On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, [po.gaillard] wrote:
Every time I try to install packages with rpmdrake I get a warning saying that
the rpm from the CD is not correctly signed. The message says :
bluefish... Signature incorrecte ((SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG
#70771ff3 NOT OK)
Fixed in
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, [aseatanner] wrote:
unable to handle Kernel paging request1 at 8010dbec
RIP: [8010dbec] PML4
1f5e0067 PGD 0
oops: 0010
CPU 0
Pid: 0, comm: swapper not tainted
RIP: 0010[8010dbec]
RSP
Try to boot with idle=poll
I am using an AMD64 3200+ CPU,
Hi,
(beginning of error messages)
error in exec of Stage 2 :-(
trying to execute '/usr/bin/runinstall2' from the installation volume
the following fatal error occurred
FATAL ERROR IN STAGE1: I/O error
I can't recover from this.
you may reboot your system.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Found stupid problem, this will be fixed in -25mdk.
Hi,
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Thanks, I now have something to work on. It could be that start_sec
nr_sects values are signed (but I can't find this on the specs) so
An attempt to select an individual package fails for Mandrake 9.2
AMD64, RC 1.
(worked fine with beta).
Fixed.
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
Example: to allow upgrading downgrading mozilla/galeon/etc., all moz
libraries that are used by other packages must be in a separate package
Indeed Mozilla must still be a correctly libified package, at least for
biarch installation. And, for
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
-=-=-=-
Name: mplayer Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 0.pre2.1mdk Build Date: Fri Nov 7 09:27:27 2003
-=-=-=-
-# Only
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Freitag, 7. November 2003, 11:30:53 Uhr MET, schrieb Gwenole Beauchesne:
-# Only support those arches for DHA at the moment
-%define vidix_arches %{ix86} ppc
-
-%define buildfor_mdk82 %(awk '{print ($4 = 8.2)}'
%{_sysconfdir}/mandrake
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
Sorry, we tried many configurations to no avail. :-( i.e. it still works.
Among others things, tried with an xfs /boot, reiserfs /, ext3 /home, it
works. Tried a 2 disks configuration: first disk with some ntfs garbage,
Hi,
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-05 21:47 ---
so probably drakxtools should add it
when configuring ide-scsi CD/DVD devices
I still believe a better fix should fit in kernel. However, this was
the precise interim solution adopted here for 9.2/AMD64. At least,
mercredi 5 novembre 2003, à 11:05 pm, Svetoslav Slavtchev a écrit :
but if you get you can fix it it would be really nice :-)
Oh no, kernel people appear to say that's not a trivial thing to fix.
And since I needed an immediate working solution for my hardware, I
preferred the workaround. ;-)
mercredi 5 novembre 2003, à 11:07 pm, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit :
topic says it all, both src.rpm and binary rpm seems to be missing.. :\
Yes, will reupload. Appears to have been trashed during AMD64 mass
synchronization weeks back (because of apparent apache/php version
change whatsoever).
Hi,
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get
a message about partition table consistency checks failure and
Hi,
Let me know if you need anything else.
Provided you use normal UP kernels, could you try the following kernels:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And with .test1 please check for any partition table check failure
message. This shouldn't fix anything but trying to isolate
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
Did it work with -22mdk?
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little more information about the kernel panic would be helpful too
as we can't
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, illogic-al wrote:
1. binutils - afaik this shouldn't depend on anything but when building the
rpm it requires dejagnu and glibc-static-devel
Needed to get a working make check, see specfile.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, illogic-al wrote:
rpm it requires dejagnu and glibc-static-devel
I went ahead and rebuilt without this and got no errors. Comments?
2. gcc needs
gcc-gnat = 3.1 is needed by gcc-3.3.1-2mdk
libgnat1 = 3.1 is needed by gcc-3.3.1-2mdk
needed to build
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Mark Scott wrote:
Ah, yes, doing a modprobe sata_via makes the drive work. So I guess the
kernel doesn't need patching, but maybe updating (the last libata patch was
17th Oct). I don't know if this is reliable or not... I'll find out over
time :-)
AFAICS, this only
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, [rodc] wrote:
the x server crashes loading driver radeon.
