.5.1 SU3 on CUCM admin pages. Restarting Tomcat resolves the issue. I have not dug deeper, anyone seen a bug ID about it? Restarting Tomcat isn't an option for us routinely, due to EM users. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Terry Oakley

Re: [cisco-voip] Contact Center Management Tool

liday dates, but > any more granularity I don’t even have a way to manage in the current > scripts. I wouldn’t know how to expose that to supervisors though. > > > > Ben Amick > > Unified Communications Analyst > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.ne

Re: [cisco-voip] Contact Center Management Tool

I never understood why this wasn't built into a user portal by Cisco for the supervisors. I have not seen any viable products that would fit this, but we need one. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Brian Meade wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I've got a customer looking for an

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups - File & Database Record Extraction

I like how he just got almost everyone on this list to follow him on twitter :) guilty as charged, in case he does create the restore utility On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Pete Brown wrote: > That's pretty slick! Well commented, too. Thanks for sharing. > > > >

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Voice Operating System-Based Products Unauthorized Access Vulnerability

Indeed it works, and sadly, I have a customer with uccx 7 still running... On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bwahaha! I just logged in to your CUCM Tim. > > On a serious note, I think it’s interesting how this “flag” issue is such > a

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C210 Replace 146 GB Disk in RAID5 with 300 GB Disk

and > stick it in front of your air intakes. > > > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf > Of *Charles Goldsmith > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 9:48 AM > *To:* Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> > *Cc:* c

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C210 Replace 146 GB Disk in RAID5 with 300 GB Disk

m no diskologist though ... just based on my own experiences of what has > worked for me for the last couple of decades ... and I’ve never lost a > server ... outside of that one time when my pants pocket snagged the > release on the 2nd disk in a R5 on my way out the door ... bad mem

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C210 Replace 146 GB Disk in RAID5 with 300 GB Disk

Keep in mind, RAID 5 is ok for smaller disks, but larger disks it's no longer recommended, but sadly, the best article about it is from Dell: http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2012/08/14/new-equallogic-raid-tech-report-considerations-and-best-practices-released With

Re: [cisco-voip] Skipping * on inbound external calls to Unity

IIRC, you should be able to setup a direct routing rule with the DID and have it send to Conversation > Attempt Sign-In. On CUCM, just setup a CTI-RP to send the number over to CUC. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: > If we have an externally available number

Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks

variphy.com has a report that looks at CDR records and will give you a report on directory numbers that have not been used, but you would need to build a database of CDR records on Variphy or import them if you archived elsewhere. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:10 AM, wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi support updated.... 6.5 for a lot of apps

Yes, that is indeed new info and good to see them backporting 11.5. The big question is, and we'll be asked a lot from customers, what will it take to upgrade existing 5.5/6.0 ESXi servers to 6.5 and make sure it stays compliant with TAC support. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi

Re: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?

SQL reports we export our CDR into so I don’t think I’d be >> able to get it for my org unless I were to front it myself or find a >> considerable ROI to pull out of it. >> >> >> >> Ben Amick >> >> Unified Communications Analyst >> >> >> >> *Fro

Re: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?

think I’d be > able to get it for my org unless I were to front it myself or find a > considerable ROI to pull out of it. > > > > Ben Amick > > Unified Communications Analyst > > > > *From:* Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, Septemb

Re: [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query?

Ben, you can glean this info via CDR if you archive those, but not an easy task. Variphy has a report to pull this type of info from CDR and is quite handy. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Ben Amick wrote: > So is there any solution for pre-12 instances for this

Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Add move change

Scott, sounds like you are looking for something to notify you when changes are made. Variphy does this well with their snapshot compare. Compare can look at different snapshots and compare the difference, or compare a snapshot to current in CUCM. Not associated with Variphy, other than a happy

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM 11.0 issues with CUC 11.5.1 SU3?

ng fine for a week. Weird. > > So I wonder if I can rehost the licenses to Unity Connection 11.5 SU3 > and have CUCM 11.0 talk to PLM on unity connection 11.5.1 SU3 fine? > > PLM is co-located on CUCM 11.0 right now (not standalone PLM server). > > Thanks! > > > On Sun, A

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM 11.0 issues with CUC 11.5.1 SU3?

