I got the 3.2 Alpha to work - neat stuff, but not for the faint of
heart. The one thing I miss is the Mandrake specific menus )the
standard KDE menu config is not very intuitive!
I still think we should come up with a way to flag when some major
component in Cooker is broken (whilst under
On Thursday 23 October 2003 02:46, Brad Felmey wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:03, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0
20 More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 02:47:07PM -0400, Rob wrote:
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 14:28, Jaco Greeff wrote:
AFAIK, this is really slang,
Yes, and as I said,
Gimp is one of those words whose American colloquial or vulgar
usage in no way resembles its dictionary definition.
Why not
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:46:36PM -0500, Brad Felmey wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:03, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:17, Guy McArthur wrote:
Can Gimp 1.3 do these?
* rotate by arbitrary # of degrees
* free rotate
* perspective transform
* other warping transforms
Apologies for the off-topic. I tried looking for a gimp-1.3 features
list.
Even old GIMP does these. Or to put it
Am Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:03:28 + schrieb Galileo:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this
happen ?
It looks like x.2 doesn't mean
when viewing my buglist from the bugzilla main page, I get an internal
server error ...
the URL causing it is:
I'm sure this was meant as sarcasm, but...
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:57:29AM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Nope, you guys are our test subjects. Our labrats. :)
This is the deal. We make packages and you make decent bugreports or you learn
to live with the fact cooker is broken.
What's the
Hi
I have met this question a couple of times, and the answer could be of help to
someone who don't trust an upgrade.
regards
guran
--
Mandrake Linux 9.2 kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk
Only in a society that has 'a priori' defined what is the truth
can the result of the evolution of life be
Brad Felmey wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:03, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this
happen ?
It looks like x.2
On Thursday 23 October 2003 08:34, Udo Rader wrote:
Am Thu, 23 Oct 2003 01:03:28 + schrieb Galileo:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0
20 More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:57, Han Boetes wrote:
David Kobler wrote:
Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading
^^
them. It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who
maintain the cooker RPMS. How hard would it be to test your rpms on
sorry about this...
I think that you are some difficulties to understand when I say
something to you.
You are not autorize to upload KDE package !
You can send me patch.
The last time you broke arts during my holiday.
Excuse me? Arts was not broken by me, it was already broken.
Sorry
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Nicolas Pomarede [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello to all,
I'm trying to do a network install of 9.2. I'm using a PCMIA adapter from
xircom.
Doing an install using the network.img or pcmia.img disk, I get an error
while trying to load
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:03:28 +0200, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this
happen ?
It looks like x.2 doesn't mean
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:03:28 +0200, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:37:11 +0200 (MEST)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to update firestarter
in order to use it under 2.6 test kernels,
the original src.rpm requires iptables
and we have two packages for iptables
one for 2.4 kernel one for 2.6 kernel
I
Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2003 08:00 schrieb Curtis Hildebrand:
I've had confirmations that with another LG model, the HL-DT-ST
CD-ROM GCR-8520B, 9.2 worked nice (e.g. did NOT do any damage to
the cdrom drive). Also, with the HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8522B,
9.2rc2 worked nice (it's then
torsdag 23. oktober 2003, 12:25, skrev Frederic Crozat:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:03:28 +0200, Galileo wrote:
Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0
20 More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How
tisdagen den 21 oktober 2003 19.44 skrev Oden Eriksson:
Hi Folks.
A couple of weeks ago my girlfriend bought the newly released album
Mescalero by ZZ Top. Just now I noticed it's copy protected..., annoying.
None of the tools in Mandrake seems to be able to rip this CD. What should
I do?
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Steinar Hauge wrote:
No, you should continue to provide bug fixes and updates as well!! :-)
Thats one of the reasons why I am a club member.
But what you should consider, is to use a little bit longer time and have a
RC3 cykle also. It is a pity that MDK has got a
Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2003, 13:20:47 Uhr MET, schrieb Oden Eriksson:
I was able to rip track 2-16 of 1-16 with w2k (yuk) and ez cd
extract. It's tragic that no tool exists in Mandrake to accomplish
this. But I guess we will see such a tool in the future, maybe at
the PLF site? If not one
Simon Oosthoek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since 9.x, we are now providing ALSO providing updates for
bugfixes..