System tested on:
Asus K8V bios 1003.012
Athlon64 3200
512mb pc3200
Powercolor Radeon 9600pro
Please confirm this is at install stage and X server really segfaulté and
not exitted abnormally. In the latter
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, [shiyutang] wrote:
But in Mandrake Linux 9.2 download edition, after installing some rpms,
the KDE menu will be lost. We have discuss it here:
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Splatt_Forumfile=viewtopictopic=12741forum=11
Frederic Crozat said it is
Hi,
When I ssh into my box and type konqueror I get:
konqueror: relocation error: /usr/lib/libkonq.so.4: undefined symbol:
_ZN9QGroupBox10setEnabledEb
QGroupBox::setEnabled(bool) should come from qt. However, a possible
incompatible qt probably got into cooker.
Hi,
Attempts to sub to cooker-amd64 return 'list does not exist'.
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/92amd64beta.php3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subscribe cooker-amd64 in the subject.
Note: that's moondrake.com for subscriptions, and
linux-mandrake.com for usual mails.
Bye,
Gwenole.
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, [bertin] wrote:
/dev/hda1 (IDE) formatted as ReiserFS. Kernel uncompresses successfully.
Then the root filesystem check reports that /dev/hda1 is mounted
read-only (!!) and exits to repair mode. fsck.reiserfs crashes
(segmentation fault).
Fixed with new reiserfsprogs in
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
there seems to be also a new libata release :-)
with support for promise ( under 2.6 sii too )
If works here on AMD64, though a kernel panic happened once. Only ~57
MB/sec too with a SATA disk on PDC20378. Concerning SIL, it's explicitly
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
That's useless if you don't have the disks capable of that. Here, in
UDMA100 or
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, [rkulagow] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-09 21:58 ---
It appears that something still isn't right:
Thread 6 (Thread 65541 (LWP 25107)):
#0 0x40be3006 in nanosleep () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, [bertin] wrote:
3ware arrays with 2TB of disks each (/dev/sda and /dev/sdb) are seen as
1TB devices
2.4 kernels have a limitation so that number of blocks is represented as
an unsigned int or signed int. This is either a 31-bit or 32-bit value.
Henceforth, max capacity
Hi,
I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested
people may find it at:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
Non AMD64-specific changes include:
* Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.4.22-12mdk
- Various updates to PDC ultra driver
, which obviously
isn't accurate.
Please fix your document accordingly. Thanks.
Regards,
Gwenole Beauchesne.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
I have been sent a package by someone that uses (AFAICT) two approaches,
running at install time, and running via cron. I will upload to contrib
(unless there is vehement opposition ...) this evening (I can't get to
klama from the university at
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
you think it is time to start doing it?
IIRC from the stuff I read about it some time ago, it would be necessarily
to run prelink on each install of new libraries. In that case, a lot of
rpms would need to be adepted. Unless ofcourse, prelink is
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
I am interested in your cron jobs though.
In other words, please don't upload the package to contribs/.
Hi,
At this moment I've got over 250 cooker packages with the same
version-release number as in i586 cooker, but that aren't in the amd64
tree.
Wrong. They are but not synchronized yet to the mirror until the next
beta. Again, you can't have more packages than are available now since
the
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
We want the amd64 to be merged and finished before an opening.
I have 271 slbd built amd64 cooker packages that I can upload.
cooker packages or contrib packages? that's not the same...
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
I am automatically rebuilding cooker main and cooker contrib packages on
the amd64 box at CSC. I'm only uploading cooker contrib. But I also have
271 cooker packages that can be uploaded, but I won't because I'm not
supposed to -- you said I
Hi,
Cooker seems to be re-opened,
No, it's normally not. Opened enough to upload the first round of ~100
packages from my tree.
Bue,
Gwenole.
Hi,
Error scenario: when doing a network install, on recent machines, the
network card seems to not respond (no DHCP answer received for example)
Why: problem with APIC
Solution: type F1 then linux noapic when booting
BTW, I saw that occuring on some instances of nvidia|via based
motherboards.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Emmanuel wrote:
Any chance of getting a quick compilation and making it into 9.2??? I
believe rc5 will be renamed 1.1 once it's propagated onto the mirrors
(based on the fact that SO7 is already out).
1.1rc5 source tarball is broken and cvs update -d from 1.1rc4 shows
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Frederic Soulier wrote:
Yes, this also applies to nForce3 based Athlon64 systems. Disks I
Were the disks using SATA?
Nope.
tested so far flied at around 57 MB/sec, i.e. faster than anything I
used so far. Not only the disks were fast, the rest of the platform was
Hi,
Has anyone on the cooker list had the privilege to try the upcoming 9.2
on an Opteron/nForce3 configuration (single or dual Opteron)?
