At 05:46 PM 8/19/07, Eric S. Sande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking clearly and logically is hard. If it were easy, everyone would
do it.
He's signed off, so he didn't see any of that.
What a waste of effort.
Thanks for your comment and your sentiment, Eric, but, if you look
closely
At 08:48 PM 8/19/07, Jeff Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob, can I call you Bob?
Well, they often call me Speedo, but my real name is Mister Earl.
As someone who's probably been over the top on more than one occasion in
my years on the list,
I don't remember you being over the
At 07:02 PM 8/21/07, Jeff Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess then you were only kidding about that 100 moderators comment.
Not in the slightest.
You don't want to be moderated,
1. I don't want listmembers to attempt to censor others, but label
such behavior moderating the
At 04:43 PM 8/25/07, Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of my Brobdingnagian package, I've never been in what you could
call a contest. All other entrants got beaten like a Sunday boner.
Are you talking about your ego?
No, I'm not. However, for a modest additional fee,
At 08:08 AM 9/4/07, Tomás de Torquemoderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list is moderated. If I don't like your posts we send thugs to your
house. [snipparoonie] In any event, the offending party is never heard
from again.
So! Youse gonna send your thugs around, or what?
I got
At 06:01 AM 8/22/07, Paul Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not take particular offense to your rant
Mazel tov. Neither did I. Possibly because, your characterization
notwithstanding, it wasn't a rant.
and thought it reasonably harmless given that the person in question had
left
At 03:39 PM 9/4/07, chad evans wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, everyone. We've heard all of bob's variations.
Ignorantly and erroneously spoken. Boo!
Time to ignore him.
Arrogantly and presumptuously spoken. Yay!
It appears that you have taken it upon yourself to decide
At 06:41 PM 9/7/07, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have I been banned from the list?
No, but make it worth our while, and we'll see what we can do for you.
What's happened is that you've been getting what is known as the
Paul McCartney Treatment. That is, you've been banned
At 04:35 PM 1/3/2008, William Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please discontinue my subscription.
Hell, no! You're not running out now. WE tell YOU when you leave. YOU
don't tell US. Who do you think you are, anyway?
Thank you,
Your superficial display of politesse doesn't
At 06:12 AM 1/4/2008, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No virus found in this outgoing message.
This is a lie.
Well, you got me there, Tex. But it wasn't a very BIG lie, now, was it?
That entire post was a virus.
You say that as if it was a BAD thing.
Bob
At 05:01 PM 2/16/2008, Steve Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopaedia, is refusing to remove medieval
artistic depictions of the Prophet Muhammad, despite being flooded with
complaints from Muslims demanding the images be deleted.
http://tinyurl.com/2f9q7w
At 08:57 AM 2/18/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't dispute your basic premise, however I think it's unfair to label
those who are offended by the public display of these images as
extremists. Islam (to my limited understanding) has a fundamental
objection to graven images and depictions
Before I go to Best Buy or Circuit City with this issue, I'd like to
bounce it off folks who I trust to give me reasonable answer, if they have
one, and who will say so if they don't. Here goes:
I run WinXP (SP2, IIRC) and have RealPlayer 11.01 (Build 6.0.14.794,
but who's
A friend of mine on another list came up with these links:
http://www.sweetadelines.org.uk/docs/how_to_minidisc.pdf
http://forums.minidisc.org/
Even though I'm still open to any other suggestions, the first link
might just do the trick, and the second seems like a nice
At 11:44 PM 3/11/2008, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot about Audacity...good free program also.
I downloaded Audacity 1.2.6 (rather than the ß-version upgrade), and
will try to install it later today. Thanks very much for the suggestions in
your previous post.
I'm
At 06:49 PM 7/31/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't that settled by Potter Stewart who said, I can't define it but I
know it when I see it!!
I don't think anyone with an adult level of cultural and
sociological sophistication (which, if you trust most of the opinions of
those who
At 08:54 AM 8/1/2008, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bluenoses are merely looking for some way to justify hating you...
I is not at all limited to sexually explicit material.
I agree completely with you, which uses up my Agreement With Tom
quota for the decade, but I only
At 02:32 PM 8/2/2008, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed..so we should allow the posting of 50 year old men having sex with
nine year old boys?
Interesting image. How/Why did you come up with it? Have you ever
actually seen anything like that? Do you know anyone who has? How can you
Beginning:
At 08:22 PM 8/2/2008, Rev. Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can everyone here do me a favor and quit bashing religion.
No. When religion deserves not to be bashed, people, generally
speaking, I predict, will stop bashing it. But this is America, Stewart.
You're
Conclusion:
China which is not a Christian nation has a very strict moral code on what
is allowed and what is not. I can give you many examples out there.
I don't think there are any examples to give. Just because you, or
they, call it a moral code doesn't make it one. Particularly
At 07:43 PM 8/3/2008, Rev. Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sociology 101 Morals = Ethics.
Extant mammals = Unicorns. I gave you examples of clearly unethical
behaviors that might have been moral, assuming morals exist, but, rather
than consider them on their merits, such
At 11:44 PM 8/3/2008, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this to say the censoring of anything only comes from the religious?
