[cisco-voip] changing sip headers

All, Is there an easy way to change the ip addresses in the SIP headers (both inbound and outbound) so that my CUCM and provider will both accept calls? Example: I have a 10.x.x.x/24 address on gig0/0, a PER address for BGP on gig0/1 and lo0 has the provider's desired signalling address.. CUCM

Re: [cisco-voip] changing sip headers

-telephony/blog/2013/04/04/cube-sip-media-and-signalling-binding-to-an-interface Brian *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2014 12:57 PM *To:* cisco-voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] changing sip headers

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco phone-vpn cert expiration

the new certificate before you make the change on the ASA. Brian *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:20 AM *To:* cisco-voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] cisco phone-vpn cert expiration I have

[cisco-voip] cisco phone-vpn cert expiration

I have a situation I'm sure isn't unique. What happens when I upload a new phone-vpn cert to the CUCM to replace an expired/expiring one? Are vpn phones going to freak out and stop authenticating to the VPN or should everything be smooth sailing? ___

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco phone-vpn cert expiration

try this in the lab. It may be due to the same Common Name on the certificate but usually it will just rename the new one to like commonname-1.pem. Thanks, Brian *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:24 PM *To:* Brian Meade (brmeade

[cisco-voip] UC lab licensing

Does anyone know if lab licensing is available for the version 10 products? I know time is realtive and all but I'm sure I'd end up forgetting to turn back time. I checked Google but I didn't find anything useful. ___ cisco-voip mailing list

[cisco-voip] OT: WAN Technology

Kind of off topic but I've been wondering... Does anyone still use frame relay or has MPLS type of connectivity pretty much replaced it? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 'buzz' secretary's phone?

I have a small group of users who were fond of the old PBX feature where they could 'buzz' their secretary. I think this was some sort of signaling key in the Nortel world. Does anyone know if there is an XML service that might accomplish this? Would the basic Informacast product be able to

Re: [cisco-voip] 'buzz' secretary's phone?

[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2014 1:35 PM *To:* cisco-voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 'buzz' secretary's phone? I have a small group of users who were fond of the old PBX feature where they could 'buzz' their secretary. I think

[cisco-voip] remote call control with EMCC

I'm hoping this is an easy one and I'm just not seeing the information. We are using RCC with Lync 2010. It works great if a user is logged in with Extension Mobility on thier home but fails when a user logs in with EMCC on a remote cluster. The EMCC device shows up and is selected on the phone

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC

. Have you tried using the phone TUI mid-call? *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:16 PM *To:* cisco-voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC Maybe I'm missing something but for the life

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF from CUEAC

ID CSCuj33939, they should be able to get you the fix. Kind Regards Jamie Gale Professional Services Engineer Arc Solutions, onsite at Cisco jamg...@cisco.com On Mar 4, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Works as expected from the phone. Does it use JTAPI

[cisco-voip] strange message notification behavior - UCONN 9.1

I've done some looking but can't seem to find the cause for this one. Call comes in on line A to user A. User B picks up the call on shared lineA. User B transfers caller direct to voicemail. Email notification shows the mesage being from user A. This is the only user this happens to.

Re: [cisco-voip] strange message notification behavior - UCONN 9.1

* from Cisco *Unity* *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Jason Aarons (AM) *Sent:* Tuesday, March 11, 2014 11:53 AM *To:* Erick Wellnitz; cisco-voip *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] strange message notification behavior - UCONN 9.1 Does this match

[cisco-voip] MTP for Video?

9.1.2.1-28 I'm trying to set up a trusted relay pointfor my VPN phones so that we can get audio and video from VPN phone to VPN phone. For security reasons we are not able to make changes to the ASA to enable direct VPN to VPN communication. I have plenty of PVDM3 resources available. If I

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP for Video?

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.comwrote: 9.1.2.1-28 I'm trying to set up a trusted relay pointfor my VPN phones so that we can get audio and video from VPN phone to VPN phone. For security reasons we are not able to make changes to the ASA

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP for Video?

