Dear George,
What I read in Martin's email is that Bekker numbers are examples of
identifiers for propositional content, not propositional objects themselves.
Which, it seems to me, is not so far from your thoughts :-)
Ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 10 gen 2024, alle ore 07:30, George Bruseker via
Dear Pat,
I confess that during the discussion at last SIG I was somewhat confused and
not at all convinced of the logical consistency of the relationship between R10
and R67 and I had retained many doubts at the end of the meeting. But the way
R10 has now been remodeled, stripping away any
Dear Christian-Emil, all,
I suggest closing this issue but not abandoning this topic which I still
consider extremely interesting.
A new issue that allows us to discuss about it could be an excellent compromise.
So I vote YES + “please open a new issue”.
Thanks and ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 14 feb
Great news!!
I vote YES.
A.
> Il giorno 27 nov 2021, alle ore 21:21, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace Museum in
> Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership.
>
> I have received the following request
Hello Martin,
Our HW for issue 546.
In the current version of the CRMtex model, TX6 Transcription can refer both to
the whole text (TX1) and also to fragments of it (TX7), being TX7 subclass of
TX1. This allows scholars, when required, to use TX6 also for the transcription
of a single glyph.
Dear Martin,
Our HW for issue 545.
A grapheme is atomic by definition as it represents the minimum unit (i.e., a
unit that cannot be further decomposed) of a writing system.
Furthermore, the grapheme is a conceptual and non-concrete unit and is made
manifest by the individual act
Dear Martin,
Your observations are extremely stimulating, as usual, especially with regard
to the observation of a linguistic object which is a very complex and
articulated operation. In our view, in particular, the following conditions can
occur while a linguistic object is observed:
1. I
I vote YES.
A.
> Il giorno 18 giu 2021, alle ore 11:47, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which
> CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document for
> this issue is here:
Dear All,Please find enclosed my HW for issue 533 (disambiguation of polysemous concepts used as ontological classes).This document is also available in the related folder of the "Issues; Working Documents” shared drive
Dear Thanasis,
I also tend to be in favour of your option 3 because in my opinion, the
planning problem is transversal and concerns many disciplines and many areas,
not just the social one. Recently, I have been working on the modeling of
laboratory analyses, their preventive planning and the
as Nicola Guarino has written in his foundational paper,
> formal ontologies try to minimize unintended applications, but cannot
> completely exclude them.
>
> All the best,
>
> Martin
>
> On 3/26/2021 10:23 PM, Achille Felicetti wrote:
>> Dear Martin, Christian-Emi
wrote:
>> You are quite correct, it would be a 2-dimentional embedding. In the 2D
>> world a pencil stroke is a unpassable hindrance.
>>
>>
>>
>> On the other hand AP 9 is not a total property. And also not all persons
>> can give birth at least not now.
&g
Dear Christian-Emil,
I understand the practical need of this operation, but I also fear that this
may cause further conceptual inconsistencies since, I imagine, in no way an
embedding can be embedded in an A3 as the latter is a feature.
I think it would be more fruitful to apply a constrain on
Dear George, all
For the Italian translation, you can certainly count on me as well :-))
Ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 10 mar 2021, alle ore 09:49, George Bruseker via Crm-sig
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I, too, fully support this important initiative and hope to learn much from
> colleagues in
Dear Christian-Emil, Martin,
I cannot help but continue to think that an embedding is something more
immaterial than an S20, for which E3 seems more adequate to me, especially in
cases where it is necessary to indicate the position, orientation and other
modalities of placement of an object
Dear Martin,
The new note scope looks great. My only doubt concerns the English adjective
"adjacent” which seems to indicate only proximity relationships in a linear
sense but not in a vertical one, in the case of overlapping elements.
For completeness I would write "adjacent or superposed".
Dear Martin,
Your changes seem perfect to me, the labels in this way are much clearer, more
readable than before and much closer to the way archaeologists talk about these
entities.
Thank you very much,
Achille
> Il giorno 20 feb 2021, alle ore 21:23, Martin Doerr ha
> scritto:
>
> Dear
I vote YES
Best,
A.
> Il giorno 26 apr 2020, alle ore 19:52, Bekiari Chryssoula
> ha scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Following the decisions of the last crm-sig (46th CIDOC CRM), we invite you
> to vote if you accept the proposed label change of A1 Excavation Process Unit
> to A1 Excavation
with definitions. Don't argue E37 must be
> something different, because it is called "mark". You may instead argue for
> renaming E37...).
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Cheers,
>
> martin
>
> On 1/20/2020 11:29 AM, Achille Felicetti wrote:
Dear Ethan, all,
A small contribution to this interesting discussion. As mentioned by Martin,
Francesca Murano and I have investigated the linguistic, physical and
conceptual aspect of inscriptions and texts in recent years. Our work is
oriented towards the construction of an extension of the
Dear all,
I obviously vote YES!