11.5.1su3 requires PLM 11.5.1su2, due to the change with the encryption license: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/11_5_1_SU2/releasenotes/cplm_b_release-notes-cplm-1151su2/cplm_b_release-notes-cplm-1151su2_chapter_01.html Look at the first Note. YMMV, but I ran into

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

I should have looked at that link a bit closer, it doesn't mention the cop file: http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/CleanupCommonCOPfilev1.4.pdf Which is the 3rd method, but there is a caveat, so read it closely. On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Charles Goldsmith <

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

There is! http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_CM_L2_Upgrade_Disk_Space_issues#Free_Up_Space_for_Unified_CM_L2_Upgrade.C2.A0 That entire page is good reading. On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > Are there instructions on how to free up disk space? >

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IM & Presence 11 5.1 SU2 corrupt install with 2nd server

low bootables on cisoc.com again. >> >> I doubt 11.6 is on CentOS now because I would expect a refresh upgrade if >> so but who knows. Maybe Red Hat changed their agreement with Cisco? >> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org &g

Re: [cisco-voip] what happened to the admin guides I remember? 11.5 is missing lots!

I hate doing this, because it's tacky IMO, but shows a good way to find the guides: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cisco+cucm+11.0+administration+guide The first link gives you the list of all of the guides. As to content, not sure, the guides are definitely smaller than they used to be, but as to the

Re: [cisco-voip] 11.5.1su3 and 12.0 release notes

made, I’m waiting to see what happened. > > I suspect it’s simple human error because so many features were common to > the two releases and they went out at almost the same time. > > -Ryan > > On Aug 24, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> > wrot

Re: [cisco-voip] 11.5.1su3 and 12.0 release notes

...@uoguelph.ca> wrote: > > > I hope they clear this up soon. The worst part is, they (Cisco) mentioned > that SU3 isn't even the final version we should expect to be running come > September 2018. > > I cried a little inside when I read that in the forums. > > > > Se

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

But Anthony, we all know you are an over achiever! And that's ok, it makes you one of our experts on here too... On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, it's kind of cool that you're even asking. Thanks for that. > > Already I can see

[cisco-voip] 11.5.1su3 and 12.0 release notes

Several sections in the New and Changed Features mentions 12.0 features, and I wasn't sure if this was a copy/paste issue, or if these features are available in su3 as well. One came to mind:

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.6 pre-release communication and webinar

d in > the browser and then get blocked. It was an applet before too, but used to > load in the browser as a plugin. Now, we download it and run it as a Java > app on the PC. > > > > Regards, > > Abhiram Kramadhati > > Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU > > CCIE Col

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.6 pre-release communication and webinar

What's the reasoning for moving the Real Time Reporting Tool to a java applet? Isn't that a step back in the industry when we see so many things moving to HTML 5? No one likes java, except maybe a few programmers... On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) <

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

gt; > 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120> > > le...@uoguelph.ca > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > > > *From:* bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com <bmead...@gmail.co

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

ft.com/en-us/help/906305/new-setting- > modifies-ntlm-network-authentication-behavior > > Beginning with Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1) there is > a change to NTLM network authentication behavior. Domain users can use > their old password to access the

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

The virtual mac address on the VM does not affect the license MAC generated for the licensing, and it still uses the same old method as previous and your license MAC can be "generated" or seen by using the AFG tool: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/applicat/content/cuc-afg/index.html Taken from that

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

t; Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > > University of Guelph > > > > 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120> > > le...@uoguelph.ca > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 &g

[cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

So, a question out to the community about how you deal with this issue. If an organization is using Webex Messenger for IM and end-users are connecting Jabber to it, along with phone services and voicemail locally, jabber is setup with accounts to authenticate to AD locally. SSO is not in the

Re: [cisco-voip] Question Concerning 3rd-Party Apps that work through Cisco Expressway

I've never attempted it, but it's not supported by Cisco, the docs are specific on what phones are supported, 7800/8800 phones on specific firmware, along with DX units. A 3rd party SIP connection normally doesn't ask for the provisioning domain, username and password in the same way that a Cisco