Yes, this also applies to nForce3 based Athlon64 systems. Disks I
tested so far flied at around 57 MB/sec, i.e. faster than anything I
used so far. Not only
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, [jan.ciger] wrote:
I would really like to see this one fixed, because I saw similar
problems since 9.1. It is a huge pain to debug threads when you are
unable to use debugger :-(
I would really like to see a testcase/sample program so that I can check
this is actually
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, [jan.ciger] wrote:
Compile (first Threads, then Producer, finally OSG itself and dataset),
install and try to run any of the demos (e.g. osgview).
Ouch! Sorry, I won't.
Alternatively, send me the updated glibc, I can test it here.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, [jan.ciger] wrote:
YES !! It works, it seems that you fixed it. I am able to debug the
application without any problems now.
OK, thanks for testing. Note however, that both rpm those glibc packages
are not in 9.2 final ISOs. Normal user will have to grab them from a
Hi,
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-16-09 21:04
---
I suppose this problem only occurs when a user has _used_ Ooo 1.0.3 so
that the
.openoffice directory has been created for that user.
Yes, but this problem should be fixed nowadays. Even a language
mismatch should
Hi,
Please test new packages (wrapper script + libvcl.so):
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/openoffice/1.1rc4/
This should fix:
- Installation of pt-BR, zh-CN, zh-TW
- UI font used for Arabic support
- UI font used in Japanese Korean help content
* Mon Sep 15 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi,
The nostop merely hides the issue and causes problems later on. This
severely impacts the ability to debug the multi-threaded application.
The fix first implies to fix rpm then rebuild glibc. A workaround would
be to manually handle EXCLUDE_FROM_STRIP stuff -debuginfo generation
from
Hi,
strings.h/string.h
for gcc = 3 dietlibc disables prototypes for
strncpy
strncmp
strncat
because gcc 3.something already defined those, this is not true with
gcc
3.2 (at least), so those prototypes will not be defined.
Sorry, fixed in current upstream CVS and MDK gi/mdk-stage1 CVS. Forgot
to
Hi,
has anyone notice that OpenOffice.org is very sluggish? I have:
OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.1-0.rc3.2mdk
You can grab libvcl645.so from 1.1-0.rc3.1mdk until .rc4.1mdk is
released.
Could the lack of the Vera fonts rpm cause this? Or is is some other
issue -
like a compilation or linking
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, [jlp] wrote:
After I upgraded to OpenOffice.org 1.1 RC3 and restarted KDE all icons for OOo
file types are gone. There is just the usual blank file icon instead of regular
OOo document icons.
Plase try update-menus -v -n.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, [jlp] wrote:
Same here :( Much better with official RC4 packages.
Let me see, you are comparing RC3 mdk packages vs RC4 binaries?
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, [f.faber-pro] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-09 15:37 ---
works for me with OO 1.1rc3 from cooker, please mark as fixed
@resolution=fixed
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
wrong language for update (installed language doesn't match installation
language)
ExitCode: 32
Installation of OpenOffice.org 1.1.0 failed
What is going on?
Look in ~/.openoffice/instdb.ins DefaultLanguage. Install the -l10n-
package matching
Hi,
Jure Repinc wrote:
In instdb.ins it says that DefaultLanguage is 01
oo_xlate tells me that this is en
If I check with RPMDrake it tells me that
OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-OpenOffice.org-l10n-en is already installed.
I also tried reinstalling OOo and localization packages and it didn't
work. The
Hi,
I am trying to install Mandrake 9.1 using a SATA drive and it is not
supported. I posted on the installation mailing list and they
recommended posting here. Is there anyway to install using a SATA
drive?
Besides SATA drives plugged onto 3ware controllers, I don't know of
others known to
Hi,
I've got a single Serial ATA drive (hde) on my Gigabyte GA-7NNXP mobo.
There are two serial ATA connectors, SATA0 and SATA1. hde is connected
to SATA0.
Do you know which controller it is? If it's a PDC20319, that finally
doesn't work.
Bye,
Gwenole.
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we please have the bugfix for supermount (v 1.2.9) ? it fixes the
init.h on non-i386,
I already fixed all linux/init.h problems. Juan should have had all 3 by
now.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:05:53AM +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
I explained. If encoded RPATH concerned X11 libs, update their aclocal.m4
(LIBTOOL) with bits from system's to add x11 libs in skip list.
You said it should be possible. How about
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, [wjl] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 02:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=730)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=730action=view)
This is the preprocessed source that makes it ICE.
Please attach the file, not the
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Ben Reser wrote:
Rather than just bitching provide an explanation of how to avoid using
chrpath and we'll try and fix the packages so they don't use it.
