two days and not changed
is it my fault ?
thanks
Francescò
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 23:29:08 +0100
francesco.melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic
parchment:
two days and not changed
is it my fault ?
Francesco,
I got everything from yesterday's change log list, main and contrib, from
ftp.leo.org this morning PDT. No mirrors in USA seem reliable.
Thanks, it seems that once I added that extra package the install recognises FAT
partitions. I will try to test it on another PC though to confirm that.
--- On Fri 10/31, Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ouch. I actually had forgotten the mdkinst_stage2.bz2 update, so if you're
Jim Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remastered 9.2 with the files mentioned below (from cooker)
using the standard Mandrake script. When the installation starts
it shows the new kernel version.
When it reaches the disk partitioning section, it does show the
Windows partitions but it does
I remastered 9.2 with the files mentioned below (from cooker) using the standard
Mandrake script. When the installation starts it shows the new kernel version.
When it reaches the disk partitioning section, it does show the Windows partitions but
it does not recognizes them as formatted. When
Hi,
I've copied to our local mirror updated files regarding
2.4.22-21mdkBOOT, which fixes the LG drives problem. Those
include boot disks, isolinux/alt0 directory and
Mandrake/mdk/modulez.cz-2.4.22-21mdkBOOT.
There have been a first batch of boot images but with a deps
problem for some network
Subject says it all . . .
Thx,
R.Fox
--
Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fox Consulting Services
On Monday 27 October 2003 01:06 pm, Robert Fox wrote:
Subject says it all . . .
I think it is. Isn't it?
--
/g
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:38:57 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Monday 27 October 2003 01:06 pm, Robert Fox wrote:
Subject says it all . . .
I think it is. Isn't it?
I seem to find a few new things every day, so it appears to be!
Tim
--
_
( )
I remember someone saying that contribs was open and we're still waiting
on the x86-64 port to be finished before main was reopened
Me thinks
Mike
Tim Sawchuck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:38:57 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Monday 27 October 2003
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:48:10 +
Michael Lothian [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
I remember someone saying that contribs was open and we're still waiting
on the x86-64 port to be finished before main was reopened
Me thinks
Well, maybe Cooker Main is not *supposed
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember lot's of talk on splitting list. Has this been done yet?
As a first step I think I will split a server related ml. And depending
how thinks behave, decide to split more or not.
--
Warly
Le Mercredi 22 Octobre 2003 11:17, Warly a écrit :
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember lot's of talk on splitting list. Has this been done yet?
As a first step I think I will split a server related ml. And depending
how thinks behave, decide to split more or not.
Have a look to
I remember lot's of talk on splitting list. Has this been done yet?
--
/g
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx
Frederic,
I've got access to an amd64 machine and have been rebuilding cooker main
and contrib packages on that host with slbd. I've been uploading the
contrib packages, but not the main packages due to specific request from
Gwenole. At this moment I've got over 250 cooker packages
Hi,
At this moment I've got over 250 cooker packages with the same
version-release number as in i586 cooker, but that aren't in the amd64
tree.
Wrong. They are but not synchronized yet to the mirror until the next
beta. Again, you can't have more packages than are available now since
Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2003, 15:51:28 Uhr MET, schrieb mandrake:
need perl-MD5 in contrib
these packages has been moved from cooker main to cooker contrib:
- perl-PDA-Pilot-0.11.8-4mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- pilot-link-0.11.8-4mdk.src.rpm (alpha)
- libpisock8-0.11.8-4mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha
I want to know if I am installing correctly before reporting any more bugs.
I have been mirroring the cooker locally and installing via NFS. But I
recently hit another package installation bug, and I don't know if the
problem is due to incorrect installation on my part, due to a lag
On Monday 08 September 2003 06:02 pm, Victor Roetman wrote:
The problem I have now is that there was an error installing the package
etcskel-1.63-15mdk
depslist.ordered calls for both:
etcskel-1.63-15mdk.noarch 4259 0 3 4 5 6 7 8
etcskel-1.63-15mdk.src 10842
but neither exist in RPMS.
It looks like my choices are to have a local mirror (~6GB), or wait for iso images
to be updated (which appears to be infrequently in comparison to devel-tree mirrors).
