Hey everyone! It's been a bit too long since I have been active here.
I have a situation where I have an SME cluster and 2 leaf clusters. Both
leaf clusters need to have telephones discovered and located by CER.
Is there a way to have all of the CTI functionality of CER residing on the
SME and o
environment so identifying
by switchport is off the table.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 8:49 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> Hey everyone! It's been a bit too long since I have been active here.
>
> I have a situation where I have an SME cluster and 2 leaf clusters. Both
> leaf clusters ne
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvd51691/?rfs=iqvred
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:59 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> Let's reframe this a little as it doesn't appear CER can be centralized
> with SME.
>
> CER can be set up into two CER groups and the two groups clustered, per
> the adm
You are correct. It's similar to registering an 8800 series phone via
expressway. Username and passpharase (password) are the user you have the
device assigned to as a controlled device. Domain is your service domain,
acme.com in your example. It will look for _collab-edge._tls.acme.com, for
ex
I have always set my OTLD to acme.com and my cluster FQDN to *.acme.com
Or if I'm using a subdomain for my CUCM I do an OTLD of acme.com then in
cluster FQDN I put *.telecom.acme.com *acme.com (space seperated)
I could be doing this completely wrong but it's always worked in the
environments I've
The answer to this might be 'ask your partner channel rep' but here goes
anyway.
What's the skinny on SCCP? I've seen the slide from CLUS 18 about
deprecation but keep hearing rumors that SCCP is going out the window for
phones with CSR 12.5. I find it implausible but customers are starting to
a
ast time I looked is going away. However I can't remember
>> if its 12.5 or the next version 14. Skipping 13, apparently it's bad luck
>> lol
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 4:50 PM Erick Wellnitz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The answer to this might be
All,
I have an interesting scenario.
2 - CUCM Telephony clusters (11.5.1 SU5)
1 - CUCM SME (11.5.1 SU5)
1 - IM&Presence Centralized Cluster (11.5.1 SU5 / 11.5.1 SU5a)
ADFS on Windows Server 2016 for SSO
SSO works as expected with individual clusters for admin and user web
pages. Jabber works f
All,
I have a client with a hybrid Exchange/O365 system.
I have an issue where free/busy information is retrieved successfully from
Exchange users but not O365 users.
O365 users return a 'mailbox not found' error along with the contents of
this SOAP message.
11:38:35.878 |system.pe.eal.ews 5732
Unity Connection with B or
> C won’t work.
>
> -Ryan
>
> > On Jan 8, 2019, at 17:37, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
> >
> > The SMTP address has no mailbox associated with it.
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I just want confirmation I'm not crazy.
.I thought I read somewhere in documentation not long ago that to do OBTP
with TMSXE you needed to have either a DX or a touch 10.
Did I imagine the whole thing?
Thanks!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puc
ion Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve
All,
I think I'm just missing something simple.
I have Expressway set up for B2B video and it works. Two things I noticed
and need to resolve.
1. If I call my Webex room say, ewellnitzv...@voip.webex.com it connects.
When it connects in my Jabber client the called party changes from
ewellnitzv.
oip.markmail.org/thread/mdiy66e6rojirfob
>
> Is his scenario the same as yours or different?
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 10:59 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I think I'm just missing something simple.
>>
>> I have Expressway set up for B2B video an
I do have "Deliver URI only in connected party, if available" set on my SIP
trunk. It seems to be working now for whatever reason.
Anthony pointed me in the right direction on the first one. Maybe that
solved both issues.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:13 AM Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
> You probably a
Has anyone set up the O365 hybrid connector (cloud to cloud) via Control
Hub?
My client is concerned with the requirement of needing a global admin
account. Is this only for setup or is it used like a service account?
Documentation eludes to the fact it's only for setup but it isn't clear to
me.
eyond that.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 11:05 AM
> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Hybrid Calendar Connector
>
>
>
> Has anyone set up the O365 hybrid connector (clo
use their own admin account and not a “service account with lots of
> privileges with a password that doesn’t change” like Unity Connection to
> exchange.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 9:05 AM
> *To:* Cisco
ity of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 8, 2019 12:15 PM
> *To:* NateCCIE
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Hybrid Calendar Connector
>
>
>
&g
All,
With the introduction of WebEx Teams the request for persistent chat isn't
so common anymore.
