Silly me. I expected you to actually back up what you said.
On Oct 20, 2009 10:13 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:07 PM, mike wrote: Figured as much, more from Tom
the judge of stuff he ha...
More Glen Beck style logic from our WFB in Chief. To scoff at breathless
reviews
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:07 PM, mike wrote:
Figured as much, more from Tom the judge of stuff he hasn't seen.
BTW, what
is your point in saying stuff you clearly can't back up?
More Glen Beck style logic from our WFB in Chief. To scoff at
breathless reviews of products that have not been
Not sure what your point is..no one knows what size the image sensor it has,
let alone as you say the quality...but you are still dismissing it? Maybe
wait till we actually know the quality? I would also rather have a great
quality 2mp cam then a so so 5mp cam, but as yet, it is all speculation.
Amen
--- On Sun, 10/18/09, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
From: phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] android takes on iphone
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date: Sunday, October 18, 2009, 11:46 PM
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:33 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure what your point is..no one knows what size the image sensor it has,
let alone as you say the quality...but you are still dismissing it?
Not dismissing it. I do, however, dismiss the megapixel wars as if
that is the sole
Of course, megapixel count is only one measure and in my opinion not a very
important one.
On Oct 19, 2009 6:41 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:33 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure
what your point is..no o...
Not dismissing it. I do,
On Oct 19, 2009, at 9:38 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Not dismissing it. I do, however, dismiss the megapixel wars as if
that is the sole criteria by which to judge the capability of cameras.
The optics and CCD in a phone are going to be terrible. To make it not
terrible would require a
Are you talking about Apple or Verizon? I seem to recall Apple touting a
camera in their phone...as well as one in the new ipod nanos. It's called
marketing, all companies do it, some better then others, but I don't recall
you blasting Apple when they touted their camera.
You mentioned all the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:40 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
The optics and CCD in a phone are going to be terrible. To make it not
terrible would require a much larger phone and nobody is going to do that.
Totally true.
The purpose of having a camera in a phone is not to take good
Well..we carry around little devices that carry our music that can't compete
at all with larger more cumbersome devices. I don't think all ipod users
are rubes just because they bought one. We carry around laptops that can't
compete with desktop units, are all laptop buyers rubes? Or are they
On Oct 19, 2009, at 12:13 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Ignorant rubes?
Probably. However, ignorant rubes are the meat that makers of
consumer gear tend to crave the most.
Just look at the stats for the number of people who buy stuff from
spammers.
Here is a post from a totally hopeless
On Oct 19, 2009, at 12:13 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Could be. But, never underestimate the propensity for the masses to
make poor decisions.
As I'm constantly reminded on this List.
*
** List info, subscription
Still nothing, Tom? People on the list might be buying android phones and
might want to know what you do about them.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:01 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
You mentioned all the things that are missing from android, like what?
On Oct 19, 2009, at 2:19 PM, mike wrote:
Still nothing, Tom? People on the list might be buying android
phones and
might want to know what you do about them.
Good luck fan boi. Buying one would be a neat trick as even the date
they will go on sale has not been announced.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:31 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Well..we carry around little devices that carry our music that can't compete
at all with larger more cumbersome devices. I don't think all ipod users
are rubes just because they bought one.
I think that you either misunderstood
Figured as much, more from Tom the judge of stuff he hasn't seen. BTW, what
is your point in saying stuff you clearly can't back up?
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 2:19 PM, mike wrote:
Still nothing, Tom? People on the list might be buying
.
That this is slightly off-topic, but a good chance to air some views, I
apologise. Thank you.
--- On Mon, 10/19/09, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
From: phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] android takes on iphone
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date
Perhaps I did misunderstand. Point of fact I've never met anyone who
thought a phone cam was just as good as a regular camera. The people I have
met just believe that at the time, a phone cam is just fine. Same as those
with laptops, just fine.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM,
: phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] android takes on iphone
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 9:38 AM
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:33 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure what your point is..no one knows what size the image sensor
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:13 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I did misunderstand. Point of fact I've never met anyone who
thought a phone cam was just as good as a regular camera. The people I
have
met just believe that at the time, a phone cam is just fine. Same as those
with
On Oct 18, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Reid Katan wrote:
Microsoft has *the worst* advertising agency. Good thing for them
that they already own so much market share.
What's the easiest way to make a $million?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
START WITH 2 $MILLION!
On Oct 17, 2009, at 11:31 PM, mike wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPYM-XTqcecfeature=player_embedded
Well done. Of course it doesn't mention all the things the Android
does not have.
Competition will be good.
What are all the things it doesn't have?
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:02 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Oct 17, 2009, at 11:31 PM, mike wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPYM-XTqcecfeature=player_embedded
Well done. Of course it doesn't mention all the things the Android does not
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Well done. Of course it doesn't mention all the things the Android does not
have.
Competition will be good.
Okay, apparently it has a five megapixel image sensor for its
camera. So what? Five megapixels on what size sensor?
Quoting mike xha...@gmail.com:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPYM-XTqcecfeature=player_embedded
Not sure if this is Verizon or Moto or both, but they seem to be going head
to head with Apple on their new phone. Whomever their marketing team is,
They're also going after ATT. Showing
25 matches
Mail list logo