That's very much appreciated!
But maybe we should go back and drop all non-security fixes
updates ?
please no! But having bugfixes in updates should not be a reason to
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:37:11 +0200 (MEST)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to update firestarter
in order to use it under 2.6 test kernels,
the original src.rpm requires iptables
and we have two packages for iptables
one for 2.4 kernel one for 2.6
john == John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
john What is needed is a committed (and known) BETA, RC
john testers. Each one committed to testing a know set of
john functionality (hardware software), and regression issues.
But that things are already fixed in the Betas RC.
Problem is
onsdagen den 22 oktober 2003 17.18 skrev Tibor Pittich:
On 22. October 2003 at 16:56, Pascal Cavy wrote:
I see error message in the log like :
[Mon Oct 20 18:30:42 2003] [error] (120013)APR does not understand this
error code: Cannot open SSLSessionCache DBM file
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
dial-up).
Would it be possible to re-package the ISO with the updates
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:40:54PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
john == John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
john What is needed is a committed (and known) BETA, RC
john testers. Each one committed to testing a know set of
john functionality (hardware software), and regression
torsdagen den 23 oktober 2003 13.29 skrev Götz Waschk:
Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2003, 13:20:47 Uhr MET, schrieb Oden Eriksson:
I was able to rip track 2-16 of 1-16 with w2k (yuk) and ez cd
extract. It's tragic that no tool exists in Mandrake to accomplish
this. But I guess we will see
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 10:25, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
And if people were reporting bugs/responding to queries DURING the
beta/RC period, more bugs would be fixed BEFORE final release...
excuse me, but most people will test during RC period, but the problem
was you release ... how many ... 2 RC !
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:37:11 +0200 (MEST)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to update firestarter
in order to use it under 2.6 test kernels,
the original src.rpm requires iptables
and we have two packages for iptables
one for 2.4 kernel one for
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:59, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
Why doesn't mandrake try to figure out WHY less people are testing cooker
than they'd like instead of blindly blaming people that THEY don't test
enough so therefore mandrake is buggy
Mandrake is the one trying to make money doing
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:31 am, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
actually mdk9.2 was quite better than previous releases regarding
quality.
yes indeed as a user since 5.3 I have seen huge improvements in 9.2 but then
the whole 9.x series has for the most part been great. Really those out there
Nicolas Pomarede [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Hello Guillaume,
thanks for your answer. Although I tried the pcmcia.img, sthg must have
been wrong with my card, since as you suggested it, I retested this image
and it now works (in fact, it's the first time there's a disk that works
with
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:43 am, Emmanuel wrote:
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
dial-up).
Would it
Le Jeudi 23 Octobre 2003 16:13, FACORAT Fabrice a écrit :
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 10:25, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
And if people were reporting bugs/responding to queries DURING the
beta/RC period, more bugs would be fixed BEFORE final release...
excuse me, but most people will test during RC
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 11:43, Emmanuel a écrit :
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
dial-up).
Would it be
Le Jeudi 23 Octobre 2003 14:12, Dave Cotton a écrit :
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:59, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
Why doesn't mandrake try to figure out WHY less people are testing cooker
than they'd like instead of blindly blaming people that THEY don't test
enough so therefore mandrake is
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates and
better ACPI/SATA support )
sata worked out of the box with silicone
Le Jeudi 23 Octobre 2003 13:43, Oden Eriksson a crit :
This is a errata issue?
Please file a bug report.
try http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6208
--
Pascal Cavy - VMF
__
Running 1 day, 3:34, 1 user, load average:
Yes, I can unplug the power cable from my laptop now. But only irritant
is, my battery monitor no longer work. I can live with this for the
moment.
ANother problem I face is with pmsuspend. I could suspend my machine
with Mand9.1 by running from a console screen. I can't do that anymore.
I
users somehow, an errata maybe?
Vince? Can you adjust the nolapic errata to include something along the
lines of Laptops supporting Intel Speedstep crash when removing the
machine from, or placing it on power or similar.
PS: This is using a tmb kernel, although it should work on the
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates and
better ACPI/SATA support )
sata worked out of the box with
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gwenole, your 1.0-11mdk broke it, it seems.