I have a client asking about it and how we can limit how long messages are
kept in persistent chat.
I can't find a native way to do that but was thinking if IM&Presence
doesn't index the database i
ase, is to just reverse engineer
> the script and grab the queries and pass those along to your customer’s SQL
> admin..
>
> https://github.com/ryanthuff/cpimdb
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 12:12, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
>
> All,
>
> With the
imum number of messages that can
> be retrieved from the archive?
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:12 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> With the introduction of WebEx Teams the request for persistent chat
>> isn't so common anymore.
>>
rite the procedure to delete
> records older than X days.
>
> Good luck, and I'd be curious to know which route you take.
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:56 AM Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> That works for what loads in Jabber but they're concerned with the
>>
>
> *~Chris*
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 13, 2019 9:36 AM
> *To:* Anthony Holloway
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat
>
I have TMS 15.6.1 and TMSXE 5.6 trying to get CMR cloud scheduling working
through TMSXE.
I can schedule my MX300 in the portal with an externally hosted WebEx URI
and it works fine.
When I use either the WebEx Meetings plugin in Outlook or the @webex macro
for calendar connector, as described i
on Technical Marketing Engineer
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2019 11:50 AM
> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] TMSXE and CMR Cloud
>
>
>
> I have TMS 15.6.1 and TMSXE 5.6 trying to get CMR
ons in the WebEx site. It's the old WebEx Site Admin
and not Control Hub.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:26 PM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> That didn't do it.
>
> I'm not exactly sure why TMSXE isn't picking up the WebEx information and
> setting it as an external participa
?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:34 PM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> I might be on to something. I found that the booking service wasn't set
> up for HTTPS. I did that but the next section of the TMSXE install guide
> talks about adding the booking service to the WebEx site.
>
> Sett
TMS:ExternalConferenceData
attribute gets stripped somewhere in transit to the Exchange room mailbox.
The email team is taking it from here as TMSXE is working as expected.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:32 AM Erick Wellnitz
wrote:
> I have discovered that the WebEx information is not present
Not a security or a firewall guy so please bear with me.
We've opened up the ports as advised in this:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X8-1/Cisco-Expressway-IP-Port-Usage-for-Firewall-Traversal-Deployment_Guide-X8-1.pdf
Now, the weird part is that wi
or NAT reflection
> for the traversal? Is your traversal connected? I would check for
> firewall drops when trying to connect if the traversal is connected.
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
> > Not a security or a firewall guy so please bear w
s._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm1.xyz.com
>
> dnscmd . /recordadd _cisco-uds._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm2.xyz.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 10 April 2015 9:24 AM
> *To:* Eric Pedersen
> *Cc:* Anthony
ote:
> In the GUI, you have to create the root SRV records under the protocol
> folder/subdomain, in this case ‘_tcp’.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 12, 2015 6:30 PM
I think you should be able to add translations or number expansion from
extension to E.164 in your SRST config.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Armstrong, Michael <
michael.armstr...@cccs.edu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Any ideas for an SRST configuration for a WAN outage that is preventing
> call
Anyone ever used IOS firewall with Expressway?
Having a difficult time with NAT configuration getting Expressway C to talk
to the Expressway E public IP.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisc
CC-96A8-8A17AF38C15C] <https://twitter.com/netechcorp>
> [image: cid:F52A69B8-DA49-4CD7-91E9-C057917D90C2]
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/NetechCorporation>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Wedn
Had a question posed to me and I'm not 100% on the answer. I think the
answer is no but I thought I'd see if anyone had done this successfully.
Anyone been successful at getting CIPC to register via MRA?
I'm thinking that because the connection to Expressway-E is TLS it isn't
going to work.
That was what I thought. Have to steer the client toward Jabber softphone.
Thanks , man!
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Justin Steinberg
wrote:
> CIPC isn't MRA aware
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> Had a question posed to
Will end users notice any difference if we change the im&p service default
domain other than the interruption while making the change?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Hey all,
Quick question regarding PCD and migrations.