Re: [cisco-voip] offline network - using NAT/PAT to connect to the outside world

J > > > > > > Lelio > > > > > > --- > > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. > > Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure > > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > > University of Guelph > > > > 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120>

Re: [cisco-voip] offline network - using NAT/PAT to connect to the outside world

Be careful of SIP connections from your offline network getting to production devices. You don't want your Unity Connection to start reporting MWI status back to your production network or if using Single Inbox, to sync with your Exchange. My advice is to not let your offline network connect to

Re: [cisco-voip] UC and UCCX 9.x upgrade to 11.5 sequencing question - when to upgrade to ESXi 6

Personally, I'd wait and do the bios/cimc and vmware until after the upgrade. Otherwise, I'd want to test 9.x on 6 in a lab to make sure there are no gotchas, but personally, I'd rather stay on a supported platform, in case you do run into issues and need TACs assistance. I also wouldn't change

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

Keep in mind an upgrade can throw off the purges. I've seen on CUCM after an upgrade, the older backups from the previous version would not be purged on the SFTP server. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > Gotcha - but only until the max number of

Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Nothing has been announced about it that I'm aware of, but it would be awesome if they did. It only makes sense since Cisco is a major sponsor of Let's Encrypt. CUCM, CUC, UCCX, IM and Expressway should be the priority in my mind :) After that, CIMC (updated for all m3 and higher hosts of

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 Tomcat Service SSL Certificate Issue

In addition to what Nate stated, the CCMCIP profile needs to be FQDN as well. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:21 PM, NateCCIE wrote: > Are you using cuplogin or cisco-uds for discovery now? If your UC > services or system/server is not fqdn and is IP address then the client >

Re: [cisco-voip] License File

Yesterday, I needed to rehost an MRA cluster setup with 4 nodes, couldn't do it with cisco.com/go/licensing, but GLO took care of it within 30 minutes. Very impressive response times! On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) wrote: > What particular features do you

Re: [cisco-voip] SMTP relay

ers not on private address space? Are they > then NAT/PAT'ed to communicate out? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 10, 2017, at 12:09 AM, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> > wrote: > > AFAIK, RTMT cannot be authenticated. > > I wouldn't trust a

Re: [cisco-voip] SMTP relay

t messages always go > out. Battery backup helps in case of power outage. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 9, 2017, at 10:31 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> > wrote: > > > > Does anyone have thoughts on how to relay RTMT alerts for sm

[cisco-voip] SMTP relay

Does anyone have thoughts on how to relay RTMT alerts for small customers who have no local SMTP server? I know I can spin up a linux box, but then maintaining it, many customers don't have the knowledge and there is always a risk when leaving something like this unmaintained. Thanks! Charles

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX and NTP

properly as NTP Master but it is not > designed for that purpose or not even tested by developer. Publisher of > CUCM not supported to act as NTP Master [for non CUCM applications].”* > > > > We ended up using public NTP sources. > > > > Hope this helps > > >

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX and NTP

To expand on this, I would point to your voice gateways with everything internal, then the voice gateways would either use an on-prem NTP server that is radio sync'd or one that Neal has advised. That way, everything is synced together with the same source. For UCCX and other apps, I point them

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM11.5 reviews

Yes, we deployed it about a month ago. What problems are you seeing? On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:49 AM, cisco.voip wrote: > All, has anyone gone with 11.5.1su2 yet? I am having nothing but problems > since upgrading from 10.5.2su4. > I se that they deferred 11.5.1, so I

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.5(1)SU1 released

Is this an April Fools joke? On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) < akram...@cisco.com> wrote: > 11.5(1)SU1 is now on CCO. > > > > UCCX: https://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?i=! > y=286309734=280840578=11.5(1)SU1= > > SM:

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX Generating name prompt from query?

