Re: Political Candidate Relations

I think that's the wrong question. We're (mostly) a bunch of programmers and know sod all about governance (much as each/most of us will happily expound on what we think we know :) ). I imagine however that many of us would happily offer up some time to hear about the problems that government face

Re: Government License

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Welton wrote: > > Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military > > uses. > > Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because > it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you > can't exclude

Re: Government License

Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military uses. Hen On Monday, June 30, 2014, McGovern, James wrote: > Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the > Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to > create a new enc

Re: Low level community

+1 to the decoupling part. The bigger the bump to join in, the less people will join. Other important items imo: * What is the value of your project? Is it valuable? Who is it valuable to? What is the larger community it is related to and what are the trends in that community? Are you also trendi

Re: Activity in Apache

irc.freenode.net #asfcommitters Added it to my autojoin list. Hen On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Why don't we have a committers IRC channel? > > The members one is useful, and I don't see that 3000 is some > unfeasible number. There are more

Re: Activity in Apache

Why don't we have a committers IRC channel? The members one is useful, and I don't see that 3000 is some unfeasible number. There are more than 3000 Tomcat users but the Tomcat channel isn't insane. Hen On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > The ASF spans the globe in terms of c

Re: seen on boost dev list: "Wake-up call for the ASF"

I never get the bureaucracy bit. If he's put it on that site and pointed to it, then we can just go take the code and integrate it. Even if he hasn't pointed to it we can still go get it as it's AL 2.0. Hen On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > > Folks with a stake in reviv

Re: PhD Research in Open Source Software

Hopefully the grad knows it's been done already (OSS + CMM). https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Open_Source_Maturity_Model https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/QSOS On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I know we usually get this kind of r

Re: Liberal corporate open source policies

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:01:24AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: >> > Presumably this "outline" described procedures for obtaining clearance from >> > management to work on open source projects? >> >

Re: Liberal corporate open source policies

over content. > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:01:24AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: >> It's a meritocracy; by stepping up with this email you've already >> started the project. Stay quietly persistent and keep it going (and I >> don't see why it can't stay on

Re: Liberal corporate open source policies

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Keith Curtis wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:23 -0700, "Marvin Humphrey" >> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:40:31PM -0700, Keith Curtis wrote: >> > > I recommend separating things out into using free software versus >> > > writing free software. >> > >>

Re: Liberal corporate open source policies

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:22:57PM +, Ross Gardler wrote: >> This is an interesting question. I was recently asked to help with >> exactly this issue and I also struggled. > > Perhaps we might consider working up an example policy ourse

Re: Are devs who work on or use open source happier in their employment?

I've not seen any studies. I have a slightly different view as developing is only part of what I do nowadays... so I'll share it/bore you with it :) The source isn't the only part, Open applies to a lot more in your standard OSS project: * I like that I can identify solutions and bugs through a w

A community page

I'd like to propose that the following page is something the Community list could be thinking of improving: http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org For addi

Re: Returned post for committ...@apache.org

the ASF) vs Archiva (Apache project) > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> I question the labeling of Cobertura as our dogfood and Clover as not >> our dogfood. >> >> Which is 'our dogfood', the GPL product or the proprietary prod

Re: Returned post for committ...@apache.org

I question the labeling of Cobertura as our dogfood and Clover as not our dogfood. Which is 'our dogfood', the GPL product or the proprietary product built on top of permissively licensed Open Source (not that I know if Clover is like this; but I've heard the same argument against JIRA)? Do we su

Re: MySQL/Roller

Chances are this is out of date with modern MT and Roller, but here's how I did it many years back: http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/mt_to_roller_migration On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > Now I would like to know how to retrieve the data from .rdf, .

Re: [OpenPGP] Moving Away From DSA and SHA-1

Need to update http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html to say 4096 asap I suspect :) Stop new people being lured into this problem. Hen On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > with ApacheConUS only three months awa

Re: Dinner at OSCON

Just converge. On Thursday, July 23, 2009, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > If any of you committers are at OSCON, feel free to meet up for dinner > at Gordon Biersch [7:30pm]: > > http://maps.google.com/maps?client=safari&a

Dinner at OSCON

If any of you committers are at OSCON, feel free to meet up for dinner at Gordon Biersch [7:30pm]: http://maps.google.com/maps?client=safari&oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF8&q=gordon+biersch+san+jose&fb=1&split=1&gl=us&ei=wo5oSoT6FIqOMeyE8c8M&ll=37.334774,-121.888571&spn=0.001147,0.001725&z=19&iwloc=A Hen -

Re: [apachecon] "Meet the developers" corner

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's an idea I came up with for the proposed Content/Web Technology >> track in ApacheCon US 2009: >> >> We'd reserve and mark a table or a corner

Re: Topic-based mailing lists

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: >> ...To support both inter-project cooperation and more general >> cross-project committer software development discussions, I would >> recommend starting with a single gener

Re: Open Expo Zürich Booth [Re: Call for Participation for OpenExpo 2008 ...]