I was addressing the forms of censorship that Stewart was discussing.
Those are, for the reasons I described, motivated by religious beliefs, on
the one hand, and
At 08:16 PM 8/3/2008, Rev. Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have a problem with organized religion.
What problem is that, Stewart? Please enlighten me. I happen to ADORE
both the free exercise and establishment clauses of the First Amendment.
Your right and my right to
At 03:57 PM 8/4/2008, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are correct about the fairness doctrine, it has nothing to do with
censorship but rather a free market vs government regulated market.
I disagree, Mike, because of your use of the term market. The legal
philosophy in this country,
At 07:07 AM 8/4/2008, John Emmerling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert,
Bob, please.
As a fellow secularist, I have to point out that this type of
confrontational arguing serves to discredit us in the eyes of most US citizens.
No, it doesn't. And, even if it did, how would you
At 07:14 AM 8/4/2008, Rev. Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way some would view secularism as its own religion.
Which just goes to show you how desperate some theocrat wannabes can get.
In order for secularism, whatever in hell THAT means, to be a
religion, it must
At 03:43 PM 8/4/2008, Chris Dunford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our federal government is supposed to reflect that choice by the laws it
passes. This is not always the case and people may disagree with it.
I disagree with the supposed to part. They have a number of democratic
ideals, and a
At 10:12 AM 8/5/2008, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In order for secularism, whatever in hell THAT means, to be a religion,
it must have some set of relatively well-settled articles of faith which
have been organized into a more or less formal, and, in any event,
At 01:10 PM 9/1/2008, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who should I pander to?
You should pander to me: Your old pal, Bob.
Should I consider a hermaphrodite who uses a PC at work and a Mac at home?
No, you shouldn't. Proper pandering requires you to give me cash, not
At 03:21 AM 9/3/2008, John McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should only be one name on the short list for VP John Gilroy! The
Piwowar/Gilroy ticket would be like a reunion of Lennon and Macartney.
Between John and Tom, which one is the dead guy?
Hard for me to tell, just by
At 05:04 PM 9/9/2008, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in a little over seven hours the Large Hadron Collider will be switched
on...any takers on if we'll all survive? I've set up a google alert to my
cell phone for the big event. The question is if all goes wrong, will I
get the msg before
At 04:31 PM 9/13/2008, Fred Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
Black hole, schmack hole! I refuse to let this European fuck-up harsh
my weekend mellow. I mean, just because the world is about to end in an
unstoppable gravitational collapse
On Jan 9, 2010, at 1:47 PM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
Tom Sharpe | The New Mexican
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2010 - 1/8/10
A Santa Fe man who says he suffers from electromagnetic sensitivity is
suing his next-door neighbor for refusing to turn off her cell phone and
other
At 06:08 PM 1/13/2010, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Owners of the BlackBerry Storm 2 and other Verizon smartphones woke up
one day last week to find that they could no longer specify a preferred
search services in the Search box on the BlackBerry's browser. It's
Microsoft Bing or nothing.
Update:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/02/school-backs-off-on-laptop-spying-policy-in-lieu-of-lawsuit.ars
Bob
I'm on the case, from outer space!
OK
End
*
** List info, subscription
At 09:41 AM 2/21/2010, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:18 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, yeah, the school said that the only intended purpose for any remote
viewing was to help them retrieve stolen or lost laptops, but that was
not what they were doing.
So if
At 11:27 AM 2/23/2010, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
WHY DON'T YOU SPEAK ENGLISH LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE!
¡Porque!
Bob
I'm on the case, from outer space!
OK
End
*
** List info, subscription
At 07:20 PM 2/28/2010, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
Lutheran Theology is unique on this one. We believe in Simul Justus Et
Picatur Luther's oft quoted Latin phrase means Sinner yet at the same
time Saint!
So yes they are contradictory, but also reality.
If it
At 10:07 AM 3/1/2010, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
There is no federal guidelines on Hospitals.
That isn't true, Stewart. You have overlooked the respective sections
of both the US Code, and the CFR, which deal with military hospitals and VA
hospitals.
At 09:35 PM 2/28/2010, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
Bob I have no need to convince anyone of what I believe, but when asked I
will explain it.
Thank you for responding, Stewart. However, I didn't mention the act
of convincing others of what [you] believe. I spoke,
At 05:35 AM 3/1/2010, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
Yes the regulator is divine but people often have the wrong view of the 10
commandments.
I was about to get to that.
They were also prescriptive telling the Israelites how they were to live
with one another and
At 10:30 AM 3/1/2010, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
Our duty to God and our Duty to one another.
There is a multi-billion dollar industry, in organized religion and
televangelism, chock-full of people, limited, biased, ignorant, stupid,
fallible, vain, gullible,
At 03:59 PM 3/1/2010, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
Only those [VA and military] hospitals and they are minimal at best.
What do you mean minimal? Do you mean few in number? If so, how
many are there, and how do you know?
All other hospitals that you or I would
http://vpike.com
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
44 matches
Mail list logo
