nd your maildir the same permissions?
>
>
> Von / From: Doug Hardie <mailto:bc...@lafn.org>
> An / To: Newcomer01 <mailto:newcome...@posteo.de>
> Gesendet / Sent: Samstag, April 01, 2023 um 10:17 (at 10:17 AM) +0200
> Betreff / Subject: [clamav-users] Error Message from cl
I have started receiving the following error message on every received email:
Unable to determine the filepath given the file descriptor
FreeBSD 13.1, Postfix, clamav-milter, clamd
clamav-1.0.1,1
As a result the test virus is not detected, but the email gets a
X-Virus-Status: Clean header
Another data point.
I upgraded from 0.88.7 to 0.90. I use just clamav-milter driven from
sendmail. Version 0.88.7 worked fine. Generally about every 2 to 3
weeks it will hang and I have to restart it. Its processing a
couple hundred thousand email daily. Version 0.90 seemed at first
On Jun 10, 2005, at 13:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:54 PM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050610 22:49]:
wrote:
At 10:44 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
Anything interesting in /var/log/clamd.log?
On May 25, 2005, at 13:38, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
I believe I can make this occur at will (as long as there is a newer
database available). However, I am running FreeBSD and don't know
for sure the equivallent to strace - ktrace
On May 24, 2005, at 08:56, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, N Fung wrote:
--- N Fung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try with clamd and use the --external option to
clamav-milter.
Would the 'internal' mode be working again
On May 24, 2005, at 11:53, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
I believe I can make this occur at will (as long as there is a newer
database available). However, I am running FreeBSD and don't know
for
sure the equivallent to strace - ktrace
On May 24, 2005, at 13:21, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:54:47PM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
ktrace is effectively the same thing as truss so I used it. There
are two files available:
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/ktrace.html
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/clamd.html
ktrace.html
On May 24, 2005, at 19:30, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
On May 24, 2005, at 13:21, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:54:47PM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/ktrace.html
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/clamd.html
clamav
On May 20, 2005, at 19:02, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:49:32PM -0500, Damian Menscher said:
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
On May 20, 2005, at 02:32, Trog wrote:
The accept call is done within Sendmail, I believe.
That would make sense except
On May 21, 2005, at 02:23, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 14:44, Craig Green wrote:
clamav 0.85.1 on two servers. Both quit right about midnight. I
found the following log entries on one of them:
Are you using FreeBSD?
We've had the milter quit on a couple of FreeBSD
clamav 0.85.1 on two servers. Both quit right about midnight. I
found the following log entries on one of them:
May 19 23:40:07 zoon clamav-milter[75664]: ClamAv: accept() returned
invalid socket (Result too large), try again
May 19 23:40:43 zoon last message repeated 8 times
May 19
On May 20, 2005, at 02:32, Trog wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:22 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 20 May 2005 Doug Hardie wrote:
clamav 0.85.1 on two servers. Both quit right about midnight.
I found the following log entries on one of them:
...
I don't find an accept() anwhere
I am using sendmail with clamav-milter to scan email. Normally
clamav-milter does not scan messages from the LAN or the machine
unless you direct it to do so via the flags. I would like to be able
to put something into a message such that it would be scanned even
though it would
I have been running clamav 0.82.1 for some time without any known
problems. However, I finally have the time to upgrade and brought
down the FreeBSD port for 0.85.1 and installed it. Everything seems
to work properly except for clamav-milter logging. I had been
running clamav-milter
On May 17, 2005, at 17:24, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav 0.82.1 for some time without any known
problems. However, I finally have the time to upgrade and brought
down the FreeBSD port for 0.85.1 and installed it. Everything
seems to work properly except for clamav-milter
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
complaining about receiving viruses so I don't think there is a problem
with
We have a number of those in operation, but they haven't really chnged
since introducing clamav
On Apr 13, 2005, at 09:12, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I
was receiving between
On Nov 18, 2004, at 05:11, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I've been running clamd 0.80 for the past several weeks without any
problems. Suddenly in the last two days two different machines had
clamd die and exit on signal 4. (SIGILL)
I tried looking for a core file but could not find one and the
On Nov 15, 2004, at 04:37, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am, unfortunately, familiar with SpamCop (and all the other similar
'tools'). As a listed contact for over 16million Internet IP
addresses I
receive notices from such 'tools' all the time, and I've *never* had
one
On Nov 1, 2004, at 09:53, René Berber wrote:
Nico,
Now my question: why is clamd listening on a TCP port (only one port
but
the
This is fine, ClamD has to listen on a port otherwise no program
would be
able to communicate with it. The port should be identical with the one
listed in the clamd.pid
On Oct 25, 2004, at 23:05, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I would suggest that you DisableDefaultScanOptions in clamd.conf
and tune values according to your system. My servers do slightly
more than 800 smtp transfers per hour and I found out that working
with the DisableDefaultScanOptions commented
On Oct 11, 2004, at 18:43, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
The list of parameters I use is too long for a command line.