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:38 PM, berndf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: >> >> On 20.04.2008 11:14:44 Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 09:24 +0200, berndf wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > I'm forwarding this CfP here as I've participa

Re: Java Service Wrapper

Raises the question of whether anyone has needed the improvements/bugfixes/whatever in the later GPL versions, and whether we should consider forking the old version. Hen On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Java Service Wrapper is being used (and some

Re: Geek book collectors

Can't recommend http://www.delicious-monster.com/ enough btw, if you have OS X :) Let's you mix the book geek and tech geek in you. Hen On Feb 7, 2008 7:28 AM, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, folks. The response was immediate and overwhelming. I think he's > got enough to round

Re: Grassroots PR

On 8/21/07, Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # I am planning to "competitive upgrade" from MovableType to > # Apache Roller ;) , BTW I did that a few years back using a script to modify the SQL dump - let me know if you want me to try and dig that up again. Hen

Re: Grassroots PR

On 7/6/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ted Husted wrote: > Perhaps it's time [we] encourage development of a Roller zone where > our PMC's can post easy-to-aggregate announcement blogs. These > would not be individual blogs as we have on PlanetApache.org, but PMC > blogs that woul

Re: Community Guidelines (was Code of Conduct)

On 6/28/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some of the ASF Members have indicated a wish to draft a code of conduct. A working draft of a set of "Community Guidelines" is available on the incubator wiki, * http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CodeOfConduct Any comments would be very welcom

SVN server problems (fwd)

Spreading the word a bit. -- Forwarded message -- From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 10, 2006 6:15 PM Subject: SVN server problems To: Apache Infrastructure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Putting an email on the infra list to provide an update (from a spectato

Re: End user code contributions to asf wikis

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Jean T. Anderson wrote: A user just posted an example -- with code -- to the Derby wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DatabaseManager My first reaction is delight that a user has energy to do this. My second reaction is to wonder about licensing issues. Jira upload h

Re: How do projects sign up for Google Summer of Code -- 2006 ?

Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] From my basic understanding, we have a couple of weeks to get our ideas/proposals up at the google site, and that's the mailing list where we'll be bringing all the ideas together (I presume in an improved variant of the method used last year on that list). Hen On Sat

Re: Question on sending email to PMCs ?

My personal opinion is that PMCs exist for internal discussion - so if the foundation wants all communities to know something, they would mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] So depends if the below is an internal or an external news item. Formally, you'd send this over to the prc@ and they'd decide if the

Re: At what point do you unsubscribe/deny a misbehaving user?

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Jean T. Anderson wrote: Below are links to public responses to some of his posts (which are numerous enough that they alone would be frustrating to wade through): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-user/200508.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.a

SVN migration race to 2006

Congratulations to Web Services(11) for dropping down to only 11 modules to go; their strategy of steadily plugging away at a module at a time has dropped Tomcat(12) and XML(12) into last place. Mark Thomas' 5-step plan for Tomcat threatens to leave XML in its dust, so can the federation pul

Re: [Info] Jini goes OSS.

All sounds great but the open sourcing of the spec confuses me. How exactly is that going to work? Has anyone open-sourced a spec before? Will the official version of the Jini spec remain within the JCP? Hen On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Niclas Hedhman wrote: FWIW, Sun have decided to put the Jini specifi

Re: Is ASL2.0 not "GPL-compatible" ??

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html The Jini technology is going Open Source and I think that is great, and even though I tried hard, it will not be under a ASL2.0 license, mos

Re: Is ASL2.0 not "GPL-compatible" ??