.729 in case your calls are using those codecs instead. Also might be an issue with the region your IOS MTP is in. Brian On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.comwrote: g711u. I didn't do codec passthrough. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Brian Meade

[cisco-voip] unity connection subject line

Along the same lines as my previous question regarding the Unity Connection 'from' address modification, I have another request from management to remove the words 'Message Notification: Voice' from the subject line of the emial notification in Unity Connection. I assume this would be another

[cisco-voip] CURRI

I'm not 100% clear on th eapplication server for CURRI. This is a generic web server, correct? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CURRI

accordingly. Anthony Holloway provided a sample web page on this API recently: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/voip/176709?do=post_view_threaded#176709 Thanks Stephen Welsh CTO http://www.unifiedfx.com On 1 Apr 2014, at 22:22, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm

[cisco-voip] trusted relay point issue

I removed an audio-only (non-hardware) trusted relay point. It seems that the phones set to use a trusted relay point continue to use this MTP as a relay point. Resets do not seem to help at all. Is there something I'm missing? Do I need to turn off TRP and turn it back on on the phones?

Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay point issue

the CCM traces when the TRP is allocated and see if it is indeed thinking it's still a valid TRP. If the database is good on all nodes, might require a CallManager service restart. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.comwrote: I removed an audio-only (non

[cisco-voip] device profile turned into phone

I just had the strangest thing happen. I had a device profile that was listed under device-phone. Even stranger, this phone was listed as the logged in profile on a phone. The name had also changed to SEP + the name of the profile. Obviously there was some database shenanigans going on with

[cisco-voip] file size sent to billing server

Hopefully this is something I'm just overlooking. Is there a way to increase the size of the files sent via FTP to an external billing server? CM 9.1.2 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] file size sent to billing server

-- *From: *Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com *To: *cisco-voip cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Sent: *Monday, April 14, 2014 5:28:34 PM *Subject: *[cisco-voip] file size sent to billing server Hopefully this is something I'm just overlooking. Is there a way to increase the size of the files sent via

Re: [cisco-voip] Adding Service URL for One Button Login ?

I would think that error would be expected because you are not passing the parameters for the login. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: After hitting send I noticed the Cisco Desktop Browser and IP Phone Agent Service and a lot of other

Re: [cisco-voip] one way audio in established call?

. I would say it's more likely a network issue though. I'd try getting packet captures of the issue. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I have a user who insists he is getting one way audio (he can hear the other party but they cannot hear him

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

Super copy identical. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote: 47 = codec mismatch Is it _really_ identical? -Ryan On Apr 17, 2014, at 4:02 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I have a VPN phones configured to use a trused relay

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

Well, identical except for MAC and description. It worked for three days now it fails. The last successful call allocated the MTP without issue. I personally tested it a dozen or so times before giving it back to the user. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote: Stuck sessions on the MTP perhaps or leaked calls in UCM? You're going to have to dig into traces to confirm. -Ryan On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Well, identical except for MAC and description

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

actually exhausted so no alert. We'll need to see CCM traces for one of these calls to see what is actually happening. Have you tried resetting the MTP? Brian On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Ryan, When you mention stuck sessions do you mean x

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

MTP looks fine. No stuck sessions. Test calls connect and release as expcted. I'll have to wait until we get another report to pull new traces. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.comwrote: The entire scenario is the phone worked for several weeks via VPN

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

it to not be required, and thus break your VPN solution when it isn't invoked? On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.comwrote: After collecting traces and sending them off to TAC, we found that the Fail Call If Trusted Relay Point Allocation Fails https

Re: [cisco-voip] info sent to Lync for RCC

. Your traces from CUPS will show the CSTA signaling outbound to Lync. You can also perform traces on Lync to see the inbound and RNL. You will not see anything from UCM to Lync directly. *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz

[cisco-voip] International TEHO challenges

Did a google search but want to verify that there is no authoritative list of countries where TEHO is prohibited. I find international TEHO, especially to less developed countries to be a minefield of regulations. ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] International TEHO challenges

in the 1980s but no longer. Seems the international rates have gotten more competitive over the years , and internally we chat/im more and more than call via PSTN. *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:11 PM

[cisco-voip] locations based CAC and video marking

I think I know the answer but would like to confirm. What would be the ramificaion with Location based CAC if video gets marked as EF as well as voice? My guess is that video would then take up bandwidth in the PQ which CAC would not account for. Am I off base on this? Thanks!

