Re: [CODE4LIB] Looking for a Word to EAD converter

Don't know whether one exists or not, but the fact that the documents are in MS Word means that you could attach some VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) macros to the documents and run a macro that extracts and creates XML. Andy. > -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:

Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data

After having done numerous matching and mapping projects, there are some issues that you will face with your strategy, assuming I understand it correctly. Trying to match a heading starting at the left most subfield and working forward will not necessarily produce correct results when matching a

Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data

: Ya'aqov Ziso [mailto:yaaq...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:18 To: Code for Libraries; Houghton,Andrew Cc: LeVan,Ralph Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data Andrew, please see [YZ] below 181 __ $z England and you would NOT find this heading in LCSH. This is issue

Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data

That is probably correct. England may appear as both a 110 *and* a 151 because the 110 signifies the concept for the country entity while the 151 signifies the concept for the geographic place. A subtle distinction... Andy. > -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LI

Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data

Ziso [mailto:yaaq...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 13:47 To: Code for Libraries; Houghton,Andrew Cc: Hickey,Thom; LeVan,Ralph Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data Andrew, as always, most helpful news, kindest thanks! more [YZ] below: 1. No disagreement, except that som

Re: [CODE4LIB] alpha characters used for field names

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Eric Lease Morgan > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:21 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] alpha characters used for field names > > Are alpha characters used for field names valid in MARC records? > > When w

Re: [CODE4LIB] implementing cool uris in java

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Emily Lynema > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 12:22 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] implementing cool uris in java > > I'm looking around for tools to implement cool uris in java. I've been > studying the re

Re: [CODE4LIB] library-related apps for the iPhone?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Stephens, Owen > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:31 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] library-related apps for the iPhone? > > >Our biggest challenge is actually getting our hands on an iPhone > because >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Assistance with Dewey to LC conversion

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Di Worth > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:59 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Assistance with Dewey to LC conversion > > Dear Code4Libs > The University of Tasmania has about one third of its collection >

Re: [CODE4LIB] creating call number browse

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Emily Lynema > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:46 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] creating call number browse > > Hey all, > > I would love to tackle the issue of creating a really cool call number

Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ross Singer > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 7:45 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data > > Also, I noticed another dump on the IA of Library of Congress updates > since the initial "Biss

Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ross Singer > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:23 PM > > I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you need to be an OCLC > customer to benefit from this? > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:35 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data > > The NAF (Name/National Authority File) is still one important database > that we are mis

Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ya¹aqov Ziso > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:39 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data > > Andrew Houghton, kindly explain: > > 1. LC names/subjects authority files, current with 2008-

Re: [CODE4LIB] Cross-Walk - LC Subject Heads to MeSH Subject Headings

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Karen Tschanz > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 12:53 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Cross-Walk - LC Subject Heads to MeSH Subject > Headings > > Dear Listers: > > We are interested in identifuing one or

Re: [CODE4LIB] Javascript trees

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Yitzchak Schaffer > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:40 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Javascript trees > > Coders: > > Have you had any successful experiences with trees in JS frameworks? > I'm tryin

Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Alexander Johannesen > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:00 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.? > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:43, Rebecca S Guenther wrote: > > Pa

Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:48 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.? > > A few points: > > 1. "x-" is commonly used in cas

Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:02 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.? > > I'm confused about your suggestion of registering a content type for

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 4:42 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > I am looking for the easiest possible way to get a legal URI > representing a su

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 4:52 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Also, the date aspect of a tag-uri seems to make it hard to use to mint > an ide

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:00 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Aha, cool! Yeah, I could use tag for this, but it wouldn't seem > appropriate f

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:18 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > I am not interested in maintaining a sudoc.info registration, and > neither is m

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:28 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Another good idea, true. There are indeed lots of ways to do this. > > But wait

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:38 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point of all this to be a

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 6:09 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > If GPO had a system where I could resolve Sudoc identifiers, then this > whole p

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:30 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Ross Singer writes: > > There should be no issue with having both, mainly because li

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:15 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > The problem is that, after setting up a non-dereferencable http: URI > to name someth

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:16 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Some hints of the existing argument in other forums can be found in > this > po

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:52 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > But when did someone suggest that all identifiers must be resolvable? > When And

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:38 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Ross Singer writes: > > I suppose my point is, there's a valid case for identifier

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:17 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > The point is that (I argue) the identifier shouldn't tie itself to a > particular d

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:35 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Houghton,Andrew writes: > > So creating an info URI

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Eric Hellman > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:51 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > There are actually a number of http URLs that work like > http://dx.doi.org/10.111

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:08 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] > registering info: uris?) > &g

Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 10:17 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris? > > Houghton,Andrew writes: > > Again we have moved t

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:58 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > I real

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:55 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification > > A concrete example. > > The MODS schema, version 3.3

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Karen Coyle > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:06 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > The general convention is that

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:23 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification > > Houghton,Andrew wrote: > > > > O

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:59 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > We do j

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:38 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > No, no

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Karen Coyle > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:26 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > This really puzzles me, becaus

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:41 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > I have to say I am suspicious o

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 10:07 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > >

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Karen Coyle > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 10:15 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > &g

Re: [CODE4LIB] points of failure (was Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification )

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 10:53 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] points of failure (was Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution > and identification ) > > Isn't there always a single point

Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?)

