I am running
FreeBSD 4.6
ClamAV version devel-20040728
clamav-milter version 0.75b
Sendmail 8.12.3p3
I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so I
upgraded to the version above.
Clamd is giving a
On Jul 29, 2004, at 00:32, Trog wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 23:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so
I
upgraded to the version above.
Clamd is giving a segment violation
I just noticed that clamd has a large number of files opened that the
directory entries have been deleted. There are well over a hundred of
them. The sizes appear to be about right for emails.
On Jul 28, 2004, at 15:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I am running
FreeBSD 4.6
ClamAV version devel-20040728
I have two mail servers. One is used by users sending mail, the other
receives mail. When a user sends me mail it goes through both servers.
Both are running sendmail with clamav-milter and clamav. Normally I
see the following header elements in such mail:
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV
I have a cron job that scans the clamd.log file every day and counts
the specific virusus found. While the numbers tend to vary a bit from
day to day the relative ratios between the various viruses found tend
to stay the same - except for Worm.Zafi.B. One day it will find 1100
of them and
Those certainly could be it, but it is unusual compared with the other
viruses we see daily. I wonder if there is more to this one than has
been foun yet.
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:40, Timo Schöler wrote:
Thus spake Doug Hardie sometime Today...
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:16, Timo Schöler wrote:
Doug
I have looked all over the clamav.net web pages and I can't find it.
Where is it?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your
On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
fprintf(fd, %d\n, (int)getpid());
which
On Sep 24, 2004, at 16:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
I would like to see clamav-milter be able to read its parameters from a
file (clamd.conf or a separate file would be fine). The command line I
am using is just too long to manage easily.
___
On Oct 11, 2004, at 18:43, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
The list of parameters I use is too long for a command line.
Oh, come on! What's so bad about...
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -l -i /var/run/clamav/clmilter.pid
-F /usr/local/etc/sig.txt /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock
;-)
Take
No. FreeBSD
On Oct 12, 2004, at 01:25, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 11 Oct 2004 23:22, Doug Hardie wrote:
I would like to see clamav-milter have a configuration file. Either
clamd.conf or a separate one would be fine. The list of parameters I
use is too long for a command line.
Are you using
I would like to see clamav-milter have a configuration file. Either
clamd.conf or a separate one would be fine. The list of parameters I
use is too long for a command line.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
On Oct 25, 2004, at 23:05, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I would suggest that you DisableDefaultScanOptions in clamd.conf
and tune values according to your system. My servers do slightly
more than 800 smtp transfers per hour and I found out that working
with the DisableDefaultScanOptions commented
On Nov 1, 2004, at 09:53, René Berber wrote:
Nico,
Now my question: why is clamd listening on a TCP port (only one port
but
the
This is fine, ClamD has to listen on a port otherwise no program
would be
able to communicate with it. The port should be identical with the one
listed in the clamd.pid
On Nov 15, 2004, at 04:37, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am, unfortunately, familiar with SpamCop (and all the other similar
'tools'). As a listed contact for over 16million Internet IP
addresses I
receive notices from such 'tools' all the time, and I've *never* had
one
On Nov 18, 2004, at 05:11, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I've been running clamd 0.80 for the past several weeks without any
problems. Suddenly in the last two days two different machines had
clamd die and exit on signal 4. (SIGILL)
I tried looking for a core file but could not find one and the
I am running clamav-milter from clamav-devel-20040209 and trying to get
it to not send mail to postmaster when it finds a virus. With version
0.65 I used clamav-milter -ol local:/var/run/virus.sock and it worked
properly. However, things have changed. As best as I can tell the
equivallent
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running clamav-milter from clamav-devel-20040209 and trying to get
it to not send mail to postmaster when it finds a virus. With version
0.65 I used clamav-milter -ol local:/var/run/virus.sock and it worked
properly
On Feb 10, 2004, at 05:47, Nigel Horne wrote:
I am running clamav-milter from clamav-devel-20040209 and trying to
get
it to not send mail to postmaster when it finds a virus. With version
0.65 I used clamav-milter -ol local:/var/run/virus.sock and it worked
properly.