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 20 December 2004 23:54, Joshua Slive wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: Does anyone know, and preferably have any authorative-like links ?? http://www.apache.org/licenses/ http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html thanks!!! Of far more int

Re: Clover licence for ASF

ble to distribute it (CVS, web, or selective email only)? Thanks, Brett Henri Yandell wrote: cvs:committers/donated-licenses/clover/ contains a version of the Clover license that may be used by any ASF project. It's restricted to the following package hierarchies: org.apache javax org.xml or

Clover licence for ASF

pt to get you to change. It's just to save the rest of us effort :) Henri Yandell Jakarta VP = Instructions for use with Maven: 1) Put the .license file in your .maven/repository/clover/jars directory. 2) Put the following

Re: Page of mailing list data

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Henri Yandell wrote: The # of moderators would be good to have on there, even better would be the apache logon of the moderators. I don't see why.. that information is already available to committers, an

Re: Page of mailing list data

Looks good Ken. The # of moderators would be good to have on there, even better would be the apache logon of the moderators. For the first statistical report, could you specify what the collection period was? Thanks, Hen On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Clover licence for Apache

Hopefully everything will soon be go on having a Clover licence for all Apache Java projects: http://www.cenqua.com/clover/ One such example of an ASF project already using Clover is Geronimo: http://geronimo.apache.org/modules/security/clover/ Part of the licence will be a restriction on which p

Re: Open Source, Cold Shoulder (fwd): One woman's comments

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Bill Stoddard wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Julie MacNaught wrote: I am a big corporation's employee (IBM), not an individual contributor. My current pet theory is that due to quotas, Dang, so much for sensitivity and respect... Took me 10 minut

re: Open Source, Cold Shoulder (fwd)

Apologies to Greg. I'd said I would send this on to the list but didn't get around to it last week. (2 emails forwarded below). Hen -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:00:08 -0400 From: Greg Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Henri Yandell <[E

Re: Open Source, Cold Shoulder (fwd): One woman's comments

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Julie MacNaught wrote: I am a big corporation's employee (IBM), not an individual contributor. My current pet theory is that due to quotas, the large corporations are gobbling up all the female graduates. Apart from the ASF ties to IBM/Sun, and obvious open-source corporates

Re: Open Source, Cold Shoulder (fwd)

I'm really not very impressed with the article. The gender issue just confuses things and they provide a perfectly rational reason for why the gender difference exists (in the same way that there's an age, nationality, education level, career-path bias to open-source). The only solution is more

Apache Licence description

Thought this might be of interest. There are a couple of books on open-source licences out this year, one by Rosen (Ptr Hall) and one by Andrew St. Laurent (O'Reilly). The chapter concerning the ASF licences in the O'Reilly book is available for download at: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/osfr

Re: private mailing list for committers

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Santiago Gala wrote: What would be the advantages? The only advantage I can think of is that many hypothetical conversations on members@ that want to be private would be able to include committers. Every now and then I see an email that says "We should discuss this on member

Re: IDE licenses

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Felipe Leme wrote: On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 02:13, Henri Yandell wrote: I don't know of Apache projects using Struts, EJBs, Hibernate, JSF; instead we create these systems. First, AFAIK we don't create JSF JFYI, http://incubator.apache.or

Re: IDE licenses

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Felipe Leme wrote: - some people said MyEclipseIDE (MEIDE, for short) is not necessary, as there are OSS-equivalent tools for all its tasks. I used to think so I know it's gone over to PRC, but one question I'd like to ask is what MyEclipseIDE gives Apache developers. Origi

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:22 PM -0400 Henri Yandell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > list. Go read groklaw. However, discussions on whether a python community > > should exist seem to be perfectly designed for

Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)

Do you have the same feelings for [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems to me that members@ is akin to a community-dev list, while community@ is akin to a community-users list. Any reason to keep members@ should exist for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree that MS Patent stuff is boring and unnecessary on a communi

Re: Python anybody?

While I'm not highly into python (I like whitespace idea, but knowledge of perl stops me getting too much beyond reading the O'Reilly books), perhaps this would be a way to experiement with the non-project technology focused communities that were talked about a couple of years ago. The one that p

Re: apache swag

I've ordered a simple t-shirt and a long sleeved t-shirt (http://www.cafeshops.com/osjava) and am happy with the quality. Had them for a year or so and they've survived frequent wear and laundry without problem. Hen On 15 Jul 2004, David N. Welton wrote: > Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: failure notice

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > > > > infrastructure@ is an open list as far as I can tell. I'm subscribed and > > am a committer like yourself. > > Henri, > > thanks, > > I can tell it that infrastructure@ is not `open list`. > # Gue

Re: failure notice

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > Aye. Thanks a ton. By the way, can I suggest it that -- > if your team (infrastructure team) would have conducted > *critical* infrastructural affairs, > could you please use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list > to notify those "changes"? > > infrastr

Re: Do we have a "jobs list"?