Please fix ASAP... I need to rip/encode the new Rush live album... ;o)
It's fixed in cooker by gwe.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Curtis Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had confirmations that with another LG model, the HL-DT-ST
CD-ROM GCR-8520B, 9.2 worked nice (e.g. did NOT do any damage to
the cdrom drive). Also, with the HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8522B,
9.2rc2 worked nice (it's then -probable- 9.2 will work
Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oct 23 12:53:49 localhost kernel: I/O error: dev 0b:00, sector 1404912
Oct 23 12:53:55 localhost kernel: I/O error: dev 0b:00, sector 1407792
Oct 23 12:54:02 localhost kernel: I/O error: dev 0b:00, sector 1410672
I have to investigate that
On 23. October 2003 at 13:43, Oden Eriksson wrote:
onsdagen den 22 oktober 2003 17.18 skrev Tibor Pittich:
On 22. October 2003 at 16:56, Pascal Cavy wrote:
I see error message in the log like :
[Mon Oct 20 18:30:42 2003] [error] (120013)APR does not understand this
error code: Cannot
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
Problem is that majority of the people don't test until the last RC or
Final :( Bugs reported during cooker Betas are normally fixed.
Well, to me the only test I'm interested in doing is a complete install from
iso images (on CDRW disks), this
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-10 12:50 ---
OK, for me this seems to be fixed in Cooker with libqt3-3.1.2-15mdk and in 9.2 with
the update release 14.1.92mdk, but not with 14mdk from the CD-ROM.
---
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Curtis Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had confirmations that with another LG model, the HL-DT-ST
CD-ROM GCR-8520B, 9.2 worked nice (e.g. did NOT do any damage to
the cdrom drive). Also, with the HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8522B,
9.2rc2 worked nice (it's then
Brook Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes this is true also I should file a bug report for the scsi being
broke in the kernel. I have three machines with two different kinds
of scsi cards. All of them crash trying to format the hard
drives. So I know this is not isolated in my case. I
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And if people were reporting bugs/responding to queries DURING
the beta/RC period, more bugs would be fixed BEFORE final
release...
excuse me, but most people will test during RC period, but the
problem was you release ... how many ... 2 RC
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:56 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:31 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
I think all you should have to do is replace the packages and then run some
scripts that update the package lists in the Mandrake/base directory.
gendistrib should be one, but I don't know of the others.
you dont need to run gendistrib
On Thursday 23 October 2003 06:17 am, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Brook Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes this is true also I should file a bug report for the scsi being
broke in the kernel. I have three machines with two different kinds
of scsi cards. All of them crash trying to format the
On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:40, Juan Quintela wrote:
john == John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
john What is needed is a committed (and known) BETA, RC
john testers. Each one committed to testing a know set of
john functionality (hardware software), and regression issues.
But
This is output doing 'startkde' from xterm (it can't start, after splashscreen it
stops , at the end I do 'killall kdeinit' to exit...)
cuand good work
startkde: Starting up...
kbuildsycoca running...
DCOP Cleaning up dead connections.
kdecore (KLibLoader): WARNING:
Buchan Milne wrote:
Greg Meyer wrote:
I spent a lot of time tonight applying the style that Buchan created
on the
main page to the rest of the pages in the Cooker Twiki. Hopefully
this gives
the whole site a more polished, professional feel.
In addition, I set up the Web template so
Jaimon Jose wrote:
Can you test with a 2.4.22.13mdk or later kernel to see if it is fixed?
I would have to make a new livecd to test ...
Tried 2.4.22.18mdk from updates. Same results.
And with the nolapic option passed to the kernel? (Configuration -
Configure your computer - Boot - DrakBoot)
Jaco Greeff wrote:
Jaimon Jose wrote:
Can you test with a 2.4.22.13mdk or later kernel to see if it is fixed?
I would have to make a new livecd to test ...
Tried 2.4.22.18mdk from updates. Same results.