What version are you
Running clamav-devel-20040209. At first I found it left a lot of files
reamining with no entries in the file structures. However, previous
messages here identified the issue and I switched to using
quarantine-dir to give them a home. However, at this time the number
of viruses being blocked
On Feb 10, 2004, at 02:20, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 10 Feb 2004 8:30 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
However, things have changed. As best as I can tell the
equivallent should be clamav-milter -f -q local:/var/run/virus.sock
but
that still sends mail to postmaster for each virus found.
-q does
I have been running with devel-20040209 for a week or so since 0.65
didn't meet my needs. The development version does. However, 0.66 has
now been released. Is it based on 0.65 or the development branch?
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed
I am occasionally receiving a number of the following entries in
/var/log/messages:
Feb 15 19:14:18 1.4 zoon clamav-milter: ClamAv: private data not NULL
Shortly after they start, some threads start returning an error to
sendmail. Some time after that all the threads are returning an error.
On Feb 16, 2004, at 00:34, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 16 Feb 2004 4:37 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
Feb 15 19:14:18 1.4 zoon clamav-milter: ClamAv: private data not
NULL
What does the message mean and is
there a configuration parameter I need to alter to avoid it?
This sounds like an error thrown
On Feb 16, 2004, at 01:52, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
; On Monday 16 Feb 2004 4:37 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
;
; Feb 15 19:14:18 1.4 zoon clamav-milter: ClamAv: private data not
NULL
; What does the message mean and is
; there a configuration parameter I
I am trying to get clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040221, clamav-milter
version 0.67g working. There have been some changes in TCP Wrapper
support that leave me a bit confused. smfi_getsymval is called to get
{if_name}. Where is that set? The messages in syslog indicate that
its not set.
I am trying to use clamav to scan mail on a prduction mail server that
has fairly high volume of mail and quite a large volume of viruses
being receivied. The only version of clamd I can run for any duration
is clamav-devel-20040209. That version runs for 4 to 5 days on my
production mail
On Mar 4, 2004, at 15:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
I am trying to use clamav to scan mail on a prduction mail server that
has fairly high volume of mail and quite a large volume of viruses
being receivied. The only version of clamd I can run for any duration
is clamav-devel-20040209. That version
On Mar 5, 2004, at 02:41, Trog wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 01:15, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just uncommented the thread timeout the last time I restarted clamd
a couple minutes ago so I don't know what effect that will have.
ThreadTimeout isn't used in the current CVS version.
Here is some more
On Mar 5, 2004, at 11:54, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing clamd from CVS as of 2004-03-04
under Solaris 7 on Sparc with the following
basic config:
# clamav.conf
LogFile /var/adm/clamav/clamd.log
LogFileMaxSize 10M
LogTime
PidFile /var/adm/clamav/clamd.pid
TCPSocket 3310
TCPAddr
On Mar 14, 2004, at 11:57, jef moskot wrote:
It looks like you get the proper IP of the offending machine firing off
these worms in the header (even though everything else is forged).
Is there any point in telling [EMAIL PROTECTED] that one of their DSL
customers is spamming the Internet with
On Mar 8, 2004, at 13:18, Doug Hardie wrote:
After a review of clamd/session.c and the developers forum archives I
know what the cause of my problem is, but not necessarily why. The
version that works (clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040209',
clamav-milter version '0.66m) does not use either
On Mar 15, 2004, at 18:44, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 8, 2004, at 13:18, Doug Hardie wrote:
After a review of clamd/session.c and the developers forum archives
I know what the cause of my problem is, but not necessarily why.
The version that works (clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040209
, but after some minutes, it stops processing
emails. It is still running, in fact, it uses up to 85% of the CPU(!),
but no email goes thru. Did anyone else experience this problem?
Yes.
I have posted a similiar issue here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
msg06462.html
Doug Hardie
On Mar 19, 2004, at 05:17, Robert Blayzor wrote:
On 3/18/04 5:40 PM, Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My quick look at the code behind --disable-urandom gave me the
impression that it only disabled the test for urandom and forced clamd
to use urandom. Thats why I manually deleted the define
On Apr 5, 2004, at 15:56, rosander wrote:
Can anyone comment if clamd support setting specific syslog facilities
and if so how I would set it in the conf file? I paroused the
documentation but nothing poped out at me except the switch to enable
output to syslog.