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > Why can't the PMC be responsible if the committers are the one the place the > > stuff (I see that all 'content' goes into CVS/SVN). > > Perhaps some PMC members are happy to spend their time verifying

Re: CVS and Subversion

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 07:20, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > 2) Tagging is clumsy. (I may just not be seeing it in the manual). It > > seems hard to tag a directory and files not in that directory with a tag, > > or tag a d

Re: CVS and Subversion

Two biggest problems I forsee with subversion: 1) Website needs to be in SVN, else we'll still need accounts for everyone who wants to modify their site annd do releases. Are the SVN based projects taking an approach that handles this? Will it? 2) Tagging is clumsy. (I may just not be seeing it

Re: Apache != HTTPD (was Issues with XMLBeans proposal)

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Agreed. On the same topic. Has anyone noticed following on the > marc.theaimsgroup.com [1]? > > * Apache * Projects of the Apache > Server Foundation Might be good to tell them that the J

Re: Free java profiler tools for open source projects?

I believe the only one was RefactorIt. At least, that's the main one I remember from the discussion and the one whose licence file I have sitting in my home dir :) Hen On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Steven Noels wrote: > Hi, > > I remember a thread on 'some' ASF list about the availability of a > number

Re: licensing review

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Serge Knystautas wrote: > Certainly we need an official reading on this, but Classpath is > specifically licensed as GPL, the least compatible open-source license > out there (not even a murkier LGPL). The Classpath author adds an > addendum to allow bundling of this library

Re: primary distribution location

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > > In short, the answer is no, and this applies to any software with > > copyright of The Apache Software Foundation. > > which brings up a very good point that may have been overlooked: > this applies to anything on

RE: primary distribution location

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > It will typically have import statements - something like: > > > import lgpl.sshlibrary.Thingy; > > Thank you very much for this explanation. It should help explain to authors > why we are asking them to provide their LGPL code under a different

Re: primary distribution location

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Conor MacNeill wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Conor, > > > > I expect that people are worried about the viral implications of LGPL, I'm worried about it :) If it's LGPL, I can use it at work, but I can't release any code that imports from the LGPL'd jar. And with RMS'

Re: Ant buildfiles - best practices for Apache projects

Sounds like you're describing maven and centipede to me. At least in terms of their dependency abilities. Hen On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Joerg Pietschmann wrote: > Hi, > > I think its time to get gather some "best practices" for setting up Ant > buildfiles. > > Let me start with a story. I thought I'

Re: [poll] weblog package on apache.org

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 07:07 AM, David Reid wrote: > > I agree that providing a forum where news can be made available for > > projects > > in an easier to find location is a good thing and soemthing we should > > aim to > > provide, but

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

So when will there be a Jakarta t-shirt available? :) Hen On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Erik Abele wrote: > Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > I believe Ken has a shop for that stuff already (thought I found the shop > > via his site at least) > > http://apache-server.com/store.html > http://www.copyleft.ne

Re: ASF Colocation proposal

Hmm. There was another site selling them, which had rather poor user feedback: http://www.copyleft.net/item.phtml?page=product_966_front.phtml Ken's is: http://apache-server.com/store.html Others: http://apache.covalent.net/store/t.php http://geekt.org/geekt/comment.cgi?newsid=1197 Hen On W

Re: Where are we?

were you hoping for a better url than http://geourl.com? That gives me a nice site that pops up lots of windows etc and tries to set my homepage. Hen On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ben Hyde wrote: > Actually we could skip the ASF-KIND boondoggle at first too. At that > point the only thing we need is t

Re: Where are we?

Why not just have a .icbm file on icarus in people's home directories? On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ben Hyde wrote: > Actually we could skip the ASF-KIND boondoggle at first too. At that > point the only thing we need is to collect URL's that have the icbm > info in them. This will make so much easier

Re: Where are we?