Are there any other choices?
tony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Rick wrote:
It looks like my choices are to have a local mirror (~6GB), or wait
for iso images
to be updated (which appears to be infrequently in comparison to
devel-tree mirrors).
Are there any other choices?
# urpmi --auto-select --auto
Bernard Varaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in rpmdrake cooker updates or in software selection when installing rc1
from scratch the system freeze.
Well not all the time but cannot find exactly what is causing it.
it is doing it on my cooker notebook and onmy server (which I am
reinstallign
in rpmdrake cooker updates or in software selection when installing rc1
from scratch the system freeze.
Well not all the time but cannot find exactly what is causing it.
it is doing it on my cooker notebook and onmy server (which I am
reinstallign from scratch following multiple hardware failure
On 2003-08-29(Fri) 22:58:02 +0200, andre wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2003 14:02, mandrake wrote:
stardict need dictionnaries
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- stardict-freedict-nld-deu-2.1.0-1mdk.noarch.rpm (i586)
- stardict-freedict-nld-eng-2.1.0
[ Oops -- I meant for this to go to the list ]
John Keller wrote:
gc wrote:
orphan from source
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- freeciv-1.14.0-5mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- freeciv-1.14.0-8mdk.src.rpm (alpha)
- freeciv-1.14.0-7mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- freeciv-client
On Saturday 30 August 2003 04:05, Abel Cheung wrote:
On 2003-08-29(Fri) 22:58:02 +0200, andre wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2003 14:02, mandrake wrote:
stardict need dictionnaries
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- stardict-freedict-nld-deu-2.1.0
Hello,
I'm trying to install cooker by sunet.se mirror, I have the following error
message in second stage install :
Please wait while probing serial ports...
getAndSaveFile: No space left on device at
/usr/bin/perl-install/install_any.pm line 144, GEN2 chunk 70.
...
install exited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
_ cosmicflo wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I'm trying to install cooker by sunet.se mirror, I have the following
| error message in second stage install :
|
| Please wait while probing serial ports...
| getAndSaveFile: No space left on device at
| /usr/bin/perl
Jan Ciger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Please wait while probing serial ports...
| getAndSaveFile: No space left on device at
| /usr/bin/perl-install/install_any.pm line 144, GEN2 chunk 70.
Are you sure that you have enough disk space ? The message means that
you ran out of space somewhere.
On Friday 29 August 2003 14:02, mandrake wrote:
stardict need dictionnaries
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- stardict-freedict-nld-deu-2.1.0-1mdk.noarch.rpm (i586)
- stardict-freedict-nld-eng-2.1.0-1mdk.noarch.rpm (i586)
- stardict-freedict-nld-fra-2.1.0
Am Dienstag, 26. August 2003, 17:58:40 Uhr MET, schrieb mandrake:
needed by perl-Date-Calc
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- wml-2.0.9-6mdk.ppc.rpm (ppc)
- wml-2.0.9-6mdk.src.rpm (ppc)
- wml-2.0.9-6mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- wml-2.0.9-6mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
Hi
Hi
I was looking at my new mirror from uninett when I noticed:
!RPMS2
!RPMS3
When I checked the were like:
../../../contrib/RPMS
and
../../../contrib/jpackage/RPMS/
Where is the i586 directory?
Are we going to have to make a full new download again?
regards
guran
--
Mandrake Linux Cooker 9.2
this could be a good idea to try post 9.2, methinks.
after i used my LVM1 version LV's with LVM2, i can no longer access them
with MDK-9.1/ LVM1 tools update kernel -25mdk
i have 4 xfs LV's and 1 reiserfs
...
both times device 3a:00
under cooker with LVM2 everythings works OK
i saw this bug
device 3a:00
under cooker with LVM2 everythings works OK
i saw this bug once, but i tried rebooting with LVM1 today and did not
have any problem. could it be that lvm2 does (or did in a previous
version) some weird things with lvm metadata?
probably yes, but that was with devmapper
/probably_broken/
10x
but the devmapper and lvm2 rpms are tottaly brocken
(from time to time i just use the web space until i solve my fs corruption problems)
i have a decent devmapper rpm at
http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2
including a lilo with device mapper support.