Oh, come on! What's so bad about...
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -l -i /var/run/clamav/clmilter.pid
-F /usr/local/etc/sig.txt /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock
;-)
Take
No. FreeBSD
On Oct 12, 2004, at 01:25, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 11 Oct 2004 23:22, Doug Hardie wrote:
I would like to see clamav-milter have a configuration file. Either
clamd.conf or a separate one would be fine. The list of parameters I
use is too long for a command line.
Are you using
I would like to see clamav-milter be able to read its parameters from a
file (clamd.conf or a separate file would be fine). The command line I
am using is just too long to manage easily.
___
I would like to see clamav-milter have a configuration file. Either
clamd.conf or a separate one would be fine. The list of parameters I
use is too long for a command line.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
fprintf(fd, %d\n, (int)getpid());
which
On Sep 24, 2004, at 16:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
I have looked all over the clamav.net web pages and I can't find it.
Where is it?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your
I have a cron job that scans the clamd.log file every day and counts
the specific virusus found. While the numbers tend to vary a bit from
day to day the relative ratios between the various viruses found tend
to stay the same - except for Worm.Zafi.B. One day it will find 1100
of them and
Those certainly could be it, but it is unusual compared with the other
viruses we see daily. I wonder if there is more to this one than has
been foun yet.
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:40, Timo Schöler wrote:
Thus spake Doug Hardie sometime Today...
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:16, Timo Schöler wrote:
Doug
I have two mail servers. One is used by users sending mail, the other
receives mail. When a user sends me mail it goes through both servers.
Both are running sendmail with clamav-milter and clamav. Normally I
see the following header elements in such mail:
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV
I just noticed that clamd has a large number of files opened that the
directory entries have been deleted. There are well over a hundred of
them. The sizes appear to be about right for emails.
On Jul 28, 2004, at 15:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I am running
FreeBSD 4.6
ClamAV version devel-20040728
On Jul 29, 2004, at 00:32, Trog wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 23:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so
I
upgraded to the version above.
Clamd is giving a segment violation
I am running
FreeBSD 4.6
ClamAV version devel-20040728
clamav-milter version 0.75b
Sendmail 8.12.3p3
I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so I
upgraded to the version above.
Clamd is giving a
On Apr 5, 2004, at 15:56, rosander wrote:
Can anyone comment if clamd support setting specific syslog facilities
and if so how I would set it in the conf file? I paroused the
documentation but nothing poped out at me except the switch to enable
output to syslog.
The facility is hard coded to
On Mar 19, 2004, at 05:17, Robert Blayzor wrote:
On 3/18/04 5:40 PM, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My quick look at the code behind --disable-urandom gave me the
impression that it only disabled the test for urandom and forced clamd
to use urandom. Thats why I manually deleted the define
, but after some minutes, it stops processing
emails. It is still running, in fact, it uses up to 85% of the CPU(!),
but no email goes thru. Did anyone else experience this problem?
Yes.
I have posted a similiar issue here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
msg06462.html
Doug Hardie
On Mar 8, 2004, at 13:18, Doug Hardie wrote:
After a review of clamd/session.c and the developers forum archives I
know what the cause of my problem is, but not necessarily why. The
version that works (clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040209',
clamav-milter version '0.66m) does not use either
On Mar 15, 2004, at 18:44, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 8, 2004, at 13:18, Doug Hardie wrote:
After a review of clamd/session.c and the developers forum archives
I know what the cause of my problem is, but not necessarily why.
