http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?doc_id=188456f_src=ieupdate
One of the big attractions of the iPod was that it was immediately
obvious how to work it. Other MP3 players can still leave one
scratching ones head over how to operate them. This article predicts a
similar huge
This email was sent from popoz...@earthlink.net
Message from sender:
Tom will like this story.
Final Cut Pro the Apple of Oscar's eye - CNET News
URL: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10465202-37.html
Many filmmakers at Sunday's Academy Awards used Apple's Final Cut Studio to
edit their
On Mar 7, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Rev. Stewart A. Marshall wrote:
Many filmmakers at Sunday's Academy Awards used Apple's Final Cut
Studio to edit their movies.
Tom will like this story.
And Adobe will be pissed off. Apple's FCP entered the market late and
quickly shoved all the incumbents off
The only other one mentioned was Avid.
Stewart
At 07:19 PM 3/7/2010, you wrote:
On Mar 7, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Rev. Stewart A. Marshall wrote:
Many filmmakers at Sunday's Academy Awards used Apple's Final Cut
Studio to edit their movies.
Tom will like this story.
And Adobe will be pissed off.
On 03/06/2010 09:23 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
If any pictures of an underage child were taken let alone viewed they are
likely open to prosecution for kiddie porn. This happened in Pennsylvania
where they prosecuted a teenage girl for taking pictures of herself and
emailing them to her
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Art Clemons artclem...@aol.com wrote:
On 03/06/2010 09:23 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
If any pictures of an underage child were taken let alone viewed they are
likely open to prosecution for kiddie porn. This happened in
Pennsylvania
where they prosecuted
What a laugh. The story reads like an ad for FC Studio, not surprising
since it's in Cnet's Apple section. But in fact what it says is that
most of the nominees did *not* use FCP.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:19 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
And Adobe will be pissed off. Apple's FCP entered the
On 03/06/2010 09:23 PM, mike wrote:
If this was it, why wasn't he accused of stealing it? Why did school
officials continue to watch this kid when they knew he had it? Why did they
further accuse him of selling and taking drugs? This software was clearly
not used to track a stolen laptop,
At present this is a lot of he said she said type stuff.
As stated before we are only getting sound bytes not all the legal niceties.
I am only hoping that when this thing truly plays out in the courts
(if it does) we get to find out all the stuff that really went on.
So far there are just
You seem to not understand that after finding who had the 'stolen' laptop
they spent zero time in telling the parents the boy had taken it without
permission. It never came up. They just called the kid in and tried to
accuse him of doing drugs. Then they had to backtrack and explain why they
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
What a laugh. The story reads like an ad for FC Studio, not surprising
since it's in Cnet's Apple section. But in fact what it says is that
most of the nominees did *not* use FCP.
What other computer section would an article
Right now a lot of hearsay and not too many substantiating facts.
Also note this is now almost 4 months past when it happened.
what happened between the actual incident and now tog et us to this point?
There is just too much missing to start drawing firm conclusions on everything.
Stewart
Right. That's 9 out of how many movies nominated? Or eligible for
nomination? I'm not going to count them all, but I'll just remind you
that Documentaries are only a small part of the Oscars.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:40 PM, phartz...@gmail.com
phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
what happened between the actual incident and now tog et us to this point?
Read what I have written about what took place between November 2009
and January 2010 as far as the Robbins family is
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:33 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
You seem to not understand that after finding who had the 'stolen' laptop
they spent zero time in telling the parents the boy had taken it without
permission. It never came up. They just called the kid in and tried to
accuse him
Yes but it still sucks,
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
I think the key is that it did say.
Final Cut Pro has almost 50 percent market share in the nonlinear
editor space, outperforming competitors like Avid.
Many of the big studios and editors may not use it, instead using
dedicated expensive editing suites. (They were pretty specific to
state
That's one area of film making.
*
Of course, Final Cut Pro isn't the only product available for filmmakers,
but it is the most popular now. According to market research firm SCRI
International, Final Cut Pro has almost 50 percent market share in the
nonlinear editor space, outperforming
Yeah but, how do you really feel?
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Eric S. Sande esa...@verizon.net wrote:
Yes but it still sucks,
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy,
On 03/06/2010 10:05 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Technical, schmechnical. Give the parents a call, for goodness
sake. That's what you do when a school fee has not been paid. What
do we have here, the KGB or something? Is this the sort of behavior
that technology can breed?
Did the
I haven't seen it, but perhaps you have..a definitive statement that the
school thought the laptop was in fact stolen? I keep seeing vague things
like 'security was used in case it was missing or stolen', but never that in
this case they had turned it on because of that. And again, if it was
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. That's 9 out of how many movies nominated? Or eligible for
nomination? I'm not going to count them all, but I'll just remind you
that Documentaries are only a small part of the Oscars.
The article focused solely on those
Exactly.
This article mentioned that they did this on a budget of less than
15K for computer, hardware, and software.
Professional studios used dedicated workstations and computers
costing much more money. (add 000s to whatever figure)
They are dedicated machines and specialized software.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Art Clemons artclem...@aol.com wrote:
The problem for your logic is that the laptop was removed without
permission so was missing. The laptop was supposed to be used in school
only under the circumstances indicated unless the insurance was
purchased. The
On 03/07/2010 11:20 PM, mike wrote:
I haven't seen it, but perhaps you have..a definitive statement that the
school thought the laptop was in fact stolen? I keep seeing vague things
like 'security was used in case it was missing or stolen', but never that in
this case they had turned it on
On Mar 8, 2010 12:45am, Art Clemons artclem...@aol.com wrote:
You'll note that there is no disputing that the laptop in
question was removed from the school without permission.
The question is though is did the kid get in trouble initially for taking
the computer home without insurance? We
Thanks Art, good catch.
I'm going to however pick a nit on this article though..it could be just bad
writing on the reporter's part or perhaps not.
*The district says it turned on the camera in Robbins' computer because,
since he had not paid a $55 insurance fee, he should not have been taking
27 matches
Mail list logo