The lvm rpm there suck
but the devmapper and lvm2 rpms are tottaly brocken
(from time to time i just use the web space until i solve my fs corruption
problems)
i have a decent devmapper rpm at
http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2
including a lilo with device mapper support.
The lvm rpm there suck a little.
I had to create
there was a thread horrible rc.sysinit a while ago,
but it won't change for 9.2 (and someone mentioned it would break the
compatibility to redhat, i don't know we need it thought)
IMHO current rc.sysinit is so patched that nothing will be broken
by any change.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:56:17AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Quoting Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:27:49PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
probably the fix is ok, but i would rather add a lvmrc script, like
hp-ux does, rc.sysinit is too much bloated for this.
under cooker with LVM2 everythings works OK
The worst thing is that a luser could have some vg managed by dm and
some by lvm1 at the same time, but i don't know if we want to support
that.
How?
hell no, even if its teoretically possible, its probably pretty dangerous
it is pratically
Hi,
the attached diff fixes for me
running lvm1 format VG's/LV's with the lvm2 tools and devmapper
both for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
is there any chance for LVM2 and devmapper in MDK-9.2,
or is it too late?
without them no one using lvm will be able to test/run 2.6 kernel
i have experimental
Hi,
does anyone know about any plans having Pekwm included in Cooker, and
ultimately in Mandrake Stable? This WM is, in my opinion, the best
of all worlds with legacy functionality coupled with a modern
outlook.
yeah, I'm using it myself... :)
--
//Christian
Registered Linux User #228949
Le Lundi 18 Août 2003 16:22, Christian Dysthe a écrit :
Hi,
does anyone know about any plans having Pekwm included in Cooker, and
ultimately in Mandrake Stable? This WM is, in my opinion, the best
of all worlds with legacy functionality coupled with a modern
outlook.
url ? do you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 02:46, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
url ? do you have a spec, or beginning of spec ?
I've already put it in contrib, but I haven't created any menu-method file
yet, dunno if I will.. aka let someone else do it;)
- --
Regards,
Hi
There seems to be a pbm with cooker ML, I'm receiving very few emails
and a couple of emails I sent never showed up...
So just checking.
--
Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 11:41, Frederic Soulier wrote:
Hi
There seems to be a pbm with cooker ML, I'm receiving very few emails
and a couple of emails I sent never showed up...
So just checking.
Come on Frederic, it's a national holiday here today, and perhaps
everyone else is busy patching
On Fri Aug 15 11:46 +0200, Dave Cotton wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 11:41, Frederic Soulier wrote:
Hi
There seems to be a pbm with cooker ML, I'm receiving very few emails
and a couple of emails I sent never showed up...
So just checking.
Come on Frederic, it's a national holiday
When I updated cooker this morning, I noticed that two new links were
created in cooker/i586/Mandrake: RPMS3 and RPMS4.
However, they were created as
../../contrib/jpackage.org/generic/RPMS/
and
../../contrib/jpackage.org/mandrake/RPMS/
whereas the RPMS2 link which points to contrib
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:32:39AM -0400, Frank Griffin wrote:
When I updated cooker this morning, I noticed that two new links were
created in cooker/i586/Mandrake: RPMS3 and RPMS4.
However, they were created as
../../contrib/jpackage.org/generic/RPMS/
and
../../contrib
Frank Griffin wrote:
This could be my imagination, but it seems like starting either this
morning or last night, rsync --delete updates from ftp.uninett.no aren't
deleting any files in my local tree. Within 24 hours, my cooker RPMS
directory (as reported by rsync) has gone from about 2.5
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:36:39PM +0200, mandrake wrote:
old
these packages has been removed from cooker contrib:
- perl-RPM-0.40-3mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- perl-RPM-0.40-4mdk.ppc.rpm (ppc)
- perl-RPM-0.40-4mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
I was using these... If nobody else wants them I'll
Ben Reser wrote:
- perl-RPM-0.40-4mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
I was using these... If nobody else wants them I'll reintroduce them and
maintain them myself...
I was using these also, the problem is that they don't build with rpm
4.1. So if you can fix it I would be very glad to have them back.
regards,
Oh, dear!
Catastrophe!
Aug 1 Cooker will not install from hd.img when the motherboard includes
the Promise PDC2072 chip which provides ATA100, ATA133, and RAID operation.