The facility is hard coded to
Another data point.
I upgraded from 0.88.7 to 0.90. I use just clamav-milter driven from
sendmail. Version 0.88.7 worked fine. Generally about every 2 to 3
weeks it will hang and I have to restart it. Its processing a
couple hundred thousand email daily. Version 0.90 seemed at first
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
complaining about receiving viruses so I don't think there is a problem
with
We have a number of those in operation, but they haven't really chnged
since introducing clamav
On Apr 13, 2005, at 09:12, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I
was receiving between
I have been running clamav 0.82.1 for some time without any known
problems. However, I finally have the time to upgrade and brought
down the FreeBSD port for 0.85.1 and installed it. Everything seems
to work properly except for clamav-milter logging. I had been
running clamav-milter
On May 17, 2005, at 17:24, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav 0.82.1 for some time without any known
problems. However, I finally have the time to upgrade and brought
down the FreeBSD port for 0.85.1 and installed it. Everything
seems to work properly except for clamav-milter
I am using sendmail with clamav-milter to scan email. Normally
clamav-milter does not scan messages from the LAN or the machine
unless you direct it to do so via the flags. I would like to be able
to put something into a message such that it would be scanned even
though it would
clamav 0.85.1 on two servers. Both quit right about midnight. I
found the following log entries on one of them:
May 19 23:40:07 zoon clamav-milter[75664]: ClamAv: accept() returned
invalid socket (Result too large), try again
May 19 23:40:43 zoon last message repeated 8 times
May 19
On May 20, 2005, at 02:32, Trog wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:22 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 20 May 2005 Doug Hardie wrote:
clamav 0.85.1 on two servers. Both quit right about midnight.
I found the following log entries on one of them:
...
I don't find an accept() anwhere
On May 21, 2005, at 02:23, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 14:44, Craig Green wrote:
clamav 0.85.1 on two servers. Both quit right about midnight. I
found the following log entries on one of them:
Are you using FreeBSD?
We've had the milter quit on a couple of FreeBSD
On May 20, 2005, at 19:02, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:49:32PM -0500, Damian Menscher said:
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
On May 20, 2005, at 02:32, Trog wrote:
The accept call is done within Sendmail, I believe.
That would make sense except
On May 24, 2005, at 08:56, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, N Fung wrote:
--- N Fung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try with clamd and use the --external option to
clamav-milter.
Would the 'internal' mode be working again
On May 24, 2005, at 11:53, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
I believe I can make this occur at will (as long as there is a newer
database available). However, I am running FreeBSD and don't know
for
sure the equivallent to strace - ktrace
On May 24, 2005, at 13:21, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:54:47PM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
ktrace is effectively the same thing as truss so I used it. There
are two files available:
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/ktrace.html
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/clamd.html
ktrace.html
On May 24, 2005, at 19:30, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
On May 24, 2005, at 13:21, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:54:47PM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/ktrace.html
http://www.lafn.org/clamav/clamd.html
clamav
On May 25, 2005, at 13:38, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Doug Hardie said:
I believe I can make this occur at will (as long as there is a newer
database available). However, I am running FreeBSD and don't know
for sure the equivallent to strace - ktrace
On Jun 10, 2005, at 13:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:54 PM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050610 22:49]:
wrote:
At 10:44 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
Anything interesting in /var/log/clamd.log?
I have started receiving the following error message on every received email:
Unable to determine the filepath given the file descriptor
FreeBSD 13.1, Postfix, clamav-milter, clamd
clamav-1.0.1,1
As a result the test virus is not detected, but the email gets a
X-Virus-Status: Clean header
nd your maildir the same permissions?
>
>
> Von / From: Doug Hardie <mailto:bc...@lafn.org>
> An / To: Newcomer01 <mailto:newcome...@posteo.de>
> Gesendet / Sent: Samstag, April 01, 2023 um 10:17 (at 10:17 AM) +0200
> Betreff / Subject: [clamav-users] Error Message from cl
55 matches
Mail list logo