And with the nolapic option passed to the kernel? (Configuration -
Configure your computer -
torsdagen den 23 oktober 2003 15.10 skrev Tibor Pittich:
On 23. October 2003 at 13:43, Oden Eriksson wrote:
onsdagen den 22 oktober 2003 17.18 skrev Tibor Pittich:
On 22. October 2003 at 16:56, Pascal Cavy wrote:
I see error message in the log like :
[Mon Oct 20 18:30:42 2003]
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:56 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 22:57, Han Boetes wrote:
This is the deal. We make packages and you make decent bugreports or you learn
to live with the fact cooker is broken.
Have you thought even a little bit about how wrong this approach is?
The only way you're going to get _good_ testing is for
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 02:58, David Coe wrote:
If I had just installed a site-full of Mandrake 9.2 workstations, I
would be less than impressed to have this size of update to do so soon
after.
I _do_ support a site full of workstations. It's amazing what cron and a
squid cache will do.
--
I think that we need a lot more RCs, and on the contrary they should be more
frequent, a lot more frequent. Updating a cooker machine is not the same
than installing the distribution from scratch, considering the updating
scripts do not have the same effects.
For example, there should be 1 RC per
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 15:37, Brad Felmey wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 22:57, Han Boetes wrote:
This is the deal. We make packages and you make decent bugreports or you learn
to live with the fact cooker is broken.
Have you thought even a little bit about how wrong this approach is?
Great idea - I was thinking the same.
At least for the download version (assuming it's too late for the
packaged version)
R.Fox
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:43, Emmanuel wrote:
Hi all,
More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
it out. Now, I'd like them to be able
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Curtis Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had confirmations that with another LG model, the HL-DT-ST
CD-ROM GCR-8520B, 9.2 worked nice (e.g. did NOT do any damage to
the cdrom drive). Also, with the HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8522B,
9.2rc2 worked nice (it's then
Here are some suggestions for 9.2
- for the public release, you should release 9.2.1 isos that include the
updates AND also corrects the problem with LG drives. I don't think
Mandrakesoft can afford a public release of ISOs that kill CD drives. That
would be very bad for Mandrake reputation.
On Thursday 23 October 2003 08:34 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Curtis Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had confirmations that with another LG model, the HL-DT-ST
CD-ROM GCR-8520B, 9.2 worked nice (e.g. did NOT do any damage to
the cdrom drive). Also, with the HL-DT-ST CD-ROM
Warly wrote:
Lea Gris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe if mod_gzip was onabled on qa.mandrakesoft.com this would make
page loading much faster and less bandwidth hungry.
mod_gzip is not yet ported to apache2
Besides, it's more the query time (on the server side) and the rendering
time
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 11:44 pm, David Kobler wrote:
Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading
them. It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who
maintain the cooker RPMS. How hard would it be to test your rpms on a
recently
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 04:59 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Hi,
Several people are reporting that installing the 9.2 totally
fried their LG cdrom drive. Luis Alves on cooker is reporting
that problem on an IBM PC 300 PL machine, with a LG CRD-8400B. On
MandrakeClub an article[1]
On Thursday 23 October 2003 06:41 am, Brad Felmey wrote:
I _do_ support a site full of workstations. It's amazing what cron and a
squid cache will do.
or a local repository in my case. Download once and have it available for
everybody.
--
On Thursday 23 October 2003 06:40 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
don't play with HPT ! :)
AFAIK they don't have native SATA chip yet,
the cards are plain PATA 133 controlers with SATA bridges,
and acording to lkml are suported by the hpt374 driver (PATA133)
svetljo
thanks promise is doing
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6084
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-10 12:50 ---
I've installed cooker kernel 2.4.22-18 4GB
and now battery control works and I get no more errors in booting procedure
The problem of 6 CDR is still the same...
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-10 12:50 ---
Hi,
I think I've got part of the clue : I can reproduce it.
Open http://www.linux-france.org and reduce the window to have a scroll
bar. When the page is loaded,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6187
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-10 12:50 ---
VCI is already set to 23 if one choose sagem and to 24 if one choose sagem_dhcp
Encapsulation is already set to 6 if one choose sagem and to 4 if one choose
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4483
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-23 12:29 ---
Try to add a comment
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-23 13:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=933)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ef2 wrote:
Here are some suggestions for 9.2
- for the public release, you should release 9.2.1 isos that include the
updates AND also corrects the problem with LG drives. I don't think
Mandrakesoft can afford a public release of ISOs that kill
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:26, Buchan Milne wrote:
I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1
Mmm, that would be nice.