I've never tried to use it other than numbers, but I've used Create Generated Prompt has an option for fullname, might be worth looking into. On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Ben Amick wrote: > In our CCX environment, we don’t have ASR, but we have a desire for a > script

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

There have been a few updates to CIPC in the last couple of years, but I haven't read the release notes as to what, so someone has been spending a bit of time on the code. I've seen a lot of contact centers use CIPC, I don't see it going away soon. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Heim, Dennis

[cisco-voip] British Telecom CUBE config

Not sure if it's a standard setup, but if someone has a recent, working CUBE config for British Telecom they will share please? I'd appreciate it very much. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] A Cisco DB Service restarts at 3:15am

Are your backups running during this timeframe? We've seen some services spit errors during the backups on 10.x and 11.x On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Erick Bergquist wrote: > I've noticed across a few different 10.5.2 SU2 and SU3 systems > recently that sometimes A

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

11.5(1)SU1 has been stable for me, and only found one bug that is causing a minor problem. An LDAP authenticated administrator logged into the CCMAdmin cannot manage any LDAP associated items, like associating users to the RMCM application user. The work around is to login as a local super user

Re: [cisco-voip] MWI Light UCM 8

David, if you are on Unity Connection, then its under Telephony Integrations > Phone System. There is a button labeled Run to Synchronize all MWIs on this phone system. It's been many moons since I've had to touch Unity, and don't remember the menu system, nor do I have access to one. On Tue,

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Meraki Hosted VoIP and Phone

Cloud is great for home use and small business (1 to 2 phones), at least in my opinion. Anything larger and I'd want QoS. Internet and voice does work, just not 100% reliably. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you hadn't heard

Re: [cisco-voip] Did Cisco Remove all voice downloads from Cisco.com?

he time being anyway. I haven't > tested that theory mind you, but I just don't see Cisco turning off the > firehose mid-stream without warning and saying, "too bad so sad". > > -Ryan > > On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:37 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> > wrot

Re: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset Recommendations

Speaking of wideband audio, recently had a conversation with a customer after we upgraded them from UCM 7 to 10.5, they were complaining that they were getting a lost more "noise" on t he line. Turns out that the wideband audio was just allowing a lot more background noise from the factory in the

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM/Unity and chrome

I use Chrome a lot, but their updates break things related to Cisco UC way too much. I gave up on Chrome years ago when doing work with UC. I'll stick to Firefox ESR for all UC activities. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NateCCIE . wrote: > I have been using chrome for all

Re: [cisco-voip] BE7K or not?

This has always been the case for me, always run out of CPU cores on the TRC builds long before the memory, even with the 10k ova's on UCM, 20k ova on UCxn and 400 agent CCX. The c240's also come with something like 12 nics, so never had an issue with bandwidth either, but I have had some

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi RAM Requirements

This is purely a guess, but I think the fact that we don't use a lot of the features available in ESXI is why Cisco doesn't have us reserve 8gb. I've never had an issue with running out of ram on a production system, always cores. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Anthony Holloway <

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote: > So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control? > > Do you like them? > > Pro's and Con's? > > We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i know about On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) < jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server…. > > > > *From:* cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

gebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org> > wrote: > >> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i >> know about >> >> On Thu, Oct

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 10.5.2 Split Brain Recovery

I personally prefer an IOS based device, a core switch or router. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Thomas LeMay wrote: > Hi, > > > > Questions: What is the best business practice for the type of NTP server > to use as the source: windows or some other operating system?

Re: [cisco-voip] COP files signed with k3 - you might need another COP file first...

Yes, release notes on upgrades tell you to install that cop file, it's a quick install and doesn't require a reboot. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: Looks like that beginning with CUCM v10, COP files are signed differently. And you depending on your

Re: [cisco-voip] Unable to switch to Jabber soft-phone

Owner User-ID set correctly on the CSF? Primary Extension set? If they are on 9 or higher, is their service profile set correctly? Have you tried deleting and rebuilding the CSF? HTH On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Tong, Dana dana.t...@team.telstra.com wrote: Hi all, A colleague of mine

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

at 12:32 PM To: Charles Goldsmith, Ryan LaFountain Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability The update that happened on the 20th was an internal system update. Basically a change happened on a case that was linked to the bug. This tickled the ‘last-update’ date

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

the ‘last-update’ date of the bug. As far as fixed versions - I’ll look to *Ryan* on how/when UCCX populates Integrated-releases field. -Wes On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Ryan/Wes, one last followup question, https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

From: cisco-voip on behalf of Charles Goldsmith Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 5:21 PM To: Wes Sisk (wsisk) Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability Gotcha, thanks for the explanation Wes, that's what I was looking for and can explain it to the customer. I'll let