Re: [cisco-voip] locations based CAC and video marking

On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I think I know the answer but would like to confirm. What would be the ramificaion with Location based CAC if video gets marked as EF as well as voice? My guess is that video would then take up bandwidth in the PQ

[cisco-voip] COnverting LDAP user to Local user

CUCM 9.1.2.1-28 I have a quick question regarding LDAP and local users. I have LDAP set up to synch users from AD. That works as expected. I convert LDAP user to local user and change the user ID. At next LDAP synch it sets my local user that was converted back to LDAP synchronised user

Re: [cisco-voip] 9951 can't access EM Url??

Packet caputre during login might show more detail as to why it's failing. I know previous vesions of firmware worked with EMCC. On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote: 9458 WRN 10:33:53.565705 CVM-http.ListenerHttpFailed:

[cisco-voip] Quick question regarding prompt variables CCX 10.5

Been a while since I have had to do much with CCX. I remember back in the day we could set up some string variables, concatenate them and have a nice clean way to cut our script in half when doing two different languages. For instance: 1 - English (set language string to EN) 2 - Spanish (set

Re: [cisco-voip] Quick question regarding prompt variables CCX 10.5

aware of. Everyone writes code differently so maybe it made more sense to them to do it that way. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on someone else's script today and was wondering because they duplicated logic for each language. So I'm

Re: [cisco-voip] Quick question regarding prompt variables CCX 10.5

button. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Been a while since I have had to do much with CCX. I remember back in the day we could set up some string variables, concatenate them and have a nice clean way to cut our script in half when doing two

[cisco-voip] CSCup71611 - ccx 10.5

Any of our Cisco people able to shed a little more light on the workaround for CSCup71611? It's been terminated but I appear to have run into it. I thought I'd check before running the gauntlet of getting a client's contract associated to my account.

[cisco-voip] SBD and staging phones

I remember back when I did a v6 to v8.6 migration and SBD would cause some issues going back and forth between the clusters. Would the same be true taking a phone from one 8.6 cluster and moving it to another 8.6 cluster? I'm looking at remotely staging and upgrading firmware on 1000 phones to

Re: [cisco-voip] SBD and staging phones

...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:08 PM *To:* cisco-voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] SBD and staging phones I remember back when I did a v6 to v8.6 migration and SBD would cause some issues going back and forth between the clusters. Would

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

Not having lines on a physical phone can be a career altering decision if someone needs to dial emergency services and they grab the nearest logged out phone. There could also be legal issues but I'm not a lawyer so take that for what you will. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Anthony Holloway

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

You'd have to make the DNs longer and make sure to base the non-did on an available range to avoid overlap and inter-digit timeout. So, if you have 43xx available, make the non-did range 43. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Use a partition

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

or public. -Wes On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Not having lines on a physical phone can be a career altering decision if someone needs to dial emergency services and they grab the nearest logged out phone. There could also be legal issues but I'm

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

or public. -Wes On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Not having lines on a physical phone can be a career altering decision if someone needs to dial emergency services and they grab the nearest logged out phone. There could also be legal issues but I'm

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

: I loved the idea of the garbage partition, but we do have CER..and I only want 911 to work. So now what? Scott On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: CER needs to be ale to call (for PSAP callback) the DNs on profiles as well as the DNs

[cisco-voip] licensing turn around time 8.6 to 10.5

All, Quick question about licensing for CUCM/UCONN Going from 8.6 to10.5 I should be able to run the license count tool and submit to licensing along with a contract number, correct? Is there usually a long turn around time or is it still a day or less? Thanks!

