Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-16 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: Clam runs fine when properly configured. And it ran fine for me right up intil 0.85. Are you asking the developers to compensate for sloppy administration? I think for that you need a No, what I'm asking for is if it runs one day with certain

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-16 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christopher X. Candreva said: On Sat, 14 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: Clam runs fine when properly configured. And it ran fine for me right up intil 0.85. Are you asking the developers to compensate for sloppy administration? I think for that you need a No, what I'm asking for is if

[Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to refuse to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ? I would much prefer it doing something and not logging then takeing down the whole mail system. ==

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Damian Menscher
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to refuse to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ? I would much prefer it doing something and not logging then takeing down the whole mail system. If your

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christopher X. Candreva said: May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to refuse to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ? I would much prefer it doing something and not logging then takeing down the whole mail system.

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Robert Stampfli
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote: Christopher X. Candreva said: May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to refuse to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ? I would much prefer it doing something and not

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Dennis Peterson
Robert Stampfli said: On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote: Christopher X. Candreva said: May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to refuse to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ? I would much prefer it doing

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Damian Menscher
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Robert Stampfli wrote: clamav-milter does not have its own config file, so it steals information from clamd.conf, and it now requires LogFile to be defined there, even though it uses syslogging by default. So, it appears I'm left with having to use a logfile for clamd, to keep