Migrating a CUCM 9.1.2 to 10.5.2 SU1 does co-res E(P)LM get migrated as
well? I understand I would still need to contact licensing.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puc
anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM 10.5.2
SU1 where the line starts ringing on some phones right away and some start
ringing up to 15 seconds later. Some also experience ringing after the
call is answered up to 15 seconds after answered.
88xx phones are the only
24‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> --
> *From: *"Erick Wellnitz"
> *To: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Wednesday, Septembe
see if they hit the wire at the
> same time.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM
>> 10.5.2 SU1 where the line starts ringing on some phones right away and some
>> star
id unexplained post configuration behavior.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037,
le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> --
> *From: *"Erick Wellnitz"
> *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi"
> *Cc: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Wednesday
e call. Do you see the 487 final response six seconds *after* the
> CANCEL/200 exchange? I ask only because this should help you determine
> where the delay is coming from - the phone or CUCM.
>
>
>
> - Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck
lated bug, but as with all filed defects, you can never really be
> 100% sure.
>
> https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCur10651
>
> Good luck. Also, you should be on 10.5(2)SU2a. ;) Just say'n.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
&g
All,
I seem to remember hearing something about a plugin or a tool to configure
the BE6KS but I can't seem to find such a thing.
I thought it was a Firefox plugin. Was I imagining things?
Thanks!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
I like both IOS and Linux ntpd
I synch those with time.nist.gov
Remember that you need a stratum 6 or better to sync UC apps like
connection or CUCM.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> I personally prefer an IOS based device, a core switch or router.
>
> On Wed, Oct 2
hat sounds wrong IMO.
>
>
>
> I would follow the same recommendation documented for CUCM (stratum 3 or
> better) on CUC.
>
>
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> - Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> O
Would someone be able to clarify the statement in the UCCX design guide
where it states NAT is not supported for Finesse?
For example, in a hosted environment the customer's internal IP of
CCX/Finesse is natted to the real IP in the hosted environment.
Thanks!
___
According to PDI helpdesk, Finesse does not support any nat at all which
coincides with the design guide statement.
On Nov 24, 2015 9:51 PM, "Erick Wellnitz" wrote:
> Would someone be able to clarify the statement in the UCCX design guide
> where it states NAT is not suppo
Quick question regarding DNS and Finesse.
Can I use a CNAME (alias) record for Finesse pointing to an A record with a
different name than the hostname of the CCX server? The CNAME record would
be the name in the certificate.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
I'm going off of table 2 in this document.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/unified-communications-licensing/product_solution_overview0900aecd806cc7a4.html
Does 'Included' mean you can have a hard phone and a jabber soft phone for
enhanced or do we need to h
I have a strange issue with CUCM 11.0.1 and IM&P 11.0.1
We installed the multi-server SAN cert for tomcat and now the IM&P data
monitor service is in an unknown state according to the system
troubleshooter.
The SAN cert is installed to tomcat-trust so it shouldn't be a cert issue.
Done service re
to say you did?
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> I have a strange issue with CUCM 11.0.1 and IM&P 11.0.1
>>
>> We installed the multi-server SAN cert for tomcat and now the IM&P data
>> monitor service is in an unknown st
resolve the issue, I would verify db replication is healthy.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
> I did that as well but I'm not 100% sure if the entire Root CA chain got
> installed. I'll check that.
>
> What
to romcat-trust after the cert bundle upload.
On Mar 16, 2016 4:35 PM, "Anthony Holloway"
wrote:
> What do you mean? Was it simply not uploaded to the Tomcat Trust? Or was
> the cert bad?
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> It was
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ryan Huff
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:19 PM
> *To:* Erick Wellnitz
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P - services reported in un
se a public CA or private CA? And did you
> upload all certs in the chain (sans the root) as one file, or as separate
> files?
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> The root CA cert wasn't uploaded. The bundle the CA provided didn't
&g
Parts of McAfee really dislike any app placing files in the AppData folder.