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turn around time 8.6 to 10.5

about 2 week or so to get then BIN file to upload to PLM. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:22 PM Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: All, Quick question about licensing for CUCM/UCONN Going from 8.6 to10.5 I should be able to run the license count tool and submit to licensing along

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I never had a license take longer than 24 hours for 8.x to 9.x but apparently those days are gone with 10.x On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Roger Wiklund roger.wikl...@gmail.com wrote: I second the hahahahaha@24 hours. More like 30-40 days of dealing with the robots at licensing. It's

[cisco-voip] message count doesn't match - cxn 8.6

I know I've fixed this particular issue before but I can't seem to find where I did it. I have one mailbox in Connection 8.6 that shows 9 messages in the Admin interface but at the user's phone it only tells us there are 8 saved messages. Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Re: [cisco-voip] message count doesn't match - cxn 8.6

It was read receipts enabled. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I know I've fixed this particular issue before but I can't seem to find where I did it. I have one mailbox in Connection 8.6 that shows 9 messages in the Admin interface

Re: [cisco-voip] 7915 showing MWI when set to none

dialing the MWI off number on the phone? Other option is to run a MWI sync from voicemail. *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:46 PM *To:* cisco-voip *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 7915 showing MWI when

Re: [cisco-voip] Licenses upgrade issues

That's what we did to make sure everything was good with their contracts contained the right licenses. Then go through the pre-upgrade process to verify then the post upgrade goes pretty fast. 5 calendar days, three of which were weekend and holiday, for my last upgrade. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at

Re: [cisco-voip] Licenses upgrade issues

licenses that the new PLM reports and not what the customer has paid for. The original purchase (SO#) was some 8 years ago with another partner. Cheers Dana *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, 9 January 2015 8:04 AM *To:* Charles Goldsmith *Cc

Re: [cisco-voip] Licenses upgrade issues

They should be able to find all of the old PAKs if you have MAC/License MAC the PAKs were registered to. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:55 PM, James Buchanan james.buchan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Do you have the original SO#s used to order the CUWL licenses? I would think based on that they

[cisco-voip] Expressway CE with multiple CUCM clusters

Hey all, Wondering if anyone has done expressway ce with multiple clusters. Am I correct to assume it's a 1:1 relationship (1 CE to 1 CUCM cluster) or is there a way to use 1 CE with multiple CUCM clusters? Thanks in advance! ___ cisco-voip mailing

Re: [cisco-voip] going to 10.5.2 after upgrade and unaligned partitions

, installing, and restoring all affected by this bug? On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:33:27 PM Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: For those of you sill out there doing upgrades from pre-9.x to 10.x and running nto the unaligned partition issue... There is a bug that was opened on 12/30

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX 8.5 outbound IVR

Center Cisco Services Direct: +1 919 392 9898 Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time On Jan 7, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Happy new year all. I have a couple questions about CCX and outbound IVR. First, is there a way to automate the upload

Re: [cisco-voip] going to 10.5.2 after upgrade and unaligned partitions

...@cisco.com wrote: Nothing about an upgrade from 8.6 to 9.x or later guarantees unaligned partitions. You will only get the error because your partitions were unaligned already. -Ryan On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:19 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I used 10.5.2 upgrade media

Re: [cisco-voip] going to 10.5.2 after upgrade and unaligned partitions

. -Ryan On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:19 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: I used 10.5.2 upgrade media to upgrade from 8.6, at that point you need to do the fresh install and DRS restore routine to correct the unaligned partition issue. The issue occurs when you try to install

[cisco-voip] going to 10.5.2 after upgrade and unaligned partitions

For those of you sill out there doing upgrades from pre-9.x to 10.x and running nto the unaligned partition issue... There is a bug that was opened on 12/30 regarding the fresh install with 110.5.2.1-5 and installing the subscriber(s) ater the restore to the Publisher. You get about 99%

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber dual domain question

: In the GUI, you have to create the root SRV records under the protocol folder/subdomain, in this case ‘_tcp’. *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Sunday, April 12, 2015 6:30 PM *To:* Eric Pedersen *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] SRST for UCCX CTI Route Points

I think you should be able to add translations or number expansion from extension to E.164 in your SRST config. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Armstrong, Michael michael.armstr...@cccs.edu wrote: Hello, Any ideas for an SRST configuration for a WAN outage that is preventing calls to a

Re: [cisco-voip] IOS firewall with Expressway?

] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:26 PM *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject:* [cisco-voip] IOS firewall with Expressway? Anyone ever used IOS firewall with Expressway? Having a difficult time with NAT configuration getting Expressway C to talk

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber dual domain question

dnscmd . /recordadd _cisco-uds._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm2.xyz.com *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 10 April 2015 9:24 AM *To:* Eric Pedersen *Cc:* Anthony Holloway; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] jabber dual domain question

Re: [cisco-voip] CIPC via MRA? Anyone done it?

That was what I thought. Have to steer the client toward Jabber softphone. Thanks , man! On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: CIPC isn't MRA aware On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Had a question

[cisco-voip] CIPC via MRA? Anyone done it?

Had a question posed to me and I'm not 100% on the answer. I think the answer is no but I thought I'd see if anyone had done this successfully. Anyone been successful at getting CIPC to register via MRA? I'm thinking that because the connection to Expressway-E is TLS it isn't going to work.

[cisco-voip] PCD migration and ELM

Hey all, Quick question regarding PCD and migrations. Migrating a CUCM 9.1.2 to 10.5.2 SU1 does co-res E(P)LM get migrated as well? I understand I would still need to contact licensing. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

[cisco-voip] be6kS

All, I seem to remember hearing something about a plugin or a tool to configure the BE6KS but I can't seem to find such a thing. I thought it was a Firefox plugin. Was I imagining things? Thanks! ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 10.5.2 Split Brain Recovery

I like both IOS and Linux ntpd I synch those with time.nist.gov Remember that you need a stratum 6 or better to sync UC apps like connection or CUCM. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Charles Goldsmith wrote: > I personally prefer an IOS based device, a core switch or

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 10.5.2 Split Brain Recovery

mention stratum 9 or better but that sounds wrong IMO. > > > > I would follow the same recommendation documented for CUCM (stratum 3 or > better) on CUC. > > > > HTH > > > > - Dan > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.n

Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

" to see if they hit the wire at the > same time. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM >> 10.5.2 SU1 where the line starts ringing on some

Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

on the phone? >> >> Lelio >> >> --- >> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. >> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure >> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >> University of Guelph >> >> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >> le...@uoguelph.ca >

Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

Infrastructure > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > University of Guelph > > > > 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 <519%E2%80%90824%E2%80%904120%20Ext%2056354> > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, On

Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

ated bug, but as with all filed defects, you can never really be > 100% sure. > > https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCur10651 > > Good luck. Also, you should be on 10.5(2)SU2a. ;) Just say'n. > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv

Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

gt; > 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > -- > *From: *"Erick Wellnitz" <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > *To: *cisco-voip@p

[cisco-voip] Finesse DNS question

Quick question regarding DNS and Finesse. Can I use a CNAME (alias) record for Finesse pointing to an A record with a different name than the hostname of the CCX server? The CNAME record would be the name in the certificate. ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] Uccx design guide clarification

According to PDI helpdesk, Finesse does not support any nat at all which coincides with the design guide statement. On Nov 24, 2015 9:51 PM, "Erick Wellnitz" <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would someone be able to clarify the statement in the UCCX design guide &g

[cisco-voip] Uccx design guide clarification

Would someone be able to clarify the statement in the UCCX design guide where it states NAT is not supported for Finesse? For example, in a hosted environment the customer's internal IP of CCX/Finesse is natted to the real IP in the hosted environment. Thanks!