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ben Hyde wrote: > If we keep it simple to start we can obviously do assorted richer > things later, but if all we try to do up front is get a map of the > committers that would be sufficiently neat. > > wdyt? It'd be fun. Would help in things like Brian's recent email seeki

RE: Weblogs and Obstructionism WAS: Re: weblogs on apache.org

On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > Consensus or at least a majority :-) After all discussion, I think that's > what has to happen - someone who wants this to happen should call for a > vote, otherwise we'll never know. > > Probabl

RE: RSS feed for ApacheWiki now in beta test

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Daniel Rall wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Danny Angus wrote: > > > Andy wrote: > > > > > I don't care for PERL > > > but cpan is like the greatest > > > thing ever invented. > > > > Invent a CPAN style method of satisfying Java dependancies, quick while > > you're still enthu

Re: [ot] domain registrars

www.godaddy.com has looked good to me [some customers use it], the price was cheap and the central management seemed useful the one time I went and used it for them. I use www.dots-r-us.com, another Tucows reseller and my only complaint there is that the renewal system is poor. I have to buy a ne

Re: [proposal] creation of communitity.apache.org

+1 with Andy's sentiment attached. I just don't want to force people to have to hunt down a camera and microphone. On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > +1 on the alias. 0 on the content suggestion (I don't think we should > vote on what people put on their page, certainly make it a >

Re: suggestion for news...

On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Not meaning to embarrass anyone, but I suggest not writing "news" on any > "news" pages like this: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#1106.1 > > The Commons CLI team is proud to announce Commons CLI 1.0, the first > official release of thi

RE: @apache web pages

> > -Original Message- > > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:06 PM > > To: community@apache.org > > Subject: @apache web pages > > > > > > someone (andy?) started a trend of setting up personal First I know of was jstrachan's: h

Re: The Apache Jakarta Law (Scientific?)

First time I've ever seen it discussed. Was an interesting discussion for a while until I hit the point of: "Okay, go write this up on a webpage so it makes sense. " On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > The Apache Jakarta Law: > > Any discussion regarding Apache Jakarta will eventuall

Re: @apache web pages

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > > > > >Yes. and no. Las Vegas is way too far for my travel budget > >this year :( > >I'll have to wait for the next Europe ApacheCon. > > > > > I hope thats not spaced too close together... Next May in London please :) Actually no, early June. I'

Re: @apache web pages

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Steven Noels wrote: > > > > updated nightly from everyone who has a public_html/index.html . > > > > Cool! > > > > How about people having a homepage at daedalus? > > I made a .htaccess file in my public_html directory on icaru

RE: @apache web pages

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > Yeah, but not quite the catchy homepagey name I was groping > > for though Chuck :) It also sticks the sites to the machine, > > which would be bad. > > You mean like users.apache.org or committers.apache.org? or people or community or homepage. co

Re: @apache web pages

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Chuck Murcko wrote: > cvs also has a CNAME: icarus. > > Chuck Yeah, but not quite the catchy homepagey name I was groping for though Chuck :) It also sticks the sites to the machine, which would be bad. Hen > > On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 06:19 PM

Re: @apache web pages

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > I'd also like to get a central forrest generator set up. I had thought > daedalus was the proper > place to do that, but perhaps cvs.apache.org is. I think daedalus is quite busy with its current jobs :) [I think]. Occasionally see comments on try

Re: Subtle barriers to entry

On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Chuck Murcko wrote: > > > > I've noticed in looking around the Apache sites that there's a lot of > > inconsistency in providing links (usually in the sidebars) where people > > can get on the mailing lists. > > since i answer the asf email, thi

Re: [VOTE] Openness

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read > this mail list thru a web archive? > > [ X ] +1 yes, let's make it readable > [ ] 0 don't know/don't care > [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private > > >

Re: ASF Membership Nomination

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Greg Stein wrote: > "But it works -- we have committers" "But it works -- Jakarta has produced > some great code" "But it works -- ..." Well, yes to all of those. Sure it > did. My concern is about the impact on the community, not the ability to get > work done. And measurin

Re: committers repos (was: ASF Membership Nomination)

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:50:59AM +1100, David Crossley wrote: > >... > > What about using CVS for this? Can only committers > > checkout the "committers" module? (I see that it is > > not available via ViewCVS.) > > Yes, the committers repos is only ava

RE: Committers home pages (was [Fwd: Re: Hi Community])

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 29 October 2002 14:38 > > > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > >I'd like to propose each committer to build a simple home > > >page like that one. > > > > That would help those like me who know

RE: ASF Membership Nomination

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:15 > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:28AM -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > I hereby nominate Ted Husted. > > > > The problem with nominations in a forum that does no

Website questions (Was: Jakarta++)

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > I think a lot of us have been talking past each other on the > various lists, and so I thought I would try and summarize the > situation as I understand it. Who is the web architect for the Apache site? How will its navigational structure handle N more t

Re: Man, it's quiet here

On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > This is a symptom of having certain constituency that fails the basic > UNIX literacy test. So ssh'ing to a UNIX box and creating a .forward > file is difficult. > > solution: Solution is that when a new person is voted for committership, they are