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:21 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: > [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?) > > Over in: http://www.w3.or

Re: [CODE4LIB] Anyone else watching rev=canonical?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Brett Bonfield > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:35 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Anyone else watching rev=canonical? > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind > wrote: > > Wait,

Re: [CODE4LIB] Anyone else watching rev=canonical?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Brett Bonfield > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:48 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Anyone else watching rev=canonical? > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Houghton,Andre

Re: [CODE4LIB] A simple windows macro program?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jill Ellern > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:52 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] A simple windows macro program? > > Hey Code4Lib folks, > > Not sure if there are any Clio ILL software users in the Co

Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view standards and usage

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ross Singer > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:07 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view > standards and usage > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Ray Denenberg,

Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view standards and usage

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:45 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view > standards and usage > > On Thu, Jul 16, 20

Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view standards and usage

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Karen Coyle > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:09 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view > standards and usage > > Houghton,Andrew wrot

Re: [CODE4LIB] XML schemas question

> -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 11:35 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] XML schemas question > > Anyone familiar with XML schemas (.xsd)? > > Can you help

Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: PURL Server Update 2

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Edward M. Corrado > Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 3:57 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: PURL Server Update 2 > > This should be a lesson to each and everyone of us who are in charge of >

Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: PURL Server Update 2

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > David Fiander > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:32 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: PURL Server Update 2 > > If Millenium is acting like a robot in its > monthly maintenance processes,

Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: PURL Server Update 2

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Thomas Dowling > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:25 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: PURL Server Update 2 > > The III crawler has been a pain for years and Innovative has shown no > in

Re: [CODE4LIB] Auto-suggest and the id.loc.gov LCSH web service

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Winona Salesky > Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 11:00 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Auto-suggest and the id.loc.gov LCSH web > service > > Quoting Ethan Gruber : > > > I have a need to integr

[CODE4LIB] Q: MARC formats in XML

Does anybody know whether the MARC formats at: are encoded in an XML format that one might use for proce

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Benjamin Young > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 09:26 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > If you're looking at putting MARC into JSON, there was some discussion > of that dur

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:30 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Houghton,Andrew > wrote:

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 01:59 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Houghton,Andrew > wrote:

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Benjamin Young > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 02:06 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > A CouchDB friend of mine just pointed me to the BibJSON format by the > Bibliographi

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ross Singer > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 02:32 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Houghton,Andrew > wrote: >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 03:45 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > I guess my concern here is that the specification, as you're describing > it, is closin

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Benjamin Young > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 04:24 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > For my part, I'd like to explore the options of putting MARC data into > CouchDB (wh

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 05:22 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > This is my central point. I'm actually saying that JSON streaming is > painful > and ra

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ross Singer > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 09:18 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > I actually just wrote the same exact email as Bill (although probably > not as polite -

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 08:48 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Houghton,Andrew > wrote: >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 05:11 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > Anyway, hopefully, it won't be a huge surprise that I don't disagree > with any of th

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Benjamin Young > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 09:32 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > Rather than using a newline-delimited format (the whole of which would > not togethe

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON]

> From: Houghton,Andrew > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 06:59 PM > To: Code for Libraries > Subject: RE: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter > > Depending on how much time I get next week I'll talk with the developer > network folks to see what I need to do to put a s

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON]

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 11:53 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON] > > I would just ask why you didn't use Bill Dueber's already existing >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON]

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:19 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON] > > I would like to see ind1 and ind2 get their own fields, though, for > easie

Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON]

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Bill Dueber > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:40 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter [MARC-JSON] > > On the one hand, I'm all for following specs. But on the other...should > w

[CODE4LIB] List of MARC flavors

Does anyone know where there might be a list of the various flavors of MARC? I currently have: marc21 usmarc US MARC Replaced by marc21 rusmarc Russian MARC canmarc Canadian MARC Replaced by marc21 ukmarc UK MARC Replaced by marc21 cmarc Chinese MARC unimarc Uni-MARC

Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

If its open source, I assume that it could be adapted to run under Mono and then you could run it on Linux, Macs, etc. It may even run under Mono, don't know, haven't played with it. Andy. > -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

-Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Ross Singer > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:23 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Houghto

Re: [CODE4LIB] Indexing MARC(-JSON) with MongoDB?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Kyle Banerjee > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:51 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Indexing MARC(-JSON) with MongoDB? > > JSON maybe a great data exchange format, but it's not a markup > langua

Re: [CODE4LIB] Indexing MARC(-JSON) with MongoDB?