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Spark detected as a virus - Artemis (McAfee 8.8.0 Signature 5/19/2016)

Parts of McAfee really dislike any app placing files in the AppData folder. On May 20, 2016 8:14 AM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" wrote: > > Lovely. I guess we'll have to work with our team to skip those directories > in an enterprise settings. Not sure they like doing that. :( > --- >

Re: [cisco-voip] PS-ALI DID Registration

Intrado makes a product so you can update the locations any time with as much detail as local law requires. Some other companies offer this as well, Verizon did at one time and may still offer their PS-ALI serivce but it was still modem based last time I used it. Intrado will integrate directly

[cisco-voip] enhanced or enhanced plus

I'm going off of table 2 in this document. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/unified-communications-licensing/product_solution_overview0900aecd806cc7a4.html Does 'Included' mean you can have a hard phone and a jabber soft phone for enhanced or do we need to

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

-trust after the cert bundle upload. On Mar 16, 2016 4:35 PM, "Anthony Holloway" <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > What do you mean? Was it simply not uploaded to the Tomcat Trust? Or was > the cert bad? > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Erick Wellnitz <e

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

The certs on UC can be fun. > > > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf > Of *Ryan Huff > *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:19 PM > *To:* Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group &l

[cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

I have a strange issue with CUCM 11.0.1 and IM 11.0.1 We installed the multi-server SAN cert for tomcat and now the IM data monitor service is in an unknown state according to the system troubleshooter. The SAN cert is installed to tomcat-trust so it shouldn't be a cert issue. Done service

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

; > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have a strange issue with CUCM 11.0.1 and IM 11.0.1 >> >> We installed the multi-server SAN cert for tomcat and now the IM data >> monitor service is in an unknown state

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

ster. > > After you resolve the issue, I would verify db replication is healthy. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 14, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I did that as well but I'm not 100% sure if the entire Root CA chain got &

Re: [cisco-voip] IM - services reported in unknown state after SAN cert install

public CA or private CA? And did you > upload all certs in the chain (sans the root) as one file, or as separate > files? > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The root CA cert wasn't uploaded. The bundle the

Re: [cisco-voip] Video Conference Auto attendant?

Take a look at the Acano/CMS product. It has IVR capability and can integrate with pretty much everything. On Jul 25, 2016 9:54 AM, "Scott Voll" wrote: > What are others doing for video conferences? > > we have a Polycom RMX that we have an extension that everyone dials

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing vCPU Quantities

Based on that caveat, I'd think that's the best bet. Same with running out of storage space in anything other than the common partition. Too bad PCD doesn't do CUC migrations. If I remember correctly this caveat is due to an application limitation and not the OS. On Jul 27, 2016 11:17 AM,

Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse IP Phone Agent (FIPPA)

t; I created for FIPPA (and you must give it its own Application User). If you > don't, you end up with a weird error message at the end of every call. > > Thanks, > > James > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> > wrote: >

[cisco-voip] Finesse IP Phone Agent (FIPPA)

Has anyone used the Finesse IP Phone Agent yet? Good, bad, ugly? Does it look and feel similar to legacy IPPA? Thanks! -E ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

It's likely along the same lines as NAT and Finesse for CCX. It works and people do it fairly often but TAC won't support it because it hasn't been thouroghly tested for issues and full functionality. On Jul 19, 2016 2:29 PM, "Justin Steinberg" wrote: > interesting - i

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Workforce Optimization

I did one of these a few months back. Make sure SQL Express is supported and you set the SQL up exactly as the documents state otherwise you'll have problems. One quirk I noticed aside from SQL is that your "service account" for AD connectivity cannot be in the root of your AD domain structure.

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Workforce Optimization

I did one of these a few months back. Make sure SQL Express is supported and you set the SQL up exactly as the documents state otherwise you'll have problems. One quirk I noticed aside from SQL is that your "service account" for AD connectivity cannot be in the root of your AD domain structure.

  1   2   >