This is a well reported legacy problem from MDK 9.1 and should have been
corrected months ago!
Correction requires
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:35, Ron Stodden wrote:
Oh, dear!
Catastrophe!
Aug 1 Cooker will not install from hd.img when the motherboard includes
the Promise PDC2072 chip which provides ATA100, ATA133, and RAID operation.
This is a well reported legacy problem from MDK 9.1 and should have
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:35:40 +1000
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, dear!
Catastrophe!
Aug 1 Cooker will not install from hd.img when the motherboard
includes the Promise PDC2072 chip which provides ATA100, ATA133, and
RAID operation.
This is a well reported legacy problem
Ron Stodden wrote:
How on earth could a responsible development organisation, MandrakeSoft,
ever have managed to forget this very basic capability.
This seems to be a pretty responsible announcement, showing that it hasn't
been forgotten:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 06:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ah, it's another Ron Stodden Special. Had Ron bothered to READ the
archives before posting his latest instalment of self-important bile,
he'd've seen the post that told us that the -BOOT kernel currently being
used is the one from 9.1, and
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correction requires the correct PDC2072 kernel option to be set,
and is very simple, but can only be done by the developer of the
hd.img image..
I think Juan has had much work to do on update kernel lately,
that may explain why the cooker and BOOT kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Stodden wrote:
Oh, dear!
Catastrophe!
Aug 1 Cooker will not install from hd.img when the motherboard includes
the Promise PDC2072 chip which provides ATA100, ATA133, and RAID
operation.
This is a well reported legacy problem from MDK 9.1
On 01 Aug 2003 07:55:26 -0400
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 06:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ah, it's another Ron Stodden Special. Had Ron bothered to READ the
archives before posting his latest instalment of self-important bile,
he'd've seen the post that told
PROTECTED])
fcrozat wrote:
major has changed
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- libopenhbci6-0.9.9-2mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- libopenhbci6-0.9.9-2mdk.ppc.rpm (ppc)
- libopenhbci10-0.9.11-1mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- libopenhbci6-0.9.9-2mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
On Fri Aug 01 14:35 +0200, Marcel Pol wrote:
On 01 Aug 2003 07:55:26 -0400
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 06:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ah, it's another Ron Stodden Special. Had Ron bothered to READ the
archives before posting his latest instalment of
Actually, I would rather not see ANY of this kind of thing.
Bob
On Friday 01 August 2003 07:35 am, Marcel Pol wrote:
On 01 Aug 2003 07:55:26 -0400
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 06:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ah, it's another Ron Stodden Special. Had Ron
Since early morning 30th july i am unable to successully update cooker
urpmi source i.e, sunsite.uio.no. it says unable to parse hdlist file and
problem reading syenthesis file. I wonder if anyone else noticed the same
behaviour or something is wrong at my end?
reagrds,
parag shah
parag shah wrote:
Since early morning 30th july i am unable to successully update cooker
urpmi source i.e, sunsite.uio.no.
I'm using that site with no problem, but I'm using the alias recommended
by the Welcome message, i.e. ftp.uninett.no.
parag shah wrote:
Since early morning 30th july i am unable to successully update cooker
urpmi source i.e, sunsite.uio.no. it says unable to parse hdlist file and
problem reading syenthesis file. I wonder if anyone else noticed the same
behaviour or something is wrong at my end?
reagrds
parag shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Jure Repinc wrote:
parag shah wrote:
Since early morning 30th july i am unable to successully update cooker
urpmi source i.e, sunsite.uio.no. it says unable to parse hdlist file and
problem reading
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:03:36PM +0200, Jure Repinc wrote:
parag shah wrote:
Since early morning 30th july i am unable to successully update cooker
urpmi source i.e, sunsite.uio.no. it says unable to parse hdlist file and
problem reading syenthesis file. I wonder if anyone else noticed
Since early morning 30th july i am unable to successully update cooker urpmi
source i.e, sunsite.uio.no. it says unable to parse hdlist file and
problem reading syenthesis file. I wonder if anyone else noticed the same
behaviour or something is wrong at my end?
Yep, contrib hdlist
Yep, contrib hdlist is broken there, it's even not half the size it should be.