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

One thing of note, Digicert works very well with all of our UC apps with their UC certificate. Add all of your server names as SAN's, as well as the domain name, and just duplicate the certificate for each app, changing the CN. It works well and also Digicert has great support. On Sun, Jul 19,

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

of Charles Goldsmith Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 5:21 PM To: Wes Sisk (wsisk) Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability Gotcha, thanks for the explanation Wes, that's what I was looking for and can explain it to the customer. I'll let the customer know of the risks

[cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

I have a customer that is tracking the progress on updates for this bug, http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150128-ghost and most of our voice apps have updates, except for UCCX. One of their customers, big bank, audits their progress on security

Re: [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

I have one customer on SU2, but it's smaller (around 250 phones) and we have not had any issues as you describe. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone running this version in production ? I saw a COP file was released this week addressing three

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

. -w On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: I understand that CUCM and UCCX are both VOS, and that it's probably not the same version, but I don't understand why the platform team for CUCM can give us a minor patch but we can't get the same out of UCCX

Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

[mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] *Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:55 PM *To:* Heim, Dennis; Charles Goldsmith; voip puck *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page Here is a good explanation of the issue and how to work around it: http://eltonoverip.com/blog

[cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

Getting this error with Firefox 39 An error occurred during a connection to 10.52.122.26. SSL received a weak ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key in Server Key Exchange handshake message. (Error code: ssl_error_weak_server_ephemeral_dh_key) The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the

Re: [cisco-voip] Fast Dial functionality in ccmuser/ucmuser on 9.0/9.1 missing?

I'd be interested with this as well, not for wireless, but newer 88xx phones. Customers are not happy with the transition to Cisco for speed dials, because they aren't user friendly to use and moderately happy with how they have to program speed dials. For instance, an 8821 with latest code, you

Re: [cisco-voip] Leap Second

No issues with any of my customers. The expressways/VCS/E were the only ones we were concerned with, and had them all at 8.5.2 or 8.5.3 and had no issues. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: How did your leap second go? I didn’t notice

[cisco-voip] UC official ISO's and bootable ISO

For lab purposes, we've all probably modified an ISO to make it bootable (if you don't know how, just google it), and it's pretty easy to do with the right tools. I don't ever remember seeing an official stance from Cisco on it, and I've heard that TAC can tell if a system was installed with an

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

As said by others, license is free for the MRA part, to get the free license, here is a handy blog entry : https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/how-to-get-expressway-c-and-e-licenses/ He also has entries on helping set it up, but it's pretty simple once you get in and start configuring.

Re: [cisco-voip] BAT and the VG310...

:45 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Not with MGCP Sent via C=64 Mobile On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:09 AM, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com wrote: So, for Domain Name, did you not specify the SKIGWXXX or just the last 10 of the MAC? Jonathan On Mon, Jun 15, 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 tomcat virtual memory issues?

We are having issues with it on CUC 10.5.1, and TAC tells us it's a false alert and we can ignore it. They have no plans to fix it. If anyone wants more details, I can give it to you and/or a TAC case number. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Erick Bergquist erick...@gmail.com wrote: Yep,

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9.1 - DRF not working

Check RTMT for what errors you are seeing, call TAC with that info. Also, while in RTMT, set it up to email you for alerts, so you know when your backups do not work. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Reto Gassmann v...@mrga.ch wrote: hello group Last weekend we rebooted our CUCM 9.1 cluster.

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

-- *From:* Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com *To:* Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org; Lokesh Lal lokesh_...@yahoo.co.in *Cc:* voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Lokesh lal lokesh...@gmail.com *Sent:* Thursday, 28 May 2015 7:57 PM *Subject:* RE

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

at 1:34 AM, Lokesh Lal lokesh_...@yahoo.co.in wrote: If u check cucm 9 and above , each port/analog requires essential ucl licence. Check utilisation report Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Date: 26/05/2015 22:35 (GMT

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

Just restart Tomcat On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning! Cert related question - think I know the answer but I dont see it explicitly stated so figured I'd ask. I need to add the CA cert for my expressway-C to call manager as a

<    1   2   3   >