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > MJ Suhonos > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:34 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Indexing MARC(-JSON) with MongoDB? > > PS. For those RDF-ites among us, I also happen to think that JSON > makes

Re: [CODE4LIB] generating unique integers

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of > Eric Lease Morgan > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 09:35 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] generating unique integers > > Given a list of unique strings, how can I generate a list of short, > unique integ

Re: [CODE4LIB] MarcXML and char encodings

> Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 14:18 > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MarcXML and char encodings > > Okay, maybe here's another way to approach the question. > > If I want to have a MarcXML document encoded in Marc8 -- what should it > look like? What should be in the XML declerati

Re: [CODE4LIB] MarcXML and char encodings

> Karen Coyle > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 15:41 > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MarcXML and char encodings > > The discussions at the MARC standards group relating to Unicode all had > to do with using Unicode *within* ISO2709. I can't find any evidence > that MARCXML ever went through the standards

Re: [CODE4LIB] more on MARC char encoding: Now we're about ISO_2709 and MARC21

> Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 19:55 > Subject: [CODE4LIB] more on MARC char encoding: Now we're about > ISO_2709 and MARC21 > > The LC docs don't actually say quite what I thought about leader byte > 09, used to advertise encoding: > > > a - UCS/Unicode > Character coding in

Re: [CODE4LIB] more on MARC char encoding: Now we're about ISO_2709 and MARC21

> -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 19:55 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] more on MARC char encoding: Now we're about > ISO_2709 and MARC21 > > Okay, forget X

Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC Classify API - sfa vs. nsfa

Without checking webdewey or the schedules the Class numbers in the records were probably built from the schedules and the "truncated" numbers are probably what is enumerated in the schedules. That's my best guess. Andy. On Jun 21, 2012, at 17:02, "Arash.Joorabchi" wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Tha

Re: [CODE4LIB] browser toolbars

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeremy Dunck > Sent: 25 May, 2005 11:44 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] browser toolbars > > On 5/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > >but I'd rather create an > > easy-to-install-an

Re: [CODE4LIB] browser toolbars

> -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeremy Dunck > Sent: 25 May, 2005 14:56 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] browser toolbars > > On 5/25/05, Houghton,Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [CODE4LIB] browser toolbars

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeremy Dunck > Sent: 27 May, 2005 11:26 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] browser toolbars > > > > > Actually, I didn't mis-paste the URL, > > Hmmm. > > You said: > "For information on Microsoft's Office Rese

Re: [CODE4LIB] Javascript question

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Vishwam Annam > Sent: 08 June, 2005 14:41 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Javascript question > > I have a question about including html files in javascript. I > created a page at > http://www.libraries.wright.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Javascript question

> From: Vishwam Annam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 June, 2005 15:37 > To: Code for Libraries > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Javascript question > > * I have copyright information for Faculty at > http://www.libraries.wright.edu/services/copyright/fac_staff/, you can see a > link to "Primary

Re: [CODE4LIB] XSLT for LCCNs

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Hickey,Thom > Sent: 10 February, 2006 14:19 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] XSLT for LCCNs > > Anyone have some XSLT that will take arbitrary LCCN's as they > are stored in MARC and transform them into a nicely

Re: [CODE4LIB] blocked IRC

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Roy Tennant > Sent: 28 February, 2006 14:56 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] blocked IRC > > An alternative is to first connect to a remote server and > then IRC from there. That is what I do, but for differ

Re: [CODE4LIB] compact display for marc-xml

> -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Edward Summers > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:46 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] compact display for marc-xml > > A while back Thom posted [1] some xslt/css for displaying > m

Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ben Ostrowsky > Sent: 22 May, 2006 09:47 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog > > [Description of Problem, deleted...] > > My guess is that we should have a row for each

Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Gorman > Sent: 22 May, 2006 10:15 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog > > My gut instinct is that while this is nice, I'm wondering if > for this particula

Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ross Singer > Sent: 22 May, 2006 11:58 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog > > Er, how many records are we talking about? > > I don't really see this table getting

Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog

On 5/22/06, Houghton,Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Ross Singer > > Sent: 22 May, 2006 11:58 > > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our H

Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Gorman > Sent: 23 May, 2006 09:54 > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Musings on using xISBN in our Horizon catalog > > > > > That's why I'd love to know whether the xISBN database uses > a common > >

  1   2   >