Austin
--
Austin Acton
Synthetic Organic Chemist,
On Thursday 23 October 2003 06:17 am, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Thanks guys for all your hard work. If you need help troubleshooting
the scsi problems I have three downed servers that I can test on.
could you fill in a bug report with oops message if possible or any
error message availlable on
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6212
Summary: doesn't start under kernel-2.6
Product: firestarter
Version: 0.9.1-2mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1 (or do we split
kde*-devel off onto CD2 or 3?).
Regards,
Buchan
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1 packages,
and leave the updates that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I find the articles at http://www.open-mag.com are normally quite
pathetic, they place *huge* significance on a small setting (and don't
seem to notice that the same settings are available on every single
distribution they have bothered to test).
On Thursday 23 October 2003 03:49 am, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
I'm sure this was meant as sarcasm, but...
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:57:29AM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Nope, you guys are our test subjects. Our labrats. :)
This is the deal. We make packages and you make decent bugreports or you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ef2 wrote:
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1
packages,
and leave the updates that are on the other CDs on the updates mirrors.
All updates must be left on the mirrors. What about people that have
already installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
I'd be happy if there were simply a rollback directory on the
mirrors. In
other words when a package is updated, yesterday's version rolls over
to the
rollback directory. Also, the reason I said yesterday's is often
ef2 wrote:
I wonder if it might be possible to only remaster the first ISO, as I
think most updates were to packages which are on CD1 (or do we split
kde*-devel off onto CD2 or 3?).
Regards,
Buchan
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1 packages,
and leave the updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 10:25, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
And if people were reporting bugs/responding to queries DURING the
beta/RC period, more bugs would be fixed BEFORE final release...
excuse me, but most people will test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lea Gris wrote:
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1
packages,
and leave the updates that are on the other CDs on the updates mirrors.
Wouldn't this be a dependancy break between updated CD1 + old CD2 CD3 ?
Only if
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6212
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-23 14:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=936)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=936action=view)
another upstream fix
this patch is not related to kernel 2.6,
but is
All updates must be left on the mirrors. What about people that have
already installed from the FTP mirrors (which also aren't likely to
change ...).
But, if a new CD1 were made, user's would automatically get the benefit
of them anyway (since urpmi would get the package from the CD first).
On Thu Oct 23 18:55 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I'd be happy if there were simply a rollback directory on the
mirrors. In
other words when a package is updated, yesterday's version rolls over
to the
rollback directory. Also, the reason I said yesterday's is often
there are
2-3 quick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Thu Oct 23 18:55 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Excellent idea, Buchan... you are a veritable fountain of such.
Just not enough time to implement them ... at the moment ... ;-)
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club
torsdagen den 23 oktober 2003 19.11 skrev Levi Ramsey:
On Thu Oct 23 18:55 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I'd be happy if there were simply a rollback directory on the
mirrors. In
other words when a package is updated, yesterday's version rolls over
to the
rollback directory.
Buchan Milne wrote:
Only if 50MB is not enough to absorb the dependancies ...
But do you really need to remaster CD1 into a 700MB iso ? Do the
corrected packages increase the size that much ?
For the download edition, if you need some space, why not dropping the
kernel marcelo ? Do really
That's sound a very good idea : remaster the CD1 with the new CD1
packages,
and leave the updates that are on the other CDs on the updates mirrors.
Wouldn't this be a dependancy break between updated CD1 + old CD2 CD3 ?
No because all hdlist files are on CD1 and would be regenerated by
Since KDE is broken, am temporarily using ICEWM. At the bottom of the screen
is the menu button, Terminal button, and Mozilla button. Terminal button
doesn't bring up a terminal window, although there is some disk activity.
V.
Larry Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My LG dvd works fine with beta*, rc*. I don't have final ISOs to
test. I did a net-install from ftp.
But did you use your CDROM in 9.2 final? That seems to toast a
drive as well.
Here's the model
HL-DT-STDVD-ROM GDR8161B
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