On May 20, 2016 8:14 AM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" wrote:
>
> Lovely. I guess we'll have to work with our team to skip those directories
> in an enterprise settings. Not sure they like doing that. :(
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>
Intrado makes a product so you can update the locations any time with as
much detail as local law requires. Some other companies offer this as
well, Verizon did at one time and may still offer their PS-ALI serivce but
it was still modem based last time I used it.
Intrado will integrate directly i
I did one of these a few months back. Make sure SQL Express is supported
and you set the SQL up exactly as the documents state otherwise you'll have
problems.
One quirk I noticed aside from SQL is that your "service account" for AD
connectivity cannot be in the root of your AD domain structure.
I did one of these a few months back. Make sure SQL Express is supported
and you set the SQL up exactly as the documents state otherwise you'll have
problems.
One quirk I noticed aside from SQL is that your "service account" for AD
connectivity cannot be in the root of your AD domain structure.
It's likely along the same lines as NAT and Finesse for CCX. It works and
people do it fairly often but TAC won't support it because it hasn't been
thouroghly tested for issues and full functionality.
On Jul 19, 2016 2:29 PM, "Justin Steinberg" wrote:
> interesting - i wonder why that is not su
Take a look at the Acano/CMS product. It has IVR capability and can
integrate with pretty much everything.
On Jul 25, 2016 9:54 AM, "Scott Voll" wrote:
> What are others doing for video conferences?
>
> we have a Polycom RMX that we have an extension that everyone dials into.
> Then it asks wha
Based on that caveat, I'd think that's the best bet. Same with running out
of storage space in anything other than the common partition. Too bad PCD
doesn't do CUC migrations.
If I remember correctly this caveat is due to an application limitation and
not the OS.
On Jul 27, 2016 11:17 AM, "Anth
Has anyone used the Finesse IP Phone Agent yet? Good, bad, ugly? Does it
look and feel similar to legacy IPPA?
Thanks!
-E
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I created for FIPPA (and you must give it its own Application User). If you
> don't, you end up with a weird error message at the end of every call.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone used the Fine
Does it work from the 'thick' desktop client or does that also fail after
30 seconds? Are all of your licenses installed? Before the rebrand there
were two license files. A general file for the Acano product and another
for xmpp.
On Aug 26, 2016 1:27 PM, "Heim, Dennis" wrote:
> Has anyone play
ype="0";
NetworkName="ciscouclab.com";Interfaces="0x2";IceRole="2";
RtpRtcpMux="0,FirstHopRTTInMs=0";
2016-08-26 16:32:58.891 Info SIP trace: ICEWarnEx="0x1";LocalSite="192
.168.10.73:25086";RemoteSite="192.168.11.17:51
I thought I was missing something obvious. Good to know someone else
noticed as well.
On Aug 30, 2016 4:15 PM, "Anthony Holloway"
wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the documentation getting worse?
>
> Specifically, what's going on with the CUCM Administration Guide? It's so
> watered down now. It
things missing?
-w
On Aug 30, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
I thought I was missing something obvious. Good to know someone else
noticed as well.
On Aug 30, 2016 4:15 PM, "Anthony Holloway"
wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the documentation getting worse?
>
> Spec
No. The 6608 series blades were never supported on IOS, only CAT OS
On Sep 4, 2016 9:36 AM, "Ahmed Elnagar" wrote:
> Hello;
>
>
>
> Anyone knows if I can run the above module “WS-6608-E1” with SUP-720…I
> cannot find any support information regarding this module.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ahmed
I agree with this sentiment. Nesting CSQs is not only subject to resource
limitations, it can become quite confusing to figure out if you haven't
looked at the configuration in some time.
If you do end up having to nest CSQs, document, document, document.
On Sep 8, 2016 5:28 PM, "Anthony Hollow
Anyone know if the csr 1000v is no longer available without a service
contract?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
http://ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/MessageShuttle/MessageShuttle.html
TAC supported even.
On Oct 31, 2016 9:12 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" wrote:
> What is this message shuttle magic you soak of?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
>
> Plus +1 to Anthony
All,
Is there an easy way to change the ip addresses in the SIP headers (both
inbound and outbound) so that my CUCM and provider will both accept calls?
