Next week, on Wednesday morning, we're hosting a Pioneers panel discussion
at ApacheCon. We'll be pulling together folks who were there in the
delivery room when the new-ht...@hyperreal.org list was born in 1995, as
well as others who have been critical to the birth of the Foundation
itself
Last week I spoke at a conference in Romania, and heard about a group in a
town called Iosi sponsoring something of a mini-Summer-of-Code for
Romanian CS students:
http://oscar.info.uaic.ro/?q=node/32
One of the proposed projects is described as:
3)Apache mod_rdf (OP03)
Creation of an
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Santiago Gala wrote:
True. JIRA does the right thing provided the changes are sent into a
public list. Bugzilla, IIRC, is usually configured so that only
assignee, reporter and other people commenting get copies, and this is
definitely bad. This is what gnome, mozilla and other
Woohoo! Go Novell!
Brian
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 00:45:01 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux News Software - OSDir.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Osdir-daily] Novell Acquires Valuable B2B, Web Services Patents
It has been
There is SVNwiki, but it only uses SVN as the database backend; it's not
designed to have the content also be edited directly, though someone could
carefully do that.
The issue is that Wikis do things to data on the way in, from syntax
checking to (perhaps) glossary-izing, as well as to the
This may be completely inappropriate for this list... but this, is so, *wrong*.
And no matter what side of the political spectrum you sit on, I know
transparency and auditability and trust is important to you - that's why you're
here at Apache. And yes, this is news; not a rehash of what you
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Julie MacNaught wrote:
Conclusion? Just play nice.
Right on! It's amazing how well a bit of humility, encouragement of
others, and responding to fire with ice works in online communities -
whether technical like this one, or social, or whatever.
I'm haunted, though, by
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
In the end, the majority of the 99% must adjust to the 1% of idiots.
Hmmm At a 2 magnitude superiority in manpower, the majority is unable to
keep them in check, and weed them out? Is
Use www.bugmenot.com if you need a password.
Comments? Is there anything the community thinks we could do to address
the situation?
Brian
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:09:41 -0400
From: Greg Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Open
Eclipse is open source. Why is this company using their brand? Ugh.
Brian
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi all,
I had to talk with MyEclipseIDE (http://myeclipseide.com) support
regarding work-related issues, so I took the opportunity to inquiry if
they would provide free
OpenOffice, too.
Batten down the hatches!
Brian
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
An interest article about the posible attack using patents. An interesting
quote:
They [MS] are specifically upset about Samba, Apache and Sendmail.
Here is the link:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
after a brief discussion, this went back to obscurity. As far as I can
see, we don't have a jobs offered / jobs wanted list. How about
getting one? I would be willing to act as moderator.
I've passed the request along to the infrastructure team.
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
* Be forgiving to the infrastructure volunteers. While the 'thank them for
all the stuff they are doing for us' can get tiring, the reality is that
the ASF seems to be growing in resources and yet Brian has not collapsed
from exhaustion.
Well I nearly am,
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As for the problem, it seems to be in spamwatch, and will be addressed.
It's not a problem in spamwatch, it's an intentional setting, based on a
pattern Tetsuya gave us.
Brian
-
We don't appear to, but I would be +1 on setting something like this up.
Freebsd.org has one, not sure who else might.
Brian
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
personal question and I don't know whether it is appropriate to ask on
community@: Do we have a Jobs available /
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Adrian Sutton wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently (ie: 2-3 days ago) been told that I'm heading off to Java One
at the end of the week and thought it would be worth checking the party@ list
to see what gatherings had been organized etc. Two questions:
1. Is the party@ list
I'll be in New Zealand the first half of August, otherwise I'd seriously
support this. I think there are enough other Bay Area types that we could
have a good turnout to man the booth. Linuxworld has stopped being a geek
show and is definitely a business show now, which I think is all the more
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hmmm..might be problematic when you're on the move and have to use
whatever system/connection is available.
A quick hack in that case, if you have access to SSH and can tunnel: set
up a tunnel over your SSH connection to minotaur's localhost port
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Most of the .qmail files in ~apmail are not setup to allow that
directly on @apache.org...
Oh yeah, you're right. That's not hard to fix, though it's a pain to
maintain. It means having files on daedalus:~apmail for each user that
fits
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Brian Behlendorf dijo:
Yeah, me too. But even with aggressive filtering I still get 200-300 a
day. I abandoned my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address for this reason.