It seems to be back now :-)
--
Olivier Blin
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why weren't these deleted like ispell-en?
mandrake wrote:
new aspell dictionary replaces it
these packages has been moved from cooker main to cooker contrib:
- ispell-cs-3.1.20-8mdk.noarch.rpm (alpha)
- ispell-cs-3.1.20-8mdk.src.rpm (alpha
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why weren't these deleted like ispell-en?
mandrake wrote:
new aspell dictionary replaces it
these packages has been moved from cooker main to cooker contrib:
- ispell-cs-3.1.20-8mdk.noarch.rpm (alpha)
- ispell-cs-3.1.20-8mdk.src.rpm (alpha
Why weren't these deleted like ispell-en?
mandrake wrote:
new aspell dictionary replaces it
these packages has been moved from cooker main to cooker contrib:
- ispell-cs-3.1.20-8mdk.noarch.rpm (alpha)
- ispell-cs-3.1.20-8mdk.src.rpm (alpha)
- ispell-da-1.4.22-6mdk.noarch.rpm (alpha
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:39:08 +0200 (CEST)
tv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
needed by lyx
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- Aiksaurus-0.15-3mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- Aiksaurus-0.15-3mdk.src.rpm (i586)
- Aiksaurus-data-0.15-3mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- libAiksaurus0
Marcel Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
needed by lyx
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- Aiksaurus-0.15-3mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- Aiksaurus-0.15-3mdk.src.rpm (i586)
- Aiksaurus-data-0.15-3mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- libAiksaurus0-0.15-3mdk.i586.rpm (i586
Um...no. That's the current version. Now you probably have to rebuild it just to get
it back.
goetz wrote:
old version
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- libSDL_gfx7-devel-2.0.7-1mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- libSDL_gfx7-static-devel-2.0.7-1mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2003, 11:09:00 Uhr MET, schrieb David Walser:
Um...no. That's the current version. Now you probably have to
rebuild it just to get it back.
Wrong, I've uploaded 2.0.8 yesterday.
--
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the
homeless, whether the mad
On 07.16, fcrozat wrote:
major has changed
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- libcroco0-devel-0.1.0-2mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- libcroco0-0.1.0-2mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- libcroco0-devel-0.1.0-2mdk.ppc.rpm (ppc)
- libcroco0-0.1.0-2mdk.ppc.rpm (ppc)
- libcroco0-devel-0.2.0
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:44:39 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mandrake wrote:
needed by cups
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- openslp-1.0.11-1mdk.src.rpm (alpha) - openslp-1.0.11-1mdk.alpha.rpm
(alpha
I've entered bug 4057 about this, but I wanted to ask here just to see
if I'm the only one experiencing this.
I've been building and installing Cooker ISOs for over a year without
problems. The installs are always full installs, with Custom Disk
Assignment of just a root ext2 partition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mandrake wrote:
needed by cups
these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main:
- openslp-1.0.11-1mdk.src.rpm (alpha)
- openslp-1.0.11-1mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- libopenslp1-devel-1.0.11-1mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- openslp-1.0.11
On 06.19, fcrozat wrote:
major changed (and GU4DEC rules)
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- libgal2.0_1-devel-1.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- libgal2.0_1-1.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
abiword2 still needs a rebuild to clean up old libgal's:
werewolf:~# rpm -qa *libgal
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:13:06 +0200
J.A. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- libgal2.0_1-devel-1.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
- libgal2.0_1-1.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
abiword2 still needs a rebuild to clean up old libgal's:
werewolf
Thanks! Don't forgot to delete hackgaim too.
Also, the Reply-To: on these is still wrong.
fcrozat wrote:
use abiword2 instead
these packages has been removed from cooker contrib:
- hackabiword-1.1.4-1mdk.src.rpm (alpha)
- hackabiword-1.1.4-1mdk.i586.rpm (i586)
fcrozat - are you going to have to do this again everytime you update these packages?
warly - this e-mail didn't set the Reply-To: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it was [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
fcrozat wrote:
oops, shouldn't have been uploaded
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- ORBit2
Le Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:43:20 -0400, David Walser a écrit :
fcrozat - are you going to have to do this again everytime you update
these packages?
I hope not..
