Re: [cooperation-wg] Heads up on DNS4EU - idea for community high level comment.

> On 3 Feb 2022, at 11:10, Desiree Miloshevic wrote: > > Any solution for DNS resolvers should adhere to the Multistakeholder > governance principles and respect the principles of distributed and modular > nature of the DNS. > > (Saying that mandated use of centralised DNS resolvers is not a

Re: [cooperation-wg] NIS2 update: EU ministers agreed on the general approach

> On 3 Dec 2021, at 16:52, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > We will keep you informed about further progress on this dossier. Dear colleagues, Would like to draw your attention to the text, as it was adopted as the general approach by EU Council. The full text of the Council compromi

Re: [cooperation-wg] NIS2 update: EU ministers agreed on the general approach

> On 3 Dec 2021, at 19:45, Patrik Fältström wrote: > > I understand after discussing with RIPE-NCC that the situation is similar in > NL. Because of this, the NIS-2 will if root servers are included not have any > real impact on how RIPE-NCC or Netnod is managed. Just to clarify to this point,

[cooperation-wg] NIS2 update: EU ministers agreed on the general approach

ing to the compromise that was agreed today. We will keep you informed about further progress on this dossier. Regards, Marco Hogewoning Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance, RIPE NCC -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, pl

[cooperation-wg] Update on NIS2: European Parliament votes to exclude DNS root servers

o find that the member states also support our view that matters concerning the root-server operations should be addressed in a multistakeholder setting and will agree to exclude the DNS root-servers from the proposal. We will send further updates to this list when we have them, Best, Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] EU Update: LIBE Committee votes on NIS2 and CER

ft to the multistakeholder model of Internet governance. Regards, Marco Hogewoning Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance - RIPE NCC

Re: [cooperation-wg] Recording and Slide deck available for Webinar and Roundtable on Understanding the UK Online Safety Bill

> As a reminder, the Bill contains several far reaching proposals including > some suggesting that Encryption should be weakened through various methods. > This has generated much pushback from UK entities and the Internet Society > has drafted an online letter to members of the UK Parliament, c

[cooperation-wg] ENISA Survey: "Cybersecurity Consumer Outreach Practices"

1, so unfortunately not much time to develop a common position. I would recommend you contribute to this survey on an individual basis. Best, Marco Hogewoning Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance RIPE NCC

Re: [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS

Dear Nick, > Marco Hogewoning wrote on 07/05/2021 11:12: >> We will continue to track the legislative process and keep you informed >> about the progress. > > Hi Marco, > > [cc: routing-wg] > > Thanks for the work y'all have been doing to sort out some

[cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS

on 27 May. We will continue to track the legislative process and keep you informed about the progress. Regards, Marco Hogewoning Manager, Public Policy and Internet Governance RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] Status update ITU discussions

d the next Plenipotentiary, which will take place in the autumn of 2022. Best, Marco Hogewoning Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance RIPE NCC

Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Response to the EU’s Cybersecurity Strategy

> On 16 Dec 2020, at 16:29, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > The full proposals are available on the European Commission's website: Dear colleagues, In our focus on the cybersecurity strategy yesterday, I forgot to mention that the text of the new proposed NIS2 directive has also

[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Response to the EU’s Cybersecurity Strategy

eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=72164 We encourage community members to make their own impact assessments. We will provide further updates on any aspects that we think are relevant to the RIPE community's or the RIPE NCC's activities and interests. Best regards, Marco Hogewoning M

[cooperation-wg] Updates regarding New IP (FVCN) and ITU meeting schedule

ticle. Have a look at https://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco_hogewoning/update-on-wtsa-20-preparations-and-new-ip Best, Marco Hogewoning Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance RIPE NCC

Re: [cooperation-wg] Sneak preview for today's WG session

been flagged in the context of IPv6. And I'm happy to provide some more information and our perspective, based on the conversations we have had with the various NRAs and policymakers, about the need and usefulness of regulatory measures. Talk to you this afternoon, Marco Hogewoning Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] New Open Consultations by BEREC (access sharing, 5G and co-investment)

find it is useful to share your views with BEREC directly. These open consultations are an important part of BEREC's efforts to take stakeholders' opinions into account and we would encourage you to make use of this opportunity. Regards, Marco Hogewoning (Interim) Manager Public Polic

[cooperation-wg] More information on New IP

Of course, we remain engaged on the topic and will keep you informed about updates. We have also agreed with the chairs of this working group to provide an overview of New IP during RIPE 80, where we hopefully also have the opportunity to answer some questions. Best, Marco Hogewoning External

Re: [cooperation-wg] Covid-19 and Internet applications

some concerns regarding load on an unspecified Internet exchange in Romania. The document is available at https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/reports/9250-berec-summary-report-on-the-status-of-internet-capacity-in-light-of-covid-19-crisis Regards, Marco

Re: [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030

proposal and the associated standardisation work. Best, Marco Hogewoning External Relations, RIPE NCC > On 8 Apr 2020, at 10:06, Gordon Lennox wrote: > > Meanwhile this is from ETSI: > > ETSI LAUNCHES NEW GROUP ON NON-IP NETWORKING ADDRESSING 5G NEW SERVICES > Sophia Antip

Re: [cooperation-wg] Impact of COVID-19 measures on operations and regulatory barriers?

pa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/press_releases/9237-press-release-coping-with-the-increased-demand-for-network-connectivity> Regards, Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] Impact of COVID-19 measures on operations and regulatory barriers?