The version that works (clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040209
On Mar 14, 2004, at 11:57, jef moskot wrote:
It looks like you get the proper IP of the offending machine firing off
these worms in the header (even though everything else is forged).
Is there any point in telling [EMAIL PROTECTED] that one of their DSL
customers is spamming the Internet with
On Mar 5, 2004, at 11:54, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing clamd from CVS as of 2004-03-04
under Solaris 7 on Sparc with the following
basic config:
# clamav.conf
LogFile /var/adm/clamav/clamd.log
LogFileMaxSize 10M
LogTime
PidFile /var/adm/clamav/clamd.pid
TCPSocket 3310
TCPAddr
On Mar 5, 2004, at 02:41, Trog wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 01:15, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just uncommented the thread timeout the last time I restarted clamd
a couple minutes ago so I don't know what effect that will have.
ThreadTimeout isn't used in the current CVS version.
Here is some more
I am trying to use clamav to scan mail on a prduction mail server that
has fairly high volume of mail and quite a large volume of viruses
being receivied. The only version of clamd I can run for any duration
is clamav-devel-20040209. That version runs for 4 to 5 days on my
production mail
On Mar 4, 2004, at 15:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
I am trying to use clamav to scan mail on a prduction mail server that
has fairly high volume of mail and quite a large volume of viruses
being receivied. The only version of clamd I can run for any duration
is clamav-devel-20040209. That version
I am trying to get clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040221, clamav-milter
version 0.67g working. There have been some changes in TCP Wrapper
support that leave me a bit confused. smfi_getsymval is called to get
{if_name}. Where is that set? The messages in syslog indicate that
its not set.
On Feb 16, 2004, at 00:34, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 16 Feb 2004 4:37 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
Feb 15 19:14:18 1.4 zoon clamav-milter: ClamAv: private data not
NULL
What does the message mean and is
there a configuration parameter I need to alter to avoid it?
This sounds like an error thrown
On Feb 16, 2004, at 01:52, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
; On Monday 16 Feb 2004 4:37 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
;
; Feb 15 19:14:18 1.4 zoon clamav-milter: ClamAv: private data not
NULL
; What does the message mean and is
; there a configuration parameter I
I am occasionally receiving a number of the following entries in
/var/log/messages:
Feb 15 19:14:18 1.4 zoon clamav-milter: ClamAv: private data not NULL
Shortly after they start, some threads start returning an error to
sendmail. Some time after that all the threads are returning an error.
I have been running with devel-20040209 for a week or so since 0.65
didn't meet my needs. The development version does. However, 0.66 has
now been released. Is it based on 0.65 or the development branch?
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed
I am running clamav-milter from clamav-devel-20040209 and trying to get
it to not send mail to postmaster when it finds a virus. With version
0.65 I used clamav-milter -ol local:/var/run/virus.sock and it worked
properly. However, things have changed. As best as I can tell the
equivallent
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running clamav-milter from clamav-devel-20040209 and trying to get
it to not send mail to postmaster when it finds a virus. With version
0.65 I used clamav-milter -ol local:/var/run/virus.sock and it worked
properly
On Feb 10, 2004, at 05:47, Nigel Horne wrote:
I am running clamav-milter from clamav-devel-20040209 and trying to
get
it to not send mail to postmaster when it finds a virus. With version
0.65 I used clamav-milter -ol local:/var/run/virus.sock and it worked
properly.
What version are you
Running clamav-devel-20040209. At first I found it left a lot of files
reamining with no entries in the file structures. However, previous
messages here identified the issue and I switched to using
quarantine-dir to give them a home. However, at this time the number
of viruses being blocked
On Feb 10, 2004, at 02:20, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 10 Feb 2004 8:30 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
However, things have changed. As best as I can tell the
equivallent should be clamav-milter -f -q local:/var/run/virus.sock
but
that still sends mail to postmaster for each virus found.
-q does
55 matches
Mail list logo