These packages shouldn't have been uploaded at all (I'm not sure if I was
the one who uploaded them..).. I'm just cleaning my packages..
Good. Now if someone could delete the hackabiword packages, hackgaim, and from main,
gd2-utils (i586)
mandrake wrote:
Obsolete
these packages has been removed from cooker main:
- pspell-0.12.2-8mdk.alpha.rpm (alpha)
- pspell-0.12.2-8mdk.src.rpm (alpha)
- libpspell4-0.12.2
1) is there a way to upgrade 7.1b - cooker on a running system?
This _should_ be possible. Grab a copy of the mirror, put it local on
the box, remove all possible 7.1b packages from the machine, upgrade the
rest to cooker. Should work, but it may be hairy at times... :-/
Wouldn't
Hello Chefs,
I've recently acquired XP1000 workstation (Alpha powered). Tried to install
cooker on it, but the installer kept falling over on various stages (did
not install any packages in the first place for example), and finally
segfault-ed (tried both ftp and nfs installs).
So I've
Jaroslaw,
I've recently acquired XP1000 workstation (Alpha powered).
Cool. 21264 CPU, right?
Tried to install
cooker on it, but the installer kept falling over on various stages (did
not install any packages in the first place for example), and finally
segfault-ed (tried both ftp and nfs
be cool.
I think it would also be cool to see if it's possible to do some
automated testing, if we have enough machines that they sit idle for no
reason ...
But, we might be getting to the point where we actually need a cooker
extranet. For example, I would like to be able to remove build output
automated testing, if we have enough machines that they sit idle for no
reason ...
Good idea!
But, we might be getting to the point where we actually need a cooker
extranet. For example, I would like to be able to remove build output on
an automated build host to get a package rebuilt, but we
On Friday 06 June 2003 19:17, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Jaroslaw,
1) is there a way to upgrade 7.1b - cooker on a running system?
This _should_ be possible. Grab a copy of the mirror, put it local on
the box, remove all possible 7.1b packages from the machine, upgrade the
rest to cooker
Le Vendredi 4 Avril 2003 00:49, Steffen Barszus a écrit :
Hi!
I know somebody has written a howto rsync Cooker. I want to try to rsync a
local copy of Cooker with isdn. Or should I better use urpmi with rsync to
get updates ?
I am using on my server the following stuff :
rsync -avl --delete
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
harddrake-9.1-26mdk (due to unsatisfied drakxtools-newt == 9.1-26mdk)
harddrake-ui-9.1-26mdk (due to unsatisfied drakxtools == 9.1-26mdk)
do you agree ? (Y/n)
Hi!
I know somebody has written a howto rsync Cooker. I want to try to rsync a
local copy of Cooker with isdn. Or should I better use urpmi with rsync to
get updates ?
--
_
counter.li.org : #296567.
machine: 181800
vdr-box : 87
_
Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi!
I know somebody has written a howto rsync Cooker. I want to try to rsync a
local copy of Cooker with isdn. Or should I better use urpmi with rsync to
get updates ?
Look at the stuff on my web site (see sig).
--
Ron. [Melbourne, Australia]
20030119 Get Fastest
Hi.
This is a kind of report on my experiences with:
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20030313 19:48
Nice installer, could not figure out how to enter the expert mode with
hd.img (?). Some splash ad png files were missing.
After 3-4 re-installs I ended up with ext3 fs corruption each time. The last
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
And of course neither french fries nor french toast have a thing to
do with France. In the first case, IIRC, the dish in question
originated in Belgium
Are you sure sure ?
Some cooking books of my grand mother said it comes from Paris, near
On Tue 11 Mar 2003 05:12, Giuseppe Ghibò posted as excerpted below:
N Smethurst wrote:
Well I just tried the fonts.conf thing and got a complete mess!
Sorry I did a truncated copypaste; here is the right one:
match target=font
edit name=hintstyle mode=assignconsthintfull/const/edit
And of course neither french fries nor french toast have a thing to
do with France. In the first case, IIRC, the dish in question
originated in Belgium
Are you sure sure ?
Some cooking books of my grand mother said it comes from Paris, near the Pont
Neuf in 1890.
They may not be right, but,
1 - 100 of 680 matches
Mail list logo