This is why I think we need to go hard on spam policies. Please, turn on
spamassassin
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
BTW, the sender header of the mail I replied is:
X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
That means we are using something to break
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, J Aaron Farr wrote:
However, mx4j is a good example because apparently it includes code licensed
under the Jetty and Jython licenses [2]. While I am not intimately familiar
with mx4j, this may mean that the total legal effect of using mx4j is not
contained within the mx4j
There's no quick answer; the question is, will someone who is making a
good-faith effort to follow the license not realize that the LICENSE and
NOTICE files are slightly differently named, and thus not follow whatever
related requirements are in the license. Even in that rare circumstance,
most
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
That looks like great news.
Everytime I see an open-source license coming out, I keep having the
same question: what is expected, what is known (and known to fail), in
terms of applicability of this license in other countries than the USA?
Dirk has
For those who want a more direct connection with our namesake:
http://www.bid4assets.com/auction/index.cfm?AuctionID=107809ct=catFeature
(I'm not the seller or anything, just saw this and though I'd forward it)
Brian
-
To
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We have so far voted to not create an ASF blog because we do not want the
perception of the ASF approving the content of the blogs. This does not
seem any different to me. I understand that some people feel that we are
just syndicating content from
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:52:29AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
certain IP addresses that could send mail that claimed to be From: an
@apache.org address, in an attempt to prevent forged spam. But I'm sure
the infrastructure team would make
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
Classified for reading until I finish a proposal ;-)
A nice scheme against spam, I read about some time ago, was about
requiring the email sender to compute a computationally difficult
challenge before the email was accepted, for uknown/untrusted
Joshua and Joerg said you can just send mail as whomever you like through
your local SMTP relay; and while that's usually true, some conservative
sysadmins will only allow relaying through of mail claiming to be from a
particular sender domain; furthermore it's becoming more common for port
25
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think that would really be acceptable, mostly
because of listing GPL.
That would be fine, but then you'd have to give away the shirt for free.
Brian
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
when I subscribed to some mailing lists, I got stunned
at seeing the fact that some mailing lists accepted
spam mails.
Some lists were setup wrong. AFAIK, none of the lists should accept mail
from non-subscribers
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
With respect to the mess of software patents, here is an example where
initially most people laughed, Ha ha, they fed Microsoft!, until it
slowly began to dawn on people that this is a huge problem.
Is there any indication yet that Eolas intends
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
as we all have noticed, the EU parliament did not vote on Software
patents. Can we start to fade the redirections out again? It's not nice,
that e.g. bugs.apache.org is no longer reachable.
Note that bugs.apache.org is being phased out, since
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, David Reid wrote:
Bill, are you seriously saying that laws in the EU will not have any impact
on the way the ASF carries on it's affairs? It saddens me as I thought we'd
moved away from this sort of small minded view of the world :(
No, it means that, at least as far as
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
If I remember correctly, Brian modified the settings of each
announce(ments)@tlp.apache.org mailing lists to forward to
announce@apache.org automatically... Right!?
Nope, in fact I was arguing against it, unless someone crafts a message to
let the
I don't think it's acceptable for moderators to miss valid messages, even
with the spam that comes through. However the last few weeks have been so
chaotic with mail systems that it wouldn't surprise me if they just missed
these, or the messages were lost along the way, or something. Anyways,
I
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
But.. I assumed that listowner != moderator
and most of the mail lists in apache.org were owned by
1. Mr. Jon Scott Stevens
2. Mr. Ken Coar
3. Mr. Dirk-Willem van Gulik
4. Mr. Pier Paulo Fumagalli
right!?!?
I am afraid that if those who
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Whoa whoa whoa. b) is backwards - from the other discussions on this, you
wanted to subscribe announce@apache.org to each [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not the other way around.
I think
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Thom May wrote:
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
So then it sounds as if two action items are to:
(a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Works for me.
Sounds good, unless anyone has
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
http://db.apache.org/mail/
http://james.apache.org/mail/general/
http://james.apache.org/mail/site-dev/
Won't these above be created?
Done. Next time something's noticed missing, just ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Erik Abele wrote:
On 03/07/2003, at 05:14, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Is this list archived? There was a post a few weeks ago with
committer stats that I wanted to save but can't locate it
any more.
There are archives at MARC and gmane.org:
And of course, at
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
FYI, I have received a spam/virus email apparently from someone
@apache.org, and I also got a virus scanner response at my @apache.org
address, indicating that some weird message has been sent with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as the originator.
If anyone
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
It's probably an oversight, nothing more. Drop a message to apmail@
(oh heck, I'll CC them in this message right now) and they should be
able to set it up. Also community@ should be added to the publically
available archives in
43 matches
Mail list logo