Example:
I have a 10.x.x.x/24 address on gig0/0, a PER address for BGP on gig0/1 and
lo0 has the provider's desired signalling address..
CUCM i
oice-video/ip-telephony/blog/2013/04/04/cube-sip-media-and-signalling-binding-to-an-interface
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2014 12:57 PM
> *To:* c
people have VPN phones that they rarely connect so you'll need to make
> sure everyone connects their phones to get the new certificate before you
> make the change on the ASA.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
I have a situation I'm sure isn't unique.
What happens when I upload a new phone-vpn cert to the CUCM to replace an
expired/expiring one?
Are vpn phones going to freak out and stop authenticating to the VPN or
should everything be smooth sailing?
___
ci
get the new certificate before you
> make the change on the ASA.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:20 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-vo
I like SCCP integrations because you cna test MWI on/off by dialing the
appropriate numbers. I like SIP because you don't need to fool around with
a bunh of ports on CM and worry about allocating enough ports to each
purpose.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> I can't be
stomers. I'll try this
> in the lab. It may be due to the same Common Name on the certificate but
> usually it will just rename the new one to like commonname-1.pem.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.
new certificate in
> them. But it may be a little risky opening up the TFTP service on one node
> to the outside world temporarily.
>
>
>
> *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:51 PM
> *To:* Brian Meade (brmeade)
>
able.
> On Jan 30, 2014 4:15 PM, "Erick Wellnitz" wrote:
>
>> We aren't terribly worried because there are only about 7 of these phones
>> out there. We'll let them have their temper tantrum and then they'll bring
>> their phones back.
>>
&
Okay, I'm probably just overlooking something somewhere. Does anyone know
if there is an ELM license definition available for CER 10 or will I need
to install Prime License Manager 10 instance.
If I need to install a PLM 10 instance, how would I migrate from a co-res
ELM to a standalone PLM?
;http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
> Support
>
> Support Phone. 410.252.8830
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Monday, February 03, 2014 9:40 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cis
Okay
I have someone telling me that they can make it so that I can zero out and
reach my local operator in UConn.
Example:
We have 5 sites, each with a local operator. Someone from site 1 calls
someone from site 3 and someone from site 5 also calls the same person from
site 3.
Both the per
perator as opposed to the operator at the recipients site?
> Interesting question. I don't have an answer for that scenario but
> would be surprised if that's possible.
>
>
> Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.
> Please excude my typtos.
nications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> --
> *From: *"Erick Wellnitz"
&
o Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 06, 2014 2:38 PM
> *To:* Erick Wellnitz
> *Cc:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] unity connection zero out
>
>
>
> Sorry, I misread... You want to reach _your_ local operator when you zero
> out, not the local operator of
Does anyone know if lab licensing is available for the version 10
products? I know time is realtive and all but I'm sure I'd end up
forgetting to turn back time.
I checked Google but I didn't find anything useful.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@
eded components.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Monday, February 10, 2014 1:04 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] UC lab licensing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
&g
I tried on a few
> models and couldn't get it to work. Even corporate directory won't let you
> make an outbound call when another call is ringing-in.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Erick Wellnitz
> wrote:
>
> There is no new call option for ring
We were but it interferes with EMCC. The phone only does DNS lookups for
the domain it is assigned so we switched back to IP addreses.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Justin Steinberg wrote:
> Is anyone using CUCM deployments where they set the System>Server value to
> the FQDN of the CUCM nod
Kind of off topic but I've been wondering...
Does anyone still use frame relay or has MPLS type of connectivity pretty
much replaced it?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I have a small group of users who were fond of the old PBX feature where
they could 'buzz' their secretary. I think this was some sort of signaling
key in the Nortel world.
Does anyone know if there is an XML service that might accomplish this?
Would the basic Informacast product be able to accom
t; not go to voicemail.
>
>
>
>
>
> Neal Haas
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2014 1:35 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 'buzz' secretary'
I'm hoping this is an easy one and I'm just not seeing the information.
We are using RCC with Lync 2010. It works great if a user is logged in
with Extension Mobility on thier home but fails when a user logs in with
EMCC on a remote cluster. The EMCC device shows up and is selected on the
phone
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
