Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

Found a solution. I called Viking support. Unfortunately they do not have a solutions database but the technical support person suggested I change the gate open code to 99. He said that the digits * and 9 are generally more tolerated by the Viking devices. So after changing the code to 99, it

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

It actually may depend on what type of IP endpoint is calling the gateway. With the gateway in MGCP mode, I have had the best overall compatibility results when I configured the gateway to support RFC2833 and allow CUCM to negotiate that. I usually keep the Type of DTMF Relay in CUCM to its

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

Yes, we press 6 or 8 to open the gate. I have did not have mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode nse set. In CUCM under the gateway settings, I changed "Type Of DTMF Relay" to NSE. Saved, applied config and then did a no mgcp and then mgcp on the router and tested. Still cannot open the gate. Any

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

I take it you press 6 or something to allow the gate to open?  can you send a copy of the MGCP statements on the gateway? looking to see what the dtmf-relay is set to. mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode nse On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 6:46 AM, Brian Meade wrote: We'd

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

We'd need some debugs to see what is happening like "debug vpm signal" to see what tones are sent on the line. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kevin via cisco-voip < cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering if a solution was found. > > I have a similar issue. We have a

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

t: July-11-16 1:27 PM To: Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>; Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Another update I went thr

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

@outlook.com>>; Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca<mailto:mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Just giving an update on this one…. Adding “

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

t;mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Just giving an update on this one Adding "no battery-reversal" did keep the call connected. I was able to press ** and heard the 2-tone confir

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

-16 3:41 PM To: Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com<mailto:kevin.dami...@oneneck.com>>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com<mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@pu

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

on, Mike Sent: July-04-16 3:41 PM To: Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>; Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Re-reading the thread, I

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

o-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Damisch, Kevin Sent: June-30-16 12:06 AM To: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>; Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Ryan - the voice p

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

Hi Ryan, I'm happy to continue discussing this topic but it might be a bit generous to call me a "master" at it. I welcome corrections from anyone if I say something incorrect. :-) > As I understand supervisory disconnect (as it applies to this context), for > the local-end to be hanging up,

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

IMHO this is where it gets interesting. We have to leave the ‘digital’ world and enter the ‘analog’ world. The “FXO” emits a signal, it travels across the wire, and might possibly be echoed back at the electrical level. Get the o-scopes ladies and gents. When the firmware of the FXO card

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

.com] Sent: June-30-16 4:10 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca><mailto:mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>; Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com><mailto:kevin.dami...@oneneck.com> Subject: Re: [

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

-30-16 4:10 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller In this scenario Mike, do you think adjusting the impedance would be a benefi

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

spot on. right up until they invented analog answering machines… then we *HAD* to have analog disconnect supervision. -w On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Norton, Mike > wrote: A phone company cannot magically reach into your house and put

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

0-16 2:26 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller I’m not Wes but I’ll take a go at it... An FXO port is the essential

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

her.net] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike Sent: June-30-16 2:26 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller I'm not Wes but I'll take a go at it... An FXO port is the essentially the same thing

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

(wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com<mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Wes, With the utmost respect to you, I just want to take a moment to understand someth

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

and thus sucks. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: June-29-16 5:32 PM To: Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

: Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Wes, With the utmost respect to you, I just want to take a moment to understand something, in hopes that I may learn something from you (if yo

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 6:56 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Damisch, Kevin; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller alternatively looks like the FXO port might be configured to to tone disc

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

alternatively looks like the FXO port might be configured to to tone disconnect supervision. try disabling that all together and work forward from there. IIRC (dis)connect supervision is implemented in firmware on the card and is only sent back to IOS as an asserted event. Alternatively stated:

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

On the Cisco FXO port side, try "impedance 600r" under the voice port config. Essentially, what I believe you are up against, is a sine oscillation disagreement between the FXO port and the Viking. Thanks, Ryan On Jun 29, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Damisch, Kevin