I explained. If encoded RPATH concerned X11 libs, update their aclocal.m4
(LIBTOOL) with bits from system's to add x11
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, [mdk.bugs] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-09 10:15 ---
It was actually a report on 3.3.1, don't know why I specified 3.1.1 initially.
Still valid/broken for the tested 3.3.1-0.7mdk and 3.3.1-1mdk.
I still need preprocessed output.
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, John Allen wrote:
I just get BIOS data check followed by a blank screen, and the reset
button is required to reboot.
Anyone got 2.6.0 booting on an Athlon.
In one case, 2.6.0-test4 is miscompiled with 3.3.1. Should be fixed in
3.3.1-2mdk but I don't know whether this
Hi,
In one case, 2.6.0-test4 is miscompiled with 3.3.1. Should be fixed in
3.3.1-2mdk but I don't know whether this would fix your bug or not.
So is the cause for it panicking on boot? So presumably it will be
fixed
by a reboot before 9.2 is released?
No, this means I was aware of one instance
Hi,
This package installs the necessary files to run ImageMagick.
+%if %build_plf
+The PLF build provide additional support for:
+- LZW compression
+- JPEG2000
+- libfpx
+All of them are covered by software patents (although LZW patents are
+expired in mid 2003, the expires in all countries will
Hi,
-=-=-=-
Name: php Relocations: (not
relocateable)
Version : 4.3.3 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 2mdk Build Date: Wed Aug 27
02:13:47 2003
-=-=-=-
- php-devel should require openssl-devel
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Dave Cotton wrote:
Version glibc-2.3.2-12mdk 25/08/03 appears to have created problems for
mozilla-1.4-4mdk dies without messages.
evolution-1.4.4-4mdk and gftp-2.0.15-1mdk seg fault.
Works here, you have to provide more information. Alternatively, you can
install
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Austin wrote:
ImportError: /usr/lib/libpng.so.3: undefined symbol: deflate
Missing deps in libpng, fixing.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Dave Cotton wrote:
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:43, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Works here, you have to provide more information.
Alternatively, you can
install glibc-debug, run e.g. gftp through gdb, you'll have glibc symbols
if it segfaults there.
Doesn't
Any chance at SDK also (or OpenOffice.org-devel package or similar)?
I don't think so. I have never looked into this and there are other
things left to JIT learn fix. ;-)
Hi,
I agree. OOo is awsome. Much better then 1.0.x. We just need to wait
for localization packages to include too. Other then that it works
perfectly and I hope to see it soon.
AFAICS, we are missing the following helpcontent wrt. 1.0.3 we shipped:
Spanish, Finnish, Czech. Of course, that's
It looks okay to me.
(Error again is line 21: ISO C++ forbids defining types within return
type)
#ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG
operator LONG_LONG () const {
That's not definition of type LONG_LONG but an implicit conversion from
some class to this type. Better post the preprocessed output...
I guess
Hi,
The source package is there as:
http://www.promise.com/support/file/driver/1_SATALINUXSRC1.00.0.8.zip
(the same src file I posted before...)
Binary drivers are 1.00.0.15 but I don't have any changelog from
1.00.0.8.
should we try to package it in 3rdparty?
or may be in kernel? how?
Yes,
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, [zeb] wrote:
If you look at the mailing list, you'll see it is very active, probably Thomas
patch has not been integrated yet. Maybe increase to priority 1 ?
Please try pdc-ultra in 2.4.22-0.2mdk. README does not mention FastTrack
376 though. Also note, that it doesn't
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it
uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend
on.
No, it doesn't. Why would it?
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote:
error: Failed dependencies:
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1
Install libstdc++2.10
You talk about a regression in the new packages, could you be more
specific (in
order to be prepared)? And will those packages meet cooker (and 9.2)
as well?
I mean, in the past, nedit used to crash when you split windows.
Nowadays with current cooker lesstif, it no longer crashes but you
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, [koi8-r] Andrey Borzenkov[koi8-r] wrote:
Thread is quite interesting even if I do not fully understand it :)
There is no CMOV emulator. I simply patched kernel so that it reports VIA
C3 as i586.
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, David Walser wrote:
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
[Contrib-RPM]
Name: kernel-2.6 Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 2.6.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 0.test2.2mdk Build Date: Wed Aug 6
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, [shirka] wrote:
I have a motherboard MSI KT400 : with this patch, it work for me ;)
Your site is slow, please try 2.4.22-0.2mdk instead. Thanks.