contact us directly and we can relay those back to the team at the Commission or other relevant regulatory bodies we’re in contact with. Stay safe, Marco Hogewoning External Relations, RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] BEREC seeking input on "Very High Capacity Networks”

's website at: https://www.berec.europa.eu/eng/news_and_publications/whats_new/6542-new-timeline-for-the-public-consultation-on-the-draft-berec-guidelines-on-very-high-capacity-networks Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Best regards, Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] Fwd: Report on ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018

served as input to this Study Group meeting. Regards, Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC > The meeting of ITU Study Group 20 in Wuxi, China, just finished and I’d like > to give you a brief report on the discussions of the work on a draft > Recommendation on IPv6 addressing. > > This

Re: [cooperation-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How EU Regulation Affects You

impact)”. This highlights both the criteria laid out in the directive, as well as some procedures to apply when an operator provides its services in multiple member states, which would be the case for RIPE NCC. The document is available via http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=5

[cooperation-wg] Report on the RIPE IoT Roundtable meeting in Leeds on 27 September 2017

, Marco Hogewoning -- External Relations - RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to BEREC consultation on the Draft Net-Neutrality Regulatory Assessment Methodology

Dear colleagues,BEREC, the European body of regulators have a number of public consultations open until today.Attached is the contribution by the RIPE NCC on one of these consultations, which sets out a draft assessment methodology for  net-neutrality regulation.Our main focus is on IPv6 and especi

[cooperation-wg] Request to contribute to AIOTI survey on IoT indentifiers

before 7 April. Please also see the attached message from Juergen Helles, Chair of the task force. As a member of AIOTI, we will continue to monitor and contribute to the work of AIOTI WG3 and this task force. Regards Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC - External Relations > > > The Allianc

Re: [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT

> On 23 Feb 2017, at 00:11, Shane Kerr wrote: > > IP+port, right? Hope it is the full 5-tuple + timestamp synced to a known (and accurate) source. And then still wonder what kinda of surprises you’ll find, with the other peer (not in UK) not logging ports or having a system clock that is sign

[cooperation-wg] Belgian limits on CGN/NAT?

l perspective? And further of course, do you think this form of cooperation between the public and private sector as a way to expedite the deployment of IPv6? Regards, Marco Hogewoning -- External Relations - RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] BoF follow-up: Creation of IoT-Discuss mailing list

sions surrounding the IoT, we would encourage you to subscribe to this mailing list. To subscribe to this list, please visit https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion. The same webpage also gives access to the public archives of this mailing list. Regards, Marco Hogewoning On beha

Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement

> On 20 Oct 2016, at 18:47, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > On 20.10.2016 11:01, Marco Hogewoning wrote: >> We would like to inform you that we have published our response to a >> Liaison Statement that we recently received on behalf of ITU Study >>

[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement

, this mailing list or you can contact me or one of my colleagues during next week’s RIPE meeting, taking place in Madrid, Spain. Regards, Marco Hogewoning -- External Relations - RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] European Commission tender: study to support the definition phase of the Next Generation Internet initiative

t and engaging with a broader community of stakeholders.” More information about this tender and the Next Generation Internet Initiative can be found on the Commission’s website: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/next-generation-internet-2025 Regards, Marco Hogewoning -- Ext

Re: [cooperation-wg] Call for Agenda Items RIPE73 - Cooperation WG

deployment of IPv6. Maybe the cooperation group would be a nice place to bring these two sides together and see if there is a way to break out of this circle. Regards, Marco Hogewoning -- External Relations - RIPE NCC > On 28 Sep 2016, at 09:36, constanze.buer...@bmi.bund.de wrote: >

Re: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”

lding an enabling > environment – something that is less likely to be covered by other > non-commercial or governmental comments. Would it be worthwhile to also > promote measurement of access in such forums? > > Cordially, > Collin > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at

[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”

hesitate to contact me or one of my colleagues. Regards, Marco Hogewoning External Relations RIPE NCC RIPE NCC’s Response to the CWG.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

[cooperation-wg] "Incentives, Benefits, Costs, and Challenges to IPv6 Implementation"

6 We would also encourage RIPE community members, where applicable, to consider responding directly to the NTIA's RFC. Regards, Marco Hogewoning -- External Relations - RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] Reports on the 10th European Summer School on Internet Governance (EuroSSIG)

activities, please do not hesitate to contact us. Regards, Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC External Relations

[cooperation-wg] IGF 2015 output document: "Creating an Enabling Environment for IPv6 Adoption"

Wim Degezelle who jointly coordinated and supported the work on behalf of the IGF Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG). Regards, Marco Hogewoning -- External Relations - RIPE NCC

[cooperation-wg] IGF Best Practice Forum document review “Creating an Enabling Environment for IPv6 Adoption"

or by making direct contributions on the mailing list or conference calls. Regards, Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC - External Relations

[cooperation-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] Meeting with Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs)

On 20 Mar 2015, at 11:13, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:31:53PM +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > >> In response to feedback from the RIPE community, a more detailed >> report of this meeting has been prepared and is available here: >> https://ww

[cooperation-wg] Meeting with Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs)

enforcement community. We are happy to answer any questions you may have about this meeting or our LEA engagement activities in general. Regards, Marco Hogewoning External Relations Officer - Technical Advisor RIPE NCC

Re: [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering

Hi Meredith, Just to chime in, that would certainly be a very useful document to have. As I am sure a lot of you are aware, but for those who are not. The IAB/IETF is currently also looking into this topic, with a draft document that looks at all the technical considerations for filtering, the