Regards,
A.
> Il giorno 13 gen 2020, alle ore 09:34, Christian-Emil Smith Ore
> ha scritto:
>
> I vote YES
>
> Best,
> Christian-Emil
> From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr
>
> Sent: 12 January 2020 11:13
> To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> Subject: [Crm-sig]
Dear all,
I fully agree with Franco.
Just a quick remark from the Linguistic world: in order not to run into
incorrect analysis of linguistic facts it is always good to keep in mind that
the grammatical coding of a language does not reflect the cognitive perception
or the cultural and moral
Yes!
Achille
> Il giorno 10 apr 2019, alle ore 21:12, Martin Doerr ha
> scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> The current scope not of E34 include a reference to the deprecated E84:
>
> OLD
>
> E34 Inscription
>
> Subclass of: E33 Linguistic
> Object
>
> E37 Mark
>
>
> Scope note:
Dear colleagues,
I think you could be maybe interested in the session Keith May and I are
organising at the forthcoming EAA September meeting in Bern.
Please find the call for papers and other details about it below .
Looking forward to having you there with us.
Bests,
Achille
Looks intriguing …
I vote YES!
Ciao,
A.
> Il giorno 25 nov 2018, alle ore 15:21, Martin Doerr ha
> scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> The engineering company Decalog would like to become an official member of
> the CRM-SIG.
>
> They provide software services to manage and expose their collections
YES
A.
> Il giorno 15 nov 2018, alle ore 15:24, Martin Doerr ha
> scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as
> well:
>
> P58 has section definition (defines section)
> Domain: E18 Physical Thing
> Range:
YES for me
A.
> Il giorno 15 nov 2018, alle ore 15:15, Martin Doerr ha
> scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to
> deprecate P149 as well:
>
> P149 is identified by (identifies)
>
> Domain: E28 Conceptual
> Object
>
Dear Christian-Emil,
I tend to agree with Martin and Martijn.
Although the semantic boundaries between finds and layers could in some cases
be ambiguous and in some ways undecidable, there is usually a clear distinction
(operated by archaeologists) between the object and the stratigraphic unit
ditor-in-Chief
> ACM Journal of Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH)
>
> Piazza Ciardi 25
> 59100 Prato, Italy
>
>> Il giorno 18 set 2018, alle ore 14:51, Achille Felicetti
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> Dear Christian-Emil,
>>
>> As you might have guesse
Dear Christian-Emil,
As you might have guessed, CMRarchaeo’s documentation is still a work in
progress and many efforts are currently taking place to improve and finalise
it. In particular, version 1.4.5 has already been extended with new real cases
and examples, and many scope notes have been
E34 Inscription (and,
contextually, with its superclass “E37 Mark”) is needed and a redefinition of
these classes would be desirable.
Best regards,
Achille Felicetti
mediate one being probably considered as
> irrelevant.
>
> Franco
>
>
> Prof. Franco Niccolucci
> Director, VAST-LAB
> PIN - U. of Florence
> Scientific Coordinator
> ARIADNE - PARTHENOS
>
> Piazza Ciardi 25
> 59100 Prato, Italy
>
>
>> Il gi
Dear Franco,
> Il giorno 10 gen 2018, alle ore 21:52, Franco Niccolucci
> ha scritto:
>
> Quoting Martin below
>
> [By Digital Collections] ... we do not mean the servers as a whole, but only
> the material signal encoding on the media.
>
> This statement is an oxymoron. Whatever material
t of this initiative, please contact
> the organisers at tha...@uni-koeln.de <mailto:tha...@uni-koeln.de>.
>
> Best regards,
> Achille Felicetti
>
><http://www.poloprato.unifi.it/>
>
>
>
> <http://www.poloprato.unifi.it/it/ricerca/laboratori/laborat
Holmes novel “The adventure of the Dancing Men”
> in the collection “The Return of Sherlock Holmes" the paper messages are
> inscriptions on paper. They become linguistic objects only when deciphered by
> the Consulting Detective - if you don’t know the story you may wish to read
>
3 September) in Maastricht (http://www.eaa2017maastricht.nl/
<http://www.eaa2017maastricht.nl/>).
For those of you interested in being part of this initiative, please contact
the organisers at tha...@uni-koeln.de <mailto:tha...@uni-koeln.de>.
Best regards,
Achille Felicetti
<ht
Dear Martin, all,
I looks fine for me.
Bests,
Achille
> Il giorno 24 nov 2016, alle ore 17:40, martin ha
> scritto:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Here my homework:
>
> CRM archaeo - Issue 303
>
> The CRM-SIG discussed that there is a link between the Range of AP20 to the
> range of AP19 of type
37 matches
Mail list logo