Hi,
apache2 worked on my box yesterday, it's broken now, anyone seeing
this?
[Tue Aug 12 21:25:59 2003] [notice] Digest: generating secret for
digest
authentication ...
Hmm, I uploaded a new gnupg which moved gpgkeys_* to a subdir expected
at configure time. Could that be a problem?
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
# urpmq -p db4-devel
libdb4.0-devel|libdb4.1-devel
Actually, that's the bug, there should not be any db4.0-devel. Next, rpm
normally autorequires the right DSO.
BTW, this reminds me xemacs is still built against absolete 4.0.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, [koi8-r] Andrey Borzenkov[koi8-r] wrote:
at least now I understand what this breakage was about :)
and does this still exist in 9.2?
There is no breakage since 9.1.
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
There is no CMOV emulator. I simply patched kernel so that it reports VIA
C3 as i586.
They pretend the bug was in the glibc, but you always said it was
kernel who was wrongly reporting C3 as a i686. Who's right?
Summary: user is
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
%{_bindir}/whiptail
-%{_libdir}/python2.2/site-packages/
+%{_libdir}/python2.3/site-packages/
Why not use a %py_ver macro as requested by fredl?
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, [scherer.michael] wrote:
all program using linux/wireless.h does not compile.
2.3.2-11mdk
@resolution=fixed
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, [shirka] wrote:
Created an attachment (id=639)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=639action=view)
For SATA150 Promise 376
Ah OK, missed the patch, will get integrated in 2.4.22-0.3mdk. ;-)
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, [shirka] wrote:
Created an attachment (id=639)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=639action=view)
For SATA150 Promise 376
Applied in 2.4.22-0.3mdk, please test.
@needinfo
mercredi 6 août 2003, à 10:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for
the
eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or
main?)
as well?
AFAIK, it uses a patched version of gcc from tree-ssa-branch which is
to be
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Well actually there is:
http://www.promise.com/support/file/driver/2_SATALINUXSRC1.00.0.8.zip
Thanks, I will know a happy opteron system. ;-)
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Abel Cheung wrote:
I was working on it, and had a fixed RPM with patch:
http://deaddog.org/Mandrake/cooker/stardict/SRPMS/stardict-2.2.1-1mdk.src.rpm
Indeed, fix stardict as it does seem to include some header that #defines
gettext to nothing.
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, [udo] wrote:
will this bug ever be fixed? it is _very_ bad to see that some (easy to
fix) mdk-specifiy problems obviously don't get any attention by the
package maitainers for such a long time (this bug is more than 7 months
old!)
This is a lesstif problem, I had
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, [udo] wrote:
the easy bug fix or better workaround is to do the same that the authors
are doing for their package: link it statically against a working
version of LessTif.
Indeed, statically linking against a working version can't be a fix.
That's a workaround.
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, [udo] wrote:
I recall it right, the problems started in 9.0 cooker and nothing has
changed since.
IIRC, initial problem got fixed but authors introduced a regression
elsewhere. Anyhow, please try the packages here:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/lesstif/
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Peter Beno wrote:
When i use fopen in dynamic library the FILE struct is not correct
filled. __pad2 = 0x0 and so the fseek cause segmentation fault.
Last two updates of glibc cause me this problem.
Testcase please.
Thanks,
Gwenole.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, J.A. Magallon wrote:
a) With pentium3, gcc spits sse instructions for moves, like movaps.
Sure it should be doing this ? If I build with -mno-sse, my code works
again. But -msse should only activate/deactivate the use of
__builtin_movaps() and friends. I am also
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
[alsa]
I thought Juan was working on 0.9.5 since we have
the rest of it in Cooker already...
I also remind you that I won't include any new kernel headers in glibc,
past the end of this week. So, Juan, if you really want to update that do
it now (I
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
I saw in 2.4 spec sparc is still blacklist. Are you aware we are trying to
restart cooker on this arch ?
We don't want you make all the works, but please help us !
same applies to alpha, ppc and x86_64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ cat /proc/cmdline
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
What's the problem? Or, are you still telling things without checking?
Gwenole, I don't understand you sometimes...
You know that the kernel don't build on most arch except x86*.
I was replying to Stefan saying amd64 kernel doesn't build whereas
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, J.A. Magallon wrote:
I am able to start a sash. Any way to recover remotely ?
And locally ?
Boot in 9.2 rescue CD. cp /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /mnt/ld-2.3.2.so.
I guess you have a P4, right? ;-)
